David Zaslav just threw in the towel on his WBD experiment — and Wall Street is thrilled
Warner Bros. Discovery — the brainchild of media mogul David Zaslav — is splitting up.
Wall Street had long questioned the wisdom of WBD, and Zaslav now seems to agree.
While this spinoff was predictable, it sparks questions for other media companies.
Warner Bros. Discovery on Monday announced plans to split its declining TV networks from its growing streaming and studios business. This spinoff proposal comes three years after WBD's inception.
WBD CEO David Zaslav will oversee the sexier streaming part, while CFO Gunnar Wiedenfels — known for delivering "synergies" — will be in charge of the shrinking networks. WBD isn't alone, as Comcast is also splitting from most of its cable assets.
By largely undoing the merger, Zaslav is acknowledging something Wall Street has been saying for a while: WBD's assets are better off apart.
WBD shares were up as much as 13% in early trading.
"The decision to separate Warner Bros. Discovery reflects our belief that each company can now go further and faster apart than they can together," Zaslav said on a call with investors about the spinoff.
When asked for comment, a WBD spokesperson referred Business Insider to comments made by executives on the investor call.
Better late than never
Many media analysts were initially excited when Zaslav orchestrated the deal to form WBD. But they soon soured on the media conglomerate as cord-cutting accelerated and WBD's streamer — Max/HBO Max — missed lofty expectations and failed to truly challenge the likes of Netflix.
Zaslav and company took note. WBD executives telegraphed this spinoff by reorganizing the business late last year, separating the TV networks from its studios and streaming businesses.
Wall Street was pleased by this potential split, which was the key catalyst for WBD's stock's 16% rally in the past month, UBS media analyst John Hodulik told BI last week.
Others agreed.
"Investor excitement for a Warner Bros. Discovery spin-off of its Global Linear Networks is building by the day," Lightshed analysts led by Rich Greenfield wrote last week.
Bank of America's Jessica Reif Ehrlich wrote in an early-June note that a "spin of studios and streaming could be the best way to unlock the significant unrecognized value of the company."
So far, it seems like she's right.
A sign of the times?
WBD's announcement will likely spark more speculation about future reordering of the media and entertainment landscape.
It's long been the expectation among industry insiders that WBD's spun-off linear networks would combine with others, potentially Versant, the linear assets that Comcast is spinning off. Other ideas that have been floated in media circles are a combination with Paramount — assuming its Skydance deal ever gets approved — or with Fox's linear assets.
Reordering is also afoot across the advertising industry. Two giant holding companies, Omnicom Group and Interpublic Group, are in the process of combining. Their peer WPP is replacing its CEO, Mark Read.
One wild card in the mix with WBD is CNN, with President Donald Trump's general hostility to deals involving media companies.
Longtime ad industry analyst Brian Wieser remarked that the news network could be an asset and a liability, given its history and future ability to attract the ire of Trump, who has been aggressive in targeting the mainstream media.
Wieser wrote on Monday that CNN would "probably benefit" from being separated from all of WBD's other assets as it's "the one part of WBD that could tie up other parts of this transaction so long as any government approvals are required to facilitate its completion."
Another question is the fate of WBD's studio business, which has been dragged down. On a call Monday announcing the separation, Zaslav emphasized that the movie business was harder to project than TV. But he said that by leaning into well-known IP, he saw WBD's studios arm becoming a $3 billion business.
The separation also could put WBD's studios business in play, Bernstein's Lauren Yoon said.
The companies that could ingest such a business include Amazon, Disney, Netflix, and Comcast. However, most of the tech companies haven't historically been big acquirers, and the timing isn't ideal.
"No tech companies want to give the government any reason to be in their business," said Jonathan Miller, chief executive of Integrated Media, which specializes in digital media investments.
Also, expect Bob Iger to field new questions about what's ahead for Disney's linear and cable networks. He once floated the idea of selling them, though he then retreated from the idea.
