Metro Vancouver housing prices may lower amid economic uncertainty, experts say
Housing prices could drop slightly in Metro Vancouver amid ongoing political and economic uncertainty in Canada, some real estate experts say.
The prediction comes as the latest market reports show a dip in April home sales compared to recent years, and a rise in the number of places for sale.
Normally, home sales jump significantly coming out of the winter and into the spring, but that didn't happen this year.
"Sales did increase, but the typical seasonal pattern has been quashed by external factors," said Ryan Berlin, head economist at realty company Rennie.
During the previous 10 years, sales were on average 79 per cent higher in April than they were in January, Berlin said, but for 2025, April sales were only 34 per cent higher.
U.S. President Donald Trump's trade war is making buyers hesitant to commit, a cause cited widely by realtors and other experts, including Berlin.
He added that the inherent uncertainty leading up to the Canadian federal election also made buyers nervous.
Similarly, industry association Greater Vancouver Realtors, cited the federal election and the possibility of a recession due to the trade war as discouraging potential buyers, despite the favourable scenario of lower interest rates.
The decrease in sales means homes for sale are accumulating.
Data from Rennie, compiled from multiple sources, shows the number of homes on the market is the highest it's been since 2018. Specifically, there are about 16,000 pre-sale and new homes available as well as 24,000 resale homes in Metro Vancouver.
"We are at an all-time high for available homes," Berlin said.
Realtor Steve Saretsky said that while it used to take one or two weeks for a condo to sell, it can now take two or three months.
Investors flee
Investors are also buying less, he said.
"Unsold inventory on developer balance sheets is at all-time highs," Saretsky said.
This, he said, is because "the investor base really disappeared, which is to say the math simply does not work anymore."
Over the past decade, investors have been some of the main purchasers when it comes to pre-sales, buying into a housing project several years before it's built and ready, Saretsky explained.
"With the outlook for home prices and rents very negative … investors aren't interested in putting their money into the pre-sale market. So there's a lot of projects that won't get off the ground."
For investors who already own, Saretsky said the unstable economy, declining rents and stagnating prices mean many are trying to sell and get out of the market.
Effect on price
In a statement, Greater Vancouver Realtors called spring 2025 a buyer's market, suggesting that the combination of lower interest rates and high inventory presents "plenty of opportunity for anyone looking to make a purchase."
Saretsky said the reluctance of buyers, along with the accumulation of homes for sale, means prices could come down.
"The reality is, when you have record inventory for sale or you've got six or seven months of inventory on the market, sometimes the only way to stand out [as a seller] is to have the lowest price, right?"
University of British Columbia Sauder School of Business associate professor Tom Davidoff said potential buyers may want to consider giving lower-than-normal offers.
"If I were a buyer and I didn't need a place desperately, if I had a place I was comfortable that I could stay, I think I would be doing low-ball offers," he said.
"I think bidding five, 10, 15 per cent below asking. Why not? Take some swings."
But Berlin said there hasn't been a significant decrease in prices so far. Instead, prices have stagnated.
"This is pretty typical because home prices tend to be what we call 'downward sticky,'" he said.
However, in some cases, developers with new builds may lower their prices slightly, he said. Having already put a lot of money into a building, a developer may find themselves needing to sell and move on.
"If you're sitting on a number of homes that you haven't sold yet, you're unable to extract that capital from the project and invest it in the construction of new homes," he said.
Looking ahead, Berlin said political and economic stability are needed for home sales to pick up again.
