Oklahoma is a ‘blueprint' for biotechnology partnerships, federal commission says
OKLAHOMA CITY — Oklahoma is a 'blueprint' for Washington, D.C. of how to implement public-private partnerships in biotechnology, said a federal official who has been tasked with reviewing advancements in the industry.
Michelle Rozo, vice chair of the National Security Commission on Emerging Biotechnology, said Oklahoma stands out from other states because of the collaboration between industries and the public-private partnerships in the state.
The Commission, which was established by Congress to advance the United States' leadership in biotechnology, is traveling across the country to discuss how states are advancing biotechnology and understand how the group can best implement its recommendations.
The main recommendation, Rozo said, is to maintain public-private partnerships in the biotechnology industry.
'I like to say we're beginning to be able to program biology like we program computers, but the outcomes are going to have much more of a wide- reaching effect,' Rozo said. ''When you program computers, you just get ones and zeros out. When you program biology, you get medicines, you get food, you get materials, you get treatments. … The limits almost do not exist.'
Rozo was joined by a handful of other commissioners, including Republican U.S. Rep. Stephanie Bice, during a stop in Oklahoma City on Tuesday as part of a nationwide roadshow to discuss how biotechnology advancements could shape national defense. The Commission provides recommendations about the intersection of national security and biotechnology, which uses biology or living organisms to develop new products and technologies or improve existing ones.
The commission in April offered Congress a series of recommendations.
Representatives from Oklahoma State University, the University of Oklahoma and the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation spoke about the importance of higher education in pushing innovation in biotechnology forward. Research at these institutions ranges from food security and supply chain resiliency to developing medical treatments and devices.
The commission also heard from state leaders about strategies to create hands-on learning opportunities and address gaps in the workforce.
The greatest need is more talent and researchers in Oklahoma to push for innovation, but it can be difficult to draw them when most research dollars go to institutions on the East and West Coasts, officials said.
When asked about federal cuts to research grants and higher education, Bice said Congress 'isn't interested' in huge cuts to research.
'We recognize that research at large, whether it is through organizations like OMRF or organizations like OU and OSU that are doing really innovative things, is important,' Bice said. 'And we'll continue to invest in those things moving forward.'
Since President Donald Trump took office in January, his administration has proposed cutting over $1 billion from the National Institutes of Health, which conducts and supports medical research. Some of the proposals have faced legal challenges.
Bice said the commission is on the road to highlight the importance of biotechnology and address the role Oklahoma can play in addressing challenges the U.S. faces in national security.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
13 minutes ago
- Fox News
‘Tired of Democracy dying': Gavin Newsom redistricting push facing possible lawsuit
California Republican Assemblywoman Alexandra Macedo is threatening to sue over Governor Gavin Newsom's redistricting push, which she says is 'disenfranchising Californians.' (Office of Assemblywoman Alexandra Macedo)
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Legislative committees advance CA redistricting legislation
(The Center Square) — Legislators, taxpayers and others debated passionately Tuesday for several hours as Democratic-led election committees in the California Assembly and Senate advanced congressional redistricting legislation. The bills making up the Election Rigging Response Act received support from the Democratic majorities in the Senate Elections and Constitutional Amendments Committee and the Assembly Elections Committee. Ultimately they're expected to land on the floors of the Assembly and Senate on Thursday. They're backed by the Democratic supermajorities in both houses, as well as by Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom. With their passage certain, the legislation will mean voters on a Nov. 4 special election will decide whether to revise boundaries for congressional districts in response to redistricting in Republican-led states such as Texas. But the Republican minority in the Legislature scored what they called an early victory Monday night by delaying Thursday's floor votes. "The bill was stalled until after 7 p.m., meaning the earliest it can be legally voted on is Thursday evening. That leaves only hours before the special election deadline for passage and Newsom's signature," Senate Minority Leader Brian Jones, R-San Diego, posted on X. Democrats and Republicans agree democracy is at stake and that California has a gold standard with its independent, nonpartisan Citizens Redistricting Commission. Republican lawmakers argued the will of voters, who approved a constitutional amendment creating the commission, was being disregarded. But Democratic legislators stressed voters can see the proposed map, which is posted at They also noted that unlike people in Texas, Californian voters will have the final say on whether congressional districts are changed and that the independent commission can resume its work after the 2030 census. "We are not asking California to rubber stamp maps behind closed doors," Assembly Elections Committee Chair Gail Pellerin, a Democrat, told the committee. "As a former election official, I would never stand for that. This is about defending democracy itself, making sure checks and balances our kids learned in government class are alive and well after the 2026 election." Other Democrats on the committee voiced their support. 'Who should have the control of the vast power of the federal government?' asked Assemblymember Steve Bennett, D-Ventura. 'Our founding fathers agreed hundreds of years ago on a special form of democracy, designed to protect our democracy from power grabs.' If people in power try to change the rules to seize power undemocratically, then democracy advocates must also change their rules in response, Bennett argued. But Assemblymember David J. Tangipa, R-Clovis, who sits on the committee with Bennett, told the committee that Republicans weren't given enough time to review the legislation in advance of Tuesday's hearing. He also noted the proposed congressional map changed at 8 p.m. Monday. Pellerin countered that she understood the map was posted at 8 a.m. Monday. Pellerin and Tangipa clashed during the hearing as the latter asked extensive questions of Assemblymember Marc Berman, D-Palo Alto, who spoke on behalf of one of the three bills making up the Election Rigging Response Act. Pellerin said she was trying to keep the meeting moving, and Tangipa stressed the importance of his questions on topics such as funding. A large number of residents throughout California, union representatives and representatives of organizations such as Planned Parenthood and the California Teachers Association, spoke in favor of redistricting at the Assembly committee meeting. But what appeared to be an even bigger number of taxpayers from throughout the state, as well as representatives of Republican organizations, spoke against the legislation. Comments on the two sides echoed those made by the Democratic and Republican legislators. The Assembly committee rejected a motion by its ranking Republican, Vice Chair Alexandra Macedo of Tulare, that the committee recess until its members could read all 16,000 comments that voters have made in a portal on the Assembly website. "Democratic power bosses want to take the power away from the people," Macedo said. She called the Election Rigging Response Act a coordinated effort to tear down the independent commission and gerrymander districts for political gain at a time California faces severe budget shortfalls. The Assembly Republican Caucus has said the Nov. 4 election will cost voters more than $235 million. Democrats have countered the Trump administration has cost the state much more than that by cutting or withholding funding.