Disney's line at the time was that it wouldn't get the price it wanted if it sold those properties and that it'd be too complex to separate them from the rest of the company. Iger and Trump have also sparred in the past, and Disney could look to avoid deals that need government approval.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
Paramount makes drastic decision amid shift in customer behavior
TV giant Paramount (PARA) , which owns networks such as CBS, Nickelodeon, MTV, and Comedy Central, is suffering from a popular consumer trend. The company revealed in its first-quarter earnings report for 2025 that its total company revenue decreased by 6% year-over-year. Specifically, it generated $4.5 billion in TV media revenue, which is 13% lower than what it earned during the same quarter last year. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Paramount flagged that its TV media segment faced a decrease in advertising revenue and subscriber numbers. Related: Spectrum struggles to reverse alarming customer behavior Paramount's struggles come as many consumers across the country have been ditching cable TV for streaming services in an effort to save money, a trend called cord-cutting. Two of the largest cable TV providers in the U.S., Comcast and Spectrum, have lost about 608,000 TV customers during the first quarter of 2025, meaning they faced an average of 6,755 cancellations daily. A recent survey from digital security firm All About Cookies even found that only 46% of Americans still use traditional cable or satellite TV services, and only 14% of cord-cutters regret cutting their cable. Also, 76% of Americans watch shows through paid streaming services, and younger people are less likely to watch cable TV. Amid this drastic change in customer behavior, Paramount has decided to make a harsh change to its workforce. In a memo sent to employees on June 10, Paramount executives revealed that the company will lay off 3.5% of its U.S. employees as it navigates "the continued industry-wide linear declines and dynamic macro-economic environment" and prioritizes its "growing streaming business." "We will be reducing our domestic workforce by 3.5%, with the majority of impacted staff being notified today," said the executives in the memo. "This process may also result in some impacts to our workforce outside the U.S. over time. As always, any changes will be considered in accordance with local legal obligations. We recognize how difficult this is and are very thankful for everyone's hard work and contributions. These changes are necessary to address the environment we are operating in and best position Paramount for success." Related: Comcast hopes to win back fleeing customers with generous offer The move from Paramount comes after Paramount Media Networks CEO Chris McCarthy warned during an earnings call in August last year that the company planned to shrink its U.S. workforce by 15% after identifying $500 million in annual cost savings. "We are primarily focused on two areas: first, redundant functions within marketing and communications; second, streamlining our corporate structure, reducing our headcount in finance, legal, technology, and other support functions," said McCarthy during the call. He said that the layoffs will mostly conclude by the end of 2025. The stern warning followed Paramount's decision to lay off 800 employees in February that year. The company also cut its headcount by 25%, affecting employees in its cable network division, in May 2023. Paramount's competitors have also been making job cuts as customers ditch cable for streaming. Earlier this month, Disney laid off hundreds of employees in its film and TV sectors and multiple corporate departments. More Labor: Amazon CEO gives hard-nosed message to employeesIRS has an alarming solution to a growing problem after layoffsJPMorgan Chase CFO issues stern warning to employees Warner Bros., which owns cable networks such as Cartoon Network, Discovery, and HBO, later followed in Disney's footsteps and laid off about 100 employees in its cable TV sector. Many companies nationwide are trimming their workforce amid macroeconomic uncertainty and changes in customer behavior. So far this year, roughly 145,000 employees have lost their jobs, according to data from Related: Disney CEO offers unexpected response to tariff concerns The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.


