&w=3840&q=100)
US-China trade talks enter day 2 in London amid rare earths, export dispute
Trade negotiations between the United States and China are set to continue for a second day in London on Tuesday, as top economic officials from both countries seek to defuse tensions that have widened beyond tariffs to include restrictions on technology exports and rare earth shipments - issues threatening global supply chains and economic growth.
Talks began on Monday at Lancaster House, a 19th-century mansion near Buckingham Palace, and ran for more than six hours, concluding around 8 pm local time.
Efforts to revive Geneva truce with China amid US allegations
The talks aim to revive a temporary truce agreed in Geneva last month, which briefly eased trade tensions and calmed markets. However, Washington has since accused Beijing of backtracking on its commitments, particularly around the export of rare earth minerals, critical components in technologies ranging from smartphones to electric vehicles and military systems. China has denied these allegations.
US President Donald Trump on Monday told reporters at the White House that the negotiations were 'going well' and that he was 'only getting good reports' from the delegation in London. 'China's not easy,' he reiterated, offering no further detail. When asked whether his administration would consider lifting recent export curbs, he replied, 'We'll see.'
Export curbs take centre stage in US-China London talks
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent leads the US delegation, which includes Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, whose agency oversees export controls, and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer. Their Chinese counterparts are headed by Vice Premier He Lifeng, joined by Commerce Minister Wang Wentao and the ministry's chief trade negotiator, Li Chenggang.
The inclusion of Lutnick, who did not participate in the earlier Geneva talks, is seen by some analysts as a sign that export controls are now central to the discussions, Reuters reported.
Among the key points on the table is the potential loosening of US restrictions on items such as chip design software, advanced chemicals, jet engine components, and nuclear materials. In exchange, Washington is seeking guarantees that Beijing will ease its export limits on rare earths. China currently produces nearly 70 per cent of the global supply.
Nvidia chips remain restricted
White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett spoke on the urgency of the issue, saying the US wants a 'handshake from China' on rare earths following a rare call between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping last week.
In an interview with CNBC, Hassett said the US expected rare earth shipments to resume in volume if a deal is reached.
However, he clarified that the highest-end Nvidia semiconductors, specifically the H2O chips used for training AI models, would remain subject to export control. 'The very, very high-end Nvidia stuff is not what I'm talking about,' he said.
Economic pressure mounts for both US and China
The London talks come at a sensitive moment for both economies, which are showing signs of strain following Trump's renewed tariff orders since his return to the White House in January. Chinese customs data showed that exports to the US plunged 34.5 per cent year-on-year in May, the steepest decline since February 2020, at the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic.
On the US side, household and business confidence have declined, and GDP contracted in the first quarter amid a record surge in imports, as consumers raced to make purchases ahead of expected price hikes.
Despite these headwinds, inflation has so far remained contained and the labour market resilient, though economists expect pressures to mount over the summer.
Rare earths dispute triggers industrial disruptions
The rare earths standoff follows China's decision in April to suspend exports of a wide range of critical minerals and magnets, disrupting industries including automotive, aerospace, semiconductors, and defence. According to Reuters, China has since granted temporary export licences to suppliers serving the top three US automakers, following the Trump-Xi call.
Legal uncertainty also looms over the broader trade framework. On Monday, the Trump administration filed arguments appealing a US trade court ruling that found its tariffs on Chinese goods exceeded legal authority. The case may reach the Supreme Court, depending on the outcome at the appellate level.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
30 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Lutnick says US-China talks going well, could run into Wednesday
US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said trade talks with Chinese officials were going well and he hoped they would end on Tuesday night, but said they could run into Wednesday. 'I think the talks are going really, really well. We're very much spending time and effort and energy – everybody's got their head down working closely,' Lutnick told reporters at Lancaster House in London, where teams from both countries have met for two days. 'I hope they end this evening, but maybe we'll be here tomorrow, but I hope they end this evening,' he added.


Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
Los Angeles riots: Apple Store looted and damaged in downtown, Graffiti painted
The law and order situation in Los Angeles deteriorated as protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids turned violent, leading to widespread looting and arrests. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The demonstrations, ongoing for five days, erupted into chaos on Monday night (June 9), with rioters targeting prominent retail locations in downtown Los Angeles. The protests, initially peaceful, began five days ago in response to ICE operations in the city. Viral videos circulating online showed rioters ransacking storefronts, including a prominent Apple Store and the Jordan Flagship Store. Additional targets included an Adidas store, a pharmacy, a marijuana dispensary, and a jewelry store, where merchandise was stolen and windows were smashed. Apple Store looted Images from the scene captured dozens of individuals looting the Apple Store, with some breaking windows to escape. Graffiti was painted on the store's windows, and merchandise was stolen. A jewelry store was also heavily damaged, with shelves cleared of goods. Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) Officer Chris Miller reported one woman was arrested at the Apple Store burglary, with at least two others detained for looting. The LAPD reported over 100 arrests related to the protests, with 21 individuals detained on Sunday (June 8) alone, including one suspect accused of attempted murder for allegedly using a Molotov cocktail against officers. Local authorities have condemned 'agitators' exploiting the protests for criminal activities. Mayor Karen Bass addressed the violence in a Twitter post, stating, 'Let me be clear: ANYONE who vandalized Downtown or looted stores does not care about our immigrant communities. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now You will be held accountable.' Donald Trump calls protestors as 'violent, insurrectionist mobs" President Donald Trump, describing the protesters as 'violent, insurrectionist mobs,' authorized the deployment of 2,000 additional National Guard troops to reinforce security in Los Angeles. The troops are assisting local law enforcement in restoring order following the clashes. Community and Official Reactions The protests have sparked widespread debate, with authorities emphasizing the distinction between peaceful demonstrators and those engaging in criminal acts. The targeting of supermarkets and retail stores has heightened concerns about the economic impact on the city. As the situation remains tense, officials continue to urge calm while vowing to hold perpetrators accountable.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
41 minutes ago
- First Post
Trump sends 4,000 National Guard, 700 Marines to LA: Pentagon says military deployments to cost $134 million
The deployment of US Marines and National Guard troops to Los Angeles in response to ongoing protests is likely to cost the Defence Department approximately $134 million, according to a report, citing a senior Pentagon official read more Members of the California National Guard stand watch outside the Edward R. Roybal Federal Building on Tuesday, following another day of protests in response to federal immigration operations in Los Angeles. Hundreds of Marines are due to arrive in Los Angeles on Tuesday after US President Donald Trump ordered their deployment in response to protests against immigration arrests and despite objections by state officials. AFP The deployment of US Marines and National Guard troops to Los Angeles in response to ongoing protests is likely to cost the Defence Department approximately $134 million, according to a CNN report, citing a senior Pentagon official. 'The current estimated cost is $134 million, which is largely just [temporary duty] cost — travel, housing, food, etc.,' CNN quoted Bryn MacDonnell, special assistant to the Secretary of Defence and the official performing the duties of the Under Secretary of Defence (Comptroller), as saying. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD MacDonnell made the statement during testimony before the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Defence. When pressed by Rep. Pete Aguilar (D-CA) on the source of the funding, MacDonnell said the money would be drawn from 'other [Operation and Maintenance] accounts.' She was joined at the hearing by Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth and Gen. Dan Caine, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Hegseth told lawmakers the deployment is expected to last 60 days and assured the subcommittee that troops would be 'housed, fed,' and adequately supplied. The operation follows President Donald Trump's controversial decision to mobilise federal forces to manage civil unrest in Los Angeles sparked by immigration enforcement actions. As the Defence Department confirmed the cost of deploying federal troops to Los Angeles will reach $134 million, Presidentrump on Tuesday defended the move and made clear that the National Guard and Marines will remain in place 'until there's no danger.' 'It's easy. Look, it's common sense. … When there's no danger, they'll leave,' CNN quoted Trump as saying in the Oval Office, declining to provide a specific timeline for the withdrawal. National Guard to Stay in LA until…: Trump On Saturday night, Trump authorised the deployment of 2,000 National Guard members as demonstrations escalated. By Monday, he had doubled the number to 4,000 and also mobilised 700 US Marines, despite public opposition from California's Democratic leadership. 'You would have had a horrible situation had I not sent them in. Horrible,' CNN quoted Trump as saying. 'You'd be reporting on a lot of death and a lot of destruction that's not going to take place,' he added. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The presidential memorandum signed by Trump stipulates that the National Guard's deployment will last 60 days, subject to the discretion of Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth. Trump also signaled that his administration's immigration enforcement campaign will continue beyond California, stating efforts will expand to other parts of the country in the days ahead. President Trump's deployment of military forces to respond to protests in Los Angeles is drawing sharp criticism from legal experts, who describe the move as highly unusual and potentially destabilising. Rare and alarming step Trump's use of the military is an 'incredibly rare' step for a US president, Rachel VanLandingham, a professor at Southwestern Law School in Los Angeles and a former lieutenant colonel in the US Air Force, told AFP. Typically, the National Guard — a fully equipped reserve component of the armed forces — is controlled by state governors and is deployed domestically in response to emergencies such as natural disasters. The last time a president overrode a governor's authority to deploy the Guard was in 1965, during the peak of the civil rights movement. The use of regular troops, such as the US Marines, is even more exceptional on US soil. Federal law generally prohibits the military from engaging in civilian law enforcement unless an insurrection is declared. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Amid rising tensions and the presence of thousands of Guard members and Marines in Los Angeles, speculation is mounting that Trump may invoke the Insurrection Act, which would allow him greater leeway to use active-duty military for domestic policing operations. Trump 'is trying to use emergency declarations to justify bringing in first the National Guard and then mobilising Marines,' AFP quoted Frank Bowman, a law professor at the University of Missouri, as saying in an interview. Bowman added that the 'suspicion' is Trump is deliberately escalating the situation to create the conditions for more drastic federal action. 'That kind of spectacle feeds the notion that there is a genuine emergency and, you know, a genuine uprising against the lawful authorities, and that allows him to begin to use even more force,' he said. The State of California has already filed a lawsuit to block the deployment of National Guard troops, and Governor Gavin Newsom has announced that the state will also sue to prevent the deployment of active-duty Marines. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD With inputs from agencies