Iran confronts Trump with toughest choice yet
President Donald Trump faces potentially the hardest choice of his time in the White House, as he weighs up whether the United States should join Israel's bombing campaign against Iran.
Trump fueled speculation about a US intervention as he dashed back from a G7 summit in Canada, warning Tuesday that the United States could kill Iran's supreme leader, but would not "for now."
The choice is a monumental one for a president who has vowed throughout both his first and second terms in the Oval Office to get the United States out of its "forever wars" in the Middle East.
"It's a major political and military choice that could define his legacy in the Middle East," Behnam Ben Taleblu, director of the Iran program at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, told AFP.
As Trump met his National Security Council in the White House Situation Room on Tuesday, there were already hints that he was considering abandoning what was until recently his preferred diplomatic route.
The most likely option under consideration by Trump would be the use of giant US "bunker-buster" bombs against Iran's deeply buried Fordow nuclear facility that Israel's bombs could not reach.
US officials said dismantling Iran's nuclear program -- which Western countries say Tehran is using to seek a nuclear weapon -- remained Trump's priority.
- Fluid situation -
Trump also implied that the assassination of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is back on the table, just days after a US official said he had waved off such a move by Israel.
US officials stressed that Trump had not yet made a decision and was keeping all options on the table, with the situation fluid and changing "hourly."
The Axios news site said Trump was even considering a new meeting between his top negotiator Steve Witkoff and Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi.
A game-changer however would be any Iranian attack on US forces in the region, with an official saying that Trump would not tolerate a "hair on the back of an American" being harmed.
Trump's change of tone is remarkable for coming less than a week after the US president -- who has openly talked about wanting to win the Nobel Peace Prize -- called on Israel to avoid strikes.
But amid frequent phone calls with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and Netanyahu's own hints about pursuing regime change in Iran, Trump has pivoted.
Trump has ordered the USS Nimitz aircraft carrier to the region along with a number of US military aircraft, raising questions about whether he will act.
- 'Decisions on your shoulders' -
A further hint that action may be on the cards came from the White House's apparent efforts to see off any backlash from his own Make America Great Again (MAGA) movement.
There has been growing opposition to any Iran intervention from the isolationist wing of his base, who hold him to his pledge to keep the United States out of wars like those in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Vice President JD Vance defended his boss, saying Trump had "earned some trust" on the issue and "may decide he needs to take further action to end Iranian (uranium) enrichment."
"Having seen this up close and personal, I can assure you that he is only interested in using the American military to accomplish American people's goals," the Iraq veteran said, in a nod to MAGA skeptics.
Trump himself meanwhile hinted at his mood as he mulled his critical decision.
He reposted a comment by US ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee, an evangelical Christian, saying God had "spared" Trump from an assassination attempt last year.
"The decisions on your shoulders I would not want to be made by anyone else. You have many voices speaking to you Sir, but there is only ONE voice that matters. HIS voice," Huckabee said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
39 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Curfew lifted in LA as Trump battles for control of California troops
Calm appeared to be returning to protest-hit Los Angeles on Tuesday as the mayor lifted a nighttime curfew, while President Donald Trump battled to keep control of California troops he deployed to the city. A fraction of the sprawling US city had been off-limits from 8pm to 6am to most people for a week after instances of looting and vandalism during demonstrations against Trump's immigration raids. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass said the curfew had been "largely successful in protecting stores, restaurants, businesses and residential communities from bad actors who do not care about the immigrant community." However, she added that, "as we continue quickly adapting to chaos coming from Washington," she was prepared to reissue a curfew if needed. Bass and other California officials have accused Trump of inflaming tensions by sending 4,000 of the state's National Guard troops -- as well as 700 Marines -- to the second-largest US city. In a show of political muscle, Trump ignored the objections of Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom, who would usually oversee the Guard. A judge said Thursday that the Republican president's actions were "illegal" and ordered that he return control of the force to Newsom. But a higher court paused that ruling after the Trump administration lodged an appeal and slammed the judge's order as an "extraordinary intrusion on the President's constitutional authority as Commander in Chief." - 'Extreme measure' - At an appeals hearing Tuesday, the Justice Department argued that Trump needed to keep control of California's troops to ensure federal immigration officers could carry out arrests without threats from the public. "Unfortunately, local authorities are either unable or unwilling to protect federal personnel and property from the mob violence ongoing in Los Angeles today," said Brett Shumate, representing the Trump administration. California officials have rejected that charge, insisting that Trump's use of the military has escalated demonstrations that Los Angeles that law enforcement could have handled. Samuel Harbourt, representing Newsom and California, pointed out that local authorities in Los Angeles have made around 1,000 arrests during the disorder. "Are we in a world that's so different from normal conditions as to justify an extreme measure like militarizing the situation and bringing in the National Guard?" he said. Harbourt urged the San Francisco court to lift the pause on the original order, meaning Trump would have to concede control of the Guard. "Every day that this order remains in effect it is causing harm for our nation's broader democratic tradition of separation of the military from civilian affairs," he said. That, he added, "sets a precedent for this president, and future presidents, to take similar actions going forward." - 'Totally lost control' - The fatigue-wearing guardsmen have been tasked with protecting federal property in Los Angeles, stationed outside buildings with helmets and large shields. US law restricts them from arresting citizens, though some guardsmen have fired tear gas and non-lethal rounds towards protesters, according to local media. It is the first time since 1965 that a US president has deployed the National Guard without the express wishes of a state's governor. Trump has been unrepentant, taking credit for making Los Angeles "safe" and declaring that Newsom -- a contender for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2028 -- had "totally lost control." The dispute mirrors multiple other tussles over Trump's attempts to expand the limits of presidential power, but is the first to involve troops. Like other cases, it could go all the way to the Supreme Court, where conservative judges hold a 6-3 majority. Many in Los Angeles are angry about immigration raids carried out as part of Trump's ambition to deport vast numbers of undocumented migrants around the country. Outrage at the use of masked, armed immigration agents has also sparked protests in other cities, including San Francisco, New York, Chicago and San Antonio, Texas.
