Kelly Loving Act aims to reinforce existing transgender rights
(COLORADO) — Colorado lawmakers have passed the Kelly Loving Act, a new bill that, if signed into law, would provide new protection for transgender individuals.
HB25-1312 is named after Kelly Loving, a Club Q shooting victim. The bill would create several protections for transgender individuals, including children, and add deadnaming and misgendering as discriminatory acts in the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act.
'This bill, by far, has generated a lot of conversations,' said Senator Rod Pelton, who detailed that he had received many emails concerning HB25-1312. The bill passed the Senate on Tuesday, May 6, with a 20 to 14 vote, right before it adjourned its regular session on Wednesday, May 7.
The act has sparked concerns from some communities, including parents and educators. In late April, Colorado Springs School District 11 Board of Education Secretary Jason Jorgeson sent a letter on behalf of the Coalition of Colorado Public School Administrators, Board Members, and individuals who influence educational decisions in Colorado, opposing HB25-1312 due to 'significant concerns.'
According to the letter, which has over 80 signatures, the Kelly Loving Act would undermine local control, parental rights, and 'create ambiguity and compliance challenges for schools.' The letter states that the bill penalizes parents for their speech or belief about their child's gender identity.
Read the full letter here:
Colorado-House-Bill-1312-School-Board-Member-Letter-1Download
While some senators also agreed that the bill could put a strain on families and even schools, some senators argued that the policy would help transgender individuals.
'The Kelly Loving Act seeks to increase the amount of dignity and respect that we as a state offer to trans Coloradans,' Senator Julie Gonzales said during the bill's third reading on May 6.'…We all deserve the freedom… Freedom… to make decisions about our bodies, our families, and our futures.'
The letter sent by Jorgenson argues that the chosen names and dress code policy requirements in the bill undermine the district's authority to create policies that align with the needs and values of the communities.
'…The prohibition on gender-specific dress codes may limit schools' ability to maintain clear and equitable standards for student conduct and attire,' the letter says.
Senator Chris Kolker explained that the dress code section of the bill leaves it up to the schools to make it equal for all students.
'I know students go to school dressed a certain way when they leave the house, but when they get to school, they are dressed a different way because their parents don't know,' Kolker said. 'It's just what that child wants to wear, and they come back and change before they get back home. That's not about transgender policy, it's about what that kid's choice is. We are just leaving it to the school to enforce policy, establish policy, enforce it, and make sure it is equal amongst all kids.'
The Kelly Loving Act would also determine the 'allocation of parental responsibilities' when making child custody decisions, and would consider deadnaming, misgendering, or threatening to publish material related to an individual's gender-affirming health-care services as types of coercive control.
Another section of the bill would also prohibit a Colorado court from enforcing another state's law that authorizes a state agency to remove a child from a guardian because the guardian allowed the child to receive gender-affirming healthcare.
'This could strain family relationships and place schools in the challenging position of navigating sensitive custody disputes, diverting resources from our core educational mission,' the letter sent by Jorgenson said.
Kolker further defended the bill, explaining that it is reinforcing previous laws, and it is not about taking parents' rights.
He said that the bill 'reinforces an existing civil rights framework in the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act, by adding clarity and enforcement precision. It does not create new superior rights for transgender people, nor does it strip rights from anyone else. In practical terms, it says you may not deny someone housing, employment, or public services because they are transgender, that public forms must respect a person's chosen name and gender marker when they have been legally recorded.'
While the Kelly Loving Act has passed both the House and the Senate, it still awaits a signature from Colorado Governor Jared Polis to be considered
'Governor Polis appreciates the work of the bill sponsors and all the advocates involved in the bill's progression, especially in removing the controversial changes to family law from the bill, and will review the final version of the bill.'