"Until we have some certainty around what Canada's economic strategy is and [what] our relationship trade wise is with the U.S., I think you're going to see the buyer stay right where they are."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Alberta's Smith, former prime ministers to speak at conference ahead of G7
CALGARY - Two former Canadian prime ministers and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith are among the notable names set to speak at a conference today ahead of next week's G7 leaders' summit in Kananaskis. The conference is hosted by the University of Calgary's School of Public Policy and its G7 research group and will feature a series of panels about past summits and international affairs. Former prime minister Jean Chrétien will speak about past summits hosted in Canada alongside his former deputy prime minister and finance minister John Manley. Later, Alberta's premier is set to speak alongside the public policy school's director Martha Hall Findlay about the role the province plays in the global energy market. Former prime minister Joe Clark is to give the closing keynote speech and offer his thoughts on the day's discussions. The university says the conference is meant to bring experts and officials together to explain key issues G7 leaders are facing heading into next week's summit. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 12, 2025. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
New data on mothers who lost jobs during pregnancy show why they fight for change
Arina Kharlamova was cradling her two-month-old daughter when an email popped into her inbox that disrupted the calm of her maternity leave. The message invited the Whitby, Ont., woman to a meeting where she was told she was part of a layoff affecting 30 per cent of the staff at the company she worked for. "It felt like a tailspin, honestly," she recalled. "It was very, very destabilizing, very difficult to be present and continue just focusing on my baby rather than starting to panic." Though she didn't know it at the time, Kharlamova was not alone in her experience. A new study funded by advocacy group Moms at Work and law firm Hudson Sinclair found 15 per cent of 1,390 Canadian moms who gave birth in 2022 and 2023 were dismissed, laid off or had their contracts go unrenewed during their pregnancy, maternity leave or when they returned to work. The respondents were surveyed online and reached through social media posts, email blasts and partner organizations, including women's associations across Canada. The overall Canadian workforce has an average involuntary turnover rate of 5.1 per cent, according to 2023 research from consulting firm Mercer. Allison Venditti, Moms at Work's founder, found the gap striking even though she had long suspected there was a connection between motherhood and job loss. She's heard many stories of pregnant women or new moms losing their jobs. Some, like Kharlamova, were terminated as part of a larger group of layoffs because their employer was closing or downsizing, which means they likely would have lost their jobs regardless. However, Venditti suspects that some companies add pregnant women or mothers to broader layoff lists because they're "out of sight, out of mind" and easy to cut when managers are asked to let go of staff. Others terminate them because they worry parenting will get in the way of work or reduce productivity, she said. When Venditti broached the phenomenon with other people, she says they told her things such as, "it's not a real problem" or "anecdotally hearing it from a couple of women doesn't make it true." Realizing that 'in order to fix the problem, you have to show that it's a problem," she set off to collect data. At 15 per cent, the findings suggests this group has more than three times the involuntary departure rate as the broader working population. That wound up being "validating" for Deborah Hudson, a Toronto employment lawyer whose firm co-funded the survey. She's had at least 100 clients, including three in a recent week, draw a link between their pregnancies and their unemployment. Employers cannot lay off workers because they've taken leave but are allowed to terminate employees during their leave if the reason for the cut is entirely unrelated to them being pregnant or giving birth, Hudson said. That means moms on parental leave can legally be laid off if their employer goes out of business, closes one of its divisions or cuts a wide swath of its workforce to cope with mounting costs. But a company can't hire someone to temporarily cover a leave and then terminate the original worker to give the job to their replacement for the long term, Hudson says, because Canadian laws dictate that employees on parental leave must be reinstated to their original position or a comparable role upon their return. In these cases and others, employers are betting their employees won't go to lawyers, she says. Employers that cut staff as a result of their impending or current parental status are often hoping workers won't have the time, energy or funding to fight them, Venditti said. When they do, she said it often ends up in a settlement because no one wants to endure a lengthy and expensive legal process. "These are women who have been on maternity leave and are often getting 55 per cent (of their wages through employment insurance) who need to go back to work and are, in most instances, not in a financial position to go after their company because they're trying to find daycare and a new job," she said. While the bulk of Canadian mothers Moms at Work surveyed kept their jobs through pregnancy, 16 per cent were denied flexible work during that time and 11 per cent said they were discouraged from attending prenatal appointments. After giving birth but still on leave, 21 per cent said they were pushed to work while off with their baby and 29 per cent reported