logo
I have £20,000 in shares from an old employer, can I cut my capital gains tax bill?

I have £20,000 in shares from an old employer, can I cut my capital gains tax bill?

Daily Mail​30-05-2025

I have £20,000 worth of shares held outside of an Isa from an old employer's share save and employee share schemes dating back to when I worked there between 2008 and 2014.
I would like to sell the shares and reinvest the money into more diversified investments but think I will end up with a big tax bill, even though I am a basic rate taxpayer.
I have been reinvesting dividends and buying more shares regularly throughout the ownership. What do I use as the purchase price for capital gains tax – each individual share price or an average? And is there any way that I can cut my tax bill if I sell?
The shares are held as certificates, if I keep hold of them, can I move them into an investment account?
Rob Morgan, chief analyst at Charles Stanley Direct, replies: Gains on shares purchased at various points through additions such as reinvesting dividends can appear be something of a tax headache.
However, if you have kept good records the calculations in most circumstances aren't too bad.
Capital gains tax rules
First the basics. Capital gains tax (CGT) is a tax on any profits made on investments, and as you are aware you will be potentially liable on the sale of shares held outside a tax-efficient account such as an Isa.
The amount of tax you're charged depends on which income tax band you fall into. For the 2025/26 tax year, rates of CGT are 18 per cent and 24 per cent for basic and higher rate taxpayers respectively.
This rate applies to the profit made – so sale proceeds minus the cost of purchase.
> What is capital gains tax? Read Charles Stanley Direct's guide
Not widely understood is the interaction of CGT with income tax bands. If you're a basic rate taxpayer, any gain taken when added to your income could push you into the higher-rate bracket.
If so, you'd pay 24 per cent on however much of the gain falls into the higher income tax band when added to your income, and 18 per cent on the portion below it.
If you are a Scottish taxpayer your CGT rate depends on the rest of UK income tax bands and not the Scottish tax bands.
You'll only need to pay tax if your realised profits in a tax year exceed the annual capital gains tax allowance. In the 2025/26 tax year, this is £3,000. For example:
If you bought shares for £10,000 and sell them this tax year for £30,000, then you've made a capital gain of £20,000.
If you have no other gains, this is reduced to £17,000 as the first £3,000 falls into the CGT annual exemption.
For a basic rate taxpayer (with income and gains falling below the higher rate tax band) the tax liability is £17,000 x 0.18 = £3,060
However, if the gain tips you into the income tax higher rate band then you pay the higher rate of CGT on the portion over the threshold of £50,270. For this reason, many basic rate taxpayers can end up paying mostly higher rate CGT on large gains.
Calculating CGT from multiple purchases
Calculating the gain on shares and the tax to pay is reasonably straightforward if you have the figures to hand.
In most circumstances you just need to know the number of shares and the total amount paid for them by adding up all the purchase transactions.
You then net the total cost of the sale proceeds (after any fees such as stockbroking commission) to calculate the gain.
When making multiple sales the purchase cost simply applies on a 'pro rata' basis to each sale.
The main exception to this 'pooling' rule is the 'same day' rule whereby shares acquired on the same day as the disposal are taken account of ahead of any others.
There is also the 'bed and breakfasting' or '30 day' rule whereby any shares repurchased within 30 days cancel out the gain or loss generated by the prior sale – but not if repurchased in an Isa. However, it appears neither of these apply in your circumstances.
As with many tax matters, there are examples and help sheets on the HMRC website that can help, but as with any tax issue if you are in any doubt you should consult a qualified tax specialist.
Ways to minimise CGT
To mitigate CGT there are some strategies you can adopt.
If the capital gain, and therefore the potential tax liability, is significant you can consider taking advantage of the CGT allowance over multiple tax years.
The allowance has been much diminished and now stands at just £3,000, but selling an asset in bits over time can help minimise CGT.
You can't do that with a second property or an antique of course, but you can with shares and funds.
