logo
South Carolina Senate Votes to Oust State Treasurer Over $1.8 Billion Error

South Carolina Senate Votes to Oust State Treasurer Over $1.8 Billion Error

Epoch Times22-04-2025

Members of the South Carolina Senate voted on April 21 to remove the state's embattled treasurer for 'willful neglect' of his duties, sending the matter to the state House for consideration.
The 33–8 vote followed an hours-long hearing of the full Senate, during which state Sens. Larry Grooms and Stephen Goldfinch, both Republicans, pushed for state Treasurer Curtis Loftis's removal over a $1.8 billion accounting error.
'The big secret of Treasurer Loftis, the one that he's kept hidden away, is that there are hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of millions of dollars in errors in the Treasury books today, and he doesn't know how to fix them,' Grooms said in opening the hearing.
A state Senate Finance subcommittee
An outside forensic
Loftis, now in his fourth term, was first elected treasurer in 2010 and has held the office since.
Related Stories
4/11/2025
4/6/2025
While two other public officials have resigned in connection with the state's accounting issues, Loftis, Grooms said, 'remains defiant and refuses to take responsibility for his failures.'
Loftis, defending his record, likened himself to President Donald Trump, who vociferously denounced various investigations related to his affairs.
'I'm inspired by President Trump, and I, too, will not back down,' Loftis said.
During prior Senate testimony, the treasurer indicated that the inexplicable funds not only existed but had been invested and were generating returns. After the audit, however, he claimed the report 'validated what we've known all along,' a statement that Goldfinch derided as 'a lie.'
The senator accused Loftis of attempting to cover up a serious error that he knew would damage his reputation.
Loftis's attorneys downplayed the discrepancy as 'an on-paper accounting error' and 'an honest mistake.'
'AlixPartners reviewed more than 1 million documents and did not find a single piece of evidence suggesting wrongdoing by the treasurer,' noted Shawn Eubanks, an attorney in the treasurer's office, referencing the firm that conducted the forensic audit.
Eubanks further held that the audit report provided 'good news for the state' in that it found no missing or stolen funds.
'The treasurer's books reconcile to the bank,' he said.
Loftis's lawyers also criticized the Legislature's efforts to oust him as a violation of both his due process rights and the will of the voters who elected him.
'Treasurer Loftis is the most popular statewide official in the history of South Carolina. This is a man who received 80 percent of the vote in the last election, a man who received overwhelming bipartisan support,' attorney Debbie Barbier said.
Decrying the proceedings as 'drastic' and unprecedented, Barbier said lawmakers had stripped Loftis of his right to call and confront witnesses by using the state's removal on address procedure rather than impeachment.
'They're asking you to make this decision not based on a trial, not with witnesses, not with exhibits and documents and expert testimony and authentication of documents, not with rules of evidence, but based upon a one-and-a-half-hour presentation with video clips,' she said. 'There is not one shred of proof and absolutely no evidence to support the removal of Treasurer Loftis.'
The more common impeachment process gives lawmakers the power to impeach and convict a statewide officer for 'serious crimes or serious misconduct in office.' The South Carolina Constitution also provides an avenue to removal for 'willful neglect of duty' or another 'reasonable cause' deemed insufficient for impeachment. That process requires the governor to remove an officer 'on the address of two-thirds of each house of the General Assembly' after a hearing.
If Loftis is removed, he would become the first state official in South Carolina's 235-year history to be ousted under the provision.
It will now be up to the state House, also under GOP control, to decide whether to hold a hearing on the matter.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sen. John Kennedy and Linda McMahon make significant math error in congressional hearing
Sen. John Kennedy and Linda McMahon make significant math error in congressional hearing

Yahoo

time10 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Sen. John Kennedy and Linda McMahon make significant math error in congressional hearing

