Pressure on Sars to prevent tax increases in 2026
And reprioritised government spending must lead to 'positive outcomes'.
All eyes are on Sars to make good on its promise to reduce the tax debt book, which currently sits at R400bn. Picture: Moneyweb
The pressure is on the South African Revenue Service (Sars) to collect sufficient outstanding revenue to prevent additional tax increases of R20 billion in 2026.
Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana said in his third budget for 2025 that he believes Sars will be able to raise an additional R35 billion that will be sufficient to close the current revenue gap.
Kyle Mandy, a tax partner at PwC, says the R20 billion additional tax, which has not yet been specified, is probably the most contentious issue in the budget. There is now a lot of pressure on Sars to collect outstanding taxes on the back of the R7.5 billion over the medium-term additional investment from the National Treasury.
Sars has indicated that it will be able to collect tax debts of between R20 billion and R50 billion per year. It was able to collect R95 billion in tax debt in 2024/25.
ALSO READ: Sensible or underwhelming? Economists react to Godongwana's Budget 3.0
'There is clearly a reluctance on the part of National Treasury to pencil in revenue expectations from the investment in Sars until such time that Sars proves that they can deliver,' says Mandy.
He explains that from a fiscal point of view, revenue is only accounted for when it lands in Sars's bank account. Currently, the tax debt book is around R400 billion, and all eyes are now on Sars to make good on its promise to reduce the debt book.
Kabelo Moutloatse, tax accounting specialist at Latita Africa, welcomed the increased investment in Sars to ensure higher tax collections and compliance.
'That is something that we need to see more of to ensure that those who are operating outside of the system are brought in. There has been leakage in the past and that should be worked on.'
ALSO READ: SA loses R30 billion in revenue due to illicit trade in cigarettes and liquor
Growth-enhancing reforms
Business Leadership SA (BLSA) says the focus on growth-enhancing structural reforms is encouraging, with the minister confirming the second phase of Operation Vulindlela's priority areas, which includes seeing through existing reforms in energy, water, logistics, and the visa regime, with new reform areas being local government, digital transformation, and addressing spatial inequalities.
'The R1 trillion allocation over three years on critical infrastructure is retained, which is important to support many of the above reforms and lift growth prospects.'
ALSO READ: Godongwana cuts government spending to offset VAT shortfall
Lower growth and inflation
Budget 2.0 and Budget 3.0 made no inflationary adjustments for bracket creep or medical aid tax credits.
In March, Treasury expected income of R19.5 billion from individual taxpayers, but this has now been revised downwards to R18 billion.
Government has revised downwards the forecasts for economic growth and inflation, which will have a knock-on effect on revenue.
'So they are pencilling in lower-than-expected increases for salaries and wages,' says Mandy.
He adds that removing the inflationary adjustment for the general fuel levy was not unexpected, given the withdrawal of the Vat rate increase of 0.5%.
Moutloatse says this will certainly impact lower-income households.
ALSO READ: Budget 3.0: First fuel levy increase in three years – Here's by how much
Many businesses, particularly smaller businesses, will pass this increase on to consumer, reducing their already stretched disposable income.
He adds that one of the key things in Godongwana's third take is the reprioritisation of spending, moving away from any tax increases.
'We need to see more accountability with programmes and when government spends money it should lead to positive outcomes.'
