Former state librarians oppose its elimination
PIERRE, S.D. (KELO) — Four of South Dakota's past heads of the State Library are taking a stand against an attempt by the Noem-Rhoden administration to defund many of its operations and eliminate most of its staff.
They issued a statement on Saturday night strongly urging state lawmakers to oppose House Bill 1041.
Old TV provides clear picture of KELOLAND's past
The House Education Committee last week voted 13-0 to recommend that HB 1041 do not pass.
The next decision will be made by the Legislature's Joint Committee on Appropriations that sets state government's budget each year.
Then-Gov. Kristi Noem proposed getting rid of many of the State Library's functions and staff when she revealed her budget recommendations to legislators in December. Her budget office recommended cutting 12.5 positions from the current staff of 21.5 and stripping $1,030,267 from its current $2,371,975 state general funding and taking away all of its current $1,399,443 federal funding.
Noem didn't mention the State Library reduction in her budget speech, but she told lawmakers that she was recommending many cost reductions in state government because revenue is flowing into the state treasury at a slower rate than lawmakers had forecast. Noem resigned last month to become federal secretary of homeland security.
Her successor, Larry Rhoden, said in his first speech to lawmakers that he wouldn't be submitting a budget of his own this legislative session.
The State Library is part of the state Department of Education. The legislation to defund the library came at the department's request. The legislation also would eliminate the State Library Board.
State Education Secretary Joe Graves was the only person to testify for HB 1041 during its hearing by the House Education Committee. Ten people spoke against it. Some were librarians. Others included Sara Rankin from the South Dakota Municipal League and Republican Rep. Tim Walburg.
The four former state librarians who issued the statement on Saturday are Daria Bossman, who served 2012-2021 during the Daugaard and Noem administrations; Dorothy Liegl, who served 2004-2007 during the Rounds administration; Suzanne Miller, who served 1999-2004 during the Janklow administration; and Jane Kolbe, who served 1986-1999 during the Mickelson, Miller and Janklow administrations.
'The State Library is an efficient, cost-effective, trusted and valuable resource for all South Dakotans,' they said in the statement.
They said a review in 2006 led to reducing the State Library staff of 37 to 27, and a decade later the staff was further reduced to 21.5. At the same time, the State Library became more technologically advanced.
'This new system which was named South Dakota Share-IT allowed the State Library to link all participating libraries with no cost to the local school or public library. The end result is that patrons can discover what each library has for their physical holdings,' the joint statement said.
The statement also said that South Dakota's universities and a few larger public libraries are members of the international OCLC library network. 'However, without the State Library's connecting software and their librarians who manage it, most of the state will go dark,' the statement warned.
'The information isolation will be devastating to local schools and communities, particularly rural areas. Without access to magazine articles through subject databases and access to books held by hundreds of linked South Dakota libraries, individual research and inter-library loan will be severely curtailed,' the statement said.
