NATO jets scrambled to intercept Russian spyplane as Kremlin threatens ‘direct' response to military buildup on border
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
GERMAN fighter jets were dramatically scrambled to intercept a Russian spy plane over the Baltic Sea.
It came just hours before the Kremlin warned of a 'direct' response to NATO's growing presence on its doorstep.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
8
German fighter jets were scrambled to intercept a Russian Il-20 spy plane over the Baltic Sea (stock picture)
Credit: AP:Associated Press
8
It came after Putin's Kremlin threatened a 'direct' response to military buildup on border
Credit: Getty
8
Two Eurofighters (stock picture) roared into action after NATO radar spotted the Russian spy plane
Credit: PA
8
Two Eurofighters roared into action on Friday after NATO radar spotted a Russian Il-20 with its transponder switched off.
The plane had taken off from Kaliningrad and was heading west toward Poland and Germany, according to Bild and The Kyiv Independent.
Germany's quick reaction team made visual contact about 100km off the coast.
They snapped a photo before the lumbering Russian aircraft turned north, skirting just 40km from the Baltic island of Usedom but staying out of German airspace.
It's the ninth time this year German jets have been scrambled to shadow Moscow's snoopers.
NATO says the Kremlin is using these flights to test alliance defences and gather intel on troop positions as the Ukraine war drags on.
The airborne drama came as Russian presidential spokesman Dmitry Peskov slammed Estonia's willingness to host NATO aircraft armed with nuclear weapons, branding it a 'direct' danger to Moscow.
'Directly, of course,' he said, when asked if such a move posed a threat, Russian news agency TASS reported.
Peskov sneered that Baltic leaders often make 'absurd' statements, and added icy relations could scarcely get any worse: 'It is very difficult to do anything worse.'
Humiliation for Putin as £37m jets destroyed in strike before vengeful tyrant kills two in blitz on Ukraine tower block
Tallinn's Defence Minister Hanno Pevkur had earlier revealed Estonia is ready to welcome NATO jets capable of carrying tactical nuclear bombs — pointing to recent visits by US F-35s that could soon be guarding the tiny nation's skies again.
It comes amid mounting alarm that Vladimir Putin is readying Russia for a showdown with NATO itself.
Bruno Kahl, head of Germany's foreign intelligence service, recently warned 'Ukraine is only a step on the journey westward,' adding: 'We have intelligence showing it.'
NATO chief Mark Rutte piled on the pressure, saying the alliance must brace for the possibility of a Russian attack by 2030.
Putin's forces have already begun amassing hardware and troops close to Finland, just 35 miles from the border, according to satellite snaps showing activity at four Russian bases — Kamenka, Petrozavodsk, Severomorsk-2 and Olenya.
Defence experts fear Moscow may attempt to provoke NATO into a limited clash, testing the alliance's Article 5 pledge of mutual defence without triggering full-scale war.
Meanwhile on the battlefield, Putin's summer push in Ukraine is grinding on at a snail's pace, with Kyiv's fierce drone attacks bogging down Russian advances.
After 448 days of fighting in Chasiv Yar in Donetsk, Moscow's troops reportedly control just half the city — clawing back land at a rate so slow that even snails would outpace them.
But with an estimated 125,000 Russian soldiers massing along Ukraine's Sumy and Kharkiv borders, Kyiv is bracing for what could be Putin's last big gamble to seize ground before negotiating a ceasefire.
Ukrainian commander-in-chief Oleksandr Syrsky said his forces had managed to pin down a 50,000-strong Russian assault near Sumy, stabilising the lines for now.
8
Bruno Kahl, head of Berlin's Federal Intelligence Service, said his team have intel suggesting Russia is plotting to test the resolve of Nato in the coming years
Credit: Alamy
8
A Russian drone strike on Kyiv overnight left dozens of residential buildings crumbling
Credit: AP
8
Ukraine is often left battling Putin's continued drone attacks
Credit: Getty
Back in Germany, Chancellor Friedrich Merz poured more cold water on any thaw with Moscow, telling Süddeutsche Zeitung he won't pick up the phone to Putin given Russia's relentless bombing of Ukraine.
His predecessor Olaf Scholz had broken ranks last year by speaking with the Kremlin tyrant — but Merz insisted the time for friendly calls is over.
As Putin's bombers continue to pound Kyiv and Odesa with hundreds of drones and missiles every night, NATO eyes remain fixed on the Baltic and beyond — wary that Moscow's next gambit could spark the very clash the world fears most.
It comes after Ukraine landed another humiliating blow on Vlad's war machine — blitzing two of Russia's prized Su-34 fighter jets in a daring long-range drone strike.
Kyiv's forces targeted the Marinovka military airfield in the Volgograd region, flying drones 200 miles to smash four of the £37million jets.
Two were destroyed outright, while the other pair were damaged, sending pro-war Russian Telegram channels into meltdown over the 'multi-billion dollar' losses.
Furious Kremlin cheerleaders raged the attack 'could and should have been prevented.'
