Chris Bishop's Halt To Council Plan Changes Risks Further Development Of Waikanae Cemetery
Kārewarewa urupā, located at Waikanae Beach, has a long and complex history, being utilised since 1839. It was sold by the Māori Trustee in 1968 to a private company under the impression it wasn't a cemetery, and lost its cemetery designation in 1970, despite local kaumātua objections. Half of the cemetery was developed into housing in the 1970s, creating a painful grievance for the local iwi. More recent attempts to develop the other half in 2000 resulted in the discovery of 11 buried individuals, and development has halted since. The most recent application to develop the remaining land was in 2019.
Following an urgent report by the Waitangi Tribunal in 2020 into the urupā history, identifying the need to protect the urupā, the Kāpiti Coast District Council have worked on a plan change they've notified to designate the urupā as waahi tapu, providing protection from further development, and a means of ensuring residents don't find themselves in the uncomfortable position of purchasing housing on cemetery lands.
However, Minister of Resource Management Reform Chris Bishop announced earlier this week that the Government would be halting all Council planning work in New Zealand, including plan changes, until the implementation of his new Resource Management Act in 2027.
'We echo the concerns of other communities across Aotearoa who are highlighting a wide range of troubling consequences this halt is creating, by stripping communities of the ability to manage their own affairs and ensure development happens in a manner that our own residents want' says iwi resource management expert Dr. Mahina-a-rangi Baker.
Treaty of Waitangi claimant and local kaumatua Tutere Parata says 'As an iwi we've had to deal with the impacts of development that has historically happened against our wishes or without our input. We've had to support distressed residents who through no fault of their own discover they're living on a burial ground, sometimes encountering human remains. Halting this plan change only puts more people at risk. Regardless of what any future resource management law says, Waikanae residents won't want to live on a cemetery.'
Chairperson of Ātiawa ki Whakarongotai Rawiri Tāwhai-Bodsworth says that the halt has serious implications for not only us as mana whenua, but all our community. 'By taking away the tools that we rely upon Council using to protect our taonga, such as urupā and waahi tapu, the Government is again breaching Te Tiriti o Waitangi, after a long painful history of successive breaches and ill treatment. We want the breaches of Te Tiriti to stop.'
Dr. Baker says the announcement highlights what she says is a lack of understanding on the part of Ministers as to what communities and local government are dealing with on the ground. 'The issue isn't that Councils need to reign in spending, the issue is that we have a range of critical resource management responsibilities devolved to our Councils, with the lowest levels of tax devolution to local government in the OECD. The Government should be addressing the funding model for local government, not stripping the tools that enable us to develop and protect our communities.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
an hour ago
- NZ Herald
Govt to increase Crown body board members' fee ranges, in some cases by 80%
He said the public sector had got 'out of whack' compared with the private sector. Luxon said when billions of dollars are being spent on the likes of healthcare, it's 'important that we actually are able to attract really good governance, of Health New Zealand for example'. 'This is just acknowledging that we need to make sure that we can attract good people.' Asked what his message was to someone struggling with the cost of living while the Government was lifting board fees, Luxon pointed to other actions the Government had taken. He mentioned efforts to clamp down on inflation, pouring money into new infrastructure, and today's announcement of removing surcharges from card payments. The Cabinet Fees Framework lays out a range of fee levels for appointees to different bodies and criteria that appointees are marked against. The higher their score, the more they could be paid. It applies to members of a range of bodies or groups the Crown has an interest in, such as royal commissions, ministerial inquiries and some governance boards. However, it doesn't cover pay set by the Remuneration Authority, which deals with MPs, the judiciary and the heads of various commissions and authorities. The framework is reviewed every three years by the Public Service Commission, which reports to Cabinet on the fees. A Cabinet Circular today revealed the new pay ranges. Photo / Mark Mitchell The circular issued today says Cabinet agreed to a revised framework that took effect from July 1. A list of 'main changes' from the previous framework include 'an increase of 80% to the fee ranges' for some governance boards and 'an increase of 30%' for other bodies. It is 'not intended to be prescriptive, and judgment will be required to determine best fit', the document says. It enables a 'consistent approach' to setting fees across bodies. The new framework says setting fees should 'support the appointment of appropriately qualified and diverse body members', contain expenditure within 'reasonable limits' and 'provide flexibility'. 'The framework enables fees to be determined by ministers and other fee-setting authorities who are most familiar with the work of particular bodies.' There is a lengthy process of setting or reviewing members' fees, which takes into account the complexity of their role, the degree to which the role is in the public eye, and recruitment or retention issues. 'Fees will continue to be set on a fair but conservative basis to reflect a discount for the element of public service involved,' the framework says. Members occupying identical positions on the same body should be paid the same rate, but the framework says in some cases it 'is necessary to secure people with scarce specialist skills' and therefore consideration may be given to a higher fee. Alternatively, a fee lower than the suggested range could also be paid in some circumstances. The framework says the schedule of fees 'reflects the nature of their business environment and the role requirements'. The 80% increase applies to the fee range for governance boards responsible for most Crown entities. The top range, for those appointees given the highest scores against the set criteria, is between $73,100 and $162,200 for a chair and between $36,500 and $80,400 for a member. This compares to the previous 2022 framework, which had a range of $40,596 to $90,123 for chairs and $20,295 to $44,655 for members. The new bottom range for this group is between $25,800 and $54,200 for a chair and between $12,900 and $27,100 for a member. On the face of it, to be in the top range, an appointee would need to chair the governance board of an entity with a budget in the hundreds of millions of dollars or above, and with more than one primary function. This would require consultation with the commission. The range reflects an annual rate, which the framework says is consistent with the private sector and is appropriate given the workload is 'predictable and/or substantial'. It's expected these members work about 30 days a year, 'which is in line with the amount of time spent by board directors in private sector companies', while chairs are expected to work about 50 days a year. 'The fees for chairs is set at approximately twice the rate of the members to take account of both the differences in responsibility and in workload,' the framework says. 'Where it is anticipated that a chair or members will have a lesser workload than above, it is expected that this be reflected in the fee level.' One group has had its fee ranges increased by 80%. Another grouping with its own fee ranges are members of statutory tribunals and authorities. This is reflected in a daily rate as it is expected their workload will be 'unpredictable'. The top range for these chairs is between $995 and $1550, or between $640 and $990 for members. The bottom range is between $525 and $770 for chairs, and between $416 and $500 for members. A range of additional information is also provided around expenses, how to review current members' fees and where exceptions to the framework could apply. A report from the Institute of Directors in October found directors' fees had not been keeping pace with inflation. 'Despite some claims that directors are overpaid, non-executive director fees rarely increase in line with general employee increases or inflation.' Jamie Ensor is a political reporter in the NZ Herald press gallery team based at Parliament. He was previously a TV reporter and digital producer in the Newshub press gallery office. In 2025, he was a finalist for Political Journalist of the Year at the Voyager Media Awards.
