Opinion: Divided by faith — but still united as parents
We know this because we see it every day in our therapy practices.
We're colleagues and friends from different faith backgrounds — one of us is Jewish, the other a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. As therapists specializing in divorce and co-parenting, we've worked with hundreds of Utah families and seen how religious divides can either deepen conflict or invite growth.
In Utah, where faith often plays a central role in family life, it's not uncommon for one parent to remain active in their religion while the other leaves the tradition — or embraces a new one. When this happens, both parents often feel fear: fear that their child won't share their values, or that the other parent will influence them in ways they can't control.
But here's what we've learned: it is possible to co-parent well across religious differences. Doing so requires three things — clarity, compassion and commitment.
We encourage co-parents to stay grounded in their core values, while staying flexible about how those values are expressed across two households. A key part of this is distinguishing between exposure to different beliefs and indoctrination. Children are more perceptive than we sometimes give them credit for. They can understand that people see the world differently, and they can learn to navigate those differences if they feel emotionally safe.
Rather than seeing every disagreement as a battle, look for shared values — like honesty, kindness, respect, service or caring for one's body. When parents can identify and affirm what they agree on, it becomes easier to manage what they don't.
It's normal to worry about your co-parent's influence. But children are shaped over time by many factors — not just by what happens at one parent's house. Attempts to control what your child is exposed to often backfire, making your own values seem rigid or fearful. A more effective approach is to live your values authentically, and trust that your child will be shaped by love, not pressure.
You don't have to agree with your co-parent's faith — or lack of it — to treat it with respect. What matters most is how you talk about it in front of your child. Kids are always listening. When they hear parents speak about each other with respect, even in disagreement, they tend to feel more secure and confident in forming their own beliefs.
Compassion doesn't mean staying silent. It means expressing your values without attacking the values of others. It's the difference between saying, 'I don't want you being brainwashed,' and, 'We believe different things, and I trust you to ask thoughtful questions as you grow.'
Even when religious paths diverge, effective co-parents find common ground in the bigger picture: raising children who are kind, capable and resilient. You might disagree on the 'how,' but agreeing on the 'why' can be a powerful starting point.
When parents agree on the values they want to instill, the conversation shifts from control to collaboration. And when that feels impossible, a neutral mental health professional — such as a therapist trained in divorce and co-parenting — can help identify what's getting in the way, offer strategies and support you in moving forward.
We know this isn't easy. Co-parenting across religious differences isn't a theoretical exercise — it's deeply personal. It can stir up old wounds, grief, fears and the strong desire to protect your child's spiritual well-being.
But time and again, we've seen what's possible when parents keep their focus on their child — not just in words, but in actions. Kids can grow up between two homes, with two belief systems, and still feel whole. They can learn that love doesn't require agreement. That faith can look different from one house to another. That they are free to ask questions and explore. And most importantly, that they are deeply loved by both parents.
So whether you're divorcing or staying in your marriage but feeling the strain of religious differences, know this: your child doesn't have to grow up caught in the middle. Support is available. With the right mindset and guidance, it's possible to turn conflict into collaboration — and raise strong, thoughtful, resilient kids, even when you and your co-parent see the world differently.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Miami Herald
8 hours ago
- Miami Herald
81 years ago, they turned Anne Frank in. Would we save her today?
Monday marked the 81st anniversary of the day Anne Frank, her family and four others were discovered in 1944 by the Nazis after two years of hiding in a living area concealed by a bookcase in a secret annex in an Amsterdam company building. An informant had turned in the German-Jewish group to the Gestapo, ending their attempt to escape the concentration camps, where they were eventually taken and died, including 15-year-old Anne. Only Anne's father, Otto Frank, survived. After the war, he found his daughter's diary — the journal she'd kept during their time in hiding, where she revealed her views of life, family and personal growth. He edited it and published it. The book became an international sensation, a Hollywood movie and one of the world's most powerful documents against the Holocaust. For generations, 'Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl' was required reading in American schools. You didn't have to identify with the angst of a teenage girl to be moved by her words. What stayed with most of us was her heartbreaking optimism: 'I still believe, in spite of everything, that people are truly good at heart,' she wrote. As we remember Anne Frank, it's worth asking: Could there be an Anne Frank in our time? And if so, how would we respond? I think the short answer is 'yes'— there are Anne Franks today. Young people trapped in war zones, fleeing persecution, and hiding from armed regimes still exist. Some are in basements in Gaza. Others shelter in Ukraine or cross borders from Syria, Sudan or Myanmar. Some even hide within U.S. borders — from detention and deportation. Frank's dad tried to escape with his family to the U.S., Great Britain and even Cuba, with no luck. The Nazis had in many cases stripped Jews of their German citizenship, leaving them as people without a country. Who would take them in? It's a situation that rings true today, in light of the Trump administration's war on undocumented immigrants and their removal from the U.S. Their stories may not be written in ink on checkered paper, but they are out there — shared in text messages, Instagram reels or TikTok videos. We live with flowery, girlish handwriting in a world saturated with information. I think today the musings of a thoughtful teenage girl would be considered 'blogging' from her hiding place that might briefly go viral, attract some sympathy, and then vanish into the algorithm's rearview mirror. Would we rescue her? Or would she become just another political flashpoint — debated, doubted as fake and dismissed depending on where she came from, how she looked? Anne Frank's diary became a symbol of human resilience not just because of her words, but because the world paused long enough to listen. In the postwar quiet, reflection was possible, some observers say. I visited the Anne Frank House in Amsterdam 10 years ago. The line to enter to see where the teen and her family and friends had hidden for two long years stretched around the block. The hiding place where the group lived felt claustrophobic. I could not have done it without a television, a radio and my cell phone. I suspect the Anne Franks of our era may be met with hashtags, temporary outrage, or even conspiracy theories. We are quicker to judge than to listen, and in doing so, we often overlook the very humanity Anne preserved in her pages. The lesson today isn't to deify Anne Frank, but to recognize her in others, as many who championed her after the war tried to do. Would we believe her if she were writing now? Would we repost her videos? Advocate for her safety? Or would we scroll past her TikTok story? Luisa Yanez is a member of the Miami Herald Editorial Board.