It added, 'In short, the proposed drastic reduction of personnel and budget cuts would severely limit the State Library's capacity to support k-12 schools, homeschoolers, public and academic libraries. Additionally, the economic impact over time would be crippling, again most especially to rural schools and communities. This ill-advised legislation will NOT save tax-payers' money. In fact, it will most likely have the opposite effect, costing tax-payers more money but with limited access to fewer resources, trainings and services.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
20 minutes ago
- CBS News
Activists shut out of Sacramento immigration hearings following ICE detainment
There was pushback outside the federal building in Sacramento on Thursday as members of a local activist group say they were prohibited from attending a scheduled immigration hearing that is typically open to the public. The group, NorCal Resist, said some of their volunteers watched as ICE agents detained an immigrant who was there for an appointment. NorCal Resist volunteers say they often accompany immigrants to appointments to observe, document, and support them through their proceedings. But on Thursday, many activists were left outside as the federal building went on lockdown for several hours after the man was detained, and only those with appointments and employees were allowed in, according to CapRadio. "It's a public government building that we have every right to be in," said Giselle Garcia, a volunteer with NorCal Resist. "This is a gross violation of the law that they're doing here." Some activists stayed there through the afternoon, with one activist describing their interaction first-hand to CBS News Sacramento. "It was alarming. There was an armed man who stood in front of me, and I just have a little poster board sign, and there were agents having their faces covered," the protester, who asked not to be named, said. Shortly after 4 p.m., CBS Sacramento saw a caravan of vehicles leaving the federal building, led by a van and unmarked government vehicles. Around half a dozen ICE agents, mostly in masks, exited a gate at the federal building as the vehicles left. ICE has not confirmed the details of its activity in Sacramento. Democratic Congressman Ami Bera, who represents Sacramento County, said President Trump's immigration policies are "creating a culture of fear in our immigrant communities." "We'll support you if you want to go after criminals, but the folks that are not a threat to our community, let's figure out a better way to address that," Bera told CBS Sacramento. Bera told CBS Sacramento that Democrats and Republicans would need to find common ground "to ease tensions in this country." "We're going to have to listen to one another," Bera said. "I want us to come together as a country, so let's do it." Republican Congressman Kevin Kiley spoke to media members over Zoom on Thursday and said that California and the City of Los Angeles have each passed policies that "have encouraged lawlessness" and "a breakdown of order." "Unfortunately, we had political leaders as well who added fuel to that fire with irresponsible and inflammatory rhetoric," Kiley said.
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Republicans respond to Israel's strikes on Iran: ‘Game on'
Republican lawmakers welcomed Israel's overnight attack against Iran and asked the public to pray for the Jewish State, which waged strikes against Tehran's expanding nuclear program and military leadership. 'Game on. Pray for Israel,' Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), a defense hawk, wrote Thursday night on the social media platform X. Similar messages were posted by other GOP members of Congress since Israel unleashed an attack that, so far, has killed Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) Commander Hossein Salami, along with two other top Iranian generals. Speaker Mike Johnson echoed President Trump's consistent warning that Iran never obtains a nuclear weapon in his response, commending the administration for working 'tirelessly to ensure that outcome.' 'Unfortunately, Iran has refused to agree and even declared yesterday its intent to build a new enrichment facility,' Johnson posted to X on Friday. 'Israel decided it needed to take action to defend itself,' he added. 'They were clearly within their right to do so. Iran will face grave consequences if it responds by unjustifiably targeting U.S. interests.' Sen. Jim Risch, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, also showed his support for Israel late Thursday, following the strikes. 'We stand with Israel tonight and pray for the safety of its people and the success of this unilateral, defensive action. I am also praying for the brave U.S. service members in the Middle East who keep America safe — Iran would be foolish to attack the United States,' he posted on X. Israel performed at least five rounds of strikes against Iran, hitting dozens of targets, including the Natanz, one of Iran's main enrichment facilities. Israel said the attack was unleashed to help prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in a video message that the operation, dubbed 'Rising Lion,' would last 'as many days as it takes.' 'We struck at the heart of Iran's nuclear enrichment program. We struck at the heart of Iran's nuclear weaponization program. We targeted Iran's main enrichment facility in Natanz,' the prime minster said in his address, shared to X. 'We targeted Iran's leading nuclear scientists working on the Iranian bomb. We also struck at the heart of Iran's ballistic missile program.' Sen. Jack Reed (D-R.I.), the ranking member on the Senate Armed Services Commitee, said that Israel's 'reckless escalation' threatens to ignite violence in the region and could jeopardize the safety of Americans stationed in the Middle East. 'While tensions between Israel and Iran are real and complex, military aggression of this scale is never the answer,' Reed said late Thursday in a statement. 