NZ Herald
3 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Te Pāti Māori announces Ikaroa-Rāwhiti candidate Hayley Maxwell
Listening to articles is free for open-access content—explore other articles or learn more about text-to-speech. Haley Maxwell co-ordinated the Toitu Te Tiriti hīkoi in Gisborne. By Russell Palmer of RNZ Te Pāti Māori has announced Haley Maxwell will stand for next year's general election - for the one Māori seat currently held by Labour. Maxwell helped organise the Hīkoi mō te Tiriti in the region last year. 'Haley Maxwell spearheaded the historic Hīkoi mō Te Tiriti from Te Tairāwhiti right through to Kahungunu. Haley embodies the fierce compassion and courage that Ikaroa-Rāwhiti is famous for,' Te Pāti Māori co-leader Rawiri Waititi said in a written statement. 'She has stood on the marae, in the courts and on the streets for our people. Parliament will be a stronger house with her voice echoing the roar of Te Tairāwhiti.'
Scoop
3 hours ago
- Scoop
Fiji: Concerns Over Suspected Price Manipulation Ahead Of VAT Reduction
26 July As Fijians anticipate relief from the upcoming VAT reduction, slated to drop from 15% to 12.5% on 1 August 2025 - discovery of unjustified price increases by some eateries have sparked serious concern. The Consumer Council of Fiji has uncovered evidence suggesting businesses are pre-emptively raising prices to offset the tax cut, effectively depriving consumers of the intended financial benefits. Through 530 market surveillances conducted before and after the National Budget announcement, the Council identified a troubling trend: certain food establishments have deliberately inflated prices in recent weeks leading up to the VAT reduction, in order to negate effectivelythe intended consumer benefit. 'This is a strategic manipulation of pricing,' said Seema Shandil, CEO of the Consumer Council of Fiji. 'By raising prices now, these eateries can later claim to have passed on savings while keeping actual costs the same or even higher, undermining the intended financial relief for consumers. This behaviour is not only unethical but directly sabotages the government's policy intent to alleviate the cost-of-living burden for ordinary Fijians'. Notable examples include a fast-food outlet's curry meal rising from $2 to $3, a Suva restaurant's two-person meal increasing from $49.95 to $54, and menu hikes at multiple food courts. A prominent restaurant chain also raised its king-sized pizza price to $56.30, while a major supermarket's chicken pie now costs $9.95 up from $7.95. The Council urges transparency and accountability to ensure the VAT reduction delivers its promised advantages to the public. 'We are extremely concerned that such behaviour not only rips off consumers but also erodes public trust in the fairness of the market. The VAT reduction has been announced to provide financial relief to Fijians, not to pad the margins of restaurants and eateries,' Ms. Shandil said. The Council notes that food establishments are often harder to monitor due to variable pricing and the ease with which cost justifications, such as ingredient or labor costs, can be used to mask unjustified increases. When traders manipulate prices to suit their own interests, especially under the guise of 'justified' cost increases, it sends a clear message that consumer welfare is secondary. This erosion of trust damages the relationship between businesses and the public, and if left unchecked, can weaken confidence in the broader market system. The Council firmly believes that ethical conduct and transparency must be upheld, particularly during times when government initiatives are aimed at easing the cost-of-living burden for ordinary Fijians. The Council is urging all traders and businesses to act responsibly and ensure that the benefits of the upcoming VAT reduction are fully passed on to consumers. This is not just a matter of regulatory compliance, it reflects their broader duty of care and ethical responsibility to the public. As essential players in the economy, businesses must align their pricing practices with the government's objective of easing the cost of living for all Fijians. Absorbing the VAT cut for profit undermines consumer trust and defeats the purpose of a policy designed to provide financial relief. Consumers are the backbone of every business, and treating them fairly through transparent and ethical pricing is vital, not only for maintaining customer loyalty and brand integrity, but also for upholding the principles of a just and fair marketplace. Consumers are also encouraged to retain receipts and, where possible, compare past and present prices of the same item or meal. If a price increase is suspected, consumers should keep both the old and new receipts or take photos showing the change and report the matter to the Consumer Council of Fiji by calling toll-free 155 or emailing complaints@
