Los Angeles turns into battleground between Trump and California Governor Gavin Newsom
Open conflict has broken out between Washington and California. In addition to 2,000 National Guard troops, the Trump administration announced on Monday, June 9, that some 700 US Marines would be sent to maintain order in Los Angeles – a further provocation in the eyes of officials from the Democratic state, who said nothing justified such a deployment except to "fulfill the deranged fantasy of a dictatorial President," as Governor Gavin Newsom said.
On the fourth day of protests in Los Angeles against Trump administration raids targeting undocumented migrants, escalation seemed inevitable. California had become the "ground zero" of the standoff between the federal government and Democratic states, particularly over immigration. Tom Homan, Trump's immigration adviser, even threatened to have the governor arrested if he interfered with the implementation of federal policy. On Monday, the American president applauded the idea. "I would do it if I were Tom," he said, before calling Newsom a "grossly incompetent" leader.
The governor responded in kind to the "tough guy" Homan: "Arrest me. Let's go," he challenged him on MSNBC. "Lay your hands off 4-year-old girls," he added, referring to Sofia, a Mexican girl from Bakersfield, northeast of Los Angeles, who suffers from a rare disease and faced deportation. The measure was canceled, the White House protested, but at this point, Newsom was no longer concerned with fact-checking either.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AFP
43 minutes ago
- AFP
Posts falsely claim Namibia has announced ban on US gas and oil exploration
'Namibia cancelled contract with US from Mining their OIL & GAS,' reads an X post published on May 30, 2025. With more than 16,000 likes, the post adds: 'They ended the Oil & Gas contract with the US and told the US Government to immediately stop all Mining Operations in Namibia as Namibia ventures into State-owned mining operations.' Image Screenshot of the false X post, published on May 28, 2025 The post includes side-by-side photos of Namibia's President Netumbo Nandi-Ndaitwah and US President Donald Trump. Similar posts were shared thousands of times more on X and other platforms, including Facebook, TikTok and blogs. Nandi-Ndaitwah, who was elected in March, placed the country's oil and gas industries under direct presidential control the day after her inauguration. They previously fell under the Ministry of Energy and Mines (archived here). However, the government has not announced the cancellation of any energy contracts with the United States. No announcements A keyword search for 'Namibia cancels oil and gas with the US' turned up more posts repeating the false claim, as well as articles debunking it (archived here). The posts began circulating at about the same time as claims debunked by AFP Fact Check alleging that Namibia had announced the deportation of 500 Americans. As reported by AFP in April, Nandi-Ndatiwah explained that the oil and gas sector had the potential to transform Namibia's economy within the next five years by securing energy supplies and creating jobs (archived here). 'Mining contributes 12 percent to our gross domestic product and over 50 percent of our foreign exchange earnings. Regrettably, this figure does not reflect the true potential of mining and our mineral resources,' she was quoted as saying. On May 30, 2025, her presidency responded to the viral posts by labelling them 'fake news' (archived here). Namibia's presidency reiterated this to AFP Fact Check on June 4, 2025. 'The Namibian government has not at any point cancelled any contracts with investors from the United States in the mining, oil and gas sectors,' said press secretary Alfredo Hengari. He added that 'it is not the policy of the government to cancel contracts that are binding'. A US State Department spokesperson told AFP Fact Check on June 11, 2025: 'The online claims that Namibia has cut off the United States from mining and gas are false.' Foreign investment Contrary to the claim, Namibia has become a global exploration hotspot with several international gas and oil companies actively exploring its coasts in recent years (archived here). At the start of 2025, American firm Chevron announced that it had not found commercially viable gas in Namibia's Orange Basin By April, however, the company confirmed it would continue exploration in the Walvis Basin in 2026 or 2027, where firms including TotalEnergies, Shell, and Galp have made discoveries. Similarly, British multinational Shell deemed its Namibia oil discoveries uncommercial due to high gas levels in January. However, France's TotalEnergies believes it can handle these geological challenges, but its investment decision hinges on maintaining production costs below $20 per barrel (archived here). Another American corporation, ExxonMobil, is investigating (here and here) the country's potential in the Namibe Basin (archived here and here). The state itself, through the National Petroleum Corporation of Namibia (NAMCOR), holds a 10 percent stake in its exploration partnership with TotalEnergies (50.5 percent), QatarEnergy (30 percent) and Impact Oil and Gas (9.5 percent) (archived here). As a top uranium producer, Namibia also announced in April 2025 that it will launch talks this year on its first nuclear energy plant, seeking to exploit its rich natural wealth to transform its economy (archived here).
Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
Top defence CEO touts need for €100 billion EU defence fund
The EU is wrangling over a provision of Donald Trump's so-called "Big Beautiful Bill" for the US budget that could see European companies taxed higher than others in retaliation for certain taxes imposed on US enterprises overseas, the vice-chair of the European Parliament's tax subcommittee has told Euronews. The German European People's Party MEP Markus Ferber said the European Commission has raised the proposed legislation—already approved by the House of Representatives—in ongoing tariff negotiations with the Trump administration. 'We are concerned because within this 'One Big Beautiful Bill' there are special taxes aimed at jurisdictions that impose taxes on the US,' Ferber told Euronews. He added that jurisdictions like the EU, which have already implemented the OECD agreement establishing a global minimum tax of 15% on multinationals, are directly targeted. 'It could also affect member states that have introduced a digital services tax,' he noted. The OECD agreement, approved by 140 countries - though as yet unratified by the US - introduced a global minimum tax of 15% on the profits of multinational companies, regardless of where those profits are declared, with effect from 1 January 2024. The EU has transposed the agreement into law and applies it to multinationals operating within the Union, to the ire of the Trump administration. Meanwhile countries such as Denmark, Portugal and Poland have implemented digital services taxes targeting US tech giants, while others are in the process of creating one. The US is now looking to retaliate against taxes it deems unfair through a provision of the "Big Beautiful Bill' which would hit foreign investors with a bump in US income tax by five percent points each year, potentially taking the rate up to 20%, in addition to existing taxes. The Commission is concerned, officials said. According to Ferber, the EU executive has put this provision of the US budget bill on the negotiating table. 'But we are not sure yet that the US agreed to put it in the basket,' the MEP said. For several weeks, the EU and the US have been discussing a resolution to the trade dispute that has been ongoing since mid-March. The US impose 50% tariffs on EU steel and aluminium, 25% on cars and 10% on all EU imports. For its part, the EU has prepared countermeasures targeting around €115 billion worth of US products. These measures are either suspended until July or still awaiting approval by EU member states. EU countries pooling tens of billions of their defence spending into a joint EU fund could help finance necessary flagship projects and close capability gaps faster, the incoming head of Europe's largest defence industry association told Euronews, recognising it would however require political leadership. Micael Johansson, the CEO of Swedish defence and security company Saab, said on Wednesday that steps taken by the European Commission to turbocharge defence spending in the EU go in the right direction but that more needs to be done to facilitate countries and companies developing and acquiring new systems together. The EU executive's 'Readiness 2030' plan for defence, unveiled in March, relies on two main financial pillars: the relaxation of fiscal rules for defence spending which the Commission estimated could see €650 billion poured into the sector over the coming four years; and a €150 billion loan instrument called SAFE. Johansson, who will from 15 June take the helm of the Aerospace, Security and Defence Industries Association of Europe (ASD) which represents some 4,000 companies, said that these financing options remain primarily in the hands of each government and based on their own immediate needs. "Maybe it's wishful thinking, but if countries actually would be prepared to spend portions of their defence budget into a fund (...) that would create a common fund which could be worked upon in terms of launching flagship projects," he told Euronews on the sidelines of a European Defence and Security Summit in Brussels. He suggested that the European Defence Industrial Programme (EDIP), a regulation first tabled in early 2024 that is still making its way through the EU lawmaking process, could be the right place for this fund. The regulation currently plans for €1.5 billion from the EU budget to be spent on strengthening the European defence industrial base over the 2025-2027 period, but Johansson said that in order to finance big projects, "a hundred billion euros" might be more appropriate. He acknowledged however that this "is a big step". "I don't really know how to accomplish that. It's political decisions, of course". Defence is a hugely sensitive topic that falls under national competencies in the EU, with member states fiercely protective of their homegrown champions in the sector. But this has led to a deeply fragmented market, suboptimal interoperability between the different systems and an industry less agile to respond to crises. The EU and its member states, 23 of which are also NATO allies, are currently scrambling to plug holes in the bloc's