If you are planning to keep some or all your holding you can consider using the £20,000 Isa allowance to at least protect it from tax going forward – both in terms of income tax on dividends and any future gains. The process here is known as a 'Bed & Isa' which can help use your CGT and Isa allowances simultaneously.
A Bed & Isa involves selling holdings and then buying them back in an Isa account. The sale part generates a capital gain, so selling or partially selling an existing investment could help with tax planning by using some of your capital gains allowance while keeping your holding.
> Bed & Isa and other Isa rules to make your life easier: Charles Stanley's guide
Outside of an Isa or pension you are prevented from generating gains in this way owing to the 'bed and breakfasting' rule mentioned above.
This highlights that prevention is often easier than cure when it comes to CGT. Buying shares in an Isa, or transferring them in at the earliest opportunity, is often the best way to avoid storing up problems further down the line.
One valuable tactic that many people miss is the special rules around transferring eligible shares from a save as you earn (SAYE) or share incentive plan (SIP) scheme tax free into an Isa within 90 days of acquisition. Potentially, it's a great way to use your Isa allowance and shelter up to £20,000 of a holding from tax.
Another strategy to reduce CGT involves transferring some of the asset to a partner if you are married or in a civil partnership. You usually don't pay capital gains tax on an asset you give or sell to your husband, wife or civil partner, and this could give you the option of using two CGT allowances each tax year. A couple, for instance, could realise gains of up to £6,000 this tax year without paying tax.
You could also consider dividing the shareholding in such a way to take advantage of lower tax bands where one partner's income is lower. This way there may be less tax to pay on the gain as more of it falls into the basic rate band than the higher rate band for one of the pair.
Finally, if you have any losses on investments elsewhere you may have opportunity to set these off against gains. If you sell an asset for less than you paid for, you can report that loss to HMRC to offset against any gains you've made in the same tax year.
You have up to four years from the end of the tax year in which the loss occurred to make a claim. This can reduce your overall taxable gain and in some circumstances bring it below the annual CGT allowance.
Keeping the shares
It can be difficult to know whether to sell a shareholding with a tax liability attached to it. Much depends on the outlook and reliability of the company in question and the level of risk the holder is happy with.
The rule of thumb is that the tax tail shouldn't wag the investment dog, and in the case of a large single stock position it can be wise to diversify to limit the impact if it falls in value. That's especially the case if a drop could have a big impact on your financial resilience.
Having your financial future heavily influenced by one business is a risk most people wouldn't be willing to take – unless they are inexorably attached to it through ownership or otherwise have significant confidence in the prospects.
A diversified approach won't guarantee a better result, but it's far less risky.
Ideally, a careful strategy around sales can help minimise the tax burden and smooth the path towards that. We have only seen the tax burden ratchet over time, and it seems a forlorn hope that it might reverse direction, at least in the near term, so from that perspective there may be nothing to be gained by putting off the issue.
However, if you decide to keep your shares, contact your stockbroker or investment platform to see if they can help with 'dematerialising' them. In other words, converting them from a physical certificate into electronic form.
This will make things easier to manage going forward if you want to keep them. It will also mean future sales are easier to execute and will cost less as brokers generally charge a lot more for a certificated sale.
You'll have to fill in some paperwork to do this and wait a short period for the process to complete. For instance, at Charles Stanley once the original share certificates and signed transfer forms are received we would expect the holdings to be deposited in an online account within 5 to 10 business days under normal circumstances.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Chris Mason: Spending Review a gamble on patience in an era of impatience
Chris Mason: Spending Review a gamble on patience in an era of impatience

