US immigration agents barred from LA Dodgers' stadium
Images shared online showed unmarked vehicles and masked agents at one Dodger Stadium entrance. (Los Angeles Times/AP pic)
LOS ANGELES : The Los Angeles Dodgers said today the club barred federal immigration agents from the team's stadium parking lot as a fresh wave of raids continued across America's second-biggest city.
The Dodgers, who have been criticised for their failure to comment publicly on the US government's immigration crackdown in Los Angeles, said in a statement the team denied access to US immigration and customs enforcement (ICE) agents who 'requested permission to access the parking lots'.
'They were denied entry to the grounds by the organisation,' the statement said, adding that the team's game later today would go ahead as scheduled.
Images and video shared on social media showed a line of unmarked trucks and masked agents at one Dodger Stadium entrance while protesters nearby chanted 'ICE out of LA'.
The department of homeland security (DHS) later clarified that the agents at the venue were from US customs and border protection (CBP), not ICE.
'This had nothing to do with the Dodgers. CBP vehicles were in the stadium parking lot very briefly, unrelated to any operation or enforcement,' a DHS statement said.
The incident comes against a backdrop of heightened tensions in Los Angeles, which has become ground zero of president Donald Trump's immigration crackdown across the US.
The city has seen scattered violence but mostly peaceful protests in recent weeks, ignited by an escalation in federal immigration sweeps that have targeted migrant workers in garment factories, car washes and other workplaces.
Local media reported further raids across the city today targeting Home Depot stores, a home improvement retailer where day labourers often gather in parking lots seeking work.
In addition to the mobilisation of ICE agents, Trump has ordered the deployment of thousands of national guard troops and hundreds of marines into the city in response to the protests – a move opposed by city leaders and California governor Gavin Newsom, who is a Democrat.
The incident at Dodger Stadium today comes as the reigning World Series champions have faced criticism for their response to the immigration crackdown.
The team has a heavily Latino fan base, with some claiming a sense of betrayal over the franchise's failure to speak out against the ongoing raids.
As of early today, the Dodgers have made no formal statement in regard to the immigration raids across the city.
'100% betrayal'
The team's failure to condemn the immigration offensive came under scrutiny last weekend, when Latin American pop singer Nezza defied Dodgers officials and sang the US national anthem in Spanish before the team's home game.
Speaking outside Dodger Stadium today after federal agents had left the venue, one 27-year-old fan among a small group of protesters told AFP she felt let down by the team.
'They've been very quiet since these ICE raids started, and I think it's very hypocritical of them not to say anything when the majority of their fan base is the Latino population here in Los Angeles,' Paola, who asked only to be identified by her first name, told AFP.
'It 100% feels like betrayal. I was born and raised here, I've supported them my whole life – for them not to come out and support us during these times is messed up.'
Los Angeles Times sports columnist Dylan Hernandez has slammed the team's response to the immigration crackdown.
'The Dodgers boast that more than 40% of their fan base is Latino, but they can't even be bothered to offer the shaken community any words of comfort,' Hernandez wrote.
'How ungrateful. How disrespectful. How cowardly.'
While the Dodgers have remained silent, the team's popular outfielder Enrique Hernandez lashed out against the raids in a statement on Instagram.
'I am saddened and infuriated by what's happening in our country and our city,' wrote Hernandez, who is from Puerto Rico.
'This is my second home. And I cannot stand to see our community being violated, profiled, abused and ripped apart. ALL people deserve to be treated with respect, dignity and human rights.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
4 hours ago
- Malay Mail
No spike in radiation — but what risks do Iran nuclear site strikes really pose?
