logo
On Carney's agenda, climate is nowhere and everywhere

On Carney's agenda, climate is nowhere and everywhere

Throughout Mark Carney's whirlwind first months on the job, two words have remained conspicuously absent from the prime minister's messaging: 'climate change.'
That's been a major disappointment for many in the climate community, who expected a more vocal advocacy from the former UN special envoy on climate action and finance. 'The G7 Leaders' Summit was a test of Canada's climate leadership, and Prime Minister Carney failed,' wrote Caroline Brouillette, executive director of Climate Action Network Canada, in an emblematic statement following the Kananaskis summit. Brouillete was responding to the G7's avoidance of climate change, including in a joint communique on the rising danger of wildfires.
'It's a serious omission, and that's being very polite,' wildfire expert Mike Flannigan told Canada's National Observer at the time.
So what happened? Where's the guy who dedicated two entire chapters of his book, Values, to the climate crisis? Why is the same person who used his platform as governor of the Bank of England to warn the world's financial elites about the risk of stranded assets and carbon bubbles now flirting with new pipelines under C-5 and invoking oil-industry jargon like 'decarbonized oil'?
Is it just his language that's changed, or has the new job pushed climate change off his radar?
All policy is climate policy
Not everyone in the climate community feels betrayed — at least, not yet.
The new prime minister doesn't lecture on climate like the old one. Does that mean he's forgotten about the climate crisis?
'It feels like we're still in a wait-and-see moment,' says Dale Beugin, executive vice president at the Canadian Climate Institute. 'I get the priority to go after nation-building projects. I get the priority to move on some of these big economic issues. Because that's where the moment is right now. I think that's pretty defensible. The trick will be to make sure that they can deliver on those shorter-term economic imperatives, while not losing the climate ones.'
Another word for 'shorter-term economic imperatives,' in today's Ottawa parlance, is 'Bill C-5.' As most of Canada is aware, Carney rushed that bill into law in record time entirely in the name of responding to the economic crisis posed by Trump's tariffs. And in order to get the votes needed to pass Bill C-5, Carney and his senior officials have had to find common cause with traditional adversaries — from prairie premiers like Danielle Smith to the federal Conservatives sitting opposite in the House of Commons.
'He's clearly balancing a number of delicate issues, including Alberta's concerns,' allows Rachel Samson, vice president of research at the Institute for Research on Public Policy.
For Samson, the fact that Carney isn't lecturing Canadians about climate change the way his predecessor did doesn't mean he's stopped thinking about it.
'He's spent a lot of his career thinking about climate change and action on climate change. And fundamentally, I think the way that we're going to get action on climate change done is not by having big policy announcements and big claims of targets. It's going to be about embedding it into everything.'
By 'everything,' Samson means things like housing (where modular home building and green financing have the potential for a massive impact on Canada's emissions), defense spending (which Carney has said will include huge sums for critical mineral supply chains needed for clean energy), and wildfire protection (named by Carney as a top priority at the G7 he just hosted in Kananaskis – albeit without any mention of climate change.)
'To say climate change is only one thing, I think misses the broader context that it's really going to encompass every policy issue,' Samson says. 'So I don't personally have a problem with it being embedded within the conversation of other policy priorities.'
Samson allows that tradeoffs are inevitable, and that Canadians may have to brace themselves for a new pipeline or two.
' It seems like he will have to compromise on certain things and that may involve an oil pipeline; it may involve more LNG projects and, and so that certainly will disappoint people who are looking to reduce fossil fuel production,' she says. But Samson remains 'cautiously optimistic' that Carney's overall focus is still fixed on the energy transition. 'If some fossil fuel production is a way to get to that – is a way to raise the revenue and get the buy-in to accomplish those things and build out the infrastructure – with that long term goal in mind, I think I can get behind it.'