CNBC
an hour ago
- CNBC
How to play Disney's Hulu deal, according to Creekmur Wealth Advisors' investment chief
John Creekmur, chief investment officer at the Illinois-based Creekmur Wealth Advisors, said that Disney is a buying opportunity after it took full control of Hulu . Shares of the entertainment giant were up more than 2% on Tuesday after Disney agreed to pay Comcast $438.7 million for its stake in Hulu. The move has been in the works for a few years, with Disney announcing in 2023 that it planned to buy Comcast's 33% stake in Hulu. Creekmur appeared on "Three-Stock Lunch" Tuesday, sharing his takes on Disney, Taiwan Semiconductor and J.M. Smucker. Walt Disney Company Disney's acquisition of Hulu is a "strong move" that only makes the media conglomerate more attractive, the investor said. The investor, who noted Hulu is the most profitable of Disney's three subscription services, said he sees a price target of $133 for the stock. That implies upside of 12% from Tuesday's close. "We love Disney right now," Creekmur said. Taiwan Semiconductor The Taiwanese chip company could be due for a bit of a pullback after a big June rally. Shares are up nearly 10% this month amid a broader advance in chip stocks. The stock was up more than 2% Tuesday, after the company reported a boost in May revenue . "The price got a little bit ahead, especially with the huge announcement today," the investor said. "We're looking for a little pullback. So we're on a hold right now. A pullback to that $192 to $195 range, then we're looking at acquiring pretty aggressively at that point. And then we do see strong momentum all the way to $240." The stock closed Tuesday at $212.46, and a decline to $192 suggests downside of more than 9%. A rebound from that level to $240 would represent 25% upside. J.M. Smucker J.M. Smucker 's disappointing quarterly revenue is another reason to stay away from the stock, the investor said. "We have kind of been sour on Smucker ever since the middle of last year," he said. "And we knew, with inflation going up, the cost of their inputs, and also the cost of labor increasing so drastically, their pricing is very inelastic, which is squeezing margins." "We'd stay away from Smuckers right now," he added. Disclosure: Comcast owns NBCUniversal, the parent company of CNBC.


Forbes
2 hours ago
- Forbes
WBD Split Will Affect AEW, But Nobody Knows How
Warner Bros Discovery (WBD) announced its long-anticipated split as the conglomerate will now be divided into two companies: WBD Global Networks and WBD Streaming & Studios. Shares jumped 9% shortly after news of the split broke on Monday, but dipped 3% by afternoon trading. '[The WBD split] is probably happening a little quicker than people thought was going to be the case. But now it's out there, and I think indicative of continuing change, continuing transformation that's going on in our business,' said WBD CEO David Zaslav on an investor call. Zaslav will be running the Streaming & Studios arm. WBD CFO Gunnar Wiedenfels will run Global Networks, which is shouldering the majority of WBD's $37 billion debt. These two pillars of power (Zaslav and Wiedenfels) and their assessment of AEW will be the most important dynamic headed into an uncertain AEW negotiation period in 2026. AEW, along with countless WBD properties, will be greatly affected by the WBD split. There's no way it won't be. But with plans still influx, it's too early to tell how this will affect AEW. 'You don't know what's good or bad,' said Dave Meltzer on 'Wrestling Observer Radio,' in a vague—if not obvious—outlook. Meltzer, who has had his own issues with AEW numbers, was inclined to believe AEW adds an additional 500,000 viewers on Max. These estimates came from a now dubious report from BJ Bethel of SEScoops, and were addressed by Tony Khan himself. 'I thought that was a really exciting report for AEW and very consistent with everything we've been told,' Khan said. 'While the numbers are being kept close to the vest, we're one of the top sports streaming shows and that report was consistent with what I've heard.' While nobody knows what the actual numbers are, Zaslav's comments on Monday's investor call seemed to throw cold water on AEW's viewership on Max being significant. 'Inside the U.S., sports has been less critical,' said Zaslav. 'It's viewed, but it hasn't been a real driver for us.' Alex Sherman of CNBC interpreted Zaslav's comments about sports being 'less critical' to be a possible strategy shift for the WBD when it comes to airing live sports. Zaslav went on to note that HBO Max viewership accounts for for 25% of programming spun off from the WBD networks. This means AEW, which is not part of TNT Sports though is currently listed on Max's sports page, would fall well below the 500,000 additional viewers on Max. AEW Dynamite's highest viewership of 2025 was 682,000 average viewers on May 14. There will be a lot of intangibles that will determine how AEW will navigate through yet another volatile period for WBD. But, outside of garden-variety speculation, nobody knows anything. 