LONDON, June 23 — President Donald Trump said Iran's main nuclear sites had been 'obliterated' in military strikes overnight, including on the deeply buried Fordow facility, as the US joined attacks launched by Israel on June 13. Experts have said military strikes on Iran's uranium enrichment facilities pose limited risks of contamination, and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said yesterday no increased off-site radiation levels had been reported following the US attacks. Which Iranian nuclear sites have been hit so far? The US military struck sites at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. Trump said Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities had been 'completely and totally obliterated'. The attacks follow previously announced Israeli attacks on nuclear sites in Natanz, Isfahan, Arak and Tehran itself. Israel says it aims to stop Iran building a nuclear bomb and the US says Tehran would not be allowed to get such weapons. Iran denies ever seeking nuclear arms. The international nuclear watchdog IAEA has previously reported damage to the uranium enrichment plant at Natanz, the nuclear complex at Isfahan that includes the Uranium Conversion Facility and to centrifuge production facilities in Karaj and Tehran. Israel has also attacked Arak, also known as Khondab. The IAEA said Israeli military strikes hit the Khondab Heavy Water Research Reactor, which was under construction and had not begun operating, and damaged the nearby plant that makes heavy water. The IAEA said it was not operational and contained no nuclear material, so there were no radiological effects. Heavy-water reactors can be used to produce plutonium which, like enriched uranium, can be used to make an atom bomb. What risks do these strikes pose? Speaking to Reuters before the US strikes took place, experts said Israel's attacks had posed limited contamination risks so far. Darya Dolzikova, a senior research fellow at London think-tank RUSI, said attacks on facilities at the front end of the nuclear fuel cycle — the stages where uranium is prepared for use in a reactor — pose primarily chemical, not radiological risks. At enrichment facilities, UF6, or uranium hexafluoride, is the concern. 'When UF6 interacts with water vapour in the air, it produces harmful chemicals,' she said. 'In low winds, much of the material can be expected to settle in the vicinity of the facility; in high winds, the material will travel farther, but is also likely to disperse more widely. The risk of harmful chemicals being dispersed is lower for underground facilities.' Simon Bennett, who leads the civil safety and security unit at the University of Leicester in Britain, said risks to the environment were minimal when subterranean facilities are hit because you are 'burying nuclear material in possibly thousands of tonnes of concrete, earth and rock'. James Acton, co-director of the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said that before uranium goes into a nuclear reactor it is barely radioactive. 'The chemical form uranium hexafluoride is toxic ... but it actually doesn't tend to travel large distances and it's barely radioactive,' he added. Attacks on enrichment facilities were 'unlikely to cause significant off-site consequences', he said, while stating his opposition to Israel's campaign. Satellite image shows the Bushehr Nuclear Power Plant, in Bushehr Province, Iran, May 26, 2025. — 2025 Planet Labs PBC handout pic via Reuters What about nuclear reactors? The major concern would be a strike on Iran's nuclear reactor at Bushehr on the Gulf coast. Fears of catastrophe rippled through the Gulf on June 19 when the Israeli military said it had struck a site in Bushehr, only to say later that the announcement was a mistake. Israel says it wants to avoid any nuclear disaster. Richard Wakeford, honorary professor of epidemiology at the University of Manchester, said that while contamination from attacks on enrichment facilities would be 'mainly a chemical problem' for the surrounding areas, extensive damage to large power reactors 'is a different story'. Radioactive elements would be released either through a plume of volatile materials or into the sea, he added. Acton of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace said an attack on Bushehr 'could cause an absolute radiological catastrophe'. Why are Gulf states especially worried? For Gulf states, the impact of any strike on Bushehr would be worsened by the potential contamination of Gulf waters, jeopardising a critical source of desalinated potable water. The Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) is on high alert to monitor for any possible environmental contamination after the attacks, said a source with knowledge of the matter. There have been no signs of radiological contamination so far, the source said, adding that the GCC had emergency plans in place in case of a threat to water and food security in the Gulf. In the United Arab Emirates, desalinated water accounts for more than 80 per cent of drinking water, while Bahrain became fully reliant on desalinated water in 2016, with 100 per cent of groundwater reserved for contingency plans, authorities say. Qatar is also 100 per cent dependent on desalinated water. In Saudi Arabia, a much larger nation with a greater reserve of natural groundwater, about 50 per cent of the water supply came from desalinated water as of 2023, according to the General Authority for Statistics. While some Gulf states such as Saudi Arabia, Oman and the UAE have access to more than one sea to draw water from, Qatar, Bahrain and Kuwait are crowded along the shoreline of the Gulf with no other coastline. 