This article was republished from Moneyweb. Read the original here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
EThekwini Mayor urged to take action against top city official after Concourt ruling
EThekwini Mayor Cyril Xaba has received a legal letter, urging him to act against City Manager Musa Mbhele. Image: Thuli Dlamini / eThekwini Municipality Pressure is mounting on eThekwini Municipality mayor Cyril Xaba to act against the City Manager Musa Mbhele following the Constitutional Court's dismissal of the City's appeal to overturn a lower order, which ruled that it must pay a service provider R30 million for the work the company had done. On Wednesday, the Constitutional Court dismissed the City's leave to appeal the Supreme Court of Appeal's decision after that court in February also upheld the earlier Durban High Court's ruling that the City must pay the service provider. The City is also expected to fork out more than R20 million in interest as the debt has accumulated interest since the high court ruling in 2022. The City also incurred legal fees as the appeal was dismissed with costs - now the case has drawn the attention of a former deputy city manager who was charged with misconduct after the city incurred legal costs in a separate matter. On Thursday, Sibusiso Makhanya instructed his law firm, Macgregor Erasmus Attorneys INC to write a letter of demand to the mayor to table the letter to the council within seven days. Makhanya, then the deputy city manager for trading services had been charged for misconduct for causing the City to incur R6 million in interest after it was taken to court by a service provider had not been paid R63.5 million. The City blamed Makhanya for failing to respond to emails from the Chief Financial Officer as there were allegations that the service provider had overcharged the City. The City argued that had Makhanya cooperated, the municipality would have avoided the R6 million in interest. Makhanya eventually left his job. Through his lawyers, Makhanya is now demanding that City management need to be consistent and hold Mbhele accountable for the cost the City will incur as a result of this week's Constitutional Court ruling. 'We brought to your attention then, as we do now, that one of the issues our client raised at his disciplinary hearing was the inconsistent application of the disciplinary code vis a vie himself and Mbhele. Mbhele was the person responsible for eThekwini having the default judgment granted against it and therefore incurring wasteful expenditure. "No further indulgences or communications will be forthcoming from our client and should you fail to act as you are obliged to, then we hold instructions to approach an appropriate forum for the necessary relief,' concludes the letter. Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs MEC Reverend Thulasizwe Buthelezi has joined calls for the mayor to act against officials responsible for the costs. In a statement the MEC called on the City to recover the money from officials that were responsible for the loss. In a short response, the City's spokesperson Gugu Sisilana said the municipality has accepted the court order, however, the mayor is yet to respond to the calls for action against for those responsible. Mbhele declined to discussing the letter of demand and referred questions to the mayor's office. [email protected]
Mail & Guardian
2 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
EFF loses fuel levy court challenge
EFF leader Julius Malema. (X) The The party's application, lodged against Finance Minister The EFF argued that it was unlawful because it was not introduced through a Money Bill, as required by section 77 of the Constitution. The party described the court's ruling as 'a betrayal of the poor and the working class' and accused Godongwana's office of sidestepping democratic procedures in the management of public finances. 'Taxation without representation is arbitrary and unconstitutional,' the party said. The ANC-led government of national unity was doing everything in its power 'to protect the interests of those who continue to benefit from the apartheid economy, while subjecting the masses of our people to economic misery'. Godongwana has insisted that he acted within existing legislation. In his He added that it had been frozen since 2021, and the increase was necessary to preserve the real value of the levy in the face of inflation and declining revenue. He warned that halting the increase would result in a R3.5 billion shortfall for the fiscus, necessitating further borrowing, spending cuts or alternative tax increases. 'The fuel levy is not a new tax. It is a regulatory adjustment falling under existing legislation and its increase does not require a Money Bill,' Godongwana argued in the affidavit, adding that freezing the levy any further would compromise the integrity of the budget and limit the state's ability to deliver services. The court's ruling allowed the increase to proceed and, on Wednesday, fuel prices rose accordingly for the month of June. However, a dip in global oil prices and modest strengthening of the rand brought slight relief for motorists. EFF leader 'It is not the EFF that got rejected; it is the people of South Africa who lost. When you increase fuel, you increase everything, transport, food, the cost of living. Our people are already suffering. This is an extra blow to the working class,' he said. The EFF would not abandon the matter, Malema said, indicating that it was considering further legal avenues, as well as a legislative push in parliament to close loopholes that allow the treasury to act unilaterally. EFF treasurer general Omphile Maotwe, who has led the party's engagements on budget matters, reiterated its position that the matter should have come before parliament. 'The levy seeks to recover revenue after the courts invalidated the unlawful VAT increase proposed earlier this year. By using the Customs and Excise Act to bypass section 77 of the Constitution, the minister is undermining the democratic function of parliament and the people's right to participate in fiscal policy decisions,' she said. Maotwe said the EFF would submit proposals to amend the relevant sections of the Customs and Excise Act and the Money Bills Amendment Procedure and Related Matters Act to ensure no future taxation could be implemented without a parliamentary vote. While the EFF's application was dismissed, legal observers say the court did not definitively rule on the constitutional questions raised, which could leave the door open for further challenge. While the government is technically within its rights to use the Customs and Excise Act to amend levies, the broader question of public accountability in tax decisions remains unresolved, constitutional law expert professor Pierre de Vos said. 'There's a grey area here. The Constitution requires that money bills originate in the National Assembly, but there are long-standing statutes like the Customs and Excise Act that give the executive certain powers. Whether those powers are now unconstitutional is a debate we may see return to the courts.' The EFF said it would use all platforms, legal and political, to hold the treasury accountable. 'We will not rest while unelected officials continue to impose taxes behind the back of parliament. The people must have a voice in every cent that is taken from their pockets,' Malema said.