feeling pressured to return early. When they were back on the job, 26 per cent reported reduced earnings because they were demoted to lower paying jobs or got fewer bonuses and commissions. Twenty-five per cent were denied promotions and one in six were reassigned "undesirable duties." Those numbers suggest to Venditti that 'women are coming back to organizations that are making it very clear that they don't want them there.' "If they're not pushing you out the door, many places are trying," she said. Companies should instead think more long-term, said Beth Wanner, a Regina-based marketing executive who started Mother Cover, a firm supporting workers that take leave. She said about a third of parents leave their jobs within 18 months of returning from parental leave. Many make the leap to new companies because they felt unsupported during or after pregnancy at their last employer but would have stuck around if they were afforded more flexible work hours or weren't overlooked for promotions or raises. With companies spending up to 200 per cent of someone's salary to replace employees gone for good and pouring months into training new workers, she said there's not just a moral case but also a business case for them to treat women better during and after their pregnancies. "This isn't about charity," she said. "This isn't about just doing what's right." It isn't only companies with a role to play. Venditti said there is much the federal government can do as well. Because Canada's current employment insurance program requires recipients to have worked between 420 and 700 hours prior to a leave, when moms lose their jobs during or following pregnancy, they've likely burned through all of or most of their eligibility. She'd like to see income support for mothers not be contingent on hours worked and be more generous than EI, which pays up to 55 per cent of a woman's salary. She envisions those supports could be offered through a program dedicated just for parental leave, rather than the traditional EI system. "EI was designed as a protection but many, many, many people don't qualify for it anymore," she said. "The bottom line is, EI isn't working for most mothers." This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 11, 2025. Tara Deschamps, The Canadian Press
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
$30B in new investments needed to meet Canada's critical mineral demand: report
TORONTO — A newly released report estimates Canada will need at least $30 billion in new capital investments by 2040 if it wants to meet domestic demand for the critical minerals key to a green economy transition. But the Canadian Climate Institute's report says cutting back on environmental safeguards and Indigenous consultation to speed up those projects is likely to backfire. The report released Thursday says those cutbacks can lead to delays later on, due to community opposition or litigation. The think tank's latest report comes as the federal government, along with Ontario and British Columbia, face major pushback from First Nations and environmental groups to legislation intended to speed up mining project approvals. The report says Canadian governments should support Indigenous participation and reduce environmental risks as part of efforts to reduce regulatory delays. It says Canada has a big opportunity to capitalize on the surging domestic and global demand for critical minerals to build the batteries, solar panels and electric vehicles required to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. It estimates domestic demand alone for six key critical minerals, including lithium and copper, will reach $16 billion by 2040 if Canada keep up its climate policies, with almost half of that coming from EV manufacturers. To meet that demand, the think tank estimates Canadian mining projects will need a total of $30 billion in capital investments, and even more if the industry wants to help satiate international demand too. The report says that's also likely a lowball figure since it excludes major cost overruns that often plague mining projects. The estimated domestic need "vastly exceeds" current investment in the sector, which averaged about $2 billion per year from 2018 to 2023, the report said. The report suggests there's a role for governments to step in to support the sector with either equity investments or financial risk-sharing agreements. But it should not come at the expense of Indigenous consultation or environmental oversight, the authors say. "Successful projects that are being developed fast are the ones that have participation from Indigenous communities, that have adhered to the highest environmental standard," said co-author Marisa Beck, the think tank's clean growth research director. Critics say recently passed Bill 15 in B.C. and Bill 5 in Ontario gives those provinces sweeping powers to exempt mining projects from environmental oversight and undermines constitutional obligations to consult First Nations. The provincial governments disagree and say the legislation will help speed up approvals without sacrificing First Nations rights or environmental protections. Ottawa has also faced pushback to its legislation intended to speed up infrastructure approvals. The authors of Thursday's report declined to comment on the specifics of those legislative efforts, but it did put forward several policy recommendations. Governments should also support Indigenous communities exercising their right to self-determination and economic participation, such as through funding for Indigenous-led environmental assessments, the report says. Elsewhere, the report recommends provinces strengthen mining regulations to reduce environmental risks and liabilities, such as requiring producers to make their closure plans publicly available. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 12, 2025. Jordan Omstead, The Canadian Press