'If AEW is doing really good in late 2026, I think they're pretty safe. If [AEW] is doing bad, it wouldn't be good,' said Meltzer, once again stating the obvious. 'It could be great, depending on different factors. It could be terrible, depending on different factors,' said an increasingly vague Meltzer. Gunnar Wiedenfels, currently the CFO of WBD, is set to become the the President and CEO of WBD Global Networks. David Zaslav is considered an ally of AEW after overseeing negotiations for AEW's massive new TV deal with WBD last year. AEW is expected to work with both companies in negotiating a new deal come 2026. Wiedenfels will now have influence on AEW's future as the head of Global Networks since AEW airs on TNT and TBS where it is consumed significantly more than it is on streaming. Of note, Wiedenfels is known for 'finding new ways to cut old costs.' There's know way of knowing which company is the 'good' company and which is the 'bad' company, but in reading the tea leaves, the fact that Global Networks will carry most of the $37 billion debt is a red flag for AEW. Pro wrestling is an acquired taste, so will Wiedenfels share the same warm and fuzzy feelings that David Zaslav seemed to have for AEW or will Wiedenfels be closer to alleged WCW-killer Jamie Kellner during the AOL/Time Warner merger? David Zaslav has had a tumultuous tenure as CEO of a struggling WBD brand. Zaslav oversaw the disaster that was CNN+, the abomination that was Joker 2, the departure of the NBA and a litany of lingering movie and network cancellations. WBD shareholders recently voted against Zaslav's $52 million pay package in what Variety called a 'symbolic rebuke.' To say David Zaslav is a polarizing executive would be an understatement. Further complicating matters for AEW, Zaslav is one of AEW's biggest allies. Tony Khan lovingly referred to the WBD CEO as 'Mr. Zaslav' when discussing their negotiations last year. There have been a lot of casualties and changes in recent years for WBD. If Mr. Zaslav's position as CEO becomes another casualty during these uncertain times, the future of AEW on WBD will be equally as uncertain. AEW is not part of the TNT Sports umbrella (it's part of WBD Entertainment), but it is listed under WBD's sports page. As WBD continues to categorize content under Global Networks and Streaming & Studios, which branch is AEW most likely to fall under? AEW airs on both television and streaming, but both will be negotiated as part of its new deal. This is one of the many complexities that will go a long way in deciding just how valuable AEW is to WBD as a whole. AEW's partnership with WBD has been a literal lifesaver. If it wasn't for WBD signing the promotion to a multimillion-dollar contract shortly before the pandemic, AEW may have closed its doors when the world shut down. AEW's latest deal with WBD gave it the longevity and finances it needs to compete with WWE as a national promotion. But WBD has become a chameleon of a conglomerate. One day it's Warner Bros., the next it merges with Discovery. One day it's WBD, the next day it splits into two different companies. The constant changes and restructurings from within WBD could be its own HBO documentary. Such instability only hurts an upstart promotion like AEW. Similarly, is AEW a good fit for WBD? WBD figures to make a lot of cost cuts as part of its looming split. Will Gunnar Wiedenfels decide that AEW's 2028 option (which will be north of $185 million) is worth paying? Will this be re-negotiated? Will it be dropped altogether? One of AEW's biggest drivers for revenue is pay-per-view. AEW has ran into a myriad of issues in finding a stable PPV provider. AEW PPVs were discontinued on B/R Network last year. AEW is not expected to move forward with Triller, which is on the verge of delisting on NASDAQ. AEW recently partnered with Amazon Prime as it continues to play the waiting game with HBO Max, which is expected to eventually become the main distributor of AEW PPVs in the United States. "Max is still going to be a great home to AEW pay-per-view," Khan said on an AEW Revolution media call in March. 'It's not a technology that's been a part of the Max service previously before AEW landed on this great platform, Max. We're very excited to have AEW TV streaming on Max every week. I can't wait to have the upcoming AEW pay-per-views there in the future.' More than five months into AEW's new deal, however, there has been no indication that HBO Max has made any progress on this model. Given all the changes that have been made, and will continue to be made with WBD's executive musical chairs, AEW shouldn't hold my breath for an HBO Max PPV model.