Latest news with #KellyLovingAct
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Politics
- Yahoo
Clarifying claims that Colorado mandated use of a person's chosen name and pronouns
According to a rumor that spread online in May 2025, Colorado lawmakers passed a law that prohibited referring to individuals by a gender and/or name they no longer identify with. The rumor appeared to originate from an outdated and exaggerated interpretation of the Kelly Loving Act, a real law passed in Colorado in May 2025. The Kelly Loving Act did not make it illegal to use names or genders that individuals no longer identify with. Rather, it clarified preexisting legislation that allowed plaintiffs to use those actions as evidence in civil discrimination cases. In practice, this means choosing not to use a person's chosen name or pronouns can be used as evidence of harassment in an anti-discrimination case involving employment, housing or places of public accommodation. It does not mean that the act of misgendering or deadnaming someone is in itself illegal. In late May 2025, a rumor spread online that Colorado lawmakers prohibited refusing to use a person's chosen name and pronouns in line with their gender identity. The claims spread on X and Facebook. Some of these claims specified that the law bans "misgendering" and "deadnaming" individuals — in other words, referring to someone by a gender and/or name they no longer identify with. However, these rumors appear to be spreading an outdated and exaggerated understanding of a legitimate law passed in Colorado on May 16, 2025, to clarify legal protections for transgender people. The bill, named the Kelly Loving Act after a transgender woman who was killed in an anti-LGBTQ+ mass shooting at a Colorado gay bar, underwent major revisions before it became law. An older version of the bill sought to specifically define misgendering and deadnaming as discriminatory acts under the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act, which prohibits discrimination in the workplace, housing and in places of public accommodation such as parks, businesses and libraries. However, both terms were taken out of the legislation. Instead, the law as it stands — as of this writing — states that refusing to use a person's chosen name or respect how a person chooses to be addressed can be used as evidence in a complaint under the state's anti-discrimination act. Here's what that means. Before the Kelly Loving Act became law, the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act already prohibited discrimination on the basis of "gender identity" and "gender expression" due to a law passed in 2021. That bill defined gender expression as "an individual's way of reflecting and expressing the individual's gender to the outside world, typically demonstrated through appearance, dress, and behavior." It also defined gender identity as "an individual's innate sense of the individual's own gender, which may or may not correspond with the individual's sex assigned at birth." The Kelly Loving Act sought to "further clarify that not utilizing an individual's chosen name is and can be used as evidence of discrimination in a gender expression discrimination case," said state Democratic Rep. Rebekah Stewart, a sponsor of the bill. It also added more details to what "gender expression" means under the law, such as "how a person chooses to be addressed." Some claims said that Colorado made it a "crime" to misgender or deadname someone. That is simply not true, as penalties for violating the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act are civil, not criminal — any person who violates the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act can be fined $5,000 per plaintiff and/or other monetary damages, as of a 2025 amendment to the law. It is also worth noting that filing a complaint under the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act does not automatically mean an employer or accused party may be fined. For example, with employment cases, there must be "clear and convincing evidence that the defendant engaged in a discriminatory or unfair employment practice with malice or reckless indifference to the rights of the plaintiff," according to a 2014 Colorado Bar Association publication (see Page 4-3 under "Remedies Under CADA"). However, "good-faith efforts to comply" and "prevent discriminatory and unfair practices in the workplace" would result in no punitive damages for the defendant, per the publication. Snopes requested a full copy of the most recent version of the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act and will update this story if we find this language has changed. We also reached out to various law firms and civil rights groups for more information about how the Kelly Loving Act may be implemented in connection with CADA and await replies. Previous versions of the Kelly