logo
A recipe for baby stars: Just add fluffy molecular clouds

A recipe for baby stars: Just add fluffy molecular clouds

Yahoo22-02-2025
To understand how the universe was formed and how we got here, ancient stars are some of the best objects to study — yet astronomers know surprisingly little about the conditions in which they were formed. Dominant cosmological theories posit that stars are formed in molecular clouds that are sufficiently large and dense that it has the conditions necessary to create new stars. These same experts have been uncertain, however, about some of the specifics of those conditions. What is it really like in those interstellar nurseries known as molecular clouds?
According to a recent study in The Astrophysical Journal, some of the molecular clouds out of which stars are formed can be captured by an adjective one does not often associate with stars: fluffy.
Scientists at Japan's Kyushu University learned this, in collaboration with researchers from Osaka Metropolitan University, by studying the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC), a dwarf galaxy near the Milky Way located roughly 20,000 lightyears from Earth. Because the SMC contains approximately twenty percent of the heavy elements of the Milky Way, it is believed to closely resemble the cosmic environment of the early universe from 10 billion years ago. That is why astronomers used the ALMA (Atacama Large Millimeter Array) radio telescope in Chile, which is powerful enough to capture higher-resolution images of the SMC.
'Our study was motivated by a fundamental question: how did star formation occur in the early universe?' Dr. Kazuki Tokuda, an Earth and planetary sciences professor at Kyushu University in Fukuoka, Japan, told Salon.
'We sought to understand the formation and evolution of stellar nurseries — molecular clouds where stars are born — under conditions similar to those billions of years ago,' Tokuda added. 'Typically, studying ancient star-forming regions requires observing galaxies that are tens of billions of light years away.'
Next the scientists assembled a dataset covering 17 distinct molecular clouds associated with massive young stellar objects. While coordinating this data from multiple programs can be challenging, Tokuda explained that it also presented 'a unique opportunity.'
'We focused on aspects of these datasets that had not yet been fully explored, and this approach not only tested our ability to integrate diverse observations but also revealed intriguing details about the evolution of star-forming regions in the SMC,' Tokuda said.
This is where the 'fluffiness' factor comes into play. Tokuda and the other scientists wanted to understand if filaments, or threadlike fibers, form during star formation, as this reveals key details about their density and overall composition. In the paper the researchers concluded that 'even if filaments form during star formation, their steep structures may become less prominent and transit to a lower-temperature state.' Even though prior observation of the Milky Way showed these filaments were present in molecular clouds which became sites for star formation, Alma's SMC studies demonstrate that stars can also form in fluffier conditions.
'Recent observations of our own Milky Way have increasingly highlighted the importance of filamentary molecular clouds as the primary sites of star formation,' Tokuda said. 'However, more diffuse, fluffy molecular clouds have not received as much attention over the past decade.'
Although these structures are lighter than the molecular clouds with filamentary structures, they are still quite similar in other crucial aspects.'The environment, such as an adequate supply of heavy elements, is crucial for maintaining a filamentary structure and may play an important role in the formation of planetary systems,' Tokuda said in the study's accompanying press statement. 'In the future, it will be important to compare our results with observations of molecular clouds in heavy-element-rich environments, including the Milky Way galaxy. Such studies should provide new insights into the formation and temporal evolution of molecular clouds and the universe.'
The researchers determined that stars can be formed in a diverse range of structures, but that there are 'systematic differences in the physical properties of filamentary and non-filamentary clouds. The former tend to have smaller velocity dispersions relative to their column densities and exhibit higher temperatures.' Additionally filamentary clouds tend to have faster velocities and at an increasing width relative to their columns' density, 'consistent with the relationship observed in the [Large Magellanic Cloud],' a dwarf galaxy near the Milky Way.
Finally, they added that 'the high temperatures observed in the filaments suggest that they likely preserve the heated conditions related to their cloud formation. In addition, [young stellar objects] with proto-stellar outflows have been found in some filamentary clouds.'
When their research into the SMC is synthesized with the growing body of knowledge about other galaxies, Tokuda told Salon that he hopes one day astronomers will be able 'to deepen our understanding of how molecular clouds form and evolve under different conditions.'
Dr. Avi Loeb, a Harvard University astronomer, told Salon that the paper illuminates a previously mysterious story involving the history of the universe.
'The data indicates that the youngest stars form in filaments of gas,' Loeb said. 'Subsequently the gas cools and fragments into later generations of stars in less filamentary structures. This behavior is not shared in star forming environments that are more enriched in heavy elements.'
He added, 'The new behavior sheds new light on what star formation in the early universe, before the primordial gas was enriched with heavy elements.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Oops! Earendel, most distant star ever discovered, may not actually be a star, James Webb Telescope reveals
Oops! Earendel, most distant star ever discovered, may not actually be a star, James Webb Telescope reveals

