Man sentenced to 2 years, 8 months after pleading guilty to petty theft
A man convicted of petty theft with two prior convictions was sentenced Thursday to two years and eight months in prison and ordered to pay restitution to his victims, the Kern County District Attorney's Office said Friday.
Juventino Espinoza's sentence stemmed from a theft Jan. 2 at the Target store on Mall View Road, according to a news release from the DA's Office. It said he was arrested after taking items including batteries and shavers without paying.
Espinoza entered a plea before a Kern County Superior Court jury had been sworn in for his trial. He also admitted to a prior strike.
He had 10 prior convictions for shoplifting and petty theft, making him eligible for a felony charge under Proposition 36. He also had a 2023 strike for assault with a deadly weapon.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 hours ago
- Yahoo
Thief stole $40,000 of electronics from SLO Target, police say
San Luis Obispo police are searching for a thief who allegedly stole $40,000 of electronics from Target in San Luis Obispo. The theft occurred at the Target on Los Osos Valley Road on April 27 between 7 and 8 p.m., the San Luis Obispo Police Department said Thursday. The suspect had brown short hair, fair skin and glasses, according to a photo posted by the Police Department on Facebook. The suspect also wore a medical mask and and AT&T vest in the photo. Police said the person in the photo was not a Target employee. People with information about the theft or the suspect can call the San Luis Obispo Police Department at 805-594-8113.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
The diabolically clever scam that keeps duping desperate Gen Zers
It's easy to read a text offering what is clearly a fake job and think, "Who in the world would fall for this?" Of course, Temu or Target isn't going to send me an unsolicited message with a too-good-to-be-true employment offer out of the blue. Except scammers don't do things that don't work — so while it may seem obvious to you, there are people who absolutely fall for these tricks, and no one is immune. Scam texts have exploded in recent years (which I probably don't have to tell you — if you have a cellphone, you're most likely well aware). Consumers reported losing $470 million to text message scams in 2024, according to the Federal Trade Commission, five times the amount reported in 2020. The actual amount of money lost could be much higher, given that many people don't alert the FTC when scammed. Fake package delivery was the most common scam, but the No. 2 was job offers — texts from purported recruiters either offering positions at well-known companies or promising big bucks in exchange for doing online tasks that seem relatively mundane. "We are definitely seeing both a growth in reported losses to text scams and also a growth in reported losses to job scams," says Kati Daffan, an attorney for the FTC in its Bureau of Consumer Protection. "Reported losses to job scams increased more than three times between 2020 and 2023." Now, the flood of job scams could get even worse. There is increased opportunity for dupers: The labor market is getting rockier, Americans are increasingly on edge about their finances, and many people really want to work remotely. At the same time, the means of cranking out these texts is getting more sophisticated: AI makes scam texts easier to craft in ways that seem plausible and realistic. The overall result is that unsuspecting job seekers may become even more susceptible to hoaxes. "It's likely that as unemployment increases and more people are worried about the economic uncertainty, if the scams aren't necessarily increasing, the likelihood that people might fall for them will be," says Selena Larson, a staff threat researcher at Proofpoint, a cybersecurity company. The way scam texts work is pretty straightforward: You get a message out of nowhere about a supposed thrilling work opportunity. It may come from a phone number, or it's from an official-looking email address. The offer seems enticing, albeit somewhat unrealistic given how jobs and money usually go — it may promise a super-high salary for just a couple of hours a day of menial online work. It can also come with some weird facets, such as conducting interviews entirely via text, promising to pay in crypto, or asking you to pay them before they pay you. Eva Velasquez, the CEO of the Identity Theft Resource Center, a nonprofit, says her organization saw a big bump in job scam reports in 2023 that took them by surprise. Since then, the number has ebbed and flowed, but the scams are here to stay. "They are very lucrative. They can capture not only your data but often your money," she says. Scammers get people to hand over personal information that would be par for the course for a legit hiring process — Social Security numbers, pictures of their driver's licenses and passports, bank account numbers. That information can be used to try to steal people's identities and for other nefarious ends. And for someone who really wants a new job, the mundanity of the requests can be deceiving. "That I think is why it's confusing to people is when you have a legitimate offer and you do start with an employer, they do need that information," Velasquez says. As much as many people like to feel that they'd never fall for a scam, we're all susceptible to them, to some extent. What's not so normal is job scammers asking victims to kick in their own money. The trick goes like this: After supposedly hiring someone or getting far enough in the process, the scammer will send someone a check and ask them to buy work-related equipment with it, such as a printer or office supplies. But the check will be for more money than the stuff costs, so they'll ask the person to send the difference back. Later, the check bounces, and the person is out of the money they spent on the equipment and sent to the scammer — and, potentially, in hot water for depositing a fake check. They may also ask people to buy gift cards or make payments to fake vendors who are in on the scam. Daffan, from the FTC, says it has specifically seen a spike in task scams, in which consumers are asked to complete little activities