IOL News
7 hours ago
- IOL News
Sars launches Project AmaBillions: expect a surge in VAT audits
Discover how Sars' new initiative, Project AmaBillions, is set to increase VAT audits significantly, impacting businesses across South Africa. Learn what steps you can take to ensure compliance and avoid penalties Image: Ziphozonke Lushaba / Independent Newspapers According to recent media reports, Sars has launched a new initiative — Project AmaBillions — as part of its broader strategy to boost revenue collection by an additional R70 billion over the next three years. To support this objective, Sars has reportedly already recruited 500 new staff members, with an additional 1,000 to 1,500 appointments anticipated. While this expanded capacity will enhance Sars' ability to collect, across multiple tax types, Value-Added Tax (VAT) remains an easy target, with a notable increase in VAT-related audits, verifications, and additional assessments already being observed. In this evolving compliance landscape, businesses, particularly those operating in complex or high-risk sectors, are encouraged to revisit their VAT positions and ensure that both legal interpretation and supporting documentation are up to standard. VAT as an Easy Win for Sars The government's recent proposal to raise the VAT rate met significant public resistance and was ultimately shelved. However, the fiscal demands that prompted the proposal remain unchanged. In the absence of a rate increase, an easy target is the enhanced enforcement of existing VAT obligations as a more immediate mechanism to protect the tax base. Given the transactional nature and extensive reach of VAT, it remains one of the most active areas of Sars enforcement, and from a tax collection standpoint, is second only to Personal Income Tax, per Sars' Revenue Announcement for the 2024/25 Financial Year: Except from the 2024/25 Revenue Announcement presentation: Recent trends confirm an increase in audit activity, particularly where VAT positions rely on complex interpretation or are not fully substantiated by documentation. Certain areas are particularly at risk: Input tax deductions , where Sars may challenge the deductibility based on the nature of the underlying expense, its link to taxable supplies, or the quality of supporting invoices; Zero-rated supplies , especially exports, where documentary proof and timing requirements are closely examined; and Apportionment calculations , in cases where businesses make both taxable and exempt supplies, and Sars queries the method used to determine the deductible portion of input VAT. In addition to heightened audit activity, input tax deductions have become increasingly the subject of legal proceedings, with courts being asked to assess whether deductions meet the requirements of the VAT Act. Often, the success or failure of a claim rests both on the commercial reality of the transaction and on whether the taxpayer can demonstrate compliance with the relevant documentary and legal criteria. Discharging the burden of proof As a self-assessment system, VAT places the burden of proof squarely on the taxpayer. Sars does not need to prove a taxpayer is incorrect; rather, it is the taxpayer who must prove that the tax position adopted is correct. Documentary shortcomings that can result in adverse audit findings may include: Incomplete or non-compliant tax invoices; Missing or outdated export documentation; Contracts or agreements that do not support the VAT treatment applied; and A lack of internal policies governing apportionment or exempt supply treatment. Even businesses with reputable systems or historic Sars engagements should not assume automatic compliance. Audit readiness requires continuous alignment with Sars' current expectations and the evolving interpretation of the VAT Act. High-risk for high reward: which businesses are most scrutinised? While all VAT-registered vendors are subject to review, recent enforcement trends suggest that the following types of businesses may be more susceptible to VAT scrutiny, especially in light of the looming 'Project AmaBillions': Exporters of goods and services , particularly where zero-rating is applied; Foreign suppliers of electronic or remote services to South African recipients; Property developers and investors , due to the complexity of VAT on construction, disposals, and mixed-use properties; and Enterprises with substantial input tax deductions or recurring VAT refunds . In these cases, a proactive review of VAT compliance and risk report may assist in identifying and addressing potential exposure, before they are raised by Sars. A Coordinated Tax Debt Collection Strategy 'Project AmaBillions' is more than a revenue slogan — it reflects a deliberate shift by Sars toward coordinated and data-driven enforcement, leading to increased tax revenue collections. This includes the use of Artificial Intelligence tools, targeted audit selection based on risk modelling, and specialised teams focused on high-yield areas such as VAT, High-Net-Worth taxpayers, and Cryptocurrency. With the recruitment of up to 1,500 additional staff, Sars is positioned to expand its enforcement reach significantly over the coming months. Proactive compliance is key While increased audit activity may place pressure on internal finance and tax teams, early intervention and strategic review can help businesses avoid prolonged disputes or unintended liabilities. A targeted VAT review can assist in confirming that: Zero-rated supplies are supported by adequate and compliant documentation; Input tax deductions meet all legal and documentary requirements; Invoicing and contractual frameworks comply with SARS standards; and Internal VAT procedures, including apportionment and record-keeping, are robus t. Early action prevents future exposure Where there is uncertainty around VAT treatment, and businesses find themselves in a potentially precarious position of now facing Sars scrutiny, the best practice is to seek the assistance of a tax professional, ensuring the best compliance strategy is followed. Early assessment can help prevent future challenges, reduce the risk of penalties and interest, and ensure Sars readiness in an increasingly vigilant digitized environment.