'If a natural disaster, oil spill, or even a targeted attack were to disrupt a desalination plant, hundreds of thousands could lose access to freshwater almost instantly,' said Nidal Hilal, professor of engineering and director of New York University Abu Dhabi's Water Research Centre. 'Coastal desalination plants are especially vulnerable to regional hazards like oil spills and potential nuclear contamination,' he said. — Reuters
Malay Mail
5 hours ago
- Malay Mail
‘Freak Offs' and trauma bonds: Sean Combs's trial hinges on abuse vs. consent claims
Defence argues hip-hop mogul's ex-girlfriends consented to 'Freak Offs' Prosecutors argue Combs used coercion and threats against ex-girlfriends Expert testimony on 'trauma bonds' challenges defence's consent argument NEW YORK, June 23 — Prosecutors at Sean 'Diddy' Combs' sex trafficking trial showed over the past six weeks ample evidence the hip-hop mogul physically abused his former girlfriends and directed them to have sex with paid male escorts, but Combs' defence is likely to highlight instances where the women participated willingly in making its own case to the jury, legal experts said. Prosecutors are expected to rest their case against Combs, who founded Bad Boy Records and is credited with popularising hip-hop in American culture, on Monday in Manhattan federal court. The defence is expected to call witnesses of its own this week. Combs, 55, has pleaded not guilty to two counts of sex trafficking as well as charges of racketeering conspiracy and transportation to engage in prostitution. The sex trafficking counts carry the highest potential prison sentence if convicted — a mandatory minimum of 15 years, and a possible life sentence. To convict Combs of sex trafficking, prosecutors must prove the sex acts were commercial in nature, and that Combs used force, threats, fraud or coercion to compel his girlfriends to take part. The defence argues that both former girlfriends, the rhythm and blues singer Casandra Ventura and a woman known in court by the pseudonym Jane, were willing participants in the sex acts. 'There's got to be a linkage between the force, fraud and coercion and the participation in the sex act,' said Sarah Krissoff, a former federal prosecutor in Manhattan. 'There is some murky testimony and evidence in there regarding that, and the defence is certainly going to hammer that.' Prosecutors say that for nearly two decades, Combs forced two of his ex-girlfriends into ecstasy-fuelled, days-long sexual performances, sometimes known as 'Freak Offs' with male prostitutes in hotel rooms while he watched, masturbated and sometimes filmed. His defence lawyers do not deny that the sex acts took place, and acknowledge that Combs was abusive in domestic relationships. But during cross-examination of the government's witnesses, the defence brought jurors' attention to sexually explicit text messages in which the women expressed affection for Combs. Both women testified that they at times took part in the sexual performances to make Combs happy, and that they participated well after brutal beatings by Combs, who was also known during his career as Puff Daddy and P. Diddy. Defence lawyers will likely use that evidence to try to convince even a single juror that Ventura and Jane took part consensually, said Krissoff, now a partner at law firm Cozen O'Connor. To convict Combs on any of the five counts he faces, the 12-member panel must unanimously conclude that prosecutors proved their allegations beyond a reasonable doubt. 'Trauma bonds' Prosecutors argue the longevity of Ventura's and Jane's relationships with Combs does not mean they consented to take part in the sex acts. Both women testified that Combs beat them, threatened to cut off financial support, or publicly release explicit videos he had taken of them. Experts who said the testimony from forensic psychologist Dawn Hughes could be key in undermining the defence argument that Ventura and Jane took part in the 'Freak Offs' consensually. Testifying as an expert witness on May 21, Hughes said victims of sexual violence can form a 'trauma bond' with their perpetrators that can make it difficult for the victims to leave an abusive relationship. 'Such compelling testimony from the victims, corroborated by the other evidence in the case of Combs' abuse and control, will be very difficult for the defence to try to overcome,' said Stephen Reynolds, a former federal prosecutor and current partner at law firm Day Pitney. — Reuters
Malay Mail
