logo
How the Hunter Biden cover-up continues to this day

How the Hunter Biden cover-up continues to this day

New York Post3 days ago
In the same week that Hunter Biden burst back onto the public stage to play the victim and lash out at Democrats, we also heard from his one time protector turned reluctant nemesis, Special Counsel David Weiss, with similarly self serving and disingenuous testimony to Congress.
Weiss, the former US Attorney in the Bidens' home state of Delaware who presided over the troubled five year investigation into the former First Son, told the House Judiciary Committee that there just wasn't enough evidence to justify charging Hunter under the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA).
His investigators 'couldn't put together a sufficient case,' he said in June testimony released last week.
Advertisement
That's pretty rich, considering that those very IRS investigators complained bitterly about the obstruction and slow walking they faced on Weiss' watch every time they pursued an investigative trail that led to Joe Biden and the lucrative foreign lobbying Hunter did in his father's name.
That's why IRS Supervisory Special Agent Gary Shapley and Special Agent Joseph Ziegler blew up their successful careers and became whistleblowers.
Hunter's business model during his father's vice presidency and beyond revolved around foreign lobbying — including for the corrupt Ukrainian energy company Burisma that was paying him a million dollars a year, Chinese government-linked firms BHR and CEFC, and an oligarch client in Romania.
Advertisement
In fact, the very first email this newspaper published from Hunter's infamous laptop was from a Burisma executive, thanking him for arranging a meeting with his father the previous night.
It wasn't just any old meeting, either.
Hunter had invited VP Biden to a private dinner at Georgetown restaurant Cafe Milano in April 2015 to meet his partners from Ukraine, Russia and Kazakhstan, as his former 'best friend in business' Devon Archer told Congress.
In their upcoming tell-all book, 'The Whistleblowers v the Big Guy,' Shapley and Ziegler point out that, along with that Burisma bombshell, emails and communications they recovered from the laptop showed that Hunter's relationship with DC lobbying shop Blue Star Strategies was tied to his position on the Burisma board and that the firm had been hired 'to influence U.S. government officials on Burisma's behalf.'
Advertisement
'These connections raised red flags about potential violations of the Foreign Agents Registration Act FARA and any comprehensive warrant would naturally include references to individuals who may have been involved, even tangentially.'
And so, when their team drafted a search warrant related to potential FARA violation, Weiss' top U.S. Attorney Lesley Wolf ordered them to remove all references to 'Political Figure 1,' the DOJ pseudonym for Joe Biden.
'Please focus on FARA evidence only. There should be nothing about Political Figure 1 in here,' Wolf wrote in an August 2020 email, according to their whistleblower testimony to Congress.
Advertisement
Every morning, the NY POSTcast offers a deep dive into the headlines with the Post's signature mix of politics, business, pop culture, true crime and everything in between. Subscribe here!
Whenever their investigations might lead to Joe Biden they found subpoenas were denied, interviews were canceled or not allowed, and Hunter's lawyers were tipped off before search warrants could be executed.
Prosecutors cited bad 'optics' or questioned whether the 'juice was worth the squeeze'
For instance, Shapley testified that Wolf refused to approve a search warrant for a guest house Hunter had been staying in on Joe's palatial Delaware estate as part of FARA-related evidence collection.
When they discovered incriminating WhatsApp messages Hunter wrote to a business partner at Chinese energy company CEFC on July 30, 2017, citing his father, the investigators were blocked from using phone location data to confirm that Joe really was in the room.