online, such as liking videos or rating products on an app or platform, to earn commission. The texts say the activity is for "product boosting" or "app optimization," which can sound realistic. "But then once people start doing this work, there's a whole system designed to trick them to actually pay money into the app, and eventually, they'll end up losing money and never being given any of the money that they were promised," Daffan says. And as much as many people like to feel that they'd never fall for a scam, we're all susceptible to them, to some extent. "It relies on this concept of social engineering and the hackers being very compelling. They make you feel something, they make you feel excited," Larson says. "They make you feel like you want to be a part of this ecosystem, that this job is a great opportunity that you don't want to lose." The stereotypical victim of a fraudster is an older person — your grandmother on the phone with someone who claims to be from Publishers Clearing House, telling her she's won a million dollars but has to kick in some of her own cash first. But in the modern world, that stereotype is out of date, including when it comes to job text scams: A lot of young people take the bait. Gen Zers and millennials are used to doing everything online, even making major life decisions. Nothing, whether it's booking a vacation, renting an apartment, or paying a friend back, feels like a "big screen" task anymore, let alone a do-this-in-person one. It's all on the small screen. "I'm a Gen Xer. For me, someone conducting very serious business over text just doesn't resonate with me," Velasquez says. "For young people, they're like, we do everything over text. It doesn't raise alarm bells." You look at the Gen Zs and the younger millennials and they just click, click, click, click, click, click. Younger people are more accustomed to the idea of side hustles. They're in the hunt for extra cash, especially if they can earn it with little effort online, and "like these videos for money" may not seem that abnormal to them in a world where "post videos on TikTok for money" is an aspired-to reality. Gen Z also faces an especially tough job market. Between tech layoffs and federal government job cuts, many avenues they may have pursued have dried up. Companies aren't hiring the way they were a few years ago, and people with jobs aren't quitting. That can specifically affect younger people looking to get a foot in the door — if nobody's going out, they can't get in. The result: a generation that's extra prone to falling into scams offering jobs and side-hustle cash. "You look at the Gen Zs and the younger millennials and they just click, click, click, click, click, click," says Alex Quilici, the CEO of YouMail, a service that helps block scam texts and calls. As I reported this story, I became increasingly alarmed about job scam texts. If the labor market is worsening, meaning more people are going to fall for this stuff, shouldn't we be doing more to stop it? On the list of a million worries, I'd really rather not add "my niece got bamboozled out of $1,000 because of some click farm scam" to the list. It turns out that doing something about this is hard. When I ask Kate Griffin, with the Aspen Institute's Financial Security Program, who's responsible for clamping down on scam texts, she tells me, "That's the problem." It's sort of everyone's job, which also means it's sort of no one's job. "A lot of people have a component part of it," she says. "There's a part of the FBI that goes after this. There's a part of the Treasury Department that is focused on the anti-money-laundering part of it. The FTC, of course, holds their component of it, but there's not a single coordinating entity to say, 'What is our national approach to fighting this?'" As far as how the private sector can combat this, it's complicated, too. Griffin explains that while telecommunications companies are the infrastructure layer, they don't necessarily have the ability to know what's inside messages. She notes that CTIA, a trade association that represents the wireless industry, has a "secure messaging initiative" whose goal is to put a stop to unwanted or illegal text messages. Besides its app that lets consumers block unwanted communications from spammers and scammers, Quilici's YouMail also collects data to alert phone carriers of scams and bad actors. Still, it's hard for companies to get their arms around the problem — scammers are savvy, and the business incentives to crack down on them aren't particularly compelling. "If you wanted to try to stop it, you'd have to make it really, really difficult for anybody to get a phone number," Quilici says. Texting and calling cost next to nothing. Making communications more expensive would make scamming less lucrative, but it would also make basic functions pricier for everyone else. Companies (or the government) could implement know-your-customer laws, as banks have, so carriers have to know whom they're giving a number to, but that would be onerous, too. "There's a big tension between their desire to sell services and quickly and stopping fraud," Quilici says. "I don't view the carriers as bad guys. I view them as having a business problem." The unwillingness of the government and phone carriers to make a concerted effort against scam texts puts a lot of onus on individual consumers to try to protect themselves, which is not an easy task. A lot of these scams look realistic — ChatGPT makes it easier to write a scam, meaning the grammar mistakes that might have set off some spidey senses are less likely to appear. These scams don't just take place via text; they can also come in emails or even in social media messages on platforms such as LinkedIn, where contact from a recruiter would seem quite normal. And they often invoke big-name companies that people would like to work for, which may increase the likelihood that someone falls for a trick. What's one to do in this scenario? First, scrutinize where the text came from. (Is it a weird email address or a foreign phone number? Though scammers can make those look plausible, too.) Next, do a deep reading of the message itself, checking whether the grammar is right and whether the offer seems