On Tuesday, Secretary of Education Linda McMahon tested before the Senate on behalf of Trump's 2026 budget. During this hearing, McMahon and Louisiana Sen. John Kennedy were discussing federal spending for grant programs for disadvantaged students when the pair made a significant mathematical error. The math error occurred when the two spoke on how much the government has spent in the duration of ten years on TRIO and the Gaining Early Awareness and Readiness for Undergraduate Programs (GEAR UP). After McMahon confirmed to Kennedy that the government spends approximately $1.58 billion a year on TRIO and has been funding this program for over ten years, Kennedy said, "So that's over a trillion dollars that we've spent on this program..." "We give this money, as I appreciate it, to colleges and universities to encourage poor kids to go to college,' said Kennedy before he went on to imply that colleges have been stealing this grant money from the government for their own purposes, The New Republic reported. McMahon failed to catch and correct Kennedy's math error, however, Sen. John Reed spoke up and corrected the counting mistake. 'I'm not a great mathematician, but I think you were talking about a trillion dollars? I believe $1.5 billion times 10 is $15 billion, and that's a little bit off from a trillion dollars,' said Reed. McMahon said in response that the budget cuts $1.2 billion, to which Reed then replied, "Well that would be $12 billion, not a trillion dollars." Presley Bo Tyler is a reporter for the Louisiana Deep South Connect Team for Gannett/USA Today. Find her on X @PresleyTyler02 and email at PTyler@ This article originally appeared on Shreveport Times: Sen. John Kennedy math error. What he said education costs

Public media funding cuts hit Chicago: WBEZ, WTTW brace for impact
Public media funding cuts hit Chicago: WBEZ, WTTW brace for impact

Axios

time14 minutes ago

  • Axios

Public media funding cuts hit Chicago: WBEZ, WTTW brace for impact

President Trump and the Republican-majority U.S. House moved one step closer to cutting funding for public media, putting local organizations in limbo. The latest: The House passed a bill Thursday afternoon to cancel over $1 billion in funding for PBS and NPR, via the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. This funding was included in the 2025 fiscal year budget, but this action removes it. Why it matters: Federal funding for public media could vanish — and Chicago stations like WBEZ and WTTW are bracing for the fallout. The big picture: The move breaks decades of bipartisan tradition treating CPB funding as apolitical and throws public media companies into budgetary chaos. What they're saying: "If approved, this cancellation of funding would eliminate critical investments, stripping resources that we use to power independent journalism, educational programming, emergency alerts and the infrastructure that supports the entire network of newsrooms nationwide," Chicago Public Media CEO Melissa Bell wrote to station members. "This could threaten the ability of PBS, and member stations like WTTW, to operate autonomously," a WTTW spokesperson said in a statement. By the numbers: The cuts would amount to about 6 percent of Chicago Public Media's budget, which the organization estimates to be about $3 million annually. That's not factoring in possible syndication costs handed down by National Public Radio, which is also losing funding from this bill. For WTTW, 10% of its 2024 budget came from federal funding. Zoom in: Chicago Public Media and WTTW (which also includes WFMT-FM) are among the largest public media organizations. Chicago Public Media (WBEZ/Sun-Times) reported revenue of $70 million for 2024, while WTTW had a total operating budget of $32.7 million. Both organizations receive significant revenue from member donations. Yes, but: Smaller Illinois radio stations, such as WILL-FM in Urbana, WUIS-FM in Springfield, and WNIJ-FM in DeKalb, have significantly higher federal funding, in some cases accounting for half of their budgets. Those stations are attached to local universities. Zoom out: It's unclear if the organizations will supercharge fundraising to attract more private donors or cut back on programming and staff. Chicago Public Media recently cut staff at both the Sun-Times and WBEZ. The intrigue: The rescission package aims to claw back funding that Congress previously approved for fiscal year 2025. It primarily consists of cuts identified by DOGE, which include funding for foreign aid programs such as USAID. The Corporation for Public Broadcasting's funding is usually allocated every two years, so this cuts the second year of funding and puts future allocations in serious doubt. The rescission bill is rare in government. Trump attempted to use it during his first term, but was defeated in the Senate. Between the lines: Republicans have increasingly painted public media as left-leaning and biased, citing PBS programs like "Sesame Street" as "woke propaganda." The other side: Public media offers a variety of independent programming from news, culture, food and children's programs, funded to avoid programming influenced by corporations and commercials.