Loving Act specified inclusion of deadnaming and misgendering as acts of discrimination under the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act. For example, see the bill as introduced, which on Page 9 defined deadnaming as "purposefully, and with the intent to disregard the individual's gender identity or gender expression, refer[ring] to an individual by their birth name rather than their chosen name." Similarly, misgendering was defined on the same page as "purposefully, and with the intent to disregard the individual's gender identity or gender expression, refer[ring] to an individual using an honorific or pronoun that conflicts with the individual's gender identity or gender expression." The bill as introduced also said on Page 2 that it defined "deadnaming and misgendering as discriminatory acts in the 'Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act', and prohibit[ed] these discriminatory acts in places of public accommodation." In contrast, the bill as signed by the governor into law — available on the bill page — made no explicit mention of deadnaming or misgendering. Instead, it simply adds "chosen name" and other details to the definition of "gender expression," which, again, is already protected under the anti-discrimination act. See the relevant part of the bill, which is on Page 5, below, with the capitalized parts representing what the bill adds to the preexisting law: (3.5) "CHOSEN NAME" MEANS A NAME THAT AN INDIVIDUAL REQUESTS TO BE KNOWN AS IN CONNECTION TO THE INDIVIDUAL'S DISABILITY, RACE, CREED, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, GENDER IDENTITY, GENDER EXPRESSION, MARITAL STATUS, FAMILIAL STATUS, NATIONAL ORIGIN, OR ANCESTRY, SO LONG AS THE NAME DOES NOT CONTAIN OFFENSIVE LANGUAGE AND THE INDIVIDUAL IS NOT REQUESTING THE NAME FOR FRIVOLOUS PURPOSES. (9) "Gender expression" means an individual's way of reflecting and expressing the individual's gender to the outside world, typically demonstrated through appearance, dress, and behavior, CHOSEN NAME, AND HOW THE INDIVIDUAL CHOOSES TO BE ADDRESSED. It is worth noting that repeated misgendering and deadnaming have already been used as evidence in successful anti-discrimination federal court cases. See, for example, a landmark 2015 case known as Lusardi v. Department of the Army, which found that the Army discriminated against a transgender woman, Tamara Lusardi, on the basis of sex in violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. One of the pieces of evidence used in the case was the repeated use of her birth name and male pronouns. Thus, the Colorado bill does not outright prohibit people from using a name or pronoun at odds with a person's gender expression — it simply strengthens preexisting anti-discrimination law in the state. In practice, this means that choosing not to use a person's chosen name or pronouns can be used as evidence of harassment in an anti-discrimination case involving employment, housing or places of public accommodation. It does not mean that the act of misgendering or deadnaming someone is in itself illegal. "2023 Colorado Revised Statutes :: Title 24 - GOVERNMENT - STATE (§§ 24-1-101 — 24-116-102) :: PRINCIPAL DEPARTMENTS (§§ 24-30-101 — 24-36-306) :: Article 34 - DEPARTMENT of REGULATORY AGENCIES (§§ 24-34-101 — 24-34-1008) :: Part 6 - DISCRIMINATION in PLACES of PUBLIC ACCOMMODATION (§§ 24-34-601 — 24-34-605) :: Section 24-34-601 - [Effective until 8/7/2024] Discrimination in Places of Public Accommodation - Definition." Justia Law, Accessed 3 June 2025. ENGROSSED a BILL for an ACT CONCERNING LEGAL PROTECTIONS for TRANSGENDER INDIVIDUALS. Accessed 3 June 2025. Gallagher, Sean, et al. The Practitioner's Guide to COLORADO EMPLOYMENT LAW SECOND EDITION VOLUMES 1 & 2 the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act a Chapter in the Practitioner's Guide to Colorado Employment Law. Accessed 3 June 2025. Garcia, Lorena, et al. A BILL for an ACT 101 CONCERNING LEGAL PROTECTIONS for TRANSGENDER INDIVIDUALS. Accessed 3 June 2025. ---. "HOUSE BILL 25-1312." 16 May 2025, Accessed 3 June 2025. "Gender Identity Expression Anti-Discrimination | Colorado General Assembly." Accessed 3 June 2025. "Home | Colorado Civil Rights Division." Accessed 3 June 2025. "Legal Protections for Transgender Individuals | Colorado General Assembly." Colorado General Assembly, Accessed 3 June 2025. Pham, Xoai. "Groundbreaking EEOC Ruling Finds the Army Discriminated against Transgender Employee by Denying Bathroom Access, Pronouns - Transgender Law Center." Transgender Law Center, 8 Apr. 2015, Accessed 3 June 2025. Powell, Laurel. "HRC Mourns Kelly Loving, 'Loving Friend & Caring Person,' Killed in Club Q Shooting." Human Rights Campaign, 29 Nov. 2022, Accessed 3 June 2025. Soper, Matt, et al. HOUSE BILL 24-1124. Accessed 3 June 2025. Zokaie, Yara, et al. HOUSE BILL 25-1239 . 22 May 2025, Accessed 3 June 2025.