'I am sitting here with my father and we would like to understand why the commitment made has not been fulfilled,' Hunter wrote, demanding $10 million.
'I am very concerned that the Chairman has either changed his mind and broken our deal without telling me or that he is unaware of the promises and assurances that have been made have not been kept.'
Advertisement
Hunter also threatened that his father would retaliate if the Chinese did not do as he commanded: 'I will make certain that between the man sitting next to me and every person he knows and my ability to forever hold a grudge that you will regret not following my direction.'
Here was Hunter explicitly claiming his father was involved in his business negotiations. Apart from the fact that Joe claimed that he knew nothing about his son's overseas business dealings, Shapley and Ziegler decided there were serious tax implications to the conversation, but they were blocked from pursuing them.
They weren't even allowed to find out if Hunter had sent the message from Joe's house.
'The message was clear,' Shapley and Ziegler write in 'The Whistleblowers v. the Big Guy.' 'Although we were investigating Joe Biden's son — who, it seemed, had often involved his father in his shady overseas business dealings — none of our materials were supposed to mention Joe Biden.
Advertisement
'Even when we needed material that might be in one of Joe Biden's homes or storage units, we couldn't mention him. The document might leak to the press, and that would make the Biden campaign look bad.
'And in the summer of 2020, there was nothing that the leadership of the FBI wanted less than to make Joe Biden look bad. Doing so might help elect Donald Trump for a second time.'
How different was the way the FBI handled Donald Trump compared to Joe Biden. Whether it was the fake Steele Dossier the FBI treated as if it were legitimate evidence, or the raid on Mar a Lago, there was no concern about the 'optics' of investigating a sitting president or presidential candidate when it was Trump.
Advertisement
As for FARA, the once little-used law against lobbying the US on behalf of foreign interests has been selectively used to target Trump allies and Democrat enemies.
For example, Paul Manafort, former chairman of Trump's 2016 campaign, was charged with FARA.
So, too, was Gal Luft, the original Hunter Biden whistleblower, who told FBI and DOJ officials in a March 2019 secret meeting in Brussels that Hunter and his uncle Jim Biden were on the payroll of the Chinese.
His accurate information was buried and then, one week before Republicans took back the House in 2022, Luft was charged with FARA and other violations. He is currently languishing in jail in Cyprus while Hunter escaped scot free.
Advertisement
In the last days of his presidency, Joe issued a uniquely tailored pardon for his son, stretching back 11 years and covering Hunter's conviction on gun charges and guilty plea on felony tax evasion charges that Weiss was forced to press after the sweetheart plea deal he'd stitched together with Hunter's lawyers fell apart in the wake of Shapley and Ziegler's revelations.
In the end, Weiss forced the IRS to remove Shapley and Ziegler from the investigation as soon as he suspected Shapley had blown the whistle. The Office of Special Counsel last year determined that the IRS had illegally retaliated against the pair by removing them from the investigation after they made protected disclosures to Congress about DOJ interference in the probe.
All the obstruction and interference and slow walking past statutes of limitation happened under the benign leadership of David Weiss.
So spare us his mealy mouthed justifications for squibbing what should have been the most consequential political corruption investigation in history.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Crow and Neguse sue Trump administration over detention center access
Crow and Neguse sue Trump administration over detention center access

