Foreign investors pump $2.5 billion into Korean stocks in July
According to Yonhap news agency, offshore investors bought a net 3.41 trillion won (US$2.46 billion) worth of local stocks last month, following a net purchase of 3.07 trillion won the previous month, according to the data from the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS).
Foreigners had been net sellers of Korean stocks for nine consecutive months through April, but turned to net buying in May.
Following their purchase in July, offshore investors owned 921.6 trillion won worth of local stocks, or 27.7 percent of total market capitalisation.
By country, investors from the United States were the top buyers, net purchasing 2.48 trillion won worth of shares, followed by those from Ireland with 765 billion won, according to the data.
In the local bond market, foreign investors purchased a net 3 trillion won worth of bonds last month, marking the sixth consecutive month of net buying.
Their holdings of local bonds had come to 307.7 trillion won as of end-July, accounting for 11.4 percent of listed bonds here, the data showed.
In July, the benchmark Korea Composite Stock Price Index (KOSPI) rose more than 6 percent, hitting a yearly high of 3,254.47 on July 30.
WAM
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gulf Today
an hour ago
- Gulf Today
Pakistan-US trade surplus tops $4b
Pakistan's annual trade surplus with the United States has exceeded $4 billion, with bilateral trade between the two countries recording a 16 per cent increase, according to official documents. The data shows that during the last fiscal year, the total volume of Pakistan-US trade reached 7.598 billion dollars. Pakistan's exports to the US stood at 5.83 billion dollars, marking a 10 per cent rise compared to the previous year. Key export items included bedwear, table, toilet, and kitchen products worth 1.038 billion dollars; men's suits, jackets, and trousers valued at 936 million dollars; ready-made garments and dress patterns worth 386 million dollars; T-shirts worth 361 million dollars; jerseys and pullovers valued at 312 million dollars; socks worth 278 million dollars; leather goods worth 165 million dollars; and women's apparel worth 157 million dollars. On the import side, Pakistan purchased goods from the US worth 1.763 billion dollars during the fiscal year, a 40 percent increase from the previous year. The top imported item was cotton, worth 393 million dollars, followed by iron and steel scrap worth 160 million dollars, soybeans worth 137 million dollars, and coal worth 56 million dollars. Other significant imports included turbojets and gas turbines worth 50 million dollars, computer machines worth 40 million dollars, petroleum oil worth 38 million dollars, electromedical equipment worth 36 million dollars, and dried fruits worth 33 million dollars. Earlier, Pakistan's economy recorded a growth rate of 2.7% during the fiscal year 2024-25, exceeding earlier projections, according to the latest report issued by the Asian Development Bank (ADB), titled Asian Development Outlook - July 2025. The report described the country's economic performance as encouraging, attributing the improvement in macroeconomic stability to a steady decline in inflation and lower prices of essential commodities. Agencies
The National
4 hours ago
- The National
Trump has weaponised tariffs against friends and enemies
US President Donald Trump appears to be succeeding in coercing allies, partners and adversaries alike to rethink their traditional policies and comply with his administration over thorny issues. Russia and the US have agreed for their two leaders to meet next week – a move seen by Mr Trump's team as payoff for its sanctions threat if Moscow doesn't comply with its deadline to cease military operations against Ukraine. A US partner, India, is in a dilemma after Mr Trump announced plans to double tariffs on Indian exports to the US to 50 per cent if New Delhi continues to purchase Russian oil, despite western sanctions imposed on Moscow over its war in Ukraine. Brazil has also faced its share of weaponised US tariffs after Mr Trump expressed dissatisfaction with the prosecution of former president Jair Bolsonaro – a Trump ally who is accused of orchestrating a failed coup against the current establishment in Brasilia. Meanwhile, Iran is preparing for possible US sanctions aimed at encircling it with measures targeting China, and most likely, renewed military action to thwart any attempts to revive its nuclear programme. So the question now is: who has adapted to Mr Trump's threats, who has defied them, and who has buried its head in the sand? Even as Mr Trump is scheduled to meet Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday, the two countries' stands on Ukraine remain far apart. At best, an agreement could be reached to cease military operations and initiate peace talks between Moscow and Kyiv. The sanctions Mr Trump has threatened to impose on Russia – failing to agree to a ceasefire – could be far-reaching, perhaps amounting to a financial blockade. Oil sanctions have a significant impact on Russia, yet imposing sanctions on banks dealing with the country would mean that these banks will no longer be able to pay Moscow its oil revenues. This may have contributed to Russia reconsidering its position. India receives about 40 per cent of its oil imports from Russia, and along with China, the two Asian countries account for about 80 per cent of Russian oil exports. While China may find ways to circumvent US financial sanctions to continue purchasing Russian oil, India has begun to consider the possibility of halting or reducing oil imports from Russia. This would be a blow to the Russian economy, particularly since oil exports have dropped since the start of the year. India won't be able to replace its Russian oil imports with Iranian oil, since Tehran is also under western sanctions. Hence, the most probable alternative source will be the Gulf states. Imposing a 50 per cent tariff on all Indian exports to the US, on par with Chinese goods, means that Mr Trump makes few distinctions between friends and foes when it comes to his policies. The new tariffs on goods from dozens of countries came into effect on Thursday, signalling the US President's resolve to reshape global trade. Washington's position is that trade exchanges between the US and other countries have been unfair and needed rebalancing, and it's in no mood to compromise with other countries. Like with Russia, the US President has been inclined to turn the screws on Iran, too. He has given Tehran a deadline until the end of August to agree to a new nuclear deal with Washington. Bear in mind that Iran's leaders have categorically refused to compromise