BBC News

time17 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Chris Mason: Spending Review a gamble on patience in an era of impatience

The hours, days, weeks and even months after a Spending Review can feel like peeling away the layers of an there is the speech from the chancellor in the Commons: the political rhetoric and the numbers often designed to sound big but which are often there are accompanying documents - in this instance in particular a blue-covered, 128-page tome crammed with words, numbers and work of months, much of it conducted privately with intermittent blasts of authorised and unauthorised briefing, talking up and grumbling, then suddenly bursts out in public demanding digestion. But that takes time. And as the detail is pored over, elements that were not put up in lights by the chancellor become clearer.A good example is the expectation many, many people in England and Wales will be paying higher council tax to help fund the police - something not set out explicitly by Rachel Reeves at the dispatch details on what is planned are expected in the coming weeks - with the government's infrastructure plans due to be set out other elements could take much longer to play out: for example, an obscure budget in a particular department that was culled, only for an outcry in six months time. Or, conversely, a budget that hasn't been culled but is later determined to be a waste of money. Seven ways the Spending Review affects youWinners and losers: Who got what in the review?What has the chancellor has announced? The key pointsWatch: Where the money is being spent The government is seeking to badge this moment as a turning prime minister told the Cabinet and has now written in the Guardian that "this week we bettered a new stage in the mission for national renewal. Last autumn we fixed the foundations. Today we showed Britain we will rebuild."Let's curiosity here is the standard critique of political leaders is turned on its head with much of this Spending often the grumble is one of short-termism, the quick win, the lack of strategic long term yet the gamble the government has taken is a willingness for patience in an era of term, so called capital spending, can - the argument goes - transform the public realm and in so doing transform economic it doesn't happen quickly and day-to-day spending is limited, even cut in this at a time of volatile politics and a restlessness among an electorate, many of whom feel squeezed and have done for years and Chancellor Rachel Reeves acknowledged to me there was an impatience for change - the very thing Labour promised - and pointed to an expansion of entitlement to free school meals and breakfast clubs in England, for big bet though remains on economic growth - finding it and sustaining lack of it is the shackle on so much within government and beyond: the national mood, taxes, you name yes the prospect of more tax rises in the autumn will hang in the air all the big test of this Spending Review is the contribution it can make to delivering growth - and when.

Eyekandy Launches Sales Ambassador, World's First Digital Human Super-Salesperson for Every Point of Purchase
Eyekandy Launches Sales Ambassador, World's First Digital Human Super-Salesperson for Every Point of Purchase

Reuters

time36 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Eyekandy Launches Sales Ambassador, World's First Digital Human Super-Salesperson for Every Point of Purchase

LONDON, United Kingdom, June 11, 2025 (EZ Newswire) -- Eyekandy, opens new tab, a global leader in immersive retail commerce, today announced the launch of Sales Ambassador™, the world's first digital human super-salesperson created to transform the shopping experience at every point of purchase. Sales Ambassador is an advanced AI-powered digital human who provides real-time, human-like product guidance for shoppers online, in-store, and on social channels. This isn't just another text based chatbot—the solution delivers visual human-like, always-on support, personalized recommendations, combined with a unique use of augmented reality to showcase products for shoppers, enabling brands and retailers to offer consistent, expert assistance to every customer, anytime and anywhere. With the rapid adoption of AI in retail, Eyekandy's Sales Ambassador addresses two critical challenges facing the industry: driving sales and reducing servicing costs. The digital human never sleeps, never takes breaks, and communicates fluently in more than 20 languages. It analyzes individual shopper needs and delivers tailored product recommendations, helping customers make confident purchase decisions and reducing costly returns. Sales Ambassador integrates effortlessly into existing retail infrastructure, offering plug-and-play deployment for brands and retailers seeking to enhance customer engagement without increasing headcount. 'Sales Ambassador is built to perform better than the best sales rep—24/7,' said Joe Golden, product director of Eyekandy. 'Our technology guides shoppers across web, mobile, social, and even in-store kiosks, driving conversions and providing real-time support at every stage of the buying journey.' The global immersive technology market was valued at $44 billion in 2024 and is projected to reach $184 billion by 2030, growing at a CAGR of over 26%. AI for sales and marketing is anticipated to hit $58 billion by 2025, with more than 70% of U.S. retail executives planning to increase their investment in AI over the next year. Eyekandy's Sales Ambassador is positioned to capitalize on this growth, offering a scalable solution for brands seeking to optimize sales and operational efficiency. 'Imagine deploying your most persuasive and knowledgeable salesperson to every product page, every store aisle, and every shopper's pocket,' added Golden. 'Sales Ambassador does not just sell—it delivers a consistent, personalized experience that builds brand trust and drives measurable results.' Retailers and brands ready to enhance customer confidence, reduce returns, and unlock new sales growth can visit opens new tab to learn more and request a live demonstration, opens new tab. About Eyekandy Eyekandy is a leading provider of immersive commerce solutions, specializing in advanced AI and augmented reality to enhance the shopping experience for consumers and brands. Established in 2016, Eyekandy serves more than 100 retailers and brands across 36 countries, reaching over half a billion unique visitors annually. The company has received multiple innovation awards for its dedication to creativity and excellence in retail technology. For more information, visit Media Contact Angela Platts letstalk@ ### SOURCE: Eyekandy Copyright 2025 EZ Newswire See release on EZ Newswire