Axios

time11 minutes ago

  • Axios

Crow and Neguse sue Trump administration over detention center access

Democratic U.S. Reps. Jason Crow and Joe Neguse on Wednesday filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration after ICE blocked multiple members of Congress from entering detention centers. State of play: Neguse, the House Assistant Minority Leader, led the suit alongside 10 other federal lawmakers seeking access to detention facilities to evaluate treatment and conditions of detainees. Context: The lawsuit calls on the administration to comply with a federal law guaranteeing access to visit ICE or Department of Homeland Security sites where noncitizens are detained without prior notice, per a statement from Neguse. It names the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem and Immigration and Customs Enforcement acting director Todd Lyons. Zoom in: Crow was denied entry during a July 20 oversight visit that was purposefully unannounced, the Democrat told us, to ensure an unvarnished look at facility conditions. Between the lines: The Trump administration in June issued new guidance limiting congressional access to facilities, requiring 72 business hours' notice. What they're saying:"Blocking Members of Congress from oversight visits to ICE facilities … clearly violates Federal law — and the Trump administration knows it," Neguse said in a statement.

6 quick questions to help you understand the Epstein probe
6 quick questions to help you understand the Epstein probe

Axios

time11 minutes ago

  • Axios

6 quick questions to help you understand the Epstein probe

Struggling to understand where we are in the Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking probe? You're probably not alone. The big picture: We've answered six questions to explain the basics of the Epstein investigation and President Trump's past relationship with the financier, given the intensifying public pressure on this administration to release court files. Case in point: On Wednesday, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and other Senate Democrats announced they'd use an obscure federal law to get the Justice Department to release more Epstein court documents. Schumer said the request includes "all documents, files, evidence and other materials" in the DOJ's and FBI's possession related to the case. Here are the questions we're answering about Epstein: Who is Jeffrey Epstein and who did he know? Epstein was a powerful financier in New York who became well-known for his wealth. He was later charged with sex trafficking but died before facing trial. He had a mysterious yet opulent lifestyle, according to multiple reports. His social circle included Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew and former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak, per the Miami Herald. How did Epstein know Trump? Trump and Epstein's association received renewed attention this month following a Wall Street Journal report alleging a "bawdy" birthday letter to Epstein that bore Trump's name. Throughout the '90s, Trump and Epstein were seen together at social events. Trump spoke fondly of Epstein in a 2002 interview with New York Magazine, calling him a "terrific guy." "He's a lot of fun to be with," Trump said at the time. "It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it — Jeffrey enjoys his social life." Yes but: In 2004, the two went head-to-head in a property fight for a Palm Beach mansion, according to The Washington Post. When Epstein was arrested and charged in 2019, Trump told reporters he wasn't a "fan" of Epstein and hadn't spoken to him in 15 years. "He was a fixture in Palm Beach. I had a falling out with him a long time ago," Trump said. What was Jeffrey Epstein arrested for? In 2019, Epstein was charged in federal court in Manhattan with sex trafficking of minors and conspiracy to commit sex trafficking of minors. He pleaded not guilty and was held without bail. Multiple women filed lawsuits against Epstein following his arrest. Flashback: Epstein was indicted on minor prostitution charges in 2008. The charges were dropped in exchange for Epstein pleading guilty to a single count of solicitation of prostitution with a minor. He planned to serve an 18-month stint at the Palm Beach County stockade compound. He was released roughly five months early. When did Jeffrey Epstein die? Epstein died in 2019 after an apparent suicide at Manhattan's Metropolitan Correctional Center. Law enforcement officials said at the time that Epstein hanged himself before he was found in his jail cell. Epstein was under extra security in a special unit of the prison, but he was not under suicide watch. Trump at the time called for a "full investigation" into Epstein's death. He also elevated a conspiracy theory that linked Epstein's death to the Clintons. Context: Trump's Justice Department and FBI said in July that they concluded that there was no evidence that Epstein was murdered. The administration released a video that showed no one entered the area of the prison where Epstein was held when he died. The 10-hour video had a "missing minute" that, authorities said, stemmed from an old surveillance recording system that resets everyday — leaving one minute unrecorded. What is the Epstein list? Many in MAGA circles have speculated for years that Epstein kept a "client list" of powerful figures. Attorney General Pam Bondi suggested it was on her desk in a Fox News interview in February when the DOJ released more than 100 pages of documents related to the case, including flight logs, a redacted contact book and masseuse list and an evidence list. Yes, but: The Justice Department and FBI concluded in July there was no evidence that Epstein blackmailed powerful figures or kept a client list. FBI deputy director Dan Bongino clashed with Bondi over the handling of the files and even took a day off from work over the squabble. What is the Epstein files debate? Zoom out: The Trump administration's release of the Epstein files triggered a debate between Trump's followers, Republicans and Democrats. Many have called for the release of all files related to Epstein for transparency sake. What's next: Senate Democrats said Wednesday they planned to use the "Rule of Five" law, which allows any five members of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee to request information about any matter related to the committee, to push the DOJ to release more details from the Epstein case.

Has America's longstanding friendship with Israel reached a breaking point?
Has America's longstanding friendship with Israel reached a breaking point?

Los Angeles Times

time11 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Has America's longstanding friendship with Israel reached a breaking point?

