Science Officially Confirmed That The 10,000 Steps Rule Is Outdated. Here's The New Number To Target.
The new findings suggest that you can actually reap the major health benefits well before you hit 10,000 steps.
Here's what experts say about the 10k number and how this applies to your life.
The idea that you need to log 10,000 steps a day for good health has been health gospel for ages. But as Women's Health previously reported this year, the 10,000-a-day steps goal (which roughly equates to five miles) isn't really based in science. In fact, it's more marketing than anything. But it's a nice, round number, and it's built into most fitness trackers.
Now, a new scientific analysis in The Lancet Public Health officially confirms that this lofty steps count goal isn't actually necessary—and the potential health benefits start to level off well before you reach that point.
If you've been happily clocking 10,000 steps a day and feel like it's working for you, there's no reason to stop. But if that number is intimidating and feels impossible to reach with everything else you've got going on in your life, this study probably has some findings you can use. Here's what the scientific review discovered, plus where experts and trainers recommend you try to land with your new step count goal.
Meet the experts: Albert Matheny, RD, CSCS, co-founder of SoHo Strength Lab; Dani Singer, CPT, founder of Fit2Go Personal Training
What did the new meta review find?
For the review, researchers analyzed data from 88 different studies, looking at how step counts were linked with the risk of developing a slew of health conditions. Overall, the researchers discovered that the risk of developing serious health conditions like cardiovascular disease, dementia, cancer, type 2 diabetes, and depression was lower in people who logged 7,000 steps a day compared to those who only did 2,000 daily steps.
But they also discovered that the health perks beyond 7,000 steps were actually pretty minimal.
"Although 10,000 steps per day, an unofficial target for decades without a clear evidence base, was associated with substantially lower risks for all-cause mortality, cardiovascular disease incidence, cancer mortality, dementia, and depressive symptoms than 7,000 steps per day, the incremental improvement beyond 7,000 steps per day was small, and there was no statistical difference between 7,000 steps per day and a higher step count for all the other outcomes," the investigators wrote. "Therefore, 7,000 steps per day might be a more realistic and achievable recommendation for some, but 10,000 steps per day can still be a viable target for those who are more active.'
Where did the 10,000 number come from?
The famous steps goal number has a long history behind it (you can do a deep dive here). But here's a quick recap: This number was formulated by a Tokyo doctor named Iwao Ohya who created a fitness tracker called Manpo-Kei (in Japanese, that means "10,000 step meter) with engineer Jiro Kato.
It's been suggested that 10,000 steps was chosen because the Japanese character for 10,000 looks like a man running or walking, but it's not really clear if that's truly one of the reasons behind the number. (Both inventors have since died.)
The number 10,000 eventually got picked up by researchers and fitness tracker developers, and its popularity spread. These days, almost everyone knows the number. Still, "no clinical data backed it then, and none was added later," says Dani Singer, CPT, founder of Fit2Go Personal Training.
Why is it not accurate?
While hitting 10,000 steps isn't bad for you (and means you're moving a lot throughout the day) the exact number is pretty much made up. "It was a marketing campaign,' says Albert Matheny, RD, CSCS, co-founder of SoHo Strength Lab. 'There wasn't a scientific basis for it.'
Matheny stresses that the 10,000 steps a day goal isn't necessarily inaccurate from a health POV—but many people can get serious health perks between 5,000 to 7,000 steps a day. "The data show health gains level off well before 10,000," Singer says. "Mortality and cardiovascular risk improvements start at just 2,000. It's important to understand this so that you avoid an all-or-nothing mindset—especially one that isn't based on any actual data."
If that's the number you like, and you hit it consistently, stick with it! But just remember: '10,000 steps per day is not the magic number," per Matheny.
So, how many steps should I take per day?
Based on the scientific review's findings, aiming for 5,000 to 7,000 steps a day is a good goal to reach for. That's roughly two to 3.5 miles per day, depending on your stride. 'There's nothing wrong with 10,000 steps, but it isn't based in science,' Matheny says.