too good to be true. A six-figure job for clicking boxes on an app sounds lovely, but it's also not a thing that exists. Mention of pay in crypto is a red flag, as are interviews via text. If the alleged employer asks you for money, that's a no-no. As a general rule, you shouldn't have to pay money to make money. "Our advice is never click on links or respond to unexpected texts or WhatsApp messages or other messages about jobs. Real employers will never contact you that way," Daffan says. She asks people to report fraud to the FTC. One of the reasons that job scams are flourishing is that many people do want to work extra and make extra income. If you do think a job offer could be legitimate, see whether you can find the listing online — and make sure it's real and matches on details such as salary and location. People can also just contact the prospective employer directly to find out if it is a fake. And if you do get scammed out of money, contact your bank immediately and try to get the money back. Ultimately, Quilici says, the best advice is to slow down. There's no need to respond to that job offer text right away. Larson echoes the point. "If they're trying to rush you, they're trying to hire you, and they ask to be paid for something, that's all red flags," she says. Anyone who's interviewed for a job lately knows that the process can drag on for a wildly long time. Overall, the good news is that as time goes on and more people learn about scams, the more we collectively become inoculated to different tactics and hoaxes. People were highly susceptible to email scams when they first got email addresses. Now, you still hear about them, but they're a lot less common, and most people have an easier time spotting them. In the meantime, the bad news is that a tougher labor market means we may not have time for this natural collective education to happen. When people are anxious about money and work, they're likelier to have blind spots that scammers know how to exploit. If you're on month five of the job search and worried about how you're going to pay rent, you'll probably reply to that text faster than you would under normal circumstances. "One of the reasons that job scams are flourishing is that many people do want to work extra and make extra income, and they're looking for an opportunity to do that," Daffan says. "And scammers know that, and so they know there's a big market out there if they can have a convincing job scam. And, unfortunately, that is the case." Emily Stewart is a senior correspondent at Business Insider, writing about business and the economy. Read the original article on Business Insider
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Osceola Sheriff Marcos Lopez's arrest follows years of controversies
The shocking Thursday arrest of Osceola County Sheriff Marcos Lopez on racketeering charges follows other controversies during his five-year tenure at the county's biggest law enforcement agency. In early 2022, Osceola deputies chased Jean Barreto-Baerga, a motorcyclist they believed was part of a group of bikers accused of pointing guns at motorists, to an Orlando Wawa. An altercation ensued, and a deputy used a stun gun while gasoline pooled beneath him and Barreto-Baerga, igniting both on fire. The deputy suffered burns on his legs while Barreto-Baerga suffered burns across three-quarters of his body. After the deputy was acquitted in a criminal trial, Barreto-Baerga filed a lawsuit this year against the sheriff's office and blamed Lopez for a 'culture of sanctioning excessive force' at the agency. In April 2022, a 20-year-old who drove a car carrying two passengers accused of shoplifting $46 in pizza and Pokémon cards, was shot and killed by Osceola deputies in a Target parking lot. Deputies in unmarked vehicles had blocked Jayden Baez, in his parking spot, then fired as he rammed their vehicles trying to flee. A grand jury cleared the deputies of criminal charges, but said in its report said the killing should not have happened and could have been avoided if the agency had better policies on the use of appropriate force in response to minor crimes. Lopez was asked to testify before the grand jury but declined to do so. A subsequent lawsuit filed by the victim's family accused Lopez of fostering 'an agency-wide culture of escalating minor criminal offenses into violent and deadly scenes.' At that time, attorney Mark NeJame, who represented Baez's family, sent a letter to state and federal officials accusing the sheriff's office of corruption, alleging protectionism and cover-ups. Orange-Osceola State Attorney Monique Worrell, following her suspension from office by Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis in August 2023, confirmed to the Daily Beast that she had begun a public corruption probe into the sheriff's office's handling of several cases, which was sparked by discrepancies found in reports filed after Baez's killing. 'As we were investigating, there was all sorts of illegal activity that started coming up: officers signing each other's reports, getting them notarized in someone else's name when they signed them themselves, fraudulent documents,' Worrell told the Beast. In early 2024, Lopez posted a photo of the dead body of Madeline Soto, the 13-year-old girl whose killing shocked Central Florida, on his Instagram page. Lopez initially publicly denied the photo was of the teenager but later told state investigators he knew it was Madeline. The State Attorney's Office filed a summons against Lopez accusing him of violating public records laws in posting the photo, but prosecutors stopped short of accusing Lopez of criminal charges. Lopez pleaded no contest and agreed to pay a $250 fine, according to a court filing. Andrew Bain, the state attorney at the time, then placed Lopez on an official list of law enforcement officers deemed untrustworthy — also known as a Brady list — in a highly unusual rebuke of a sitting sheriff. In July 2024, a fired sheriff's office employee said Lopez received a nude photo of a female civilian employee at the agency from a fired deputy and made a vulgar comment about wanting to have sex with her, according to what appeared to be a screenshot of a text conversation between the two men.