Yahoo
21-05-2025
- Politics
- Yahoo
Lawsuit filed over Kelly Loving Act
(COLORADO SPRINGS)– Multiple groups are suing the state of Colorado over the Kelly Loving Act only days after Governor Jared Polis made it a law. The new law expands transgender protections in Colorado, with those behind the suit claiming it violates free speech and parental rights. 'What's at stake here is the protections for transgender Coloradans,' said Ollie Glessner, communications and advocacy director for Inside Out. The Kelly Loving Act is named after a transgender woman who was killed in 2022 during the Club Q shooting in Colorado Springs. Under the new law, intentionally misgendering or dead-naming someone is considered a discriminatory act. 'The bill should have never been written,' said Darcy Schoening, and member of Moms for Liberty. The Kelly Loving Act has been a controversial discussion topic since it was proposed, and now it is heading to court after parent advocacy groups filed the lawsuit to make sure the law does not go into effect. 'Colorado now is passing these laws to make sure that we keep our protections in state no matter what, and not only that, but we also expand them to some of the things that are under attack right now,' said Glessner. But some parents do not agree with how the new law will affect their children. 'My daughter doesn't have the ability to choose who she shares her safe spaces with,' said Schoening. Kelly Loving Act aims to reinforce existing transgender rights The act allows a person's chosen name to qualify as gender expression, which is protected under the Colorado anti-discrimination act. That means if a person intentionally misgenders or dead-names a transgender person, they are breaking state law. 'I dare you to come after me for telling the truth, for calling a man, a man,' said Schoening. When Glessner first changed their name, they said it was hard on their parents to understand at first. 'When I changed my name, I know it was really difficult for my family because they had named me for a purpose, you know, and that purpose then seemed lost or changed for them,' they said. The group Defending Education is behind the lawsuit, filed on behalf of the Colorado Parents Advocacy Network and Protect Kids Colorado groups, and they think the law could violate their first and 14th amendment rights. 'To compel somebody to refer to somebody as a gender that they're not and say that it's criminal if the person doesn't do it, is a really dangerous precedent,' said Schoening. But Glessner said it is not compelled speech, instead it is respect: 'People will say that making them call someone by their chosen name or pronouns is compelled speech, and frankly, nothing else in our society operates that way.' The new act would also impact schools, setting new requirements for dress codes and bathrooms for school districts to follow. 'When you take rights, and you say, my feelings are now more important than those of a child or a parent or a family member and law should be written for my feelings,' said Schoening. 'Your feelings are valid if you're grieving the loss of what you hoped for your child,' said Glessner. State Attorney General Phil Wiser, who was named in the lawsuit, said he is not commenting at this time, and neither is Governor Jared Polis. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
20-05-2025
- Politics
- Yahoo
Colorado Dems urge Noem not to get rid of FEMA ahead of peak fire season
DENVER (KDVR) — A group of Colorado Democratic lawmakers is urging U.S. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem to reconsider restructuring or dissolving the Federal Emergency Management Agency ahead of peak wildfire season. Colorado Sens. Michael Bennet and John Hickenlooper and Reps. Joe Neguse, Diana DeGette, Jason Crow and Brittany Pettersen, in a letter sent Monday, argued that cutting FEMA's workforce and shutting down disaster relief programs places both current recovery efforts and future responses in jeopardy. Well wishes pour in for former president Joe Biden 'Cutting FEMA's workforce, closing mitigation programs … or even dissolving the agency completely threaten to jeopardize ongoing recovery efforts and hinder our ability to swiftly and effectively respond in the future,' the letter says. The letter also highlighted the help lawmakers argue FEMA provided during the 2021 Marshall Fire, the most destructive wildfire in Colorado history, during which more than 1,084 homes were destroyed, lawmakers said. 'FEMA provided critical support that helped Coloradans recover, rebuild infrastructure, and prepare for future emergencies,' the lawmakers wrote. Kelly Loving Act signed into Colorado law Noem said in March that she planned to 'eliminate' FEMA, reports CNN. The revelation came months after President Trump said in January that he planned on signing an executive order to 'begin the process of fundamentally reforming and overhauling FEMA,' reports CNN. Trump, who made the comments during a visit to North Carolina to survey damage caused by Hurricane Helene, said that he may get rid of FEMA entirely, saying, 'I think, frankly, FEMA's not good.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
19-05-2025
- Politics
- Yahoo
Colorado parent groups sue state over controversial new transgender law enforcing 'compelled speech'