Boston Globe
7 days ago
- Boston Globe
A day of mourning in a time of fear
Other disasters have coincided with the 9th of Av. That was when the No date in the long annals of the Jews is so drenched in grief. For more than 2,000 years, observant Jews have marked the day by abstaining from food and drink for 25 hours. In synagogues worldwide, families will begin the fast at nightfall Saturday by sitting on the floor and reading the biblical Advertisement In a sense, Tisha B'Av encapsulates in a calendar date all the pain and loss that have been inflicted on the Jewish people through the generations by those who hate them. That hatred has ebbed and flowed, but it has never vanished. There Advertisement Tisha B'Av arrives this year as American Jews confront an inescapable and chilling reality: Antisemitism in the United States has surged to levels unseen since before World War II. The threat has been Advertisement Here in Massachusetts, anti‑Jewish hate crimes A In response to these attacks, the ADL commissioned a national survey. Its report stressed that a majority of Americans regard antisemitic hatred as a serious issue and oppose violence against Jews. But between the lines, the survey's findings were horrifying. Asked about the violent attacks in Washington and Colorado, as well as the torching of Shapiro's home, 13 percent of respondents said that such acts were 'justified,' 15 percent believed they were 'necessary,' 22 percent did not consider them antisemitic, and an astonishing 24 percent — nearly 1 in 4 respondents — pronounced the attacks 'understandable.' Advertisement These are no longer fringe views. Raw, antisemitic bigotry is Young people acquire their opinions from multiple sources, of course. But at least some of this animus against Jews has been As Tisha B'Av approaches, more than Advertisement For anyone born after 1945, this normalizing of Jew-hatred in the United States represents a chilling reversal. The Cold War era's moral taboo against antisemitism — bolstered by the revelation of Nazi Germany's genocide, and by the success of the Civil Rights and Soviet Jewry movements — used to render overt Jew‑hatred unthinkable in mainstream America. Now that taboo is shredding. Ours has become a society in which antisemitic venom — As a Jew, and as the son of an Auschwitz survivor, I find all this darkly ominous. So do many Jewish Americans I know. Yet with few exceptions, most of my non-Jewish friends and acquaintances don't seem to understand how frightening it is for Jews to sense history beginning to repeat itself — or how exposed, isolated, and endangered many Jews now feel. It has been pointed out often that the Advertisement That isn't merely a historical observation. It reflects a pattern first articulated in the earliest pages of the Bible. As an Orthodox Jew, I believe in the continuing validity of the promise God made to Abraham in Benjamin Disraeli, who twice served as Britain's prime minister, distilled the biblical pledge into an axiom of statecraft: 'The Lord deals with the nations as the nations deal with the Jews.' Winston Churchill agreed and on multiple occasions quoted his predecessor's maxim. 'We must admit,' More than 80 years later, the renowned journalist and historian Paul Johnson developed the point in It happened to Spain after it expelled the Jews in the 1490s, to France in the wake of the Dreyfus affair, and to Czarist Russia following the wave of antisemitic pogroms in the late 19th century. Germany's descent into genocidal madness led to cataclysmic military defeat in 1945 and brought on 40 years of communist dictatorship in the eastern third of the country. And the antisemitic obsessions of the Arab world over the past century have kept it mired in economic and cultural backwardness, when it could have become 'by far the richest portion of the earth's surface.' Conversely, nations that extended protection and freedom to their Jewish citizens have invariably flourished. Cyrus the Great of Persia liberated the Jews from captivity, and went on to rule the largest empire the world had seen to that time. The Ottoman sultans who welcomed Jewish exiles from Spain presided over a multicultural dominion that thrived for centuries. Above all, the United States — where Jews enjoyed freedom, opportunity, and safety they had never before known in their long Diaspora — grew into the wealthiest, strongest, and most important nation on the globe. Jewish Americans, making the most of the liberty and equality afforded them, became scientists and doctors, entrepreneurs and entertainers, retail innovators and writers, judges and educators. America's ascent to global preeminence was inseparable from its treatment of Jews as full citizens. 