Benjamin Netanyahu and his extremist right-wing government can't win the 'total victory' over Hamas that the Israeli prime minister repeatedly demands; even Israeli defense officials have said so. But he — or, more to the point, Israel — can lose. With the starvation of Gaza, Netanyahu is hastening a break in the bipartisan U.S. support for Israel, support that has endured for the entire lives of most Americans. After straining that broad backing for two decades by denying Palestinians' humanity and overtly courting Republicans over Democrats in the U.S., Netanyahu is inviting a complete rupture by his culpability for Gazan babies wasting away in the arms of their helpless parents. Many more children and adults have died, of course, since the start of Israel's war to avenge Hamas terrorists' gruesome murders of 1,200 people and abduction of 251 more in their attack on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023. This week the Hamas-run Gaza Health Ministry's toll surpassed 60,000 killed, including 18,500 children. But for the most part, the world hasn't seen close-ups of kids' corpses pulled from rubble after Israeli air strikes. Now, though, despite Israel's restrictions against international reporters in Gaza, we're increasingly seeing graphic videos and photos of dying, starving kids, as well as desperate, hungry adults. Meanwhile, Israel continues its bombing and allows into Gaza a mere drip-feed of humanitarian aid, estranging some longtime allies — France, Britain and Germany among them — as well as Democrats and independents in the U.S. Congress who for much of Israel's existence were Israel's most stalwart supporters. That's a loss that Israel literally can't afford: For decades, it has been far and away the largest recipient of U.S. foreign aid (eclipsed for now by war aid to Ukraine). On Monday, independent Sen. Angus King of Maine announced he'd no longer support aid to Israel 'as long as there are starving children in Gaza due to the action or inaction of the Israeli government.' His statement began, 'I cannot defend the indefensible.' And Netanyahu's war policies are indefensible, however justified Israel's war against the genocidal Hamas was at its start. It is beyond painful and tragic to watch a nation born of the sympathy of a world horrified by the newsreel footage of human skeletons emerging from Nazi camps now bearing responsibility for the pictures coming from Gaza. The Israeli government itself stands accused of war crimes and genocide even by its own citizens, including some former leaders. Yet the prime minister has the gall to tell us that our eyes are lying: 'There is no starvation in Gaza,' Netanyahu insisted on Monday. That lie was so bald-faced that even the liar in chief, Netanyahu's pal Donald Trump, called him out. Asked on Monday about Netanyahu's denial, President Trump told reporters he'd seen the clips of starving Gaza children on TV. 'That's real starvation stuff,' he said. 'I see it, and you can't fake that.' Not exactly how most people would express empathy and outrage, but we take what we can get. Trump also went on about how the United States would step up to create new food centers in Gaza, seemingly unaware that the United States already is involved, complicit actually, in the failed 'humanitarian' effort that supplanted United Nations and independent humanitarian groups in Gaza and spawned the current crisis. After Israel in March abandoned a ceasefire that Trump had taken credit for, it blocked all goods into Gaza for nearly three months to pressure Hamas to surrender. FYI, hunger as a weapon of war is a war crime. Instead of hundreds of aid centers run by experienced humanitarian organizations, Israel created a shadowy, misnamed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation with a handful of centers run by U.S. contractors and policed by Israeli troops. Since May, more than 100 Gazans have reportedly died of hunger, but 10 times as many have been shot dead, according to the U.N., by trigger-happy soldiers firing 'warning shots' at the predictably overrun food sites, turning them into killing fields. And lest we forget, in the West Bank Palestinians continue to be tormented and killed by militant Jewish settlers, backed by the Netanyahu government. U.N. data shows that violence against Palestinians is at a higher level than any time in two decades. The suffering, and the transformation of Israel's image from from David to Goliath, from righteous to wrathful, is in turn transforming U.S.-Israel politics, no doubt to Israel's long-term detriment. On Tuesday a new Gallup polling report was headlined '32% in U.S. Back Israel's Military Action in Gaza, a New Low.' That poll was conducted earlier in July, mostly before the torrent of heart-rending photos of malnourished babies. Americans' reduced support for Israel's actions in Gaza was driven by increased opposition among Democrats and independents. Republicans' approval of Israel's war is up, likely reflecting Trump's support for Netanyahu — and the administration's zeal to tar as an antisemite anyone or any institution critical of Israel's government. In February, amid the since-abandoned ceasefire, Gallup found just 46% support for Israel among Americans overall, the lowest level in its 25 years of tracking. Until 2022, both Republicans and Democrats sided with Israel over the Palestinian territories in their long-running dispute. Since then, Democrats have tipped in favor of the Palestinians, presumably reflecting disgust that was building before the war with Netanyahu's long, antidemocratic and self-serving rule. Similarly, the Chicago Council on Global Affairs reported in May on the growing partisan divide on U.S. support for Israel. It concluded: 'a long-term shift in public opinion could lead to reduced U.S. support for Israel down the line.' That polarization of support in the United States, Israel's most longstanding and crucial ally, is Netanyahu's legacy. It's not a good one for the Jewish people, or for America. Bluesky: @jackiecalmesThreads: @jkcalmesX: @Jackiekcalmes

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store