If you want to still aim for 10,000 steps, Matheny says you should go for it. 'If you don't get there, maybe you still get to 7,000,' he points out. But any amount of walking is helpful. 'A thousand steps is way better than zero,' Matheny says.
You Might Also Like
Jennifer Garner Swears By This Retinol Eye Cream
These New Kicks Will Help You Smash Your Cross-Training Goals
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Saquon Barkley says he's not a member of President Trump's Council on Sports Nutrition
In a move that will revive a standard from the Reagan, Clinton, and Bush era, Harrison Butker, Nick Bosa, Tony Romo, and Lawrence Taylor will join President Trump's Council on Sports, Fitness, and Nutrition.' One athlete and sports star who won't be participating is Eagles' All-Pro running back Saquon Barkley. Following Monday's practice, Barkley disputed the initial press release, stating that he will not be a member of the presidential council. According to the Washington Post, President Trump on Thursday announced that the presidential fitness test, a hallmark of American physical education programs, will be making a comeback in public schools. The assessment was retired and replaced by a fitness program under the Obama administration. The presidential fitness test was initiated in the 1950s by a council established by President Dwight D. Eisenhower that was directed to improve the physical fitness of American youths, in response to fears they were falling behind their European counterparts when it came to athleticism. The project is an alternative way to get anti-obesity drugs to Medicare and Medicaid patients, after the administration said in April that neither program would cover GLP-1s for weight loss. In doing so, it scrapped a 2024 Biden administration proposal for the programs to start covering GLP-1s for patients with obesity. Several high-profile athletes — all of whom have existing ties to Trump — attended the ceremony and will serve on the President's Council on Sports, Fitness and Nutrition. The attendees included professional golfer Bryson DeChambeau, who will chair the council; controversial National Football League kicker Harrison Butker; World Wrestling Entertainment mainstay Paul 'Triple H' Levesque; golfer Annika Sorenstam; and football Hall of Famer Lawrence Taylor. The Eagles running back wasn't in attendance and said he was shocked to hear his name mentioned. The list also includes NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell, whom Trump repeatedly scrutinized during his first presidential term. Barkley was criticized during the off-season for spending time with President Trump on a golf outing prior to the Eagles' ring celebration. This article originally appeared on Eagles Wire: Saquon Barkley is not on President Trump's Council on Sports Nutrition


USA Today
6 hours ago
- USA Today
Saquon Barkley says he's not a member of President Trump's Council on Sports Nutrition
Eagles All-Pro RB says he is not joining Harrison Butker, Nick Bosa, Tony Romo, and Lawrence Taylor on President Trump's Council on Sports, Fitness, and Nutrition.' In a move that will revive a standard from the Reagan, Clinton, and Bush era, Harrison Butker, Nick Bosa, Tony Romo, and Lawrence Taylor will join President Trump's Council on Sports, Fitness, and Nutrition.' One athlete and sports star who won't be participating is Eagles' All-Pro running back Saquon Barkley. Following Monday's practice, Barkley disputed the initial press release, stating that he will not be a member of the presidential council. According to the Washington Post, President Trump on Thursday announced that the presidential fitness test, a hallmark of American physical education programs, will be making a comeback in public schools. The assessment was retired and replaced by a fitness program under the Obama administration. The presidential fitness test was initiated in the 1950s by a council established by President Dwight D. Eisenhower that was directed to improve the physical fitness of American youths, in response to fears they were falling behind their European counterparts when it came to athleticism. The project is an alternative way to get anti-obesity drugs to Medicare and Medicaid patients, after the administration said in April that neither program would cover GLP-1s for weight loss. In doing so, it scrapped a 2024 Biden administration proposal for the programs to start covering GLP-1s for patients with obesity. Several high-profile athletes — all of whom have existing ties to Trump — attended the ceremony and will serve on the President's Council on Sports, Fitness and Nutrition. The attendees included professional golfer Bryson DeChambeau, who will chair the council; controversial National Football League kicker Harrison Butker; World Wrestling Entertainment mainstay Paul 'Triple H' Levesque; golfer Annika Sorenstam; and football Hall of Famer Lawrence Taylor. The Eagles running back wasn't in attendance and said he was shocked to hear his name mentioned. The list also includes NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell, whom Trump repeatedly scrutinized during his first presidential term. Barkley was criticized during the off-season for spending time with President Trump on a golf outing prior to the Eagles' ring celebration.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Want to Make Real Big Arm Gains? This Quick Fix Can Make a Huge Difference.
"Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links." EVEN IF YOU'RE not a bodybuilder with 20-plus-inch arms, we're willing to bet that biceps curls are somewhere in your weekly workout routine. After all, who doesn't want arms that stand out even when they're covered up? But there's a downside to such a dedicated focus on your pump. Countless curls performed every day in every gym across the globe are near-useless due to bad form. Technique can fall apart fast, which is likely why curls are among the most 'cheated' moves in strength training. You know what we're talking about: those sloppy sets that are more to stoke your ego than build up your body. Yes, there is a time and place for 'cheat reps,'—mostly, for advanced lifters—but if you can't complete all of your normal reps without throwing in some body English (e.g., arching your back, twisting your torso) or enlisting supporting muscles to generate momentum (rocking your hips to swing the weight), you're doing it wrong. And bad form isn't always that obvious or dramatic; perhaps you simply let your elbows travel forward as you fatigue during your final reps, or you let the tension out of your core. Whatever the movement dysfunction is, the results are the same: less effective sets and slower overall gains. That ends today. By paying more attention to each rep and really feeling what each muscle and joint is doing, you can firm up your form and fast-track your gains to build the big arms you want. Here's how. The Simple Secret Behind a Perfect Curl One of the things every great trainer understands is that in practice, there is no such thing as an 'isolation exercise.' The term is used to describe a move that involves a single joint, such as the biceps curl, which flexes the elbow. But even if it were true that a single muscle was involved in bending the elbow (it's not; your biceps, brachialis, and brachioradialis all chip in), that muscle still wouldn't truly be acting in isolation. Indeed, a whole armada of supporting muscles in your torso and core kick into gear to provide the necessary stability for the movement to happen. That's where the secret to performing the biceps curl perfectly begins: in the supporting musculature. You'll need to keep your abs, glutes, and mid-back muscles contracted (or 'braced') and your shoulder blades pulled back and down during each rep. That's what will keep you from losing your balance and needing to shift your footing to regain it, as MH senior editor Brett Williams, NASM does in the video above. Another key to proper form in the biceps curl is to keep your elbows locked to your sides. Don't let them travel forward. Many guys make that minute shift to bring the weight up to shoulder level—but that's counterproductive to what your focus is for the movement. Your goal is full contraction of the biceps muscle, not lifting the weight to a specific height. Use Partner Eccentrics to Get More From Each Rep If you're fortunate enough to have a training partner for your workout, you can crank up the muscle-building potential of every set by having them add manual resistance to the eccentric (lowering) phase of the first several reps. As demonstrated in the video above, MH fitness director Ebenezer Samuel, C.S.C.S. presses down slightly on the bar as Williams lowers it, forcing him to fight the added resistance to control the bar—and to keep his posture on point. Emphasizing the eccentric phase can optimize your muscle-building potential, especially if you're someone who typically concentrates exclusively on the concentric (lifting) phase of each rep. Regardless, having your partner add some eccentric resistance can also help expose weaknesses in your form, allowing you to shore it up for your standard reps, too. You Might Also Like The Best Hair Growth Shampoos for Men to Buy Now 25 Vegetables That Are Surprising Sources of Protein