
There are millions of ways to make a lineup. How does Carlos Mendoza choose?: Q&A
Building a lineup is one of a manager's central jobs. How he goes about it highlights some of his most important skills, including communication, adaptability and delegation.
Advertisement
In Mendoza's season and a half at the helm of the Mets, he's made several critical decisions when it comes to the lineup and the batting order. Last year, he swapped in Mark Vientos for Brett Baty in May and Tyrone Taylor for Harrison Bader by the postseason. He jump-started the offense and his star player by moving Francisco Lindor to the leadoff spot in mid-May.
This year, Mendoza has juggled a plethora of similar options at different positions, finding time for Baty, Vientos, Ronny Mauricio, Taylor and Jeff McNeil at second base, third base and center field. He's shifted off his Opening Day order, initially by moving Juan Soto from second to third in the lineup, then by bumping Lindor down from the leadoff spot to second. Both times, it's helped spark production from the player and the lineup as a whole.
At a time when every day brings something else to consider, I sat down with Mendoza to discuss lineup construction. How much does he ponder it, what factors go into 'matchups' and how important is a batting order, really? The conversation has been lightly edited, condensed and annotated.
We talked on Wednesday before the Mets' game with the Orioles was rained out.
How far in advance are you thinking of your daily lineup? It's Wednesday. I assume you have Thursday's done. Are you looking at Friday and Saturday yet?
So, I start two series in advance. We have an idea of (the pitchers) we're facing in the three against Baltimore and the next three against the Royals. In my head, I'm thinking whether I need to give someone off in this stretch or if I'm going to ride the everyday guys all the way through, especially if we're in the middle of a 13- or 14-game stretch. Then, I might look ahead and say there's a tough righty, that might be a good day for a right-handed hitter (to sit). Or a tough lefty for a left-handed hitter. That's how I start.
Advertisement
But as far as writing out a lineup, the last call I make is the night before. So before this series, I knew the three (opposing starters). I knew the lineup for Game 1, I had an idea for Game 2 and potentially Game 3. But there's always a couple of adjustments. You're between one guy or another, and one might need a day. The catchers with the day game, which is the best or the worst matchup? I'm going to play Luis (Torrens) in the first game and then which one between the last two; which one makes the most sense?
With the catchers, what goes into the matchup? Is it how he works with his own pitcher or how he matches up with the opposing pitcher as a hitter?
Because our two catchers are very good defensively, they're elite receivers, they control the running game, they have the ability to handle the pitching staff, I don't want to create favorites. Credit to the pitching staff: Out of respect, I usually go to the guys and ask which one they prefer, and they say they're fine with any of the catchers. It's more matchups. What's the best matchup for (Hayden) Senger? What are the two best for Luis?
When you talk about riding your everyday guys, what tells you that they need a day during those longer stretches? What do you look out for?
As a manager, when you have players like Pete Alonso, right now I'm to the point where I don't even go up to him anymore because he wants to play. Lindor's the same way. Nimmo. Soto. So, for me, it's a lot easier.
Now that we get in this temperature where it's hot and humid, (I look at) how much they're running the bases, how much they're running in the outfield or infield. I check with the trainers and check with the coaches. Have the hitting coaches seen anything in the cages behind the scenes? I use the coaches to give me some input or feedback to how certain guys are feeling. Because, as the manager, when I go up to them, they're always going to say they're good. But they might say something to a coach, like their shoulder is barking a little bit. I want that without losing their trust with the coaches.
With the everyday guys, I've created a routine where after every game, I go up to them and I check with them. Now I know, they're never going to tell me they need an off-day, but their response — 'I'm good' or 'I'm feeling it, but I'm good' — I have a better idea of where they're coming from that allows me to make the last call.
Advertisement
How long did it take you to develop that idea with each of them?
It took me quite a bit last year, because I didn't know any of the players. I didn't know Lindor. I didn't know Nimmo. I didn't know Pete. This year with Soto. I feel like I got there a lot quicker with Soto. I got information from his previous teams, and he was pretty honest with me from the beginning.
