The world is laughing at Britain, and only Starmer hasn't noticed
So finally, Labour's policies are resulting in tax cuts, and the Laffer Curve is back in fashion. At last, people are going to keep more of their hard-earned money, a big chunk of the national debt will be paid off and, to cap it all, minimum salaries are going to be raised and VAT on food will be reduced.
Yes, the people of Mauritius sure have done well out of the Chagos deal. That £30 billion windfall, all paid for by the British taxpayer, is going to be put to excellent economy-boosting use. And who can blame them for celebrating? Their government has played an absolute blinder.
Of course, we could get all picky and start asking awkward questions about why the Chagos Islands should be surrendered at all, least of all to an African country more than a thousand miles across the Indian Ocean. But that would be to rain on the Mauritian parade. It's their day and their victory, and while it was against abject, third-rate opposition, we mustn't carp. There's nothing worse than a bad loser.
But we are within our rights, I reckon, to ask why good things always happen to other people. What are the chances of us British being gifted £30 billion from another country, plus a brand-new territory to paint pink on maps? I'm trying to think of an equivalent. Perhaps Spain paying us to take Tenerife off its hands, and throwing in the Women's World Cup as a juicy extra?
But we British are the baddies, so we must always pay for our sins. Some international court has told us exactly that, and under the Government we elected last summer, that's final. Never mind the humiliation, the terrifying security considerations and the almighty cost. And what about the Chagossians themselves, who have been treated disgracefully throughout? Oh, sod 'em.
This is the Starmer way. And hunker down, because we've got at least four more years of it. Are you happy now, you Tories who preferred to stay at home last July rather than strolling to the polling station? Ever think you might have been conned by all those bright red 'Change' placards behind Sir Keir?
Well, at least when Rachel Reeves breaks yet more promises and raises our taxes in her budget this autumn, and when she comes up with yet more tripe about black holes, working people, a changing world and fixing foundations, we'll know that the rest of the world is having a darn good laugh at our expense.
Yes, we are the butt of a hilarious joke by a mocking Mauritian government. And we can't complain. A baddy always gets a comeuppance in the end.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Britain ready to implement US tariff deal, trade minister says
LONDON (Reuters) -Britain is ready to implement its side of a tariff deal with the United States and is hopeful for a proclamation from U.S. President Donald Trump to put the agreement into effect in the coming days, trade minister Jonathan Reynolds said on Thursday. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Trump on May 8 agreed to reduce tariffs on UK imports of cars and steel to the U.S., with Britain agreeing to lower tariffs on beef and ethanol, but implementation of the deal has been delayed. Reynolds met U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on Tuesday and discussed the implementation of the deal. Asked on Thursday if there would be an update by the end of the week, Reynolds said he was "very hopeful". "We're ready to go, and as soon as the president and the White House are ready to go on their side, we'll implement (our) part of the deal," Reynolds told reporters. Reynolds said he would issue a government order known as a statutory instrument to implement the changes to reciprocal tariffs. Officials said that the update on implementation was likely to come early next week. One of the details to be ironed out before the deal can be implemented is steel quotas. Reynolds added that he wanted to make sure the tariff reductions applied to every bit of the UK steel industry, as the U.S. finalises quotas that will place supply chain requirements on British steel exports to the United States. The bioethanol industry has warned its future is under threat, with Associated British Foods deciding on the fate of a plant later this month. Reynolds acknowledged the deal could increase competition but said the industry was already struggling. "We are very sensitive to the ethanol issue... (but) they're losing a lot of money already," Reynolds said, adding regulatory tweaks could help, but that for financial support: "any intervention I make has to be a clear route to profitability." "So there are much wider issues for these partners than just the U.S. trade deal." Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The UK, Germany and Canada have slashed foreign aid this year, deepening damage done by US cuts, analysis shows
Western countries have slashed foreign aid budgets this year and reductions will steepen in 2026, with the United States, United Kingdom, Germany and Canada cutting the most, according to a new analysis from the Center for Global Development (CGD). The aid cuts will mean 'significant losses' for many developing nations, according to the analysis from the DC-based think tank, shared exclusively with CNN. Ethiopia is projected to lose the most aid in nominal terms, with Jordan, Afghanistan and the Democratic Republic of Congo also hit particularly hard. Smaller nations will also be hammered by the reduction in foreign aid, with Lesotho, Micronesia and Eswatini each losing around 50% of their aid. 'It's setting fire to the bold ambitions to solve poverty and transform developing countries,' Lee Crawfurd, one of the authors of the report, told CNN. 'It's some of the poorest, most fragile places in the world that are going to be hardest hit.' The analysis looked at projections of bilateral aid – money provided directly to another country rather than routed through multilateral organizations such as United Nations agencies or the World Bank – for 2025 and 2026. The US is projected to cut the most, with a projected 56% reduction compared to levels two years ago. The Trump administration's gutting of the US Agency for International Development (USAID) earlier this year has already left a hole in many international aid budgets, and several other Western nations are following suit rather than filling the void. 'A big, big chunk of overall cuts in the next couple of years are going to be from the US pulling out, rather than other countries. But these other countries are making things worse,' said Crawfurd, a senior research fellow at the CGD. The UK aid cuts are estimated to represent a roughly 39% reduction compared to 2023 levels of spending. Meanwhile, Germany is cutting about 27%, Canada 25% and France 19% of their international aid budgets. The true level of aid cuts remains unclear, as the Trump administration's proposed budget and other government proposals are still making their way through legislatures. But some funding cuts are almost guaranteed. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced in February that his government would increase the UK's defense spending by cutting its aid budget to 0.3% of gross national income in 2027, its lowest level since 1999. Many organizations and aid workers have raised alarm about European governments pitting aid budgets against defense spending. 'Cutting the already lean aid budget is a false economy and will only increase division and amounts to a betrayal of the world's most vulnerable people,' said Halima Begum, head of Oxfam GB. 'It is a false dichotomy to pit international cooperation to tackle poverty against national security interests in order to avoid tax increases.' Crawfurd said that bilateral aid is a 'really small part of government budgets' and the money for defense or security could be found elsewhere. 'It's a choice… it's a political choice,' he added. The think tank wrote in its analysis that 'one striking takeaway is that some countries are projected to lose large amounts of ODA (official development assistance) simply because of who their main donors are – while others are projected to lose very little' – a game of chance, with losses not matching up to the recipient country's needs. Yemen, for example, is projected to experience a 19% fall in its bilateral funding compared to 2023, while its 'comparable' neighbor country Somalia is projected to lose about 39%. The UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) has also warned that multilateral aid cuts are threatening efforts to tackle 44 of the highest-priority, protracted humanitarian crises. As of April, only 11.9% of the funding for UN response plans had been covered. 'Every year, the UN has been helping more than 100 million people in the world as they go through the worst time of their lives in wars and disasters. But let's be clear: we won't reach the level of funding in 2025 that we've seen in previous years,' Anja Nitzsche, OCHA's chief of partnerships and resource mobilization told CNN in a statement. 'Vulnerable families are being left without food, clean water, healthcare, shelter or protection in places such as Sudan, Yemen, Ukraine, Myanmar and Afghanistan.' The CGD is urging Western donors to reallocate aid to the poorest countries to try to 'ensure that resources are directed to populations in greatest need.' Western countries also need to improve coordination to mitigate further damage, especially as they are withdrawing from countries receiving aid, the think tank said. In some countries, the cuts will change who the largest donor is, which 'can lead to major shifts in what gets funded and how,' according to the CGD. For example, Portugal will likely overtake the US in aid to Angola, and Japan is projected to overtake France in Egypt. 'A new lead donor may not continue the same programs' or may take time to get up and running, according to the analysis. Giving a larger share of aid to multilateral organizations can also help improve international cooperation and cut down on duplication of aid efforts. 'Coordination is an ongoing challenge,' Crawfurd told CNN. 'The easiest way to do that is just to fund big multilateral funds like the World Bank.'
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's border tsar: We'll flood liberal cities with ICE raids
Donald Trump's border tsar says he will 'flood the zone' with arrest squads in liberal sanctuary cities as he punches back against protests that have rocked Los Angeles for days. In an interview with The Telegraph, Tom Homan said the protesters will do nothing to slow the pace of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detentions. 'If they think they're going to shut ICE operations down, they're wrong,' he said, after returning to Washington DC from California, where he had seen the protests up close. 'What they're going to see is an increase in ICE operations especially in sanctuary cities.' Last week the Department of Homeland Security issued a list of 500 cities, counties and states it said obstructed the Trump administration's deportation plan by protecting illegal immigrants. Mr Homan said he already had teams operating across places including New York and Chicago, where local law enforcement did not share immigration status of people in detention. 'We're going to send massive teams, we are going to flood the zone,' he said. 'If we can't arrest the bad guy in jail we'll arrest them in the neighbourhood. If we can't find them there we'll arrest them at a workplace. 'So sanctuary cities won't get exactly what they don't want – more agents in the neighbourhood, more work site enforcement operations.' Mr Homan, a former police officer who has also served as acting head of ICE, is the public face of Mr Trump's operation to deport as many as a million people in a year. So far, he said, the number was at about 140,000. But with fewer people crossing the southern border the pace of detentions has slowed since the Trump administration took power. The result has been a broader operation to find migrants wherever they might be. Immigration officers, backed by FBI agents, raided several sites around Los Angeles on Friday triggering protests that grew into riots at the weekend. Mr Trump responded by sending in 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines. Since then protests have spread around the country offering Democratic politicians their first real chance to unite against Mr Trump. Gavin Newsom, the Democratic governor of California, accused the administration of drawing a 'military dragnet' across the nation's second biggest city. However, Mr Homan said media coverage had missed a key point about the raids. 'It wasn't an immigration raid, it was a criminal investigation,' he said. The operation was investigating money laundering, tax evasion and customs fraud at a business, he said. 'The big overarching investigation is looking at whether some of this money is making it to Mexico and Columbia to fund cartel activities,' he said. Relatives and protesters arrived as news of the raids spread. Some tried to confront the federal agents wearing camouflage. One person fell to the ground in front of a vehicle as he attempted to stop its progress. Mr Homan said the FBI and ICE were investigating several organisations he believed supplied bricks and gas masks to protesters. 'So we know there's a couple organisations that are behind it that's under criminal investigation,' he said. 'I can't talk about it but we're going to prosecute them to the full extent of the law.' Online conspiracy theories have – without any evidence – suggested that George Soros, the Jewish donor to liberal causes, or Karen Bass, the city's mayor, were responsible for depositing pallets of bricks at strategic locations. Other commentators point out that one of the biggest flashpoints was beside a Home Depot store, which would have been stocked with building materials. Protests slowed on Tuesday and Wednesday, in part because of a curfew. Mr Homan said his officers had been placed at risk, night after night. 'I was there Friday night. I saw the federal building surrounded with close to 1000 people,' he said. 'I saw the threats. I saw the damage. 'I saw them trying to breach the federal building.' He said officers had been doxxed and assaulted for trying to do their job. Sending in the troops was not a piece of political theatre or an effort to create a crisis. 'Thank God President Trump deployed the National Guard when he did,' he added. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