on their doctrine of projecting power using nuclear weapons, ballistic missiles and armed proxies. Iran has doubled down on its support for Hezbollah's right to retain arms in Lebanon. So far, the Trump administration hasn't imposed sanctions on Tehran for its intervention in sovereign countries; the latter's regional behaviour has so far remained outside the scope of the talks between Washington and Tehran. But this could change soon, not only because Iran is exposing itself by preventing Beirut from reclaiming its sovereignty, but also because it has been using its regional cards – including Hezbollah's influence in Lebanon – as bargaining chips in its negotiations with the US. However, the Lebanese Cabinet's recent decision to disarm Hezbollah was bold, pioneering and wise. In doing so, President Joseph Aoun, Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, and perhaps to some extent Speaker of Parliament Nabih Berri, may have taken a decisive step towards reclaiming the state's sovereignty. This could explain why Israel hasn't gone all out in its most recent assault on Hezbollah. It might limit its actions to targeting the group's leadership and structure – if the latter continues to refuse to hand over its weapons to the state – rather than waging an all-out war spreading across Lebanon. Circling back to the Trump tariffs, it is noteworthy that the one country the US President hasn't issued punitive measures against is Israel, despite his periodic statements seeking an end to the war in Gaza. The tragedy of Gaza is that it has been a victim of players who view it through veils that obscure the full picture. Mr Trump does disservice to his own legacy when he pretends that merely providing food after Israel has used starvation as a weapon against innocents is sufficient. He does disservice to his own vision for securing a Middle Eastern 'Deal of the Century' through his blind allegiance to Israel's rejection of a Palestinian state. For its part, the Israeli government appears to no longer care about the remaining hostages in Hamas's custody. It seems ready to withdraw this leverage from the group at any cost, with new measures – including, perhaps, a reoccupation of Gaza. Mr Trump still views Israel's actions as a response to the horrific Hamas-led assault on October 7, 2023. He is, therefore, unlikely to ever impose sanctions on, or seek accountability from, Israel – no matter what crimes it commits in Gaza.
Arabian Post
9 hours ago
- Arabian Post
Oil Prices Plunge Amid US Tariffs and Ukraine Tensions
Oil prices ended the week with significant losses, influenced by the latest round of US tariffs and the mounting anticipation surrounding US-Russia discussions on a ceasefire for the ongoing Ukraine conflict. Both major oil benchmarks, Brent and West Texas Intermediate, saw considerable weekly declines, with Brent recording a 4.4 per cent drop and WTI losing over 5 per cent. On Friday, Brent crude, which represents the global benchmark for oil, closed at $66.59 per barrel, marking a modest 0.24 per cent increase from the previous day's session. Meanwhile, WTI, the gauge tracking US crude, was essentially unchanged, remaining at $63.88 per barrel. Despite the small uptick on Friday, both crude prices experienced a sharp weekly decline. The primary catalyst behind the fall was the imposition of new tariffs by the US on Chinese imports, which are likely to further strain global economic relations. This move has exacerbated concerns about potential disruptions in oil demand, especially as growth projections for key economies face downward revisions. Additionally, traders and analysts have been closely monitoring the possibility of a breakthrough in the US-Russia negotiations on a ceasefire in the Ukraine conflict, which could drastically alter oil supply dynamics. ADVERTISEMENT The market's response was swift, with oil prices responding to the broader economic uncertainty generated by geopolitical tensions. Analysts highlighted that any potential peace settlement would alter the existing energy supply structure, especially in relation to Russia, a major player in global oil production and exportation. Compounding these concerns, oil's performance has been lacklustre year-to-date, with both Brent and WTI benchmarks down nearly 11 per cent. The drop in oil prices since the beginning of the year underscores the heightened volatility in global energy markets, driven by ongoing geopolitical risks, shifting demand patterns, and unpredictable macroeconomic conditions. The evolving geopolitical landscape has left traders in a state of heightened caution. In particular, the US's evolving foreign policy on Russia, especially its stance on the conflict in Ukraine, has been central to oil market fluctuations. The possibility of a ceasefire agreement could lead to an influx of Russian oil back into global markets, which would add further pressure on already struggling crude prices. Economic forecasts point to a weakening global demand for oil. The International Monetary Fund has adjusted its global growth outlook downward, partially due to the global trade disruptions caused by tariffs and ongoing political tensions. These issues have raised doubts about the sustainability of oil prices in the short term, despite a minor rebound on Friday. The potential for a resolution in the Russia-Ukraine conflict has raised complex questions for the energy sector. While a ceasefire could reduce the supply disruptions caused by the war, the global oil market has become accustomed to Russian oil being partially sidelined due to sanctions. Reintegrating Russian oil into the market would present a series of challenges, with uncertainty about how quickly the market could absorb the additional supply. Market sentiment has also been influenced by concerns over inflation and its broader economic implications. Oil prices, historically sensitive to inflationary pressures, have been under intense scrutiny as central banks, particularly in developed economies, work to balance interest rate hikes and the risk of economic slowdown. Rising interest rates in major economies have dampened demand for oil, as higher borrowing costs stifle investment and consumer spending. As the US continues to implement tariffs on imports from China, global trade is expected to remain under pressure, further weighing on economic growth and, by extension, the demand for oil. While some countries in the Asia-Pacific region may face challenges in accessing cheaper oil supplies, others, such as India, have been able to tap into the dip in prices to stockpile reserves. However, the long-term effect of such price fluctuations remains unclear, especially as the global oil market remains tethered to the broader economic climate.