Like (last year), I took Lindor out of the lineup on a night where I needed to wait until the next morning to see how he was feeling. I don't know if he was feeling sick or something,* and I sent out the lineup the night before, like I usually do, to the players, and I didn't give him a chance to wake up. So, I learned my lesson. Man, this guy wants me to give him every chance. So, now, with situations like that, instead of me sending out the lineup, I'll just tell the guys I know are playing that they're playing and that I'm waiting on the other guys before sending the final lineup.
* This was last May, when Lindor left a game against the Cubs with flu-like symptoms. He didn't start the next game but came off the bench to go 2-for-3 with two two-run doubles, including the walk-off winner.
So whenever a guy goes home at the end of the night, he knows whether he's in the lineup the next day?
Right. Yeah, 99.9 percent of the time, they know whether they're playing or not.
When you decide to move Soto from second to third, or Lindor from leadoff to second, how long are you generally thinking about moves like that? What makes you decide this is the time to do it?
I'm always thinking. I'm trying to get ahead. What will this combination look like? How can we benefit from moving this guy? What are the pluses, what are the negatives, if any? I wrestle with a lot of ideas and information, and then, obviously, I'll ask the players what they think. You check the temperature and their reaction. It's a lot easier when your superstars are willing to do whatever it takes.
You've got that top four penciled in every day. The bottom five have been shuffled more. How do you decide how to structure that group?
That's a conversation you have with all of them. We've got 13 really good players, and only nine of them can play. I was very upfront and clear with them. If I pinch hit for you, that doesn't mean I don't trust you. We have someone where the matchup is in our favor. If your name is not in the starting lineup, it's because we like that particular matchup for the other guy. That doesn't mean you're not going to have an impact. You might get a huge at-bat coming off the bench. They understand that.
We've got some lefties. We've got some righties. It allows me to play around with some of the versatility that I have.
Advertisement
When you talk about matchups, I think most fans look at that as righty/lefty. How thoroughly are you looking at a pitcher's style and things like that?
It's not just the righty/lefty. We've seen it where there are a lot of right-handed pitchers that are better against lefties; they're a reverse split. So why are they reverse? Is it a changeup or what kind of fastball do they throw? Does it have ride? Does it have sink?
So it's not just righty/lefty. It's more like pitch type, swing plane, how certain swings play against certain pitches, case rate and strike zone discipline. There's a lot* that goes into it.
* For instance, earlier this season, Mendoza would often start Starling Marte over Jesse Winker against right-handed pitchers who relied on cutters — a pitch that Winker has struggled against the last few seasons.
How much are you looking at the other team's bullpen and what they might do late in games, especially against that part of the order?
That goes into it, too. But it depends on who you're playing. If you're playing the Phillies, you know they're going to ride their starters, and you have to put together your best lineup to get to their starter. But there are also teams that like to play the matchups as early as the fourth or fifth, so you have to stay away from giving them an easy pocket or lane for their bullpen. If you stack the lefties to get to the starter, that might be an easy lane for a bullpen.
Today, you moved Mauricio above Torrens. What goes into a small decision like that?
They only have one lefty (in the bullpen), in (Gregory) Soto. They only have one bullet like that, and after that, it's a bunch of righties. So, I just wanted another lefty there, a switch-hitter. In case I use a pinch hitter against Soto, I have the switch hitter in Mauricio, who's still another lefty against their righties. It's just a small adjustment.
In your mind, how important is the batting order? Fans obsess over the order regularly. Analysis shows it doesn't make a huge difference. To you, how important is getting that the way you want it?
Yeah, it's important. You have guys that want to get on base. You want to get your best hitters as many plate appearances as possible. I'm kind of old-school in that I like guys who put the ball in play with traffic. There's something to putting the ball in play with guys on. But also, guys that control the strike zone. When I'm making out a lineup, the balance of lefty/righty, that goes into the batting order.
It used to be that a leadoff hitter had to be a speed guy, the second hitter had to control the bat well. How different are the perceptions of different spots in the order than when you were playing?
Yeah, I grew up in the old school as a player, and then I grew up as a coach in the new school. I'm still at school! That's the beauty, that you're learning. There are days where, with the matchup, you like the speed at the top with Marte, a guy that puts the ball in play and can lay a bunt down. But I also like a guy that controls the strike zone and can hit for power, a guy that gets on base with what's behind him.
We're a good team because I can go in a lot of different directions.