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

Oops! Earendel, most distant star ever discovered, may not actually be a star, James Webb Telescope reveals

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. The most distant star ever discovered may have been misclassified: Instead of being a single star, the object — nicknamed Earendel from the Old English word for "morning star" — may be a star cluster, a group of stars that are bound together by gravity and formed from the same cloud of gas and dust, new research suggests. Discovered by the Hubble Space Telescope in 2022, Earendel was thought to be a star that formed merely 900 million years after the Big Bang, when the universe was only 7% of its current age. Now, in a study published July 31 in The Astrophysical Journal, astronomers used the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) to take a fresh look at Earendel. They wanted to explore the possibility that Earendel might not be a single star or a binary system as previously thought, but rather a compact star cluster. They found that Earendel's spectral features match those of globular clusters — a type of star cluster — found in the local universe. "What's reassuring about this work is that if Earendel really is a star cluster, it isn't unexpected!" Massimo Pascale, an astronomy doctoral student at the University of California, Berkeley, and lead author of the study, told Live Science in an email. "[This] work finds that Earendel seems fairly consistent with how we expect globular clusters we see in the local universe would have looked in the first billion years of the universe." Ancient object Earendel, located in the Sunrise Arc galaxy 12.9 billion light-years from us, was discovered through a phenomenon known as gravitational lensing, a phenomenon predicted by Einstein's theory of general relativity in which massive objects bend the light that passes by them. A massive galaxy cluster located between Earth and Earendel is so large that it distorts the fabric of space-time, creating a magnifying effect that allowed astronomers to observe Earendel's light, which would otherwise be too faint to detect. Studies indicate that the star appears at least 4,000 times larger due to this gravitational lensing effect. This magnifying power is strongest in some special regions. If a star or galaxy happens to be right next to one of these regions, its image can be magnified hundreds or thousands of times brighter than normal. Earendel seems to sit extremely close to one of these "sweet spots," which is why we can see it even though it is almost 12.9 billion light-years away. Such near-perfect alignments are incredibly rare, which made astronomers consider alternative explanations beyond a single star. Related: Giant, cosmic 'Eye of Sauron' snapped staring directly at us in stunning 15-year time-lapse photo After Earendel's discovery in 2022, researchers analyzed the object using data from JWST's Near Infrared Imager (NIRCam). By examining its brightness and size, they concluded that Earendel could be a massive star more than twice as hot as the sun and roughly a million times more luminous than our star. In the color of Earendel, astronomers also found a hint of the presence of a cooler companion star. "After some recent work showed that indeed Earendel could (but is not necessarily) be much larger than previously thought, I was convinced it was worthwhile to explore the star cluster scenario," Pascale said.. Using spectroscopic data from JWST's NIRSpec instruments, Pascale and team studied the age and metal content of Earendel. The team looked at Earendel's spectroscopic continuum, which basically shows how its brightness smoothly changes across different wavelengths of light. This pattern matched what would be expected from a star cluster and, at the very least, matched the combined light of multiple stars. "The new part of this study is the NIRSpec spectrum, which provides a bit more detail than was possible with the NIRCam data," said Brian Welch, a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Maryland and NASA Goddard Space Flight Center who led the team that discovered Earendel in 2022 but was not involved in the new study. But Welch doesn't think the new data is enough to confirm that Earendel is a star cluster. "At the spectral resolution of the NIRSpec [instrument], the spectrum of a lensed star and a star cluster can be very similar. It is therefore important to consider all available data when attempting to classify these highly magnified objects," Welch told Live Science in an email. The researchers have only explored the "star cluster" possibility. They did not investigate all possible scenarios, like Earendel being a single star or a multiple star system, and compare the results. RELATED STORIES —Spotify-like AI helps discover never-before-seen supernova as greedy star attempts to eat a black hole —A real-life Pandora? Newfound 'disappearing' planet in our neighboring star system could have a habitable moon, just like the Avatar movies —Astronomers find bizarre 'Cosmic Grapes' galaxy in the early universe. Here's why that's a big deal. "The measurement is robust and well done, but in only considering the star cluster hypothesis, the study is limited in scope," Welch noted. Both Pascale and Welch agreed that the key to solving Earendel's mystery is to monitor microlensing effects. Microlensing is a subtype of gravitational lensing in which a passing object temporarily distorts the image of a distant object when a nearer object lines up in front of it as it passes by. Changes in brightness due to microlensing are more noticeable when the distant objects are small — such as stars, planets or star systems — rather than much larger star clusters. "It will be exciting to see what future JWST programs could do to further demystify the nature of Earendel," Pascale said. James Webb Space Telescope quiz: How well do you know the world's most powerful telescope? Solve the daily Crossword