West Australian
39 minutes ago
- West Australian
US Embassy in Jerusalem, Israel, closed: Services in Tel Aviv unavailable as Middle East war fears grow
The US Embassy in Israel has told its government staff to 'shelter in place', closing down Jerusalem and Tel Aviv services due to the deteriorating security situation in the Middle East. 'As a result of the current security situation and ongoing conflict between Israel and Iran, the US Embassy has directed that all US government employees and their family members continue to shelter in place in and near their residences until further notice,' the Embassy said in a statement. 'Given the security situation and in compliance with Israel Home Front Command guidance, the US Embassy in Jerusalem will be closed tomorrow (Wednesday, June 18) through Friday (June 20). 'This includes the Consular Sections in Jerusalem and Tel Aviv. There will be no passport (emergency or regular) or Consular Report of Birth Abroad services.' The announcement comes after US President Donald Trump met with national security advisers in the White House Situation Room on Tuesday after returning from the G7 summit early. Both US and Israeli media have also reported that Mr Trump spoke with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu before the Situation Room meeting. The US Embassy said it had 'no announcements' on assisting private US citizens in Israel. The main airport in Israel, Ben Gurion Airport near Tel Aviv, is closed. The advice from the US Government, which echoed advice from the Chinese Embassy in Israel a day prior, was to head towards Jordan land crossings The Australian Government updated it's advice for Israel to 'do not travel' on June 15. Like other governments, no plans to rescue stranded citizens have been announced. Mr Trump on Tuesday demanded Iran 'surrender' as more missiles were fired. Following his demand, Iran's Supreme Leader issued a chilling messaging, saying: 'the battle begins'.
Sky News AU
42 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese considers snap trip to NATO summit in bid to secure crucial meeting with Donald Trump
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is considering a snap visit to The Hague for the NATO summit in an attempt to secure a long-anticipated face-to-face meeting with US President Donald Trump. The possible Albanese-Trump encounter in the Netherlands at the end of June follows the abrupt cancellation of their scheduled talks at the G7 in Canada. Mr Albanese has been scrambling to re-establish direct dialogue with the Trump administration on key issues, including the AUKUS defence pact and trade tariffs. Mr Albanese confirmed the NATO trip was under active consideration after the US President left the G7 summit due to the escalating conflict in the Middle East. The sudden exit blindsided government officials, who were notified only when President Trump's press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, posted the news on social media. 'We're mature about the circumstances of what happened,' Mr Albanese told reporters after the G7 summit on Wednesday (Australian time). 'It's perfectly understandable. We'll reschedule a meeting — from time to time that is what occurs.' Mr Albanese was asked whether he was 'considering going to NATO' for the possibility of a rescheduled meeting with President Trump. 'Look, I'm considering discussions with a range of people over the last couple of days… I met with the NATO secretary general yesterday,' he said in response. 'But I had discussions with others here as well.' Ambassador to the US Kevin Rudd had worked for months to secure the now-cancelled bilateral meeting with Mr Trump. The missed opportunity sparked a flurry of criticism at home, with opposition figures and foreign policy commentators branding the development a failure of diplomacy. 'This is a complete humiliation for Albanese,' The Australian's Foreign Editor Greg Sheridan told Sky News on Tuesday. 'Trump has had multiple, multiple meetings with (UK and Canadian Prime Ministers) Starmer and Carney. 'But he'd rather have another meeting with them than have his first ever meeting with Albanese.' 'There's just no way you can get around this. This is a complete snub.' In the absence of Mr Trump, Mr Albanese instead held two short meetings on the sidelines of the G7 with key members of the Trump administration. He met US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett, and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. 'I had a meeting this morning with US Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent, which was a good opportunity to put forward Australia's position on tariffs,' Mr Albanese said. 'We also discussed how Australia can support the United States on critical minerals. Australia has endorsed the G7 Critical Minerals Office Action Plan. 'This opens up the prospect of further inspections of the Australian critical minerals and rare earths industry.'