(Top photo of Carlos Mendoza: Lucas Boland / Imagn Images)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
2025 Fantasy Football Quarterback Preview: Once again, it's okay to wait on the position in drafts
Veteran fantasy football managers picked up on this dichotomy many years ago. In the real-life NFL, the quarterback is everything. In the fantasy world we navigate, the quarterback is never the priority — at least in a standard league. [Join or create a Yahoo Fantasy Football league for the 2025 NFL season] Consider the current ADP board for Yahoo leagues. Superstars Lamar Jackson, Josh Allen, Jayden Daniels and Jalen Hurts are all landing outside the top 20. Quarterbacks are the big ticket in the real world, but you can do well at almost any price point for fantasy purposes. I like to compare fantasy QB shopping to the public transit system in New York City. If you miss a train, it's not a big deal — another one is coming in a few minutes. That's essentially my QB ethos. I'll have preferences and targets, sure — but if one train leaves without me, I'm unstressed, knowing another one is soon to arrive. Evaluating quarterbacks for fantasy purposes is about much more than pure talent, of course. You have to consider the play-caller and the pass-catchers on the roster. It's nice to draft a QB who can also run some — the forever cheat code. You might want to consider the schedule, and how many indoor or weather-safe games the player is facing. And your fantasy QB might achieve glory in part because his defense is lousy, forcing a high-scoring affair almost every week. Joe Burrow would probably be great in any context, but the crummy Cincinnati defense forced him to pump up the volume on a weekly basis in 2024. We love that. And the Bengals will probably have the same setup for 2025. Get your popcorn ready. Because of the depth of the position, I'll probably attack it reactively. If one of the vanity QBs slips a round or two, I might pivot to them — but I'm probably going to focus on my RB/WR building in the early rounds. After that, I'm thinking about upside and probably looking to draft two QBs who could easily jump a tier if things break right. It's common for me to be the last to enter the QB mix, but early to take that second option. The 2025 Fantasy QB Board (consider the top five to be in their own tier) 1. Lamar Jackson 2. Josh Allen 3. Jayden Daniels 4. Jalen Hurts 5. Joe Burrow 6. Patrick Mahomes 7. Bo Nix 8. Justin Fields 9. Jared Goff 10. Brock Purdy 11. Dak Prescott 12. Baker Mayfield 13. Jordan Love 14. Justin Herbert 15. Caleb Williams 16. Drake Maye 17. Kyler Murray 18. C.J. Stroud 19. Trevor Lawrence 20. J.J. McCarthy 21. Matthew Stafford 22. Bryce Young 23. Michael Penix Jr. 24. Geno Smith 25. Tua Tagovailoa 26. Aaron Rodgers 27. Sam Darnold 28. Cam Ward 29. Russell Wilson 30. Anthony Richardson 31. Daniel Jones 32. Joe Flacco 33. Tyler Shough 34. Jaxson Dart 35. Spencer Rattler Some 2025 QB Targets Dak Prescott, Cowboys: I know new OC Brian Schottenheimer never met a running play he didn't want to dial up, but the 2025 Cowboys might not allow him to play things that way. The Cowboys have uncertainty at the running back position and a ton of holes on defense, with or without Micah Parsons. I could easily see Dallas turn into one of the carnival teams of the year, with Prescott asked to carry the load on a weekly basis. The WR room gets a boost with George Pickens arriving, and Jake Ferguson's production generally spikes when Prescott is available. Don't forget Prescott has QB2, QB3, QB6 and QB7 seasons on his resume — and he was a legitimate MVP candidate just two years ago. Drake Maye, Patriots: It was miraculous that Maye kept his head above water with very little help last year. Now, the entire room has been repainted. Mike Vrabel is obviously a step up at head coach, and don't sleep on the Josh McDaniels rehiring — McDaniels has failed as a head coach but has an excellent resume as a play-designer. The leaky offensive line has been improved and the skill talent is better around Maye. And the second-year QB has sneaky athleticism and resourcefulness, with the potential to run for 500 yards or so. New England was a lousy four-win team last year; it looks poised to be a legitimate playoff contender this season (its win total is set at 8.5, a healthy jump from last year). So many arrows are pointing upward here. Justin Fields, Jets: He can be erratic as a passer and his sack avoidance must improve, but at least Fields is finally on a team that will leave him alone. Tyrod Taylor is a veteran backup, not a threat to the starting job. Fields isn't throwing to a deep WR room, but he did spend two years in college with Garrett Wilson — that matters. And if Fields can stay healthy for a full