logo
South Korea completes removal of anti-Pyongyang loudspeakers in DMZ

South Korea completes removal of anti-Pyongyang loudspeakers in DMZ

UPIa day ago
South Korea's military completed the removal of anti-Pyongyang propaganda loudspeakers in the DMZ, officials said Wednesday. Photo courtesy of South Korea Ministry of Defense
SEOUL, Aug. 6 (UPI) -- South Korea completed removing loudspeakers that had been installed along the DMZ to blast anti-Pyongyang messages across the border, military officials said Wednesday.
Around 20 speakers were completely dismantled by Tuesday afternoon, officials said. The military began the project on Monday, calling it a "practical measure that will help ease tensions between the South and the North."
In June, South Korean President Lee Jae Myung ordered the suspension of the broadcasts, which included news, K-pop music, and information about democracy and life in South Korea.
Seoul had resumed the Cold War-style propaganda campaign one year earlier in response to a series of provocations by North Korea that included floating thousands of trash-filled balloons across the border.
The North countered by broadcasting bizarre noises such as metallic screeching and animal sounds, disturbing residents in areas near the DMZ. Pyongyang quieted its own speakers after the initial suspension but has not yet appeared to take corresponding action to remove them.
As of Tuesday, there were "no movements by the North Korean military to dismantle their loudspeakers," Joint Chiefs of Staff spokesman Col. Lee Sung-jun said at a press briefing.
President Lee has made an effort to improve inter-Korean relations since taking office in June. In addition to the loudspeaker suspension, his administration has also cracked down on activists floating balloons carrying anti-Pyongyang leaflets across the border.
Last month, Seoul repatriated six North Koreans who drifted into southern waters on wooden boats and announced plans to return the remains of another North Korean national found near the maritime border.
Pyongyang did not respond to the repatriation plan by a deadline on Tuesday afternoon, South Korea's Unification Ministry said. Local government officials will conduct "a respectful funeral in accordance with procedures for handling unclaimed bodies," the ministry said.
North Korea has rebuffed Seoul's attempts at rapprochement so far.
Last week, Kim Yo Jong -- the influential sister of North Korean leader Kim Jong Un -- said Pyongyang had "no interest" in responding to efforts by the Lee administration to thaw relations, citing Seoul's "blind trust" in military ties with the United States.
The allies are scheduled to hold their annual large-scale Ulchi Freedom Shield joint military exercise this month. Pyongyang frequently condemns the joint drills as rehearsals for an invasion.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The week in whoppers: Axios is shocked, shocked at probes into Obama officials, Kathy Hochul resorts to lies about starving children and more
The week in whoppers: Axios is shocked, shocked at probes into Obama officials, Kathy Hochul resorts to lies about starving children and more

New York Post

time23 minutes ago

  • New York Post

The week in whoppers: Axios is shocked, shocked at probes into Obama officials, Kathy Hochul resorts to lies about starving children and more

Diary of disturbing disinformation and dangerous delusions This tweet: We say: After years of probing Donald Trump on specious grounds — for Russian collusion and via numerous cooked-up civil and criminal prosecutions and two impeachments — Axios is now outraged that Team Trump is probing the Obama officials who spawned the first anti-Trump probes. Hello? Advertisement This excuse: 'Children [will be] starving because they don't have the SNAP benefits.' Advertisement — Gov. Kathy Hochul, Monday We say: Tugging on heartstrings to push an agenda is a popular shtick with the left. But to excuse illegal gerrymandering in New York in response to Texas' new maps? And when, as The Post noted, the excuse is beyond lame? Advertisement Note: Changes to the SNAP program in GOP legislation merely involve slightly tougher work requirements and having states pick up more of the tab. No need for children to 'starve.' This remark: 'I will liken [Texas' redistricting] to the Holocaust.' Advertisement — Texas state Rep. Jolanda Jones We say: Please. The idea that new congressional voting districts in Texas, which might produce a few more Republican seats in the 435-seat House, will lead to a new Holocaust is so nutty, even Jones felt the need to apologize for saying it. Yet the left uses precisely this kind of wacky, extremist language at the drop of a hat these days. This warning: 'We know how the age of colonialism worked on this planet.' — CBS News host Vlad Duthiers, Wednesday Advertisement We say: Duthiers, plainly consumed by the left's anti-colonialist kookiness, was warning against attempts to colonize the moon, given the Earth's history of foreigners dominating native populations. Memo to Duthiers: No one lives on the moon. — Compiled by The Post Editorial Board

Anti-Israel activist confronts former IDF soldier on New York beach, gets questioned in return
Anti-Israel activist confronts former IDF soldier on New York beach, gets questioned in return

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Anti-Israel activist confronts former IDF soldier on New York beach, gets questioned in return