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
California's controversial parental rights bill
Amy Reichert had a few days notice to pack her bags and catch an early morning flight from San Diego to Sacramento. 'I just felt like I needed to be here physically,' she said. Reichert traveled to California to protest against Assembly Bill 495, or the Family Preparedness Plan Act, on Tuesday in front of the state Capitol. The bill is intended to aid migrant children of deported parents but the policy has a few holes, Reichert said. Proponents of the bill say it will help migrant parents, while opponents say it will strip parents of their rights to decide who cares for their children. The bill expands who is allowed to sign a caregiver's authorization affidavit, a legal form to give an adult authority over a child's schooling and healthcare decisions, allowing an adults to become a caregiver to a child without a requirement that parents sign the form. It also expands the definition of a caregiver to a relative or a nonrelative, which could include anyone, from a family friend to a teacher. The proposed bill relies on the caregiver's declaration and does not mandate any sort of background checks. What are critics saying? The mobilization efforts against the bill are growing. Among the people making opposed to the bill is Steve Hilton, a British-American political Republican commentator who is running for governor. In a video on X, he said the bill 'legalized kidnapping.' Critics, like Reichert, argue the bill will have negative consequences for American families and could lead to child exploitation. She hadn't seen any major red flags in an earlier version of the bill but then learned about the changes. 'There were more safeguards on it. Those safeguards were taken off and it was frightening because I do have a school aged child myself,' Reichert said. 'Remember — we all have different living situations," she said, adding that the bill could legally embolden one parent to make decisions without considering the other or going through the court system, should the couple be divorced or separated. Reichert, the founder of Restore San Diego, who also pushed for the reopening of schools and businesses in 2020, spoke to the Deseret News on her walk from the Hyatt Regency, where she attended a meeting to organize lobbying efforts against the bill, to the Capitol steps. She was tasked with leading people to Sen. Steve Padilla's office to ask him to vote against the bill, which passed the Assembly and is now being considered in the California State Senate. As Reichert arrived at the protest ahead of time, she switched to FaceTime, giving the Deseret News a peek into the scene on the ground. Live gospel music played in the background as hundreds of people held signs that said 'STOP AB 495″ and 'Don't Gamble with Child Safety,' as they stood scattered around the steps and the lawn waiting for the programming to begin. Legal precedent against AB 495 Will Estrada, the senior counsel at the Homeschool Legal Defense Association, who was also at the protest, chatted with the Deseret News ahead of attending and speaking at the rally. Estrada was at a hotel across the street, alongside a crowd of people with signs gathered in the atrium. 'As people have dug into this, they've realized that this is not just in an immigration context. This is a bill that really comes between the parent-child relationship,' he said. 'The family is the foundation of society,' Estrada said. Whether found in religious scriptures, from Jewish, Christian to Islamic, or Greek philosophy — most cultures are in agreement about this foundation, he said. The Supreme Court has protected this relationship for 102 years, he added. Beginning with Meyer v. Nebraska (1923) and Pierce v. Society of Sisters (1925), the courts have asserted a child doesn't belong to the state. And 'just earlier this year, Mahmoud v. Taylor, the Supreme Court case regarding parental opt-outs of certain curriculum in the public schools,' reaffirmed parental rights as fundamental, as Estrada put it. He said he is optimistic California Gov. Gavin Newsom will listen to reason. He's a dad to four children himself, the legal counsel noted, adding, 'Parental rights are for everyone and the government should not come between that.' Proponents of the bill argue it will help ease disruptions for children when families are separated because of immigration issues. Parents facing tough situations, like sudden deportation because of their undocumented immigration status, are often faced with 'impossible choices,' Alliance for Children's Rights said in a statement. Incarceration, military service or illness are other reasons where such an affidavit comes into play. 'Some make the difficult choice to suspend their parental rights through the complicated probate guardianship process, others opt to use a caregiver's authorization affidavit for a more informal arrangement.' The statement noted these affidavits are already an existing route for caregivers who aren't the parent or legal guardian. This paperwork doesn't transfer over the custody of the child — a court order would still be required. Solve the daily Crossword