Colorado potentially faces a major lawsuit regarding a new law on transgender protections and how it could violate free speech and parental rights. On Friday, Gov. Jared Polis signed into law the Kelly Loving Act, a bill that expands state anti-discrimination protections for transgender individuals by allowing a person's "chosen name" to qualify as a form of "gender expression" that is protected under the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act (CADA). Now that the bill has passed, the group Defending Education (DE) has sued the state on behalf of the Do No Harm, The Colorado Parent Advocacy Network and Protect Kids Colorado groups out of concerns that the law could violate their free speech rights. "The Act's new definition of 'gender expression' is unconstitutionally overbroad," the lawsuit provided to Fox News Digital reads. "Because it covers any treatment based on the use of a 'chosen name' or other forms of preferred 'address,' it punishes many forms of constitutionally protected speech." Colorado's 'Totalitarian' Transgenderism Bill Sparks Concerns From Parents It continued, "When speakers refer to transgender-identifying individuals using biologically accurate terms, they advance a viewpoint about a hot-button political issue: gender ideology. That kind of speech lies at the core of the First Amendment. But the Act's definition of 'gender expression' makes all such speech discriminatory and unlawful." Read On The Fox News App The lawsuit added that since CADA prohibits the "publishing of discriminative matter," the new act could prohibit and potentially penalize individuals, including parents, for publicly disapproving of changing one's name and gender. In a statement to Fox News Digital, Sarah Parshall Perry, Vice President of Defending Education, said the law "muzzles" parents and doctors to protect the state's "preferred gender orthodoxy." "Colorado can't seem to stop losing at the Supreme Court on constitutional challenges to its anti-discrimination laws. And yet, Governor Polis has nevertheless signed another patently unconstitutional iteration of its Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act—something that can only be described as an exercise of remarkable hubris," Perry said. DE is seeking a preliminary and permanent injunction on enforcing this new definition as a violation of the First and Fourteenth Amendments for using "unconstitutionally overbroad" language and enforcing "compelled speech." "Do No Harm is proud to challenge Colorado's absurd so-called anti-discrimination act. Abridging American's constitutional right to freedom of expression in the name of radical gender ideology is wrong. We expect the court to reaffirm that the Constitution trumps progressive dogma," said Dr. Stanley Goldfarb, Chairman of Do No Harm. Fox News Digital reached out to the governor's office for comment. The Kelly Loving Act has come under fire by conservatives and Colorado parents since it was introduced in March. Among the protections in the original bill included a ruling that "deadnaming, misgendering, or threatening to publish material related to an individual's gender-affirming health-care services" could be considered forms of "coercive control" that could affect a parent's custody over children. After facing backlash, Colorado lawmakers eventually removed language regarding "deadnaming" and child custody, although opponents still criticized elements of the bill for broad language. Colorado Parents Unload On Liberal Lawmakers, Prompting Changes To Controversial Gender Bill Colorado has been at the center of several high-profile cases based on its anti-discrimination laws over the past few years. Most infamously, Masterpiece Cakeshop owner Jack Phillips has been sued multiple times over his refusal to bake a cake celebrating a same-sex wedding or a gender transition. In 2023, the Supreme Court ruled against the state, finding that Colorado's anti-discrimination laws could not force a graphic designer to create wedding websites for same-sex weddings in violation of her article source: Colorado parent groups sue state over controversial new transgender law enforcing 'compelled speech'
Time of India
17-05-2025
- Politics
- Time of India
'Misgendering' now considered discrimination in this US state: Here's what the law says
Colorado Governor Jared Polis has signed House Bill 1312 into law, marking a significant shift in how the state handles discrimination against transgender individuals. While early drafts of the legislation stirred controversy, its final version still delivers key protections, including restrictions on 'misgendering' and 'deadnaming' in specific contexts. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The bill, named the 'Kelly Loving Act' after a transgender woman killed in the 2022 Club Q shooting, expands Colorado's anti-discrimination laws. It no longer explicitly mentions the terms 'misgendering' or 'deadnaming', but it lays out provisions that indirectly address those actions by mandating inclusive practices across public records, education, and identification documents. Originally, HB 1312 included far-reaching clauses, including a requirement that courts consider 'deadnaming' and 'misgendering' in child custody disputes as forms of coercive control. Those sections were ultimately removed after significant public pushback and concerns raised by groups across the political spectrum. Over 700 people signed up to testify at a Senate hearing – the highest number for any bill this session. Polis, a Democrat and the nation's first openly gay governor, acknowledged the controversy. He said he was 'not comfortable' with the family law provisions in the initial draft, praising the final version for better reflecting public consensus. 'A lot of the controversial parts were removed during the legislative process,' he added. 'What's left are a few provisions that make it easier to reflect the gender identity of folks. ' Under the law, individuals can now update their marriage or civil union licences with a new name without the revised certificate being marked as amended. The same applies to sex designation changes on a Colorado driver's licence, which may now be made up to three times before a court order is required. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now In educational settings, students are allowed to choose names for any reason if a school has a name policy in place. Dress code policies must now permit all students to choose among available options, regardless of gender identity. The bill also includes a clause that prevents Colorado courts from recognising laws from other states that would penalise parents for supporting a child's access to gender-affirming care. Despite the removal of some of its original provisions, HB 1312 still marks a landmark moment in LGBTQ+ rights in Colorado. Sponsored by Democrats in both chambers, the bill passed 36-20 in the House and 20-14 in the Senate.