To read the full bill, click the link above.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
41 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Democratic states double down on laws resisting Trump's immigration crackdown
As President Donald Trump's administration targets states and local governments for not cooperating with federal immigration authorities, lawmakers in some Democratic-led states are intensifying their resistance by strengthening state laws restricting such cooperation. In California alone, more than a dozen pro-immigrant bills passed either the Assembly or Senate this week, including one prohibiting schools from allowing federal immigration officials into nonpublic areas without a judicial warrant. Other state measures have sought to protect immigrants in housing, employment and police encounters, even as Trump's administration has ramped up arrests as part of his plan for mass deportations. In Connecticut, legislation pending before Democratic Gov. Ned Lamont would expand a law that already limits when law enforcement officers can cooperate with federal requests to detain immigrants. Among other things, it would let 'any aggrieved person' sue municipalities for alleged violations of the state's Trust Act. Two days after lawmakers gave final approval to the measure, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security included Connecticut on a list of hundreds of 'sanctuary jurisdictions' obstructing the enforcement of federal immigration laws. The list later was removed from the department's website after criticism that it errantly included some local governments that support Trump's immigration policies. States split on whether to aid or resist Trump Since taking office in January, Trump has enlisted hundreds of state and local law enforcement agencies to help identify immigrants in the U.S. illegally and detain them for potential deportation. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement now lists 640 such cooperative agreements, a nearly fivefold increase under Trump. Trump also has lifted longtime rules restricting immigration enforcement near schools , churches and hospitals, and ordered federal prosecutors to investigate state or local officials believed to be interfering with his crackdown on illegal immigration. The Department of Justice sued Colorado, Illinois and New York, as well as several cities in those states and New Jersey , alleging their policies violate the U.S. Constitution or federal immigration laws. Just three weeks after Colorado was sued, Democratic Gov. Jared Polis signed a wide-ranging law expanding the state's protections for immigrants. Among other things, it bars jails from delaying the release of inmates for immigration enforcement and allows penalties of up to $50,000 for public schools, colleges, libraries, child care centers and health care facilities that collect information about people's immigration status, with some exceptions. Polis rejected the administration's description of Colorado as a 'sanctuary state,' asserting that law officers remain 'deeply committed' to working with federal authorities on criminal investigations. 'But to be clear, state and local law enforcement cannot be commandeered to enforce federal civil immigration laws,' Polis said in a bill-signing statement. Illinois also has continued to press pro-immigrant legislation. A bill recently given final approval says no child can be denied a free public education because of immigration status — something already guaranteed nationwide under a 1982 U.S. Supreme Court decision . Supporters say the state legislation provides a backstop in case court precedent is overturned. The bill also requires schools to develop policies on handling requests from federal immigration officials and allows lawsuits for alleged violations of the measure. Legislation supporting immigrants takes a variety of forms Democratic-led states are pursuing a wide range of means to protect immigrants. A new Oregon law bars landlords from inquiring about the immigration status of tenants or applicants. New laws in Washington declare it unprofessional conduct for bail bond agents to enforce civil immigration warrants, prohibit employers from using immigration status to threaten workers and let employees use paid sick leave to attend immigration proceedings for themselves or family members. Vermont last month repealed a state law that let law enforcement agencies enter into immigration enforcement agreements with federal authorities during state or national emergencies. They now need special permission from the governor to do so. As passed by the House, Maryland legislation also would have barred local governments from reaching immigration enforcement agreements with the federal government. That provision was removed in the Senate following pushback from some of the seven Maryland counties that currently have agreements. The final version, which took effect as law at the start of June, forbids public schools and libraries from granting federal immigration authorities access to nonpublic areas without a judicial warrant or 'exigent circumstances.' Maryland Del. Nicole Williams said residents' concerns about Trump's immigration policies prompted her to sponsor the legislation. 