logo
Wexford motorists urged to slow down as static speed camera positioned on N25 commute

Wexford motorists urged to slow down as static speed camera positioned on N25 commute

Motorists commuting between Wexford and Waterford will notice the camera in place from Friday, May 30 and vehicles detected driving in excess of the posted speed limit will be subject to prosecution from 12 p.m..
Prosecution of speeding offences takes place by Fixed Charge Notice (FCN), which is a fine of €160, accompanied by 3 penalty points.
The static camera will be positioned on the national road in Ballynamona, South Kilkenny, which is the Waterford City Bypass road. Meanwhile, at the other side of the Luffanny roundabout, from the Rhu Glen to the Glenmore roundabout, locals are calling upon the relevant authorities to address the lack of safety measures in place along the 10 km N25 stretch. A public meeting is due to be held in the Rhu Glen on June, 16 at 8 p.m.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

More than 4,600 bus gate fines issued to drivers
More than 4,600 bus gate fines issued to drivers

Yahoo

time02-06-2025

  • Yahoo

More than 4,600 bus gate fines issued to drivers

A council has been issuing around 100 fines a day on average to drivers for illegally using a bus gate. The Mill Road bridge bus gate in Cambridge was introduced on 11 March, banning vehicles except for buses, emergency services, taxis and blue badge holders' registered vehicles. A Freedom of Information request submitted by the Local Democracy Reporting Service shows more than 4,600 fines were issued in its first seven weeks. Councillor Alex Beckett, chair of Cambridgeshire County Council's highways and transport committee, said "nobody wants to fine people" but that the restrictions made Mill Road a "more enjoyable, safer place to visit". He said: "Mill Road is the centre of a community. We want it to be a more enjoyable, safer place to visit and to encourage more people to come into the area. "Reducing motorised through traffic and installing the bus gate will help achieve this." Anyone driving illegally through the bus gate can be issued with a Penalty Charge Notice of £70, discounted to £35 if paid within 21 days. Although fines were due to begin on March 11, enforcement was suspended for two days due to emergency work to fix a burst water main in the area, with fines starting on March 13. In the first seven weeks of the bus gate being fully operational, 4,677 fines were issued to drivers who breached the restrictions. In the first full week of its operation, commencing March 16, there were 857 fines issued. The highest number of fines issued in one week was in the week commencing March 30, when 887 fines were issued to drivers. Cambridgeshire County Council agreed last year to issue a Traffic Regulation Order (TRO) to install a bus gate on the bridge. This was the second time the authority agreed to issue a TRO after the first was quashed following a legal challenge. The restrictions created under the TRO closed the bridge to all motor vehicles. There were exemptions for local buses, taxis, emergency services, blue badge holders registered vehicles, vehicles in a disabled tax class, and vehicles on the council's permitted vehicles list. Those who fit into one of the categories still have to apply to the county council for a bus gate exemption. Pedestrians and cyclists were also still allowed to continue to cross the bridge. The county council put in place a formal warning period at the start of the year, issuing warning PCNs to drivers who breached the bus gate restrictions, but not actual fines. Signs were also put up at the bridge to warn drivers about the new restrictions. Follow Cambridgeshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X. Drivers face bus gate fines from Thursday Burst water main delays fines for using bus gate Warning period begins for bus gate flouters Cambridgeshire County Council

Wexford motorists urged to slow down as static speed camera positioned on N25 commute
Wexford motorists urged to slow down as static speed camera positioned on N25 commute

Irish Independent

time02-06-2025

  • Irish Independent

Wexford motorists urged to slow down as static speed camera positioned on N25 commute

Motorists commuting between Wexford and Waterford will notice the camera in place from Friday, May 30 and vehicles detected driving in excess of the posted speed limit will be subject to prosecution from 12 p.m.. Prosecution of speeding offences takes place by Fixed Charge Notice (FCN), which is a fine of €160, accompanied by 3 penalty points. The static camera will be positioned on the national road in Ballynamona, South Kilkenny, which is the Waterford City Bypass road. Meanwhile, at the other side of the Luffanny roundabout, from the Rhu Glen to the Glenmore roundabout, locals are calling upon the relevant authorities to address the lack of safety measures in place along the 10 km N25 stretch. A public meeting is due to be held in the Rhu Glen on June, 16 at 8 p.m.