Trump Touts Higher Duty Rate for Chinese Imports Under New Trade Deal
Trump Touts Higher Duty Rate for Chinese Imports Under New Trade Deal

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Touts Higher Duty Rate for Chinese Imports Under New Trade Deal

Hours after his cabinet announced that the United States would resume its previously agreed upon trade truce with China, President Donald Trump stoked confusion by revealing a new tariff rate of 55 percent for the sourcing superpower. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, along with U.S. Trade Representative Ambassador Jamieson Greer, traveled to London this week to sit down with Chinese trade officials following weeks of trade tensions and the crumbling of a provisional agreement solidified in Switzerland in mid-May. More from Sourcing Journal China-to-US Freight Rates 'No Longer Surging'-Is it All Downhill from Here? Trump Likely to Extend Tariff Pause as Negotiations Take Shape, Treasury Secretary Says China and US Return to Terms of May Trade Truce At the end of negotiations on Tuesday, Lutnick indicated that both sides had agreed to 'implement the Geneva consensus' upon approval from Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping. That deal centered on the deferral of reciprocal duties—lowered on the U.S. side to 30 percent and China's side to 10 percent—for three months. But by Wednesday morning, Trump had Truthed new information about the deal, saying that China will now pay a 55-percent duty rate, while the U.S. will still be subject to 10-percent tariffs on any goods imported into China. An all-caps missive said the deal with China was done, though subject to final approval by Xi and himself. 'RELATIONSHIP IS EXCELLENT!' he wrote. The president did not elucidate the reasoning for the 55-percent rate, which appears on its face to be a a 25-percent increase from the May agreement. But a White House spokesperson, who spoke to The Guardian anonymously, said the rate includes Trump's 10-percent universal baseline tariffs, a previous 20-percent punitive duty for fentanyl trafficking and an existing 25-percent tariff on China-made goods. 'A reported 55 percent tariff on our largest supplier of American apparel and footwear, stacked on top of already high MFN and Section 301 rates is not a win for America,' Steve Lamar, president and CEO of the American Apparel and Footwear Association, said in a statement. 'We're closely watching for more details, but the reality is this: nearly all clothes and shoes sold in the U.S. are now subject to elevated tariff rates,' he added. 'These costs will hit American families hard especially as they get ready for back-to-school shopping and the holiday seasons. New trade deals that bring lower tariffs can't come soon enough.' At a budget meeting with the House Ways and Means Committee on Wednesday, Secretary Bessent seemed to hint that the China deal may be shakier than the president indicated in his post on Truth Social. 'China has a singular opportunity to stabilize its economy by shifting away from excess production towards greater consumption. But the country needs to be a reliable partner in trade negotiations,' he told the Committee. 'If China will course-correct by upholding its end of the initial trade agreement we outlined in Geneva last month, then a big, beautiful rebalancing of the world's two largest economies is possible.' Footwear Distributors and Retailers of America senior vice president Andy Polk told Sourcing Journal that he believes this week's trade talks represent 'more political marketing than anything else.' 'It is positive that high level talks continue in hopes of getting us closer to a tariff end-game,' he said. 'However, there doesn't seem to be anything rally new coming out of these talks, just a climb down from threats.' Calling the president's tariff calculations 'very confusing,' Polk said he believes the 55-percent rate includes the Section 301 duties from his first term, the 20-percent fentanyl-related tariffs and the 10-percent baseline duties for all trade partners, among others. 'It is not a new tariff rate he is adding, it just seems to be fuzzy tariff math on his part.''Perhaps these steps forward will continue to unlock other issues to reduce this trade impasse, but I am not sure they are tackling the big items in a speed we need,' Polk said. 'We need a real deal that reduces tariffs back to reasonable levels quickly, and one that stabilizes them so shoe companies aren't jolted around constantly.' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store