season, he's likely to run for 1,000 yards. Shrewd fantasy managers need to mind the gap between real-life and fantasy values, and Fields is the signature player for that concept this year. Some 2025 QB Fades Kyler Murray, Cardinals: His running comes and goes, probably depending on how his body feels at the time. He's struggled to execute in the red zone, likely tied to Murray's substandard height at the position. Well, guess what, gamers, Murray isn't getting any bigger. When I see Trey McBride and Marvin Harrison Jr. commanding high draft picks, I suspect it's tied to the idea that Murray will get better or the Cardinals will have a better sense of how to call plays for this offense. That all feels like wish-casting to me. Baker Mayfield, Buccaneers: History tells us to be suspicious when somebody has a career year deep into their NFL run. That's the situation with Mayfield, who put things together in his age-29 season. Mayfield even spiked his rushing stats, something nobody saw coming. But now Mayfield has to do it without offensive wizard Liam Cohen; Mike Evans is in his 30s; and we don't know when Chris Godwin is going to be ready to play. There's a lot of moving parts here. Even with the addition of classy rookie Emeka Egbuka, Mayfield probably gives back a lot of his juicy stats from last season. Some 2025 QB Sleepers Trevor Lawrence, Jaguars: The Lawrence nickname is on Football Reference for everyone to see: 'The Prince Who Was Promised.' Is this the year the fairy tale actually happens? Lawrence has dealt with dated coaching for most of his pro career — Doug Pederson didn't help much and Urban Meyer was a disaster. Now Liam Coen comes to town, fresh off orchestrating Baker Mayfield's glorious career year. The Jaguars should have impact players downfield, with sophomore hotshot Brian Thomas Jr. now joined by college star Travis Hunter. As disappointing as Lawrence's career has felt at times, he does have QB7 and QB12 finishes on his resume. Maybe Coen can helm him back into that lofty area. Michael Penix Jr., Falcons: Although Atlanta was a losing team last year, it wasn't the offense's fault — the Falcons were sixth in yards and 13th in points. And the arrow is likely pointed up with Penix taking over for Kirk Cousins, a limited veteran who couldn't run the entire playbook. Penix is tied to an indoor-heavy schedule, good skill talent and an Atlanta defense likely to be below average. The 2025 Falcons definitely have some carnival potential.
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Team owner predicts van Gisbergen will make a deep run in NASCAR playoffs
Labeling statistics as 'kind of an American thing,' Shane van Gisbergen avoids dwelling on his record-setting rookie season in the NASCAR Cup Series. 'It normally hits me on the plane ride home or at 4 a.m. after a few beers,' van Gisbergen said Sunday after conquering the Watkins Glen International road course in New York for his fourth victory this year. 'I try to reflect on it, but I also try and get to the next week pretty quick. I'll try not to tweet at 4 a.m. this morning.' If the laid-back Kiwi were into chest-pounding on social media, the list of heady accomplishments includes being the third driver with four consecutive Cup wins on road or street courses, joining 2020 champion Chase Elliott and NASCAR Hall of Famer Jeff Gordon. It also includes being the first rookie with four victories — breaking a tie with seven-time champion Jimmie Johnson and three-time champion Tony Stewart — and the largest margin of victory (11.116 seconds) in Watkins Glen history and second largest this season behind his 16.567-second win at Mexico City that was the biggest gap from first to second since 2009. The next achievement could be the loftiest yet for the driver from Auckland, New Zealand, who struggles massively on the ovals that comprise most of the season. Can van Gisbergen be a legitimate championship contender in Year 1? Trackhouse Racing owner Justin Marks, who put his reputation on the line and convinced sponsors to risk millions on an audacious plan to make the Cup playoffs with an inexperienced and unheralded rookie, suggests a deep run awaits the No. 88 Chevrolet. 'Shane just continues to go showcase why we've made a long-term commitment to him, why we brought him over here from New Zealand and built this team around him,' said Marks, who signed van Gisbergen to a multiyear extension last week. 