The Third Rock From Another Sun Shows No Signs of Life So Far
The Third Rock From Another Sun Shows No Signs of Life So Far

New York Times

time6 days ago

  • New York Times

The Third Rock From Another Sun Shows No Signs of Life So Far

In the search for signs of life on what seemed like a promising little exoplanet, astronomers' hopes have dimmed. Living things, as we understand them, seem to flourish best in an atmosphere like the one on Earth. But scientists who have been using the James Webb Space Telescope to examine the planet known as Trappist-1 d have found no sign of an earthlike atmosphere, according to a study published on Wednesday in The Astrophysical Journal. Exoplanets revolve around stars other than our sun. And the exoplanet in question is the third of seven that orbit Trappist-1, a star some 40 light-years from our place in the Milky Way. It is a red dwarf, so named because this type of star emits reddish light and tends to be small. In the search for life elsewhere in the galaxy, the discovery of the Trappist-1 planetary system was a big deal. Researchers announced in 2017 that the seven planets around Trappist-1 seemed to have excellent potential as hosts for living things. But in the years since, astronomers have not detected habitable atmospheres on the two innermost planets. They are still examining the outer ones. The star Trappist-1, which was named for a telescope in the Atacama Desert of Chile, is just a little bigger than Jupiter. Red dwarves are the most common stars in our galaxy, but this particular star and its planets are a bit easier to study than other known planetary systems. The system is fairly close to Earth, and the seven planets follow a tight, fast orbit. That makes them good candidates for a method of observation called transmission spectroscopy. When light from a star shines through a planet's atmosphere on its way to the Webb telescope, scientists can find clues about the chemical makeup of that atmosphere by determining which wavelengths of light it absorbed. The third world from the Trappist-1 star, a rocky planet, had appeared promising, according to Caroline Piaulet-Ghorayeb, a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Chicago and the study's lead author. But the starlight that passed the exoplanet before reaching the Webb telescope did not appear to have been filtered through the kinds of atmospheric molecules that are essential to life on Earth, like water or carbon dioxide. The research of Dr. Piaulet-Ghorayeb and her team did not completely rule out the possibility of an atmosphere there, she said. But it did suggest that cool red dwarves — or, at least, this cool red dwarf — might be too volatile to support life. 'Maybe that tells us that it's going to be harder than we thought to find atmospheres on these rocky planets,' she added. Astronomers may need to turn their attention to planets that circle brighter stars, like our sun. Those planets are more difficult to observe and will probably require another telescope, said Jacob Bean, an astronomer at the University of Chicago who advises Dr. Piaulet-Ghorayeb but was not involved in the study. 'We still have this burning question: Can life develop elsewhere?' he said. Dr. Piaulet-Ghorayeb agreed that other planets might be better candidates for life than Trappist-1 d, but she was not ready to give up on the exoplanet just yet. 'There are different ways of figuring out whether these planets have atmospheres,' she said. 'Transmission spectroscopy is just one of them.' Based on the results of her study, she said, 'our job is going to be a little bit harder.' 'But it definitely doesn't kill our prospects,' she added. Dr. Bean called the Trappist-1 system 'a fantastic laboratory for studying terrestrial planets around other stars,' and said that the research so far had yielded plenty of interesting data despite the largely negative result of the latest study. 'If we go look, sometimes we come up disappointed,' Dr. Bean said. 'But if we hadn't looked, we wouldn't know. And it's always better to know.'

