'Misgendering' now considered discrimination in this US state: Here's what the law says
Colorado Governor Jared Polis has signed House Bill 1312 into law, marking a significant shift in how the state handles discrimination against transgender individuals. While early drafts of the legislation stirred controversy, its final version still delivers key protections, including restrictions on 'misgendering' and 'deadnaming' in specific contexts.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The bill, named the 'Kelly Loving Act' after a transgender woman killed in the 2022 Club Q shooting, expands Colorado's anti-discrimination laws. It no longer explicitly mentions the terms 'misgendering' or 'deadnaming', but it lays out provisions that indirectly address those actions by mandating inclusive practices across public records, education, and identification documents.
Originally, HB 1312 included far-reaching clauses, including a requirement that courts consider 'deadnaming' and 'misgendering' in child custody disputes as forms of coercive control.
Those sections were ultimately removed after significant public pushback and concerns raised by groups across the political spectrum. Over 700 people signed up to testify at a Senate hearing – the highest number for any bill this session.
Polis, a Democrat and the nation's first openly gay governor, acknowledged the controversy. He said he was 'not comfortable' with the family law provisions in the initial draft, praising the final version for better reflecting public consensus.
'A lot of the controversial parts were removed during the legislative process,' he added. 'What's left are a few provisions that make it easier to reflect the gender identity of folks.
'
Under the law, individuals can now update their marriage or civil union licences with a new name without the revised certificate being marked as amended. The same applies to sex designation changes on a Colorado driver's licence, which may now be made up to three times before a court order is required.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
In educational settings, students are allowed to choose names for any reason if a school has a name policy in place. Dress code policies must now permit all students to choose among available options, regardless of gender identity.
The bill also includes a clause that prevents Colorado courts from recognising laws from other states that would penalise parents for supporting a child's access to gender-affirming care.
Despite the removal of some of its original provisions, HB 1312 still marks a landmark moment in LGBTQ+ rights in Colorado. Sponsored by Democrats in both chambers, the bill passed 36-20 in the House and 20-14 in the Senate.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
Deal to get US-China trade truce back on track is done, says Trump
President Donald Trump on Wednesday said he was very happy with a trade deal that restored a fragile truce in the US -China trade war, a day after negotiators from Washington and Beijing agreed on a framework covering tariff rates. The deal also removes Chinese export restrictions on rare earths minerals and allows Chinese students access to US universities. "We made a great deal with China. We're very happy with it," Trump told reporters before a performance at Washington's Kennedy Center on Wednesday evening. "We have everything we need, and we're going to do very well with it. And hopefully they are too." Earlier, Trump used his social media platform to offer some of the first details to emerge from two days of marathon talks in London that had, in the words of US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, put "meat on the bones" of an agreement reached last month in Geneva to ease bilateral retaliatory tariffs that had reached crushing triple-digit levels. "Our deal with China is done, subject to final approval with President Xi and me," Trump said on Truth Social. "Full magnets, and any necessary rare earths, will be supplied, up front, by China. Likewise, we will provide to China what was agreed to, including Chinese students using our colleges and universities (which has always been good with me!). We are getting a total of 55per cent tariffs, China is getting 10per cent ." A White House official said the 55per cent represents the sum of a baseline 10per cent "reciprocal" tariff Trump has imposed on goods imported from nearly all US trading partners; 20per cent on all Chinese imports because of punitive measures Trump has imposed on China, Mexico and Canada, associated with his accusation that the three facilitate the flow of the opioid fentanyl into the US ; and pre-existing 25per cent levies on imports from China that were put in place during Trump's first term in the White House. Lutnick said the 55per cent rate on Chinese imports is fixed and unalterable. Asked on Wednesday on CNBC if the tariff levels on China would not change, he said: "You can definitely say that." Still, many specifics of the deal and details on how it will be implemented remain unclear. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told lawmakers that the deal would not reduce US export restrictions on high-end artificial intelligence chips in return for access to Chinese rare earths. "There is no quid pro quo in terms of chips for rare earths," Bessent told a US Senate Appropriations subcommittee hearing. China's commerce ministry did not immediately reply to a request for comment and more information. Framework for a deal Officials from the two superpowers had gathered at a rushed meeting in London starting on Monday. The meeting followed a call last week between Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping that broke a standoff that flared just weeks after the preliminary deal reached in Geneva. The Geneva deal had faltered over China's continued curbs on critical minerals exports, prompting the Trump administration to respond with export controls preventing shipments of semiconductor design software, jet engines for Chinese-made planes and other goods to China. Lutnick said the agreement reached in London would remove restrictions on Chinese exports of rare earths minerals and magnets and some of the recent US export restrictions "in a balanced way," but did not provide details after the talks concluded around midnight London time (7 p.m. EDT). "We have reached a framework to implement the Geneva consensus and the call between the two presidents," Lutnick said. Both sides will now return to present the framework to their respective presidents for approvals, he added. "And if that is approved, we will then implement the framework," he said. In a separate briefing, China's vice commerce minister, Li Chenggang, also said a trade framework had been reached in principle that would be taken back to US and Chinese leaders. 