Firm linked to Baroness Bra 'must pay back £122m for faulty PPE': Government suing over Covid contract 'initiated' by Tory peer
Firm linked to Baroness Bra 'must pay back £122m for faulty PPE': Government suing over Covid contract 'initiated' by Tory peer

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Firm linked to Baroness Bra 'must pay back £122m for faulty PPE': Government suing over Covid contract 'initiated' by Tory peer

A firm linked to Michelle Mone must repay £122million for allegedly breaching a Covid PPE contract, a court heard yesterday. The bra tycoon had recommended PPE Medpro, which went on to provide 25 million 'faulty' surgical gowns. The consortium, led by the Tory peer's husband Doug Barrowman, was awarded contracts by the former Conservative administration during the pandemic. PPE Medpro is now being sued by the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC), with Government lawyers claiming the gowns couldn't be used because they were not sterile. Baroness Mone and the firm both deny any wrongdoing. The Government is seeking to recover the costs of the contract, plus an additional £8,648,691 for transporting and storing the items. PPE Medpro said it 'categorically denies' breaching the contract, with its lawyers claiming the company has been 'singled out for unfair treatment'. Opening the trial, Paul Stanley KC, for the DHSC, said: 'This case is simply about whether 25 million surgical gowns provided by PPE Medpro were faulty. It is, in short, a technical case about detailed legal and industry standards that apply to sterile gowns.' Mr Stanley said in written submissions the 'initial contact with Medpro came through Baroness Mone', with contract discussions then going through one of the firm's directors, Anthony Page. Baroness Mone remained 'active throughout' negotiations, he said, with the peer stating Mr Barrowman had 'years of experience in manufacturing, procurement and management of supply chains'. But he said Baroness Mone's communications were not part of this case, which was 'simply about compliance'. He added: 'The department does not allege anything improper happened, and we are not concerned with any profits made by anybody.' In court documents from May this year, the DHSC said the gowns were delivered to the UK in 72 lots between August and October 2020, with almost £122million paid to PPE Medpro between July and August that year. The department rejected the gowns in December 2020 and told the firm it would have to repay the money, but this has not happened and the gowns remain in storage. Mr Stanley said 99.9999 per cent of the gowns should have been sterile under the terms of the contract. The DHSC claims the deal also specified PPE Medpro had to sterilise them using a 'validated process', attested by CE marking, which indicates a product has met certain medical standards. He said 'none of those things happened', and that of 140 gowns tested for sterility, 103 failed. He added that the DHSC 'was entitled to reject the gowns, or is entitled to damages, which amount to the full price and storage costs'. Charles Samek KC, for PPE Medpro, said the 'only plausible reason' for the gowns becoming contaminated was due to 'the transport and storage conditions or events to which the gowns were subject' after delivery. He said testing was done several months after the gowns were rejected, and that the samples were not 'representative of the whole population'. Mr Samek described the DHSC's claim as 'contrived and opportunistic', with PPE Medpro 'made the fall guy for a catalogue of failures... and uncontrolled buying spree with taxpayers' money'. Neither Baroness Mone nor Mr Barrowman is due to give evidence during the five-week trial. A PPE Medpro spokesman said it 'categorically denies breaching its obligations' and will 'robustly defend' the claim.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store