'We believe that diversity is our strength, and our role as elected officials is to make sure that all of the residents within our community — regardless of their background — feel safe and comfortable,' Williams said. Many new measures reinforce existing policies Though legislation advancing in Democratic states may shield against Trump's policies, 'I would say it's more so to send a message to immigrant communities to let them know that they are welcome,' said Juan Avilez, a policy associate at the American Immigration Council, a nonprofit advocacy group. In California, a law that took effect in 2018 already requires public schools to adopt policies 'limiting assistance with immigration enforcement to the fullest extent possible.' Some schools have readily applied the law. When DHS officers attempted a welfare check on migrant children at two Los Angeles elementary schools in April, they were denied access by both principals. Legislation passed by the state Senate would reinforce such policies by specifically requiring a judicial warrant for public schools to let immigration authorities into nonpublic areas, allow students to be questioned or disclose information about students and their families. 'Having ICE in our schools means that you'll have parents who will not want to send their kids to school at all,' Democratic state Sen. Scott Wiener said in support of the bill. But some Republicans said the measure was 'injecting partisan immigration policies' into schools. 'We have yet to see a case in California where we have scary people in masks entering schools and ripping children away,' said state Sen. Marie Alvarado-Gil. 'Let's stop these fear tactics that do us an injustice.' ___ Associated Press writers Susan Haigh, Trân Nguyễn, Jesse Bedayn, John O'Connor and Brian Witte contributed to this report. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
Two House Republicans issue megabill threats as Senate ponders changes - Live Updates
Two House Republicans drew firm red lines Friday on changes to the House GOP megabill, threatening to vote 'no' if the Senate made any changes whatsoever to key provisions. Rep. Nick LaLota of New York warned GOP senators against lowering the House's $40,000 cap on the state-and-local-tax deduction, while Rep. Chip Roy of Texas vowed to oppose any attempt to delay or otherwise water down the phaseout of clean-energy tax credits provided for in the House-passed megabill. 'If the Senate waters it down by a dollar, I'm a no,' LaLota posted on X, arguing that the SALT cap as it stands is 'unfair' to his constituents. Roy was equally strict about GOP senators' hesitations on quickly phasing out clean-energy tax credits signed into law under former President Joe Biden — even calling out skeptical Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) by name in a floor speech Friday. Tillis has been critical of the phaseouts, saying the House bill is 'void of any understanding of just how these supply chains work.' 'You backslide one inch on those IRA subsidies and I'm voting against this bill,' Roy said. 'Because those god-forsaken subsidies are killing our energy, killing our grid, making us weaker, destroying our landscape, undermining our freedom. I'm not going to have it.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Pearl Street attack suspect appears in federal court for hate crime charge
DENVER (KDVR) — The man accused of throwing incendiary devices at people on Boulder's Pearl Street Mall appeared before a federal judge on Friday afternoon on a federal hate crime charge. The hearing took place on the heels of another state hearing that took place in Boulder on Thursday. Denver bar announces final day of business after nearly 30 years Mohamed Soliman sat in a jury box at the federal courthouse in downtown Denver for the entire hearing. He was told about the hate crime charge. Soliman said 'yes' in Arabic through a translator when he was asked if he understood the court process and why he was there. He was wearing a green jail uniform, and his hands and ankles were handcuffed. A United States Marshall sat behind him. The 45-year-old Egyptian national sat still and did not look at the full courtroom during the initial hearing. One of the first questions the judge asked was if he had a copy of the criminal complaint that detailed the crime he was accused of. Federal prosecutors outlined their case against Soliman in that complaint. The court record detailed why investigators believe the attack was a hate crime. 5 people and a dog were hurt in that attack. The incident happened on Sunday, when the Egyptian national allegedly threw makeshift incendiary devices at a group of demonstrators, were calling for the release of Hamas hostages. An FBI agent said, in the complaint, 'Soliman threw two lit Molotov cocktails at individuals participating in a pro-Israel gathering'. That agent went on to say, 'Soliman yelled 'Free Palestine!' and the Molotov cocktails ignited.' In the complaint, the agent also said, 'He (Soliman) stated that he wanted to kill all Zionist people and wished they were all dead. Soliman stated he would do it again.' Soliman stated that he hated the Zionist group and did this because he needed to stop them from taking over 'our land,' which he explained to be Palestine. FOX31 Legal Analyst Christopher Decker said prosecutors will have to dig deep into what motivated Soliman's alleged actions. Pothole that formed in under 30 minutes causes backups on I-70: CDOT 'Federal prosecutors in this case are going to be looking to uncover and present evidence of the motive and bias behind this criminal act and to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that it was based on his bias against the race, religion, or national origin of the victims involved,' Decker said. Just a day before, 118 charges were filed in state court in connection with this case. Those charges include attempted murder and assault charges. Soliman's next hearing is set for June 18. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