Ukraine's SBU boasted the strike sparked a fire in critical infrastructure used to prep and repair Russian warplanes.
Putin lashed out in brutal revenge. Overnight, Russia flattened a 21-storey tower block in Odesa, killing a married couple and wounding at least 14 others — including three children.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump ‘did not like' moment Macron called him out over Putin during high-stakes call with European leaders
Donald Trump 'did not like' being called out by Emmanuel Macron during a high-stakes call with European leaders, ahead of his bilateral meeting with Vladimir Putin. The French president took 'very tough positions,' and reportedly told Trump Wednesday that a meeting was 'a very big thing' to give Putin, sources familiar with the call told Axios. "Trump didn't like that,' the source added. The U.S. president is set to meet with his authoritarian Russian counterpart on Friday in Alaska, the first time Putin has set foot on American soil since 2015. The pair will discuss bringing about an end to the Russian war in Ukraine, which has raged since February 2022. Trump told the European leaders, which included Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, that his goals for the summit were to secure a ceasefire and to better understand whether a full peace is possible. As well as Macron's hardline position, Axios reported that German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte were both "very active" on the call, and Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni"raised some good points." Zelensky, who at this stage will not be present at Friday's meeting, told Trump that Putin 'cannot be trusted,' the outlet's source added. Speaking to reporters following the meeting on Wednesday, Trump said that he could not guarantee success on the ceasefire, and his administration previously described the meeting as a However, Trump also added that Putin would face 'severe consequences' if the Russian leader does not agree to a ceasefire, though he did not specify exactly what those consequences would be. Russia is likely to resist Ukraine and Europe's demands strongly and previously said its stance had not changed since it was set out by Putin in June 2024. When asked if Russia would face any consequences if Putin does not agree to stop the war after Friday's meeting, Trump responded: 'Yes, they will.' Asked if those consequences would be sanctions or tariffs, Trump told reporters: 'I don't have to say, there will be very severe consequences." The president also described another aim of the meeting as "setting the table" for a quick follow-up that would include Zelensky. "If the first one goes okay, we'll have a quick second one," he said. "I would like to do it almost immediately, and we'll have a quick second meeting between President Putin and President Zelenskiy and myself, if they'd like to have me there." Trump did not provide a time frame for a second meeting.
Telegraph
24 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Putin cannot fight in Ukraine indefinitely. Unfortunately, he doesn't have to
Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin are heading to Alaska to discuss the possibility of a negotiated end to the war in Ukraine, but some observers fear that the Russian president isn't bothered about making peace. They assess that Russia is prepared to fight indefinitely, with Putin believing that he can outlast Ukraine in terms of weapons and manpower. As a former US intelligence officer, specialising in Putin's thinking and Russia's war-fighting strategy, I participated in dozens of wargames, simulating conflicts similar to the one in Ukraine, in which US/Nato forces eventually intervened. When leading the Red Team (Russian forces) – comprised of Russia analysts from across the intelligence community – against the Blue Team (US/Nato forces), my colleagues and I ran our campaign just as we assessed the Russian president and his military would. Based on that experience, here is what I consider to be Putin's decision calculus. He is unlikely to think that he needs to fight 'indefinitely'. Instead, he may have determined that he only has to fight long enough to inflict what Russian military planners call 'unacceptable damage' – to both Ukraine's combat potential and to the morale of the country's troops and civilian population. The result would be Ukraine's capitulation. Based on the calculations of the Russian General Staff, Russia's significant advantage in combat potential over Ukraine – even when including military assistance from the US and Europe – and its historically-proven tolerance for casualties, will enable Moscow to outlast Kyiv and its Western supporters. From the intelligence standpoint, this rationale has its logic. In terms of combat potential – a combination of the size of a country's weapons stockpile, the size of its armed forces, its ability to mobilise additional troops, its military-industrial capacity to scale up production of weapons, and its will to fight – Ukraine is outmanned, outgunned, and overly reliant on the West economically and militarily. Its will to fight also appears to have been eroded. Despite having lowered the minimum conscription age in 2024 from 27 to 25, and allowing men over 60 to enlist in the military, Ukraine is in a manpower crisis, with the average age of a Ukrainian soldier reportedly having reached 45. Ukraine faces critical shortages in key weapon systems and ordnance, forcing it to ration its ammunition, especially artillery shells. Russia's disproportionate advantage over Ukraine in artillery shell use – 44,500 vs 14,600 in the summer of 2024, according to one estimate – has hindered the Ukrainian military from fighting effectively and appears to have drained its troops' morale. Supplies from the US and Europe are not endless, either, because their respective arsenals have also been depleted. In July, the Pentagon even ordered a temporary pause on deliveries of munitions to Ukraine. The Pentagon apparently deemed it crucial to conserve its stockpiles of Patriot interceptors, Howitzer munitions, Hellfire missiles, GMLRS precision-guided missile systems, Stingers, AIM air-to-air missiles and grenade launchers. The fact that some deliveries were rapidly restored does not