defences and have identified seven priority capability areas including ammunition, drone and anti-drone systems, air defence, military mobility, and electronic warfare among others. European companies will be able to meet most of the continents' needs, Johansson said, but lag behind their US counterparts in some key areas such as integrated air missile systems, long-range strike capabilities, and autonomous systems like sophisticated, high-end drones. With Washington increasingly sending mixed messages over its long-term commitment to Europe's defence as it seeks to pivot some of its resources in the Indo-Pacific region, these "flagship" projects could benefit from a more European approach and joint financing, Johnasson said. This could be through member states or companies creating so-called coalitions of the willing to develop common systems. "But this is not easy because there is a trade-off between national sovereignty and creating interdependencies," he told Euronews. The Commission's defence proposal plans for more collaboration between member states with several of them required to pool their orders together in order to access financing through the SAFE instrument. The EU executive is meanwhile set to unveil a new proposal next week for the defence sector aimed at slashing red tape. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz welcomed Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen at the Federal Chancellery in Berlin on Wednesday. Topping the agenda for the two leaders was Russia's invasion of Ukraine, immigration bilateral ties and global trade and politics. Commenting on recent Russian attacks on Ukraine, Merz stressed that anyone with a reasonably clear view must recognise that 'Russia is a threat to the security' of the entire NATO alliance. As the NATO leaders' summit in the Hague nears, the German chancellor emphasised that 'Russia is a risk to security on both sides of the Atlantic.' Merz noted that the allies are set to discuss a 'historic' increase in defence spending at the summit in light of the threat the Kremlin poses to Europe. 'We will strengthen the European pillar of NATO together,' said Merz. Frederiksen echoed a similar sentiment, as she highlighted the need to bolster the continent's defences as quickly as possible. 'We have to rebuild our European Defence Industry and of course the German Industry is key for us,' said the Danish leader. 'Rearm Europe, do it fast,' added Frederiksen. The two leaders also discussed immigration, where they expressed similar views regarding the need to impose stricter policies. 'We cannot accept everyone who wants to come to Europe, it has to be a democratic decision who can enter our democratic societies', said Frederikse. Chancellor Merz praised the migration policy of Denmark, saying 'What Denmark has achieved in recent years is truly exemplary and together we are also moving towards new and stricter asylum rules in the European Union.' Regarding the repatriation of migrants, Merz said noted that, if necessary, 'there will also be corresponding changes to the legal basis'. Merz and Frederiksen also spoke about the highly volatile and unstable global trade environment, exacerbated by US President Donald Trump's global tariffs, which have spiralled stock markets internationally. The German leader welcomed the announcement of a new US-China trade deal, after the two nations agreed on a framework of a new deal to ease tensions and resolve trade disputes. 'I therefore welcome the fact that there has been such an agreement between America and China, and I very much hope that we will succeed in reaching similar agreements with America, for example regarding tariffs, in the near future,' said Merz. The pair also discussed the ongoing threat to Greenland, after Trump renewed his interest in 'taking ownership' of the arctic island; an overseas territory of Denmark. "The principle of the inviolability of borders is enshrined in international law and is not up for discussion,' said Merz. 'We stand closely by our Danish friends on these issues and will continue to do so.' Frederiksen once again shot down Trump's remarks, insisting that Greenland is not for sale and its sovereignty is non-negotiable. "Sovereignty of states, the territorial integrity, and by the way the future of Greenland can only be decided in Greenland by the Greenlandic people." She added that she thought Trump was "serious" when it comes to Greenland "and I have to say that so are we."
France 24
5 hours ago
- France 24
Beach Boys founder Brian Wilson dies at age 82
01:55 12/06/2025 At least 49 killed in South Africa floods 12/06/2025 Air India plane headed for London crashes at India's Ahmedabad airport 12/06/2025 Trump says US personnel moved as Iran nuclear talks stall 12/06/2025 Spotlight on female animation directors at Annecy festival 12/06/2025 Carbon storage in spotlight at UN Ocean Summit 12/06/2025 Israeli fire kills 60 in Gaza, many near aid site, medics say 12/06/2025 Police 'becoming much more forceful' as more than 400 arrested at LA protests 12/06/2025 How would Iran retaliate in event of Israeli strikes? 12/06/2025 NATO chief in Rome for key Ukraine talks