'I will bless those who bless you, and those who curse you I will curse,' God said at the dawn of Jewish history, and history has repeatedly confirmed it. But the ancient promise — or, if you like, Paul Johnson's 'historical law' — is also a reminder and a warning to the American nation. Unchecked antisemitism is not merely a Jewish problem. It is an infection in America's soul and a threat to its future. George Washington, in his famous That vision animated America's founding promise and it helped shape the nation's greatness. But today, nearly 235 years after Washington wrote those words, the children of the stock of Abraham are afraid. If that fear is allowed to deepen and spread, the cost will not fall on Jews alone. Tisha B'Av is a day of mourning for the Jewish people — but it ought to be a moment of reckoning for all Americans. To drive out the virus of antisemitism, to ensure that Jews can live in safety and dignity, is not only to defend a beleaguered minority. It is to recommit to the very ideals that made the United States a light among nations. America has been blessed because it blessed its Jews. May it never learn what happens when it stops doing so. This article is adapted from the current , Jeff Jacoby's weekly newsletter. To subscribe to Arguable, visit . Jeff Jacoby can be reached at


New York Post
28-07-2025
- New York Post
Starving Palestinians swarm aid trucks in Gaza — as Israel announces daily pause in fighting
Harrowing video captured hundreds of desperate Palestinians swarming aid trucks in Gaza over the weekend — as Israel announced a daily halt in fighting across parts of the enclave so humanitarian supplies can be airdropped in. The grim footage, shot by a reporter on the ground, captured scores of people clamoring on top of two moving trucks in southern Gaza on Saturday, just days after images of starving Palestinian children alarmed the world. As the trucks inched by, hundreds of people on the ground could be seen shoving each other as they tried to rush towards the vehicles, the clip shows. Advertisement The wild scenes came as Israel announced Sunday that its military would pause operations in Gaza City, Deir al-Balah and Muwasi for 10 hours a day — between 10 a.m. to 8 p.m. — to allow for the improved flow of aid into the region. 5 Hundreds of desperate Palestinians swarmed aid trucks in Gaza over the weekend. MOHAMMED SABER/EPA/Shutterstock Israel's military said designated secure routes, or humanitarian corridors, would also be established between 6 a.m. and 11 p.m. from Sunday to allow the United Nations to disperse food and medicine in Gaza. Advertisement United Nations aid chief Tom Fletcher said some movement restrictions already appeared to ease by Sunday after the Jewish state decided to 'support a one-week scale-up of aid.' Initial reports indicated that more than 100 truckloads of aid had already been collected from crossings to be transported into Gaza, according to Fletcher. 'This is progress, but vast amounts of aid are needed to stave off famine and a catastrophic health crisis,' Fletcher said. 5 Harrowing images showed people clamoring on top of moving trucks in parts of Gaza on Saturday. Xinhua/Shutterstock Advertisement 5 People could be seen carrying sacks of supplies as the trucks moved through. MOHAMMED SABER/EPA/Shutterstock Meanwhile, Jordan and the United Arab Emirates parachuted 25 tons of aid into Gaza on Sunday, a Jordanian official said. Aid agencies have welcomed Israel's new measures, but warned they weren't enough to counter the rising hunger in the Palestinian territory. The measures come after photos of malnourished kids sparked global concern late last week — including from Israel's close allies. Advertisement President Trump, who described the portraits of emaciated children in Gaza as 'terrible', vowed Monday to send more US aid to the war-torn enclave. 5 As the trucks inched by, hundreds of people on the ground could be seen shoving each other as they tried to rush towards the vehicles. MOHAMMED SABER/EPA/Shutterstock 'If we weren't there. I think people would have starved frankly,' Trump said. 'They would have starved and it's not like they're eating well.' He added that the United States had already provided $60 million for humanitarian aid but that other nations would have to step up, too. 'We're giving a lot of money and a lot of food, and other nations are now stepping up,' Trump said. 'It's a mess. They have to get food and safety right now.' Trump claimed he'd received blowback from some of his supporters but stressed he decided to send aid to Gaza anyway because there is 'a humanitarian reason for doing it.' 'Will I do more aid, yeah,' Trump said when asked about sending additional resources. 'The US is going to do more aid for Gaza but we would like to have other countries participate.' Advertisement 5 The wild scenes came as Israel announced Sunday that its military would pause operations in Gaza City, Deir al-Balah and Muwasi for 10 hours a day. AFP via Getty Images The Gaza Health Ministry said dozens have died of malnutrition in recent weeks — including at least 14 new fatalities in the 24 hours leading into Monday. In total, 147 have died of malnutrition and hunger since the war began in 2023, including 89 children, according to the health ministry. Israel has blamed Hamas for the current humanitarian crisis gripping the region, arguing the terror group has disrupted food distribution. Advertisement 'Israel is presented as though we are applying a campaign of starvation in Gaza,' Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in the wake of the recent backlash. 'What a bald-faced lie. There is no policy of starvation in Gaza, and there is no starvation in Gaza.' With Post wires