But those with a long memory may recall that is precisely the reasoning Justin Trudeau provided for expanding the Trans Mountain pipeline.
'The TMX project is a significant investment in Canadians and in Canada's future that will … fund the clean energy solutions that Canada needs to stay competitive on the global stage,' Trudeau said in announcing the purchase in 2019.
So the question under Carney becomes: when, exactly, does he mean what he says?
Pipeline promises
The reason Carney was able to rush Bill C-5 through the House of Commons so quickly was that he secured Conservative support. And one major reason Conservatives supported it was that they hoped it would usher in a new wave of 'conventional energy' pipelines. If Carney had explicitly promised to exclude fossil fuel from the legislation — if he'd framed it as being designed to accelerate Canada's energy transition — the process would likely have been far slower.
Conservatives were certainly delighted by Tim Hodgson, a fellow banker and the new minister of energy and natural resources, when he visited Calgary in May to speak with the oil patch. During that visit, Hodgson, who has previously sat on the board of oil sands producer MEG energy, promised federal support for new oil and gas pipelines, though he didn't get into specifics.
'It's very encouraging. This is exactly what we need,' Rich Kruger, CEO of Suncor (one of the biggest producers in the oil sands) told the Calgary Herald after Hodgson's talk.
But will Carney actually deliver the pipelines he and Hodgson have been dangling in front of the oil patch?
'I've been paying really close attention to what he's said about certain topics, like 'nation-building,'' says Chris Severson-Baker, the executive director of the Pembina Institute, an environmental think tank based in Alberta. 'What is he actually saying about an oil pipeline, versus the words that others are putting in his mouth?'
'When talking about so-called 'conventional energy,'' — the industry term for fossil fuels — 'I've noticed that he's very careful to say that the scheme would have to make sense, or only a sensible project would be considered,' Severson-Baker says. He also had a very different takeaway from Tim Hodgson's May visit to Calgary.
'Hodgson came in and said to a bunch of oil and gas executives exactly what they wanted to hear,' he said. It wasn't that Hodgson was trying to deceive his audience; rather, Severson-Baker described him as 'a brand new [natural resources]NR-Can minister who hasn't been briefed by his own department yet. I don't actually have a lot of confidence that he knows what he's talking about when he made those statements.'
Meanwhile, the things Carney has said must be weighed against the things he hasn't. On Bill C-5 and elsewhere, the prime minister has floated climate-friendly projects like a national energy grid, a huge offshore wind-power project in Nova Scotia, and high-speed rail connecting Windsor to Quebec. Shortly before the G7 summit, he published the list of priorities he wanted to discuss (the host leader gets to set the agenda). In addition to wildfires, Carney named 'energy security' as a top concern – but nowhere did 'conventional energy' get mentioned; instead, he named 'critical mineral supply chains,' an unambiguous reference to clean energy.
That emphasis extends to Carney's recent commitment in Brussels to massively increase Canada's defense spending, to five per cent of the national GDP — some $150 billion per year —– by 2035. In subsequent news conferences, Carney was quick to point out that a third of that spending would go to securing critical minerals and associated infrastructure, like ports and electricity grids. He may not have mentioned climate change, but he didn't express any support for fossil fuels, either.
That leaves a lot of room for everyone to hear what they want.
The PMO didn't respond to a request for comment on this story, though the ministry of environment and climate change did provide a statement: 'Climate action remains a core priority of this government and a defining pillar of Canada's economic future. As we build the strongest economy in the G7, we know climate action is central to our plan for a strong, secure, and competitive country.'
That sounds more like something Carney's predecessor would say than Carney himself. But the sentiment may not be too far off. As Rachel Samson put it, advancing climate policy – however that looks, or sounds, 'isn't about a moral highground or anything. It's just smart policy.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sentencing hearing begins for Freedom Convoy leaders Lich, Barber
Sentencing hearing begins for Freedom Convoy leaders Lich, Barber