6 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Clock ticking: Debt fears, Medicaid cuts stall Trump's US$2.8t ‘Big Beautiful Bill' ahead of July 4 deadline
Trump, US Senate Republicans face test as 'Big Beautiful Bill' deadline looms Republicans face resistance over tax-cut bill due to debt concerns Senate parliamentarian's decision crucial for bill's passage Medicaid cuts in bill opposed by some Senate Republicans WASHINGTON, June 23 — US President Donald Trump and his allies in the Senate face a political free-for-all over passage of his sweeping tax-cut and spending legislation, which Republican congressional leaders hope to enact in coming days despite growing resistance from different party factions. Senate Majority Leader John Thune, House Speaker Mike Johnson and administration officials are pressing Republican lawmakers to pass the One Big Beautiful Bill Act so Trump can sign it into law before the July 4 US Independence Day holiday. But hardline Republicans have redoubled their push for additional spending cuts after an official forecast that the bill would add at least US$2.8 trillion (RM12 trillion) to the US$36.2 trillion US debt. Other lawmakers, looking to minimise the impact of cuts on social programmes including Medicaid, have also voiced adamant opposition to the bill's language. Republicans control the Senate by a 53-47 majority and the House by 220-212. One Republican from each chamber has opposed the legislation from the beginning due to the debt. Thune aims to begin Senate action by the middle of this week and complete passage by the weekend, sending the bill back to the House for final approval. Trump is expected to turn up the heat on senators this week, according to Republican lawmakers who view him as 'the closer.' 'Great unity in the Republican Party, perhaps unity like we have never seen before. Now let's get the Great, Big, Beautiful Bill done,' Trump said in a social media post on Sunday. Lawmakers are still waiting for the Senate parliamentarian, the chamber's nonpartisan gatekeeper, to decide whether the legislation qualifies for the privileged status needed to circumvent Democrats and the 60-vote Senate filibuster and pass it with only 51 votes. 'The Senate Republican bill is, simply put, bigger cuts, bigger betrayal,' Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer said. 'It makes even deeper cuts to healthcare. It destroys American clean energy. It raises costs on working and middle-class families. And it rewards those at the very top,' he said. Pushback Some Republicans are pushing back on Thune's schedule in hopes of gaining more time to negotiate bigger savings. 'There's no way. There's no way,' Senator Ron Johnson, a leading fiscal hawk who wants to cut federal spending back to pre-Covid pandemic levels, said when asked if he could support the bill this week. The Wisconsin Republican said he is coordinating with fellow hardline Senators Mike Lee and Rick Scott, who want to glean additional savings from green tax credits and the Medicaid healthcare programme for lower-income Americans, respectively. 'If we had all the money in the world, why would you make a change? We don't. We're running US$2 trillion deficits,' Scott told reporters. The legislation has yet to pass muster with the Senate parliamentarian, a nonpartisan referee who has said Republican efforts to restrict food assistance, curtail the ability of judges to block government policies, slash funding for financial watchdogs and reverse Biden vehicle policy, violate budgetary rules. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said last week the House version of the bill could lead to a US$2.8 trillion increase in the federal deficit over the next decade. The deficit hike would reach a total of US$3.4 trillion, if the cost of rising interest payments due to increased borrowing needs were included, according to the agency, which took into account the bill's potential impact on economic activity. The report contradicted Republican claims that tax cuts would lead to buoyant economic growth and pay for themselves by generating higher revenues from increased business activity. In a Senate floor speech last week, Thune cited a White House Council of Economic Advisers projection the legislation would increase federal revenue by US$4.1 trillion, saying it would more than offset the CBO's deficit estimate. Medicaid hit A revised Senate version of the legislation would reduce Medicaid provider taxes from 6 per cent to 3.5 per cent by 2031 in states that expanded the programme to able-bodied recipients under the Affordable Care Act. That provision is opposed by several Senate Republicans who say it would undercut funding for rural hospitals. 'They cannot defund rural hospitals,' said Senator Josh Hawley, a Missouri Republican who has positioned himself in the debate as a champion of Medicaid. But Republicans signaled the time for negotiations would soon come to an end and predicted that wavering members would ultimately support the legislation. 'Some people are going to have to settle for a ham and egg sandwich without the ham. That's just the way it is,' said Senator John Kennedy of Louisiana. — Reuters
