Trump And Putin: A Strained Relationship
Their complicated relationship will be put to the test at a summit in Alaska on Friday, where the two leaders who claim to admire each other will seek to outmaneuver one another over how to end Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
While the two were close to a bromance during Trump's first term (2017-2021), their relationship has grown strained during his second term. The US president has expressed anger with Putin for pressing on with his brutal three-year-old war in Ukraine, which Trump calls "ridiculous."
Trump describes the summit as "really a feel-out meeting" to evaluate Putin's readiness to negotiate an end to the war.
"I'm going to be telling him, 'You've got to end this war,'" Trump said.
The two leaders notably have radically different negotiating strategies: the Republican real estate magnate usually banks on making a deal, while the Russian president tends to take the long view, confident that time is on his side.
Referring to Trump's meeting with Putin, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Tuesday that Trump needs "to see him face to face... to make an assessment by looking at him."
Trump praised Putin for accepting his invitation to come to the US state of Alaska, which was once a Russian colony.
"I thought it was very respectful that the president of Russia is coming to our country, as opposed to us going to his country or even a third place," Trump said Monday.
It will be only the second one-on-one meeting between the men since a 2018 Helsinki summit.
Trump calls Putin smart and insists he's always "had a very good relationship" with the Kremlin leader.
But when Russian missiles pounded Kyiv earlier this year, Trump accused him of "needlessly killing a lot of people," adding in a social media post: "He has gone absolutely CRAZY!"
For his part, Putin has praised the Republican billionaire's push to end the Ukraine war. "I have no doubt that he means it sincerely," Putin said last year when Trump was running for president.
Since returning to the White House in January, the American president has forged a rapprochement with Putin, who has been sidelined by the international community since the February 2022 invasion of Ukraine.
Trump and Putin, aged 79 and 72 respectively, spoke for 90 minutes by phone in February, both expressing hope for a reset of relations.
But after a series of fruitless talks and continued deadly Russian bombing of Ukrainian cities, Trump has appeared increasingly frustrated.
"I am very disappointed with President Putin," Trump told reporters last month. "I thought he was somebody that meant what he said. And he'll talk so beautifully and then he'll bomb people at night. We don't like that."
Trump and Putin have met six times, mostly on the sidelines of international events during Trump's first term.
In his recent book "War," Washington Post journalist Bob Woodward wrote that Trump spoke to Putin seven times between leaving the White House in 2021 and returning there earlier this year. The Kremlin denies this.
But the defining moment in their relationship remains the July 16, 2018 summit in the Finnish capital Helsinki. After a two-hour one-on-one meeting, Trump and Putin expressed a desire to mend relations between Washington and Moscow.
But Trump caused an uproar during a joint press conference by appearing to take at face value the Russian president's assurances that Moscow did not attempt to influence the 2016 US presidential election -- even though US intelligence agencies had unanimously confirmed that it did.
"I have great confidence in my intelligence people, but I will tell you that President Putin was extremely strong and powerful in his denial today," Trump said. "He just said it's not Russia. I will say this: I don't see any reason why it would be."
Given this history, Democratic Senator Jeanne Shaheen is worried about what could happen at the Trump-Putin summit.
"I am very concerned that President Putin will view this as a reward and another opportunity to further prolong the war instead of finally seeking peace," she said. Putin and Trump: A former bromance has become strained over Ukraine AFP
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Int'l Business Times
15 minutes ago
- Int'l Business Times
Okinawa A Reluctant Host For US Troops 80 Years After WWII
Okinawa resident Hiromasa Iha can still recall the screams of his classmates and teachers after a US military jet crashed into his elementary school, killing 18 people more than six decades ago. As people globally commemorate the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II, the 72-year-old retired businessman is among many residents who oppose the American troops stationed on their island ever since. He joins dozens of islanders in near-daily protests against the US forces. The United States has around 54,000 military personnel stationed in Japan, mostly on Okinawa, and a string of incidents over the years, including sexual assault cases, have angered residents. "For us, these crimes and accidents are not someone else's business, and we feel a pressing unease that we can't predict when these things may happen again," he told AFP, recalling the 1959 school incident. "We want the bases to go." The island region, a subtropical paradise with a huge tourism industry, hosts 70 percent of all American bases in Japan and serves as a key US outpost to monitor China, the Taiwan Strait and the Korean peninsula. The bloody Battle of Okinawa near the end of the war led to the US occupation of the island until 1972, during which troops seized private land in Okinawa to expand their presence in what is locally known as a "bayonet and bulldozer" campaign. During the Cold War, US troops in Okinawa were seen by Washington as a deterrent against the spread of communism. Now, both Tokyo and Washington stress the strategic importance of Okinawa in the face of China's territorial ambitions. But residents have for years voiced their fury over a spate of crimes and accidents involving American soldiers and base personnel. In 2024 alone, Okinawa police detained 80 people connected to the base -- such as US soldiers or military contractors -- including seven for severely violent crimes. Okinawa erupted in anger after a 1995 gang rape of a 12-year-old girl by three US Marines. In August 2004, a Marine helicopter crashed at a university in Okinawa, causing no injuries but amplifying fears of accidents. In April 2016, a former Marine, who was working as a military contractor in Okinawa, raped and killed a 20-year-old woman. And as recently as last month, a senior Marine officer visited the Okinawa government to apologise after a Marine was convicted of sexually assaulting a woman. Opinion polls in Okinawa have historically shown that the majority of residents believe the rest of Japan must carry its fair share of the load when it comes to hosting the US military. Okinawa Governor Denny Tamaki routinely points out the island's "excessive burden", impacting the daily lives of residents. "It's not that we don't like