'Because in a sport like this where winning is so important and so hard to do, if you can catch some lightning in a bottle like we've got with SVG, you've got to really lean into it. That's what we've done. It's like seeing a plan come together.' The plan now has a path to the doorstep of a Cup title. The first round of 16 drivers is contested on three ovals, but van Gisbergen has a sizable 22-point cushion (victories are worth five points apiece for the playoffs) to overcome a 26.9 average finish on ovals. Pared down to 12 drivers, the second round features a road course at Charlotte Motor Speedway. A win there would catapult a driver into the third round, where eight drivers will square off for four berths in the championship finale at Phoenix Raceway. 'He's in a really good position,' Marks said. 'I think we have a real opportunity to get to the Round of 8.' The playoffs open at tricky Darlington Raceway, whose odd shape is among the most difficult layouts in NASCAR, but van Gisbergen is more concerned about the first-round cutoff race at Bristol Motor Speedway. He finished 38th in his April 13 debut on the Tennessee short track. 'I ran terrible there,' said van Gisbergen, who finished 20th a week earlier at Darlington. 'Bristol was so far from anything I've ever done, and that's a really tough place. That's probably the biggest worry. Darlington, I feel fine, especially now that we have a lot of points. You've just got to have three solid weeks, and you might get through. We just have to play the averages, make no mistakes and make sure we're in a good spot every week.' Zilisch future After pulling Connor Zilisch from the Cup race at Watkins Glen, Marks said it's unclear when the Xfinity Series points leader will return from the broken collarbone he suffered while celebrating his series-high sixth victory Saturday. With approval from NASCAR, Zilisch could skip the final three regular-season races and still be eligible for the Xfinity playoffs. 'He's a huge asset and a huge part of the future of the business,' Marks said. 'We have to make sure that we're not hurting any long-term opportunities by taking advantage of a short-term opportunity.' Having raced with a broken collarbone in 2021, van Gisbergen believes Zilisch could return for the Aug. 22 race at Daytona International Speedway. 'I had a weekend off and raced the next week, so pretty much what he's going to go through,' van Gisbergen said. 'I'd get a plate put in and then take it out at the end of the year. It's obviously going to be in pain. My biggest problem was tightening the belts. I could really feel the plate through the skin, and it was a horrible feeling. But I raced the next week and did pretty well. For sure with some good doctors and some good drugs, he'll get through the race fine.' Impressing the boss With team owner Michael Jordan in attendance, Bubba Wallace finished eighth at Watkins Glen (a spot ahead of 23XI Racing teammate Tyler Reddick) for a season-best fourth consecutive top 10. The stretch includes the Brickyard 400 victory that qualified Wallace for the playoffs and relieved enormous pressure from the No. 23 Toyota driver. 'Indy was life-changing,' Wallace said. 'It allowed me to not harp on all of the mistakes that I usually make at a road course. The big boss was here, so it's good to get MJ a couple of top 10s.' ___ AP auto racing:
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Oilers' Connor McDavid expected to sign shorter-term contract
Oilers' Connor McDavid expected to sign shorter-term contract originally appeared on The Sporting News The next chapter in the Connor McDavid/Edmonton Oilers marriage approaches. According to the '2 Mutts Hockey Podcast," they believe McDavid will sign either a two-year or four-year deal, as the Oilers do not expect him to sign for the full eight years. There is also speculation that the annual average value could rise from $16 million to around $17.5 million. While Edmonton wants McDavid donning its sweater for life, this is not necessarily a bad alternative. The pressure is on the front office to win now while the Oilers remain one of the top teams in the league. No, they are not quite on the Florida Panthers' level, and the two-time defending champions brought everyone back for another run at the Cup. However, reaching four straight Finals is difficult, and while Edmonton winning the Western Conference for a third year in a row is no cakewalk, either, there are just no guarantees that time of year. McDavid on a shorter-term contract means the front office has to continue pushing its chips into the pile and surrounding him with winners. Goaltending is still an issue, and giving out all that money to McDavid, Leon Draisaitl, Evan Bouchard, and Darnell Nurse creates depth difficulties. However, the Oilers did add rookies Isaac Howard and Matthew Savoie up front, both of whom can be impact scorers in their first years. Andrew Mangiapane is no slouch in a middle or bottom-six role. A healthy Zach Hyman is crucial, too. Expect Edmonton to stay aggressive with trades and be one of the big buyers at next season's deadline.