Scientists may have found a powerful new space object: 'It doesn't fit comfortably into any known category'
Scientists may have found a powerful new space object: 'It doesn't fit comfortably into any known category'

Yahoo

time7 days ago

  • Yahoo

Scientists may have found a powerful new space object: 'It doesn't fit comfortably into any known category'

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. A bewilderingly powerful mystery object found in a nearby galaxy and only visible so far in millimeter radio wavelengths could be a brand new astrophysical object unlike anything astronomers have seen before. The object has been named 'Punctum,' derived from the Latin pūnctum meaning "point" or "dot," by a team of astronomers led by Elena Shablovinskaia of the Instituto de Estudios Astrofísicos at the Universidad Diego Portales in Chile. Shablovinskaia discovered it using ALMA, the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array. "Outside of the realm of supermassive black holes, Punctum is genuinely powerful,' Shablovinskaia told Astronomers don't know what it is yet — only that it is compact, has a surprisingly structured magnetic field, and, at its heart, is an object radiating intense amounts of energy. "When you put it into context, Punctum is astonishingly bright — 10,000 to 100,000 times more luminous than typical magnetars, around 100 times brighter than microquasars, and 10 to 100 times brighter than nearly every known supernova, with only the Crab Nebula surpassing it among star-related sources in our galaxy," Shablovinskaia said. Punctum is located in the active galaxy NGC 4945, which is a fairly close neighbor of our Milky Way galaxy, located 11 million light-years away. That's just beyond the confines of the Local Group. Yet, despite this proximity, it cannot be seen in optical or X-ray light but rather only millimeter radio wavelengths. This has only deepened the mystery, although the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) has yet to take a look at the object in near- and mid-infrared wavelengths. What could Punctum be? Its brightness remained the same over several observations performed in 2023, meaning it is not a flare or some other kind of transitory phenomenon. Millimeter-wave radiation typically comes from cold objects such as young protoplanetary disks and interstellar molecular clouds. However, very energetic phenomena such as quasars and pulsars can also produce radio waves through synchrotron radiation, wherein charged particles moving at close to the speed of light spiral around magnetic field lines and radiate radio waves. What we do know about Punctum is that based on how strongly polarized its millimeter light is, it must possess a highly structured magnetic field. And so, Shablovinskaia believes what we are seeing from Punctum is synchrotron radiation. Objects with strong polarization tend to be compact objects, because larger objects have messy magnetic fields that wash out any polarization. Perhaps that synchrotron radiation is being powered by a magnetar, the team believes, which is a highly magnetic pulsar. However, while a magnetar's ordered magnetic field fits the bill, magnetars (and regular pulsars for that matter) are much fainter at millimeter wavelengths than Punctum is. Supernova remnants such as the Crab Nebula, which is the messy innards blasted into space of a star that exploded in 1054AD, are bright at millimeter wavelengths. The trouble is that supernova remnants are quite large — the Crab Nebula itself is about 11 light-years across — whereas Punctum is clearly a much smaller, compact object. "At the moment, Punctum truly stands apart — it doesn't fit comfortably into any known category," said Shablovinskaia. "And honestly, nothing like this has appeared in any previous millimeter surveys, largely because, until recently, we didn't have anything as sensitive and high-resolution as ALMA." There is the caveat that Punctum could just be an outlier: an extreme version of an otherwise familiar object, such as a magnetar in an unusual environment, or a supernova remnant interacting with dense material. For now, though, these are just guesses lacking supporting evidence. It is quite possible that Punctum is indeed the first of a new kind of astrophysical object that we haven't seen before simply because only ALMA can detect them. In the case of Punctum, it is 100 times fainter than NGC 4945's active nucleus that is being energized by a supermassive black hole feeding on infalling matter. Punctum probably wouldn't have been noticed at all in the ALMA data if it wasn't for its exceptionally strong polarization. Further observations with ALMA will certainly help shed more light on what kind of object Punctum is. The observations that discovered Punctum were actually focused on NGC 4945's bright active core; it was just happenstance that Punctum was noticed in the field of view. Future ALMA observations targeting Punctum instead would be able to go to much lower noise levels without worrying about the galaxy's bright core being over-exposed, and it could also be observed across different frequencies. The greatest help could potentially come from the JWST. If it can see an infrared counterpart, then its greater resolution could help identify what Punctum is. "JWST's sharp resolution and broad spectral range might help reveal whether Punctum's emission is purely synchrotron or involves dust or emission lines," said Shablovinskaia. For now, it's all ifs and buts, and all we can say for sure is that astronomers have a genuine mystery on their hands that has so far left them feeling flummoxed. "In any case," concluded Shablovinskaia, "Punctum is showing us that there is still a lot to discover in the millimeter sky.' A paper describing the discovery of Punctum has been accepted by the journal Astronomy & Astrophysics, and a pre-print is available on Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store