American people. We are saying, please do something about the bases," she said. When Okinawa was returned to Japan in 1972, residents expected that US bases would be spread across Japan -- a vision that never came true, she added. Recent polls suggest growing resignation among the Okinawan public. In a 2023 survey, nearly 40 percent of Okinawan survey participants said the anti-US base movement was powerless to change Tokyo's policy. But many Okinawan residents say they live in fear of crimes by American soldiers, with victims still trying to process their grief. Takemasa Kinjo, 68, was a high school student when his mother was killed by a Marine in 1974 with a brick at their home where she operated a small bar. "It is truly scary if you think crimes can happen in your neighbourhood," Kinjo said. He also joined a recent protest at a Marine base that is being expanded into a secluded bay where dugongs and other protected species live. He believes Okinawa -- where base-related income accounts for just over five percent of its economy -- can thrive thanks to tourism alone, with an increasing number of holidaymakers drawn to the area's turquoise bays and coral reefs. "There should be no base on Okinawa," he said. "We don't need new military facilities." Iha, whose elementary school was destroyed by a US jet, feels the need to explain to future generations what happened -- and warn them it could happen again. At the time of the crash, which also left more than 200 people injured, "everyone thought another war was starting", he recalled. Now, "every day, military jets fly over our houses, and we see helicopters making emergency landings," said Iha. "This is not something that only belongs in the past. This can happen again anytime." Takemasa Kinjo, who was a high school student when his mother was killed by a US Marine in 1974, holding a placard reading "Opposition to War" outside his residence in the Henoko area of Nago city AFP Residents have for years voiced their fury over a spate of crimes and accidents involving American soldiers and base personnel AFP A portrait (L) of Takemasa Kinjo's mother, who was killed by a US Marine in 1974 AFP
DW
an hour ago
- DW
North Korea denies removing propaganda loudspeakers – DW – 08/14/2025
Pyongyang denied south Korea's claims that some of the loudspeakers along the borders were removed. Dialogue prospects between the two countries seem poor as Kim Yo Jong said her country has no interest in the South. Kim Jong Un's sister denied claims North Korea had removed some of its loudspeakers along its border with the South, saying Seoul is wrong to think of renewed dialogue between the two countries. "We have never removed loudspeakers installed in the border area and are not willing to remove them," Kim Yo Jong said on Thursday. Kim Yo Jong, the North Korean leader's powerful sibling, repeated previous North Korean statements that Pyongyang has no interest in reviving negotiations with the US and South Korea. She said an upcoming military drill planned between the two countries at the end of August is proof of their hostility towards North Korea, also blaming the government in Seoul for misleading the public. North Korea has traditionally always condemned such joint drills, saying they serve as preparation for invasion into its territory. The country often uses such exercises to show off its military strength through military demonstrations and tests to advance its nuclear program. On Thursday, South Korea said it stood by its assessment that North Korea had begun dismantling border loudspeakers. A South Korean military spokesperson said caution was needed when interpreting official statements from Pyongyang. Last weekend, South Korea's army said it had detected some of the speakers in the North being removed after the South took a similar measure regarding the loudspeakers used for K-pop and news reports in a bid to ease tensions between Seoul and Pyongyang. In response to the North's alleged removal of the speakers, liberal South Korean President Lee Jae Myung voiced hopes of "reopening dialogue and communications" between the two rivalled countries. The North's response, however, was a cold shoulder. "We have clarified on several occasions that we have no will to improve relations with the (South)," Kim said, adding that this position will become "fixed" in North Korea's constitution in the future. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Kim also ruled out conveying a message to the US through Russian President Vladimir Putin ahead of his meeting with President Donald Trump. "Why should we send a message to the US side?" she said. The two Koreas are technically still at war with each other due to the 1950-53 war between them ending with an armistice rather than a peace agreement.
DW
an hour ago
- DW
Trump signs order to ease commercial spaceflight regulations – DW – 08/14/2025
The move is set to remove "inefficient" regulations for private space ventures in a move that could benefit former Trump advisor Elon Musk. Environmental groups criticized the order. US President Donald Trump signed an executive order on Wednesday that he claimed would ease regulations that govern commercial rocket launches. The order directs the US transportation secretary to eliminate or expedite environmental reviews for launch licenses given by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). "Inefficient permitting processes discourage investment and innovation, limiting the ability of US companies to lead in global space markets," the executive order reads. It also calls for the cancellation of "outdated, redundant or overly restrictive rules for launch and reentry vehicles," according to a statement released by the White House. Trump's latest executive order also states that "inefficient" permitting processes "discourage investment and innovation," which in turn limits US companies' ability to lead in global space markets. The move could benefit private space companies such as SpaceX, the company owned by former Trump advisor Elon Musk, despite the two falling out publicly in recent months. The company — which dominates the global private space launches market — plans missions to the Moon and Mars using its Starship rockets, which saw a series of setbackslastly in June as a routine test ended up in an explosion. Environmental groups have criticized Trump's moves to deregulate commercial spaceflight. "This reckless order puts people and wildlife at risk from private companies launching giant rockets that often explode and wreak devastation on surrounding areas," Jared Margolis of the US-based nonprofit Center for Biological Diversity said in a statement. The FAA approved an increase in annual SpaceX Starship launches from five to 25 in early may, saying it would not negatively affect the environment. SpaceX boss Musk, the world's richest man, has repeatedly complained that studies over the environmental impact of Starship slow the tests of the rocket, together with post-flight mishap investigations and licensing reviews required by the FAA.