'Back to square one' Trump's shifting tariff policies have roiled global markets, sparked congestion and confusion in major ports, and cost companies tens of billions of dollars in lost sales and higher costs. US stocks drifted lower on Wednesday but have recouped most of the losses suffered earlier in the spring during Trump's wave of tariff announcements. "It's a done deal, according to President Trump, but we haven't seen any details, which is why I think the market is not reacting to it yet. As with just about everything, the devil is in the details," said Oliver Pursche, senior vice president and adviser at Wealthspire Advisors in Westport, Connecticut. The World Bank on Tuesday slashed its global growth forecast for 2025 by four-tenths of a percentage point to 2.3per cent , saying higher tariffs and heightened uncertainty posed a "significant headwind" for nearly all economies. The US -China deal may keep the Geneva agreement from unravelling over duelling export controls, but does little to resolve deep differences over Trump's unilateral tariffs and longstanding US complaints about China's state-led, export-driven economic model. "If China will course correct by upholding its end of the initial trade agreement we outlined in Geneva - and I believe after our talks in London, they will - then the rebalancing of the world' largest economies is possible," Bessent told a separate House of Representatives hearing hours after returning from the London talks. The two sides left Geneva with fundamentally different views of the terms of that agreement and needed to be more specific on required actions, said Josh Lipsky , senior director of the Atlantic Council's GeoEconomics Center in Washington. "They are back to square one, but that's much better than square zero," Lipsky said. It was not immediately clear from Trump's comments where things stood regarding the timeline for a more comprehensive deal that was reached last month in Geneva, a deadline set at that time for August 10. William James in London, and Sachin Ravikumar; Ethan Wang, Shi Bu, Yuhan Lin and Alessandro Diviggiano in Beijing, Caroline Valetkevitch in New York; Writing by David Lawder, Kate Holton and Liz Lee; Editing by Lincoln Feast, Paul Simao, Jamie Freed and Leslie Adler)
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
Amid Unrest, Trump Sends More US Troops To LA Than In Iraq, Syria Combined
Los Angeles: US President Donald Trump has reportedly sent more American troops to the city of Los Angeles (LA) in California-- to curb the protests against his harsh immigration policies -- than those deployed in Iraq and Syria by Washington. The Republican leader has deployed around 4,000 National Guard personnel and over 700 active duty Marines in LA to counter protests ignited over a sudden escalation in efforts to apprehend migrants who were in the country illegally. "There are 4,800 activated Guard and Marine personnel in LA, compared to the 2,500 troops in Iraq and 1,500 in Syria," according to an ABC News report. According to the Pentagon, the deployment in LA will cost taxpayers $134 million over 60 days. LA Protests The unrest in LA began on June 6 after United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) began mass detentions of undocumented migrants. By the evening of June 7, the authorities had reportedly arrested at least 44 people on suspicion of immigration violations. In response, residents took to the streets, with protests later escalating into riots. President Trump ordered the deployment of troops to the city-- which is home to nearly 3.9 million people-- in response to the unrest without consulting California Governor Gavin Newsom, who later sued the Trump administration for the move. Governor Newsom, a Democrat, has charged that Trump is seeking to escalate the confrontation for political gain. "Democracy is under assault right before our eyes," he said in a televised address late Tuesday. "California may be first, but it clearly won't end here." Trump's Immigration Crackdown Trump won the election last year partly on promises to combat what he claims is an "invasion" by undocumented migrants. He is now seizing the opportunity to make political capital, ordering the California National Guard to deploy despite Governor Gavin Newsom's objections, the first time a US president has taken such action in decades. Meanwhile, demonstrations against Trump's immigration raids spread on Wednesday across the United States despite a military-backed crackdown in Los Angeles and threats by the hard-right Republican president to use "heavy force." US Pulling Troops Out Of The Middle East Meanwhile, amid unrest at home, Trump is planning to move US troops out of the Middle East, which he described as a "dangerous place". On Wednesday, the American leader said personnel were being moved out of the Middle East because "it could be a dangerous place," adding that the United States would not allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon.
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
US President "Acknowledged" Elon Musk's Apology, Says White House
Washington: White House Press Secretary, Karoline Leavitt on Wednesday (local time) said that US President Donald Trump acknowledged Tesla CEO Elon Musk's apology for his comments. Leavitt, in her media briefing, said that after the incident, the government has started to focus on the business of the American people. "The President acknowledged the statement that Elon put out this morning and he is appreciative of it and we are continuing to focus on the business of the American people," she said. When asked if the administration started a review of Musk's government contract- something that the President said he's considering, Leavitt said nothing like that has started as of now. "Currently have no efforts have been made on that front as far as I'm aware," she said. On Wednesday, Musk said in a post on X, "I regret some of my posts about President Donald Trump last week. They went too far." Musk called Trump on Monday night, as per CNN, before saying early on Wednesday that he regrets some of his social media posts about the President during their very public blow-up last week. The call with the President, which lasted just moments, came after Vice President JD Vance and White House chief of staff Susie Wiles spoke by phone with Musk on Friday, when which the three discussed the feud between Trump and the tech billionaire, two sources familiar with the discussion told CNN. Republican lawmakers and high-profile Trump allies have spent the last week quietly reaching out to Musk, urging him to not only reconcile with the President but also support his domestic policy bill. During Musk's time as Trump's "first buddy," many of the President's closest advisers formed their own relationships with the tech billionaire, which they leaned on after the messy public break-up between the two men to try and bring Musk back around. Through text messages and phone calls with Musk, these Trump allies have sought to de-escalate the feud and explain the necessity for what Trump calls his "Big Beautiful Bill," which faces hurdles in the Senate. Sources familiar with these interactions said Musk was receptive to outreach but still pushed back on there not being enough spending cuts in the legislation, CNN reported.
