Auckland Transport Ends Award-winning Road Safety Programme Ahead Of Road Safety Week
Auckland Transport's latest Statement of Intent (SOI) abandons safety as a key focus area.
AT's Safe Speeds programme is on the chopping block under the new Speed Rule, affecting around 1,400 streets across the region. It was awarded a prestigious international award for the programme in December.
The gaps in the SOI fly in the face of both Auckland Transport and Auckland Council's obligations and commitments, including the Auckland Plan, Vision Zero, Auckland's C40 city status, Auckland Transport's statutory