EXCLUSIVE 'Greedy' firm tried to fine me £200 for not paying for parking within FIVE minutes… I fought them for two years and finally won - here's how
EXCLUSIVE 'Greedy' firm tried to fine me £200 for not paying for parking within FIVE minutes… I fought them for two years and finally won - here's how

Daily Mail​

time24-04-2025

  • Daily Mail​

EXCLUSIVE 'Greedy' firm tried to fine me £200 for not paying for parking within FIVE minutes… I fought them for two years and finally won - here's how

A parking firm that tried to get £200 out of a motorist after she took more than five minutes to pay for her spot has been left empty handed - after years of fighting. Angela Haley, 64, had decided against stopping in her usual Derby car park and instead chose to station her car elsewhere after entering from a different route. Initially she had issues paying due to the machine being out of service on May 4, 2023, but she eventually managed to pay the £3.20 due over the phone before heading into the city for a couple hours of shopping. Having followed Excel Parking's guidelines she believed all was well, until a PCN (Parking Charge Notice) came through her letter box five months later accusing her of parking without payment. Steadfast Ms Haley appealed the fine, providing proof including confirmation texts, phone calls to the company, as well as a bank account statement showing she made the payment that day. However, the parking firm denied her request. She then continued to fight against the ticket via the Independent Appeals Service (IAS), described as 'an alternative dispute resolution service' for tickets handed out by private firms, adamant she had paid the ticket. Ms Haley continued to show her payments receipts to both IAS and Elms Legal, who previously represented the parking firm, but then the reason for the fine emerged - she had not paid within a five minute window. She told MailOnline: 'I was in a bit of disbelief, I thought well, I know I would never not pay for parking. It's just not something I'd do. 'I kept getting letters from them, and I said look here's my bank statement. 'I didn't have a physical ticket because the normal routes of payment, which would have been just to tap my debit card, wasn't an option on the day.' 'I kept getting legal letters, and then when I found the receipt on my phone, and emailed them a copy, they said, "Oh, no, that they still want to pursue". 'But now then it was because they claimed I didn't pay within their time period, and I just said, I'm not paying. I've paid once I've. I'm not paying again.' She added: 'It stressed me out to the point where every time any sort of official envelope addressed to me came through the door. 'But I was also going to fight tooth and nail - I was determined I wasn't paying it. There was no way I was backing down from this.' The legal firm then offered her a reduced fine to around £200, whilst also giving her the option to pay in monthly instalments of £17. 'I didn't even realise it was that much anyway, so they could offer me whatever they liked. I wasn't not paying it,' she added. 'I just kept writing every time I got a threatening letter I just wrote back and said, "Don't write to me anymore. Just take me to court".' Eventually a small claims court date was set in Sheffield, around 75 miles away from Ms Haley's home. This combined with clashing events meant she could not attend in person. However she did send her court bundle, which included an overwhelming amount of documents showing her innocence, and eventually emerged victorious. And after a year of battling Excel Parking sent a letter to confrim they were discontinuing the claim. 'You only have to look at Trustpilot and Google Reviews to realise how many people this company is pursuing for fines,' Ms Haley said. 'I'm lucky because I'm retired. So I've got loads of time in my hands. 'But I think if I'd have been still working and I used to have a stressful job, I'd have just paid it because I'd have been so stressed out. 'I think that's what a lot of people do They terrorise people into thinking they have to pay this money. She added: I could have afforded to pay it, it was never about the money it was about the principle. 'It was the fact that I was able to prove that their paperwork was not relevant to the date I parked that was what really keeping me going.' Recalling the moment she received the letter from the firm, notifying her they were dropping the issue, she said: 'Obviously I was relieved. But there's no we do apologise for any upset or inconvenience.' 'I do feel terrible for those people who may be in be in a different financial position, or more frightened, people could have a nervous breakdown,' she added. A representative from Excel Parking Services said: 'ELMS Legal Ltd were instructed following the rejection of the Defendant's appeal by the Independent Appeals Service and in accordance with the terms and conditions in effect at the site at the time of the contravention. 'Any further details regarding the instruction of the claim and/or its discontinuance are subject to legal privilege.] A spokesperson from Elms Legal said: 'ELMS Legal Ltd were instructed by the Claimant following the rejection of the Defendant's appeal by the Independent Appeals Service and in accordance with the terms and conditions in effect at the site at the time of the contravention. 'Any further details regarding the instruction of the claim and/or its discontinuance are subject to legal privilege.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store