A peaceful afternoon on a New York beach took a jarring turn when an anti-Israel activist launched a verbal tirade against a former Israeli soldier, simply for wearing a Star of David necklace. The incident, captured on video and posted by ILTV Israel News, shows the activist shouting accusations and interrogating the man and his friends in an increasingly heated exchange. "Yesterday, an unhinged pro-Hamas protester targeted a former IDF soldier on a New York beach, simply for wearing a Star of David," the outlet captioned the clip on Instagram. "Despite her shouting and offensive behavior, the Israelis stayed calm, respectful, and composed. The only hate in that video came from one side as usual and it wasn't theirs," the post continued. Anti-israel Activist Mahmoud Khalil Claims Oct. 7 Terror Attack Was 'Desperate Attempt' For Gaza To Be Heard In the video, the activist approaches a man sitting on a towel with a woman and another man, accusing him of war crimes. Read On The Fox News App "You went to Gaza, right? You fought children? You killed children in Gaza?" she shouts at him. Both men calmly answered her questions. One of them confirmed he served in the Israel Defense Forces and had been stationed in Gaza. The woman he's sitting with adds, "He went to Gaza to help all the children that your people killed." As the woman continues filming and yelling, one of the men attempts to de-escalate. Zohran Mamdani's Dsa Sponsors Protest With 'Death, Death To The Idf!' War Cry "So if you want to see a picture of [my brother] over there right now, I can show you what's going on." The protester screams back, demanding to see it. "Please show me a picture of your brother in Gaza, please do. Please. The world wants to see your faces. The world does want to see your faces!" she screams at him. She then asks if he is proud of his service. Smiling, he replies, "I'm proud of serving my country." That only fuels her anger. "You think killing other people and radicalizing them makes your people safer?" she shouts. He calmly fires back, bringing up the Oct. 7, 2023 Hamas attack, in which over 1,200 Israelis were slaughtered and hundreds taken hostage. The man invites her to have a real conversation. She refuses. New York Man Charged With Federal Hate Crimes After Assaulting Jewish People At Anti-israel Protests: Doj He asks if she's ever been to Gaza. "I cannot go to Gaza," she replies. "Your people are not letting me." "If you go there right now, dressed like that, they'll slaughter you," he says, pointing to her bikini. "That's not true!" she screams back. A lifeguard eventually approaches, attempting to mediate. The protester claims the Israelis insulted her and that they are IDF soldiers who "killed people in Gaza." "Insulted you? How did I insult you?" the man asks, still calm. He again offers to talk — she declines. "Why would I want to talk to your guys? You guys have killed my people! You're killing children," she yells. "Why are you sitting with people who kill children? Is that cool for you?" she asks the other man sitting in the group. "Just leave us alone," the man replies. As she walks away, she shouts one final slogan: "Free Palestine!" Fox News Digital reached out to the New York City Parks Department for comment on the incident but did not receive a article source: Anti-Israel activist confronts former IDF soldier on New York beach, gets questioned in return Solve the daily Crossword

5 questions looming over potential Trump-Putin summit
5 questions looming over potential Trump-Putin summit