'I urge both nations to show immediate restraint, and I call on President Trump and our international partners to press for diplomatic de-escalation before this crisis spirals further out of control,' the Democratic senator added. 'President Trump must be crystal clear with the American people and the international community in charting a way forward. The world cannot afford more devastating conflict born of short-sighted violence.' Iran retaliated, launching over 100 drones, some of whom are intercepted by the Israeli military, according to officials. Trump warned Iran Friday morning to accept a nuclear deal with the U.S. or it would face harsh consequences. 'I told them it would be much worse than anything they know, anticipated, or were told, that the United States makes the best and most lethal military equipment anywhere in the World, BY FAR, and that Israel has a lot of it, with much more to come – And they know how to use it,' the president wrote on Truth Social. He added in a subsequent post, 'Now they have, perhaps, a second chance!' Iran, amid the tension, announced Friday that they were pulling out of the next round of nuclear talks that were expected Sunday in Oman. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
As Israel launches a major attack on Iran, Trump's pre-election rhetoric runs into reality
About a month before Election Day 2024 in the United States, tensions in the Middle East escalated as Iran targeted Israel with a ballistic missile attack. Asked about the developments, then-candidate Donald Trump appeared largely focused on himself, insisting that there were no similar events during his White House term — a claim that was demonstrably ridiculous. But that's not all he said. Referring to Iranian officials, the Republican argued, 'They have no respect for the [Biden] administration. This would have never happened if I was president.' As part of the same exchange, Trump added that the sooner he was returned to power, 'the safer the world will be.' The rhetoric was absurd but familiar. In the four years following his 2020 defeat, Trump routinely tried to convince the public that his first term was a time of global peace, stability and tranquility — in part because so much of the world respected his awesomeness, and in part because U.S. foes feared his mightiness. It was an utterly bizarre effort to rewrite recent history, but it nevertheless became a staple of his pre-election pitch. As MSNBC's Chris Hayes summarized via Bluesky, 'Trump's go-to line about every foreign policy crisis and war — from Russia's invasion of Ukraine, to October 7th, to the Israel's devastation of Gaza — was 'It would never have happened if I was president.'' Ahead of his second inaugural, Trump similarly told Time magazine, 'I think that the Middle East is an easier problem to handle than what's happening with Russia and Ukraine. Okay, I just want to say that up front. The Middle East is going to get solved. ... I think it's more complicated than the Russia-Ukraine, but I think it's, it's, it's easier to solve.' As the president really ought to know, his rhetoric often has unfortunate confrontations with reality. NBC News reported that the Israeli military launched a massive attack on Iran on Friday, increasing the risk of another war in the Middle East. The strikes, which killed senior Iranian scientists and top military officials, involved more than 200 fighter jets. They were aimed at Iran's main enrichment facility and targets associated with the country's ballistic missile program, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said. Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei swiftly vowed retaliation. Soon after the strikes, Iran launched more than 100 drones towards Israel, Israeli Brig. Gen. Effie Defrin said. The Trump administration, which has spent recent months negotiating with Iran over the future of its nuclear program, made no secret of the fact that it wanted Israel to hold off on launching such a military offensive as the diplomatic talks continued. Netanyahu appears to have ignored those calls. With this in mind, the State Department made clear after Israel's attack that the United States was not involved in this offensive and was not providing assistance. The next morning, the American president seemed to undermine his own administration's line with a statement published to his social media platform. 'I gave Iran chance after chance to make a deal. I told them, in the strongest of words, to 'just do it,' but no matter how hard they tried, no matter how close they got, they just couldn't get it done,' Trump wrote online, putting a spin on his own inability to successfully negotiate a deal. 'I told them it would be much worse than anything they know, anticipated, or were told, that the United States makes the best and most lethal military equipment anywhere in the World, BY FAR, and that Israel has a lot of it, with much more to come — And they know how to use it. Certain Iranian hardliner's spoke bravely, but they didn't know what was about to happen. They are all DEAD now, and it will only get worse!' The Republican suggested that Iran should continue to negotiate with the United States and 'make a deal,' in order to 'save what was once known as the Iranian Empire.' (There was never any such thing as 'the Iranian Empire.' Whether Trump was trying to refer to the Persian Empire was unclear.) I won't pretend to know what the White House might say or do next, though Politico reports that the broader MAGA movement is largely divided between those who expect the U.S. administration to rally behind Israel and those who want the administration to steer clear of a burgeoning Middle East crisis. As of this writing, it's unclear whether Joe Biden will tweet, 'They have no respect for the Trump administration. This would have never happened if I was president.' This article was originally published on