Vancouver Sun

time8 minutes ago

  • Vancouver Sun

Sentencing hearing begins for Freedom Convoy leaders Lich, Barber

The sentencing hearing for Freedom Convoy leaders Tamara Lich and Chris Barber has started in Ottawa, months after the two were found guilty of mischief. Barber is appearing virtually due to the sudden death of one of his parents, while Lich is attending in person. Dozens of people have filled the courtroom to watch the proceedings. Two days have been set aside for the parties to present their sentencing submissions. The Crown is seeking a prison sentence of seven years for Lich and eight years for Barber, who also was convicted of counselling others to disobey a court order. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. Lich and Barber were key figures behind the convoy protest that occupied downtown Ottawa for three weeks beginning in late January 2022 to protest vaccine mandates and other pandemic measures. The protest ended after the federal government invoked the Emergencies Act for the first time ever. The convoy was cleared out of Ottawa's downtown core in a three-day police operation that began on Feb. 18. Ontario Court Justice Heather Perkins-McVey said she found Lich and Barber guilty of mischief because they routinely encouraged people to join or remain at the protest, despite knowing the adverse effects it was having on downtown residents and businesses. Barber also was found guilty of counselling others to disobey a court order for telling people to ignore a judge's injunction directing convoy participants to stop honking their truck horns. Lich was not charged with that offence. In a separate Ottawa-based trial for Pat King, another convoy leader, the Crown sought a sentence of 10 years in prison for mischief and disobeying a court order. King was sentenced in February to three months of house arrest, 100 hours of community service at a food bank or men's shelter and a year of probation. He received nine months credit for time served before his conviction. Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre criticized the Crown's sentencing proposals for Lich and Barber. In a social media post Monday, Poilievre compared the sentencing range to sentences for other crimes and asked, 'How is this justice?' While it's quite rare for elected officials to comment directly on a sentencing hearing, Poilievre's message was echoed by several other prominent Conservatives. Deputy Conservative leader Melissa Lantsman called the Crown's proposed sentence 'political vengeance not actual justice.' Some Conservatives, including Poilievre, were openly supportive of the Freedom Convoy as trucks and other vehicles clogged roads around Parliament Hill. Both Lich and Barber thanked Poilievre for his support in separate social media posts. 'There is a fine line between politics and the judiciary, as there should be, and I have long understood the uncomfortable position elected officials find themselves in when it comes to commenting on cases that are before the court,' Lich said on X Tuesday. 'In our case, the double standard and the vindictive nature from the prosecution office has become too obvious to ignore and will set a precedent going forward that will affect all Canadians who choose to peacefully protest or deter them from exercising their Charter Right to peacefully assemble.' 'Thank you, Pierre, we've been waiting so long for elected officials to speak up,' Barber wrote in his own post. Poilievre lost his Ottawa-area seat in the April election and is running in an Alberta byelection. Both Lich and Barber were found not guilty on charges of intimidation, counselling to commit intimidation, obstructing police and counselling others to obstruct police. Justice Perkins-McVey said intimidation carries a sense of menace or violence. She said that both Lich and Barber repeatedly called for protesters to remain peaceful throughout the protest. As for obstructing police, Perkins-McVey said both were arrested without incident and were in custody before the main police operation began to clear downtown Ottawa. Charges for counselling others to commit mischief were stayed at the request of the Crown. Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here .

Sentencing hearing begins for Freedom Convoy leaders Lich, Barber
Sentencing hearing begins for Freedom Convoy leaders Lich, Barber

Edmonton Journal

time8 minutes ago

  • Edmonton Journal

Sentencing hearing begins for Freedom Convoy leaders Lich, Barber

Article content Barber is appearing virtually due to the sudden death of one of his parents, while Lich is attending in person. Article content Article content Dozens of people have filled the courtroom to watch the proceedings. Article content Two days have been set aside for the parties to present their sentencing submissions. Article content Article content The Crown is seeking a prison sentence of seven years for Lich and eight years for Barber, who also was convicted of counselling others to disobey a court order. Article content Article content Lich and Barber were key figures behind the convoy protest that occupied downtown Ottawa for three weeks beginning in late January 2022 to protest vaccine mandates and other pandemic measures. Article content The protest ended after the federal government invoked the Emergencies Act for the first time ever. The convoy was cleared out of Ottawa's downtown core in a three-day police operation that began on Feb. 18. Ontario Court Justice Heather Perkins-McVey said she found Lich and Barber guilty of mischief because they routinely encouraged people to join or remain at the protest, despite knowing the adverse effects it was having on downtown residents and businesses. Article content Barber also was found guilty of counselling others to disobey a court order for telling people to ignore a judge's injunction directing convoy participants to stop honking their truck horns. Lich was not charged with that offence. Article content Article content In a separate Ottawa-based trial for Pat King, another convoy leader, the Crown sought a sentence of 10 years in prison for mischief and disobeying a court order. Article content King was sentenced in February to three months of house arrest, 100 hours of community service at a food bank or men's shelter and a year of probation. Article content He received nine months credit for time served before his conviction. Article content Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre criticized the Crown's sentencing proposals for Lich and Barber. In a social media post Monday, Poilievre compared the sentencing range to sentences for other crimes and asked, 'How is this justice?' Article content While it's quite rare for elected officials to comment directly on a sentencing hearing, Poilievre's message was echoed by several other prominent Conservatives. Article content Deputy Conservative leader Melissa Lantsman called the Crown's proposed sentence 'political vengeance not actual justice.'