The Hill

timean hour ago

  • The Hill

5 questions looming over potential Trump-Putin summit

President Trump is eyeing a summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin as early as next week as he pushes for an end to the war in Ukraine, a potential face-to-face meeting that carries huge risks and rewards for the White House. Trump has grown increasingly frustrated with Putin in recent months as Russia pounds Ukraine despite U.S. calls for a pause in the fighting. The administration on Wednesday announced tariffs on India over its purchases of Russian oil, and additional sanctions on Russia are expected Friday. Much is still unknown about the meeting, including when, where – and even whether – it will happen. Here are five questions hanging over the potential Trump-Putin summit. When and where? Both the White House and the Kremlin have indicated the meeting will take place soon, potentially as early as next week. But officials did not offer details on where it would take place, how long it would last or who would be involved. Trump told European leaders on a call on Wednesday that his idea was to meet with Putin and then have a trilateral meeting with Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. It was not clear if all parties would agree to such a set up, or who else might attend. Trump told reporters Thursday Zelensky's attendance was not a prerequisite for him to meet with Putin. Possible venues could include Turkey, which has served as a mediator for U.S.-Russian prisoner swaps. The United Arab Emirates has also mediated between Russia and Ukraine for prisoner swaps. Qatar is a mediator the U.S. has relied on heavily in negotiating between Israel and Hamas and between warring parties in Africa. Trump's 2018 summit with Putin in Helsinki, Finland served to provide neutral ground at a time of heightened U.S.-Russia tensions, after Russia's interference in the 2016 elections. Helsinki holds historic significance as hosting talks easing tensions during the Cold War. In 2022, Putin and then-President Biden met in Geneva, Switzerland, long a diplomatic hub due to its neutrality on the global stage. Putin has restrictions on his travel, barred from going to countries who are party to the International Criminal Court, possibly compelling them to arrest him on a warrant from the court over allegations of abduction of Ukrainian children. Putin cancelled a trip to South Africa in 2023 over concerns he could be arrested. But Mongolia flouted the court's orders in September 2024, rolling out the red carpet for Putin. The court later reported Mongolia to its oversight organization for failing to arrest Putin. What involvement does Ukraine have? One key piece of any potential summit is Ukraine's role. Trump indicated to European leaders that his idea would be to meet with Putin, then host a meeting with Putin and Zelensky. The Kremlin had earlier dismissed a meeting between Putin and Zelensky unless negotiators had reached the final stages of a deal to end the war. Zelensky has not publicly commented on a potential meeting with Putin, and such a meeting would be the first time the two leaders have come face-to-face since the war began in 2022. 'Russia now seems to be more inclined toward a ceasefire – the pressure is working. But the key is to ensure they don't deceive anyone in the details – neither us, nor the United States,' Zelensky said in a statement Wednesday after speaking with Trump and European leaders. Zelensky has been adamant that there should be no decisions about Ukraine without Ukrainian input. And while Trump spent his first few months back in office railing against Zelensky and saying Ukraine had no leverage in peace talks, he has focused his frustration on Putin and agreed to provide more weapons to Kyiv. Russia has reportedly floated an air-truce over Ukraine absent a deal on a total ceasefire. A majority in Ukraine want negotiations for an end to the war as soon as possible (69%), according to a recent Gallup poll, up from 52 percent the year prior. But 68 percent believe it is unlikely fighting will come to an end in the next year. What are the risks for Trump, Putin? Such a high-stakes meeting could yield a historic diplomatic win for Trump if he stops the war – but it also carries risks for all parties involved. Trump has repeatedly demurred on whether Putin is stringing him along, and an in-person meeting could buy the Russian leader more time without producing concrete results toward a cease-fire in Ukraine. White House officials have indicated they are going into the potential meeting with eyes open about Putin's lack of commitments thus far. 'This potential meeting will not be a meeting for the sake of a meeting. This will only be if the president feels that Vladimir Putin is committed to doing what the president has promised on day one, which was ending this war once and for all,' White House spokesperson Harrison Fields said Thursday on NewsNation. 'The president is obviously frustrated. We see Putin not willing to engage in proper diplomacy with the president,' Fields added. Putin, meanwhile, risks further angering Trump and consolidating support for Ukraine if he embarrasses the U.S. president during a summit that yields no results. 'In this case [Trump] is faced with an experienced KGB officer who is specifically trained to manipulate people in person. Unfortunately Putin is known to be quite good at it,' said Maria Snegovaya, senior fellow for Russia and Eurasia with the Center for Strategic and International Studies. 'We don't want the 2018 Helsinki scenario to be repeated. It's not going to be a win for Trump,' she said. At that time, Trump sided with Putin over U.S. intelligence agencies in dismissing Russian meddling in the 2016 elections. Will Trump delay Russia sanctions? The White House is expected to announce a fresh round of sanctions on Russia on Friday after Trump shortened the timeframe for Moscow to agree to a ceasefire in Ukraine. A senior administration official said sanctions would go into effect at the end of the week, despite a positive meeting between Steve Witkoff, the special envoy for peace missions, and Russian officials. But it's not clear what actions Trump is considering. Some experts argue for narrowing tariffs on countries purchasing Russian oil to the actual amount of money being paid to Moscow. The effect could discourage large purchases of Russian oil and generate revenue that could go toward assistance for Ukraine. But Democrats are raising alarm that Trump has already undermined U.S. commitment to sanctions by holding back on any new penalties on Russia over six months into the administration, even for tightening penalties on sanction-evaders, according to a report released Tuesday by the minority staff of the Senate committees on Foreign Relations and Banking. The administration said imposing new sanctions would undermine their ability to negotiate with Russia. Trump has in the past delayed sanctions threats against both adversaries and allies, while also questioning the impact of additional penalties on Russia. The prospect of an imminent meeting with Putin and a chance to make gains in negotiations could lead the president and the White House to hold off on new sanctions if they feel it would undermine progress. Will it lead to a ceasefire? Trump's ultimate goal is to immediately halt the fighting between Russia and Ukraine, having long railed against what he views as needless death and destruction. While initially pressuring Zelensky and framing him as an obstacle to a ceasefire, Trump has more recently described Putin as deceitful, saying he would have a 'nice phone call' with the Russian leader and then 'the missiles are launched into Kyiv.' 'The talk doesn't mean anything,' Trump said on July 14, after his sixth phone call with Putin. But Snegovaya said Putin is in a strong position going into talks, with his economy squeezed but not on the brink of catastrophe, the Russian military making slow but steady gains on the frontline, and the increased military production allowing for punishing aerial attacks on Ukraine that are depleting Kyiv's defenses and resolve. 'The best strategy seems to be the one he [Putin] adopted since the start of negotiation effort: Continuously engage with the US administration, try not to provoke it while simultaneously pushing into Ukraine further, gaining additional territory,' she said. 'It's clearly a diplomatic win for Putin, I think it's almost a cliché at this point to repeat this – he is ending international isolation and meeting, arguably, the most powerful person in the world, without giving any major concessions on Ukraine,' she continued. 'And that would have been consistent with his original premise that the West will crack and come around eventually.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store