Wisconsin Supreme Court's liberal majority strikes down 176-year-old abortion ban
State lawmakers adopted the ban in 1849, making it a felony when anyone other than the mother 'intentionally destroys the life of an unborn child.'
It was in effect until 1973, when the US Supreme Court's landmark Roe v. Wade decision legalizing abortion nationwide nullified it. Legislators never officially repealed the ban, however, and conservatives argued that the US Supreme Court's 2022 decision to overturn Roe reactivated it.
Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul, a Democrat, filed a lawsuit that year arguing that the ban was trumped by abortion restrictions legislators enacted during the nearly half-century that Roe was in effect. Kaul specifically cited a 1985 law that essentially permits abortions until viability. Some babies can survive with medical help after 21 weeks of gestation.
Sheboygan County District Attorney Joel Urmanski, a Republican, defended the ban in court, arguing that the 1849 ban could coexist with the newer abortion restrictions, just as different penalties for the same crime coexist.
Dane County Circuit Judge Diane Schlipper ruled in 2023 that the 1849 ban outlaws feticide – which she defined as the killing of a fetus without the mother's consent – but not consensual abortions. Abortions have been available in the state since that ruling but the state Supreme Court decision gives providers and patients more certainty that abortions will remain legal in Wisconsin.
Urmanski asked the state Supreme Court to overturn Schlipper's ruling without waiting for a decision from a lower appellate court. It was expected as soon as the justices took the case that they would overturn the ban.
Liberals hold a 4-3 majority on the court and one of them, Janet Protasiewicz, openly stated on the campaign trail that she supports abortion rights.
Democratic-backed Susan Crawford defeated conservative Brad Schimel for an open seat on the court in April, ensuring liberals will maintain their 4-3 edge until at least 2028. Crawford has not been sworn in yet and was not part of Wednesday's ruling. She'll play pivotal role, though, in a separate Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin lawsuit challenging the 1849 ban's constitutionality. The high court decided last year to take that case. It's still pending.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
33 minutes ago
- CNN
House Voting Whether To Advance Trump Bill - CNN NewsNight with Abby Phillip - Podcast on CNN Podcasts
House Voting Whether To Advance Trump Bill CNN NewsNight with Abby Phillip 47 mins A megabill is in the balance as the House is voting to advance President Trump's agenda with Republican hardliners threatening to hold out over its price tag.
The Hill
38 minutes ago
- The Hill
GOP holdouts stall Trump agenda into the night, with outcome uncertain
The GOP's 'big, beautiful bill' hit a wall late Wednesday night when a group of hardline conservatives and moderate Republicans combined forces to stall the sprawling package. Lawmakers returned to the House chamber at 9:30 p.m. — after an hours-long delay — to hold a procedural vote that would open up debate on the megabill and tee up a vote on final passage. The effort, however, stopped in its tracks after three hardline conservatives — Reps. Keith Self (R-Texas), Andrew Clyde (R-Ga.) and Victoria Spartz (R-Ind.) — voted against the rule, along with centrist Republican Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (Pa.). Nine other Republicans declined to vote altogether, denying Republican leaders the majority needed to open debate on the megabill. With all Democrats opposing the package, the vote remained stuck at 207-216 for a time, before Rep. David Valadao (R-Calif.) voted to support the measure shortly after 11 p.m. That momentum in favor of the bill was quickly negated, however, when Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), who voted against the megabill in the House last month, switched his vote on the rule from 'yes' to 'no,' setting GOP leaders back some more. As of just before midnight, the vote stood at 207-217, with five GOP 'no' votes and eight Republicans not yet having voted. Those eight were: Reps. Josh Brecheen (R-Okla.), Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.), Eric Burlison (R-Mo.), Michael Cloud (R-Texas), Andy Harris (R-Md.), Bob Onder (R-Mo.), Scott Perry (R-Pa.) and Chip Roy (R-Texas) had not yet voted as of 11:45 p.m. The impasse has forced Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) into a game of chicken, with leaders vowing to hold the vote open indefinitely in an effort to force the holdouts into a change of heart. 'I'll keep it open as long as it takes to make sure we've got everybody here and accounted for and all the questions answered,' Johnson told Fox News's Sean Hannity just before 11 p.m. 'I made that commitment to my members.' 'This is part of the process,' he added. 'We are tying up some loose ends. We had a Senate bill that was sent over that was modified from the House version. We liked the House version better, no surprise about that, and we had reached a very delicate balance on it, so it's taken a little while to go through the changes and to have everybody fully process that and figure out what that means for them and their districts.' The Speaker said he spoke to three of the GOP 'no' votes, calling some of their positions a 'placeholder.' 'I've spoken to 'three of the four, I'm trying to find the fourth one,' Johnson said. 'But a couple of those are still waiting for some of those questions to be answered, and they're just sort of putting placeholders on the board and I think they're open for conversation. Everybody's here in good faith, everybody wants to get to yes, everybody wants to deliver this agenda for the people and we're gonna give them every opportunity to do that.' The logjam did not come as a complete surprise. Shortly before leaders called the procedural vote, a handful of hardline conservatives announced that they would not vote on the effort if top lawmakers called the referendum on Wednesday, contending that they needed more time to receive clarity about the policy details of the package — and (perhaps) ease their qualms and win their votes. Johnson, however, tried to call their bluff, convening the vote despite the threats. Some Republicans, including Rep. Ralph Norman (R-S.C.), relented on their initial opposition, supporting the procedural vote after hours of bashing the bill throughout the day on Wednesday. 'We got clarification of what's going to be enforced,' Norman told reporters. 'We got clarification on how the IRAs are going to be dealt with. We got clarification on the tax cuts. And still we'll be meeting tomorrow on the specifics of it. But no, I feel comfortable with this.' It is unclear what leaders will do next. As the clock approached midnight, lawmakers of both parties were milling around the chamber even as the vote tally remained frozen. Johnson said Trump offered Wednesday night to call the remaining holdouts to try and get them on board. 'He has been, in fact, he called me most recently about an hour ago and said who else needs to have a discussion, I'm ready to get on the phone. And I said, 'Mr. President, you've done your job and we'll do ours here,'' Johnson told Hannity.
Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
MAGA world figures take aim at GOP holdouts
Mike Johnson is staring down the legislative challenge of his career. As soon as this morning, the speaker will attempt to ram the Senate-passed megabill through the House as dozens of Republicans threaten to vote it down. The detractors come from across the Republican conference after the Senate sent over a bill with deeper Medicaid cuts, steeper deficit hikes and less onerous clean-energy provisions than expected. And he's gunning to deliver by President Donald Trump's self-imposed July 4 deadline, as severe thunderstorms in Washington threaten full attendance. 'We'll see. I've got to play the cards that are dealt to me,' Johnson said Tuesday, after admitting he was 'not happy' with the Senate's changes to the bill. 'And we're working through that. … But we remain optimistic we're going to land it at this point.' Johnson has 24 to 48 hours to persuade reluctant fiscal hawks and Medicaid moderates to swallow the Senate's bill. He spent Monday on calls with concerned lawmakers and caucuses, scrambling to figure out how to pass it this week without making changes to the bill. (John Thune and Johnson have been in contact through much of the process but did not speak in the hours leading up to the Senate vote, the majority leader told POLITICO.) But the Senate bill will be tough to sell. House Freedom Caucus members like Reps. Chip Roy (R-Texas) and Ralph Norman (R-S.C.) blasted the Senate's bill Tuesday for adding to the deficit and softening clean energy tax credits. Roy and Norman both voted against the bill in the Rules Committee overnight. House moderates are worried about the steep cuts to Medicaid, which Johnson has privately said could cost Republicans the House in 2026. Sen. Thom Tillis' (R-N.C.) speech torching the Senate's Medicaid provisions for similar reasons shook many vulnerable Republicans. And a substantial cross section of the two groups of holdouts would rather take time to rework the package and send it back to the Senate, instead of jamming the Senate version through the House under a self-imposed deadline. Norman said the House should go back to the original bill, leave town and come back when Senate Republicans are 'serious.' Some signs of progress for Johnson: Rep. Nick LaLota (R-N.Y.) appeared more likely to support the bill Tuesday night after previously refusing a deal on a state and local tax deduction. Rep. Jeff Van Drew (R-N.J.), previously a strong no on the bill over the Medicaid provider tax, told POLITICO a local provider tax tweak in the wraparound amendment for New Jersey and other states has him feeling better about the bill. But it would still be a gamble for Johnson to put it on the House floor: Many Republicans think the bill would fail without additional changes. However, the speaker has previously succeeded in putting bills on the floor without the votes — and relying on Trump to pressure holdouts to fold. What else we're watching: — Weather problems could delay House vote: Over 200 flights into Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport were either canceled or delayed Tuesday amid thunderstorms in Washington, according to the flight-tracking service FlightAware. Johnson said Tuesday night that the travel issues could push back the House vote on the GOP megabill, which is expected as early as Wednesday. — More reconciliation packages: As the House looks to pass the current reconciliation package without further tweaks, Johnson is suggesting there could be future opportunities for lawmakers to get their priorities into party-line packages. In an interview on Fox News on Tuesday night, Johnson said the House will plan to do two more reconciliation bills during this session of Congress, which ends in 2026. Jordain Carney, Meredith Lee Hill and Benjamin Guggenheim contributed to this report.