Trump ‘acting like the enemy,' Ford says as premiers wrap final day of meetings
Trump ‘acting like the enemy,' Ford says as premiers wrap final day of meetings

CTV News

time38 minutes ago

  • CTV News

Trump ‘acting like the enemy,' Ford says as premiers wrap final day of meetings

The Canadian premiers speak to the media during the 2025 summer meetings of Canada's Premiers at Deerhurst Resort in Huntsville, Ont., on Wednesday, July 23, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Nathan Denette Following a day of talks focused on domestic issues, such as bail reform and health transfers, Canada's premiers are wrapping up their three-day gathering in Muskoka presenting a united front in the ever-looming threat of U.S. President Donald Trump's trade war. 'We can walk and chew gum at the same time,' New Brunswick Premier Susan Holt said during a post-meeting press conference. 'What's happened is that the pressing threats that Donald Trump has made to our economy have meant that instead of occupying all of our meetings and squeezing out conversations about bail reform and immigration, we've been meeting a lot more.' 'We've spent a lot more time together in my entire tenure as premier in just eight months than I think my predecessor would have spent in six years,' Holt also said. The premiers are wrapping up three days of meetings in Huntsville, Ont., hosted by Ontario Premier and Council of the Federation Chair Doug Ford. While the provincial and territorial leaders have covered topics ranging from internal trade barriers to health transfers and immigration, the threat of Trump and his trade war loomed large. Prime Minister Mark Carney also joined the premiers in Muskoka for a meeting on Tuesday, aimed mostly at giving an update on the state of negotiations with the United States. While Carney has given an Aug. 1 deadline to hash out a new economic and security deal with the U.S. — pushing it back from an earlier mid-July date — the prime minister signalled Tuesday he's prioritizing getting 'the best deal' over the timeline. Many premiers said Tuesday they have faith in the federal government as a negotiating team, while Trump's pledge to raise tariffs on Canadian goods to 35 per cent on Aug. 1 fast approaches. During the post-meeting press conference on Wednesday, Quebec Premier François Legault said the Muskoka gathering gave the premiers an opportunity for 'two-for-one' talks, both on domestic issues amongst themselves and on trade negotiations with Carney. Legault said considering the impending Aug. 1 deadline for higher tariffs, the chance to meet with the prime minister was 'necessary.' Earlier Wednesday, Ford said: 'Trump himself is acting like the enemy.' 'I have no problem, but I don't trust President Trump as far as I can throw him,' Ford said, when asked whether he'd be satisfied waiting until 2026 to renegotiate the Canada-U.S. Mexico Agreement (CUSMA), the date by which the free trade deal is already set for review. 'He constantly changes his mind, you just don't know who you're dealing with,' the Ontario premier added. Premiers support waiting for best deal Alberta Premier Danielle Smith, meanwhile, said she would prefer to have the CUSMA renegotiation process accelerated, especially with Trump 'getting quite aggressive' on certain sectoral tariffs, such as those targeting autos, steel, aluminum, and copper, to name a few. 'I'm watching Truth Social along with everyone else, because things could change in five minutes,' Smith said during the premiers' final press conference. 'But what we're hearing from the Americans, it looks like they're putting off a full renegotiation of the Canada-U.S. free trade agreement until next year. I find that disappointing.' 'If we can come up with some kind of common arrangement on those sectoral agreements by Aug. 1, we'll look at that as a win,' Smith also said. 'And if it takes a little bit longer to renegotiate (the) Canada-U.S. free trade agreement to make sure that we get it right, then I'm supportive of that.' Manitoba Premier Wab Kinew said he's also in favour of waiting on a good deal instead of rushing into a weaker one. After spending the bulk of Tuesday focused on Trump and presenting a united front with the American administration, the premiers shifted to domestic policy on Wednesday, discussing health transfers and bail reform. Deal by deadline 'highly unlikely': former ambassador In an interview on The Vassy Kapelos Show across the iHeart Radio network on Wednesday, former Canadian ambassador to the U.S. David MacNaughton said he believes it's 'highly unlikely' Canada and the U.S. will reach a 'comprehensive deal' by Aug. 1. 'It may take longer, and I think it probably will,' he said. MacNaughton served as Canada's diplomat in Washington throughout the original CUSMA negotiations during Trump's first term. With files from CTV News' Rachel Aiello and Samantha Pope

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store