Ukraine war briefing: Zelenskyy accuses Moscow of doing ‘everything it can' to sabotage peace talks
Ukraine has said it does not expect any results from talks with Russia in Turkey, unless Moscow provides its peace terms in advance, accusing the Kremlin of doing 'everything' it can to sabotage the potential meeting. Moscow said it was sending a team of negotiators to Istanbul for a second round of talks on Monday but Kyiv has yet to confirm if it will attend. 'For over a week now, the Russians have been unable to present the so-called memorandum,' Volodymyr Zelenskyy said on X on Friday, referring to a document Russia says it has prepared outlining its conditions for peace. 'For a meeting to be meaningful, its agenda must be clear, and the negotiations must be properly prepared,' the Ukrainian president added. 'Unfortunately, Russia is doing everything it can to ensure that the next potential meeting brings no results.' Russia says it will provide the memorandum at the talks in person on Monday. But Ukraine suspects it will contain its maximalist demands that Kyiv has already rejected.
Zelenskyy said he and the Turkish president, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, discussed on Friday the conditions under which Ukraine would participate in the Istanbul meeting proposed by Russia. 'There must be a ceasefire to move further toward peace. The killing of people must stop,' Zelenskyy wrote on Telegram. While he didn't commit to Ukraine's attendance, he said that in their call he and Erdogan discussed the possibility of organising a four-way meeting with the leaders of Ukraine, Russia, Turkey and the US. Erdogan said it was important that Russia and Ukraine sent strong delegations to Istanbul, adding that a leaders' meeting could contribute to the peace process, the Turkish presidency said.
A leading US senator warned Moscow it would be 'hit hard' by new US sanctions. Republican Lindsey Graham said on a visit to Kyiv that the US Senate was expected to move ahead with a bill on sanctions against Russia next week. Graham, who met Zelenskyy in the Ukrainian capital, told a news briefing he had talked with Trump before his trip and the US president expected concrete actions now from Moscow. Graham accused the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, of trying to drag out the peace process and said he doubted the Istanbul meeting would amount to more than a 'Russian charade'.
Trump, meanwhile, said on Friday that both Putin and Zelenskyy were stubborn and that he had been surprised and disappointed by Russian bombing in Ukraine while he was trying to arrange a ceasefire.
Pro-Kremlin websites are ramping up a disinformation campaign targeting Ukrainian refugees in Poland, using AI-generated content to stoke resentment ahead of Sunday's presidential election, experts warned. Russia-aligned accounts have 'inflamed negative sentiment towards Ukrainians', calling them 'pigs' and accusing them of planning armed attacks, the London-based Institute for Strategic Dialogue said in a report on Friday. Ukraine ally Poland hosts about a million Ukrainian refugees – mostly women and children – and immigration has been a key issue for voters.
Ukraine has jailed a 21-year-old man for 15 years on allegations he guided missile attacks for Russia. The SBU security service said on Friday that on the orders of a Russian special services officer, the man travelled around the Ukrainian capital and its outskirts secretly photographing the locations of Ukrainian troops. It said the Kyiv resident, who was not identified by name, was also preparing attacks in the city on behalf of Russia and was caught red-handed while 'spying' near a military facility.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
32 minutes ago
- The Independent
Starmer's strategic defence review: What we know so far from home guard to ‘nuclear jets'
One of Sir Keir Starmer 's first acts as prime minister was to order a 'root and branch' review of Britain's armed forces. The prime minister said the UK's military capabilities had been 'hollowed out' during 14 years of Conservative rule, warning that an urgent revamp was needed with the country facing an increasingly dangerous world. And 10 months on, Sir Keir will on Monday unveil the outcome of the so-called strategic defence review. The Independent looks at what we know about the defence review and what to expect. Led by Lord Robertson, a former Labour defence secretary and secretary general of Nato, it brought together experts from the military, industry and academia. Lord Robertson was tasked with considering 'the threats Britain faces, the capabilities needed to meet them, the state of UK armed forces and the resources available'. Announcing the review, Sir Keir said: 'We live in a more dangerous and volatile world. My government will forge a new clear-eyed approach to our national defences, equipping us to tackle international threats head-on while keeping the British people safe and secure.' It was desperately needed, with Russia's invasion of Ukraine highlighting the importance of new technologies such as drones in warfighting, while parliament's defence committee warned last year Britain would not be prepared to fight an all-out war. Alongside this, Donald Trump has been pressuring Sir Keir to hike Britain's defence spending to 3 per cent of GDP years earlier than planned, as the president seeks to wean Europe off dependence on the US for military support. And, adding to the urgency of an overhaul is Sir Keir's planned peacekeeping force, which would see thousands of troops sent to Ukraine in the event of Volodymyr Zelensky and Vladimir Putin agreeing to a ceasefire. Ahead of the long-awaited review's publication, some insights have emerged, giving the public a taste of what to expect when it is fully unveiled. A key part of the review, announced by defence secretary John Healey, is a cyber command to counter a 'continual and intensifying' level of cyber warfare. Mr Healey has also announced plans to invest more than £1 billion into a new 'digital targeting web' to be set up by 2027, to better connect weapons systems and allow battlefield decisions targeting enemy threats to be made and executed faster. He said the intensity of the cyber attacks the UK is seeing from Russia has stepped up, adding that 'cyber is now the leading edge, not just of defence, but of contests and tension between countries'. Cyber experts are also expected to be sent to the frontline alongside regular forces, in a move designed to modernise the military. The review is also expected to put forward plans to establish a new home guard to protect key British infrastructure from attacks by hostile states and terrorists. The new force drawn from the civilian population would be sent to guard sites such as airports, power plants and coastal hubs where undersea internet cables join the shoreline. Ministers have also announced they are to spend an additional £1.5 billion fixing up the military at home amid claims years of neglect have led to troops quitting. At the same time, another £1.5bn will be used to build at least six munitions and weapons factories, as part of an attempt to be ready for potential future conflicts. The Times reported Britain also wants to purchase fighter jets capable of firing tactical nuclear weapons, which would mark a recognition that the world has entered a more dangerous nuclear era. The review is also expected to warn of an "immediate and pressing" threat by Russia and draw heavily on the lessons learned from the war in Ukraine. Despite some welcoming the early announcements and leaks, experts have raised concerns throughout the process of the review about delays caused by growing global tensions, whether it is ambitious enough, and whether Sir Keir's commitment to spend 2.5 per cent of GDP on defence would be enough. Matthew Savill, director of military sciences at the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) think tank, said: 'The long-awaited strategic defence review can lead to significant change in the Armed Forces if it moves beyond previous platitudes and half-implemented ideas on innovation to rebuild the foundations of defence while also making recommendations for the big choices on technological transformation.' The strategic defence review is the latest overhaul of Britain's defence outlook, following an integrated review of security, defence, development, and foreign policy in 2021, which was then refreshed in 2023 after Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
Daily Mail
34 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Jose Mourinho's ugly first season in Turkey ends in anger as two ex-Premier League stars REFUSE to play in Fenerbahce's last game of the season and leave the club after goodbyes in the training ground kitchen
Two former Premier League stars refused to play for Jose Mourinho in Fenerbahce's final game of the season on Saturday. Fenerbahce faced Konyaspor at home in their last league game having secured second place in the table after failing to mount a significant challenge to Galatasaray in the title race. But two of their senior players missed the game, and it has now emerged that they made themselves unavailable to play. Edin Dzeko and Dusan Tadic were due to be given commemorative plaques after announcing that they will leave the club this summer, but they decided they did not want a ceremony at the stadium due to fears over fan unrest. Fenerbahce supporters showed their anger towards their players following a match earlier this month, and there were concerns the same could happen again on Saturday. Instead, Dzeko and Tadic opted to say their goodbyes in the training ground kitchen. The ceremony was attended by their team-mates, club president Ali Koc and vice-president Acun Ilicali. Sporting director Mario Branco and four coaches from manager Mourinho's team also bid farewell ahead of leaving the club this summer. Galatasaray held their own farewell ceremony at their stadium for departing stars Fernando Muslera and Dries Mertens on Saturday, leading to Fenerbahce fans reacting angrily to not getting the chance to say their own goodbyes to Dzeko and Tadic. Tadic subsequently released a statement to explain why he and Dzeko had not turned up to the stadium for the final game. The statement read: 'It was a decision we made together with Dzeko not to play in the last match. We didn't want to damage Fenerbahce's image. 'The fans have always supported us. The way he said goodbye is not a problem for me. I would have preferred it to be in the stadium, but the ambiance is not very good at the moment. That's why it's better to be that way.' Fenerbahce beat Konyaspor 2-1 as they finished the season on 84 points, 11 adrift of Galatasaray. They end the campaign trophyless, while also waving goodbye to Dzeko and Tadic. Dzeko, who previously played 189 matches for Manchester City, finishes with 46 goals in 99 games for Fenerbahce. Ex-Southampton forward Tadic scored 29 goals in 109 appearances for Fenerbahce. Dzeko and Tadic failing to make a farewell appearance ends what has been a turbulent first season in Turkey for Mourinho. The former Chelsea and Manchester United boss was accused of making racist comments earlier this season after he claimed Galatasaray players were 'jumping like monkeys' when appealing for decisions to go in their favour. Mourinho denied the allegations, and Fenerbahce launched a lawsuit against Galatasaray as they leapt to their manager's defence. Mourinho was then hit with a three-match ban for pinching the nose of Galatasaray manager Okan Buruk following a feisty Istanbul derby in April. Earlier this week, Mourinho lashed out at Turkish reporters after his team were beaten 4-2 by relegation contenders Hatayspor. The Portuguese boss said: 'In the last seven years, I have played in two European finals. So in the past seven years I have played more European finals than the history of Turkish football together.' The 62-year-old may be proud of his past achievements, but it has been a difficult first season for him in a new country, and now he must prepare for life without Dzeko and Tadic following their abrupt departures.
The Guardian
43 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Starmer's attack on Reform's irresponsible policies could backfire
For a politician who has done more than most to shape modern Britain, nothing seems to stick to Nigel Farage. Not the chaos of the post-Brexit referendum years; or the contradiction of his closed-border English nationalism combined with a fondness for courting nomad capitalists from Malaysia to Mar-a-Lago. This is, of course, because the Reform UK leader is the agitator-in-chief. He has prodded successive prime ministers into action, but has not been in the driving seat himself. Things though are changing. When Keir Starmer turned his guns on Reform last week, blasting the party's 'fantasy economics', he made clear that Farage is now Labour's most serious rival. While Kemi Badenoch has led the Conservatives into increasing irrelevance, Reform has marched on to once traditional Labour ground on the economy, while keeping a rightwing stance on immigration and culture. It is clear that Farage sees an opening to peel support away from both traditional parties at once. It is no fantasy to suggest that Farage, riding high in opinion polls, could become prime minister. He should expect heightened scrutiny of his policies as a result, not least on economic policy, where there are serious questions marks over whether Reform's tax and spending plans add up. However, something is lost in the argument about Farageonomics. Not only are the party's numbers hardly better than scribblings on the back of one of its leader's umpteen fag packets, but there is a more fundamental problem: his plans would not help the communities that Reform claims to champion. Yes, scrapping the two-child limit on benefits, introduced by the Conservatives but maintained by Labour – something Farage promised he would do – would be welcome. At least 350,000 children would be lifted out of poverty overnight, at a cost of £2bn – barely a rounding error in the government's more than £1tn of annual spending. Why Labour has not taken this step is a mystery. There is the tight position of public finances, but perhaps also a political calculation that Reform-curious voters are among the majority of people who tell opinion pollsters that benefits eligibility is too lax. As is clear from recent weeks, Britain's attitudes are not that simple to triangulate. Labour has made a grave political error in reckoning otherwise. Farage's other policies remain straight from the right-wing, free-market libertarian playbook. They would help working-class families little, and the super-rich a lot. Central to Reform's election manifesto was a plan to cut £60bn from income tax. It would raise the personal allowance from £12,750 at present to £20,000 a year, while lifting the 40% higher-rate threshold from £50,271 to £70,000. Unspecified welfare cuts worth £15bn also feature – a sum three times larger than the savings Labour is pushing to find from the disability and incapacity support bill, which has provoked nationwide anger. Lifting more people out of tax altogether might sound beneficial for poorer households, and for many it would be. However, most of the gains from these vastly expensive policy changes would flow to the rich. According to analysis by the IPPR thinktank, raising the personal allowance would come with a cost to the exchequer of at least £40bn a year, and hand the poorest 20% of households an extra £380 on average in annual household disposable income. However, the richest fifth would get a vast £2,400 extra. Changes to the higher-rate threshold would cost the exchequer about £18bn a year, and would benefit the poorest fifth of families by just £17. The richest, again, would get a much bigger boost, of £2,700. Taken together, the top 10% of households would get 28p for every £1 of cash forgone by the exchequer, while the bottom 10% would receive only 2p. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion Where in Britain would the winners and losers be from these vast distributive changes? For those with the biggest gains, look no further than London, home to 47 out of 50 local areas with the highest incomes before housing costs, according to the latest official figures, including Westminster, Kensington and Chelsea, Wandsworth and Camden. Of the 50 areas with the lowest incomes, more than half are in Yorkshire and the Humber, with a further quarter in the East Midlands, places where Reform has gained the most ground in the opinion polls. Those in Farage's constituency of Clacton, where average earnings are £25,670 a year, would gain far less than in the leafy London commuter belt seat of Orpington, where the Reform leader has a £1m property and typical pay is £41,385 a year. In defence of Farage, something resembling an opposition to Labour's vast parliamentary majority is not a bad thing. Starmer should not be surprised that the poorest communities in Britain are deserting Labour. Promising 'change', then continuing as the Tories did, with high-profile benefit cuts, will do that. Starmer's attack on Farage's fiscally irresponsible stancemay highlight Labour's discipline but could also backfire. Voters are of course keen for the numbers to add up – nobody would relish another Liz Truss moment- but Labour's attack is reminiscent of the ill-fated Project Fear – as opponents named the campaign to stay in the EU – and risks reinforcing a sense that the party has lost its purpose in the depths of a Treasury spreadsheet. Where the prime minister should focus is on using words and deeds to show the country's poorest communities that Labour can change things for the better, in contrast to the cod working-class values of his shape-shifting opponent.