mean the stated rationale for the pause was incorrect. Indeed, the Pentagon must maintain a sufficient weapons arsenal to meet the requirements of its geographical combatant commands, which are responsible for military operations in their respective areas of responsibility. Each of these commands keeps war plans on the books for likely future conflicts and these plans must be resourced with the necessary munitions to prosecute a successful campaign. Having strained the US stockpile significantly, due to its extremely high burn rate of munitions (at least by Western standards), Ukraine cannot count on years of additional arms shipments. With the threat of China looming large, there's grave concern among US military planners that the US would probably fail at any future intervention. According to the 2024 report by the Commission on the National Defence Strategy, the US military 'lacks both the capabilities and the capacity required to be confident it can deter and prevail in combat'. In a great power conflict with Beijing, it warned that the US would likely run out of munitions in three to four weeks, with some weapons systems lasting only a few days. The same report assessed that the US military was inadequate for a multi-theatre conflict to 'defend the homeland and tackle simultaneous threats in the Indo-Pacific, Europe, and the Middle East'. More alarmingly, US industrial production is 'grossly inadequate to provide the equipment, technology, and munitions needed today,' let alone for future conflicts. In contrast, Russia, having moved onto a wartime footing seven years prior to the invasion of Ukraine, is now believed to be producing more ammunition in three months than Europe in one year. Putin has also increased the size of Russia's armed forces, to ensure that they can fight until the last Ukrainian. Given the current level of attrition of Ukraine's manpower and munitions and the West's limited ability to restock supplies, Putin highly likely believes that Ukraine and the West are nearing the point of 'unacceptable damage', eventually compelling them to abandon the fight. A recent Gallup poll revealed that 69 per cent of Ukrainians now favour a negotiated end to the war with Russia. While both Russia and Ukraine have suffered tremendous losses thus far, with a population three times larger, Russia is better placed to fight a multi-year war of attrition. Russia's fear of a US-Nato intervention on the battlefield in Ukraine is likely to be mitigated by the assessment that neither the Americans nor Europeans, culturally or psychologically, would be willing to sustain the scale of human loss required for this type of land war of attrition. Indeed, it's hard to imagine Western leaders summoning up the political will to throw their troops into the meat grinder of an adversary whose centuries-old way of war centres on out-suffering and outlasting its opponent. Having lost 25 million people in the Second World War in four years, Russians believe they have a much higher pain tolerance. War-gaming has suggested that, in a large-scale war with a near-peer adversary, such as Russia and China, the US and its allies would suffer thousands of casualties in the first few weeks of the conflict. With 24,000 casualties incurred each month, as assumed by US Army doctrine, the US military would have to 'almost immediately request reauthorisation of the draft to ensure it had sufficient manpower to sustain the war,' according to US military planners. The idea of returning to conscription remains unthinkable for many Europeans and Americans, and could be political suicide for Western leaders. In contrast, Putin has been mobilising overtly and covertly throughout this conflict and will almost certainly approve a bill recently submitted to the State Duma, introducing year-round conscription for military service. Putin is highly unlikely to make any concessions to Trump in Alaska. My assessment is that he firmly believes Moscow holds the upper hand. While Trump's goal is to stop the killing in Ukraine, Putin's likely goal is to appear next to the leader of the free world, demonstrating not only that Russia is not as isolated as the West thinks, but is an equal to America. Without a thorough understanding of Putin's Playbook, Trump's art of negotiating will not produce the deal. Rebekah Koffler is a strategic military intelligence analyst, formerly with the US Defense Intelligence Agency. She is the author of 'Putin's Playbook', Regnery 2021. Her next book 'Trump's Playbook' will be published later this year. Rebekah's podcast Trump's Playbook is running on her channel Censored But Not Silenced and is available on most social media platforms @Rebekah0132
Scottish Sun
an hour ago
- Scottish Sun
Two schoolgirls, 15, ‘sexually assaulted' near field in broad daylight attack as man, 39, is arrested
The suspect has been arrested on suspicion of sexual assault and possession of a controlled drug ATTACK PROBE Two schoolgirls, 15, 'sexually assaulted' near field in broad daylight attack as man, 39, is arrested Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A MAN has been arrested after two teenagers were sexually assaulted on a path close to a field. The two 15-year-old schoolgirls were walking on the path close to the green space in Adderley Green, Stoke-on-Trent, at around 12.35pm yesterday when a man approached them, police said. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up He then sexually assaulted both of them, Staffordshire Police said. Both girls walked away after the attack and told someone in the area about what happened to them. Now, cops have arrested a 39-year-old man on suspicion of sexual assault on a female and possessing a controlled drug of Class B - cannabis. Police had previously established that the suspect was known to the victims, after carrying out enquiries locally. Officers added that they were not looking for anyone else in connection with the investigation. The suspect currently remains in custody for questioning. More to follow... For the latest news on this story keep checking back at The Sun Online is your go-to destination for the best celebrity news, real-life stories, jaw-dropping pictures and must-see video. Like us on Facebook at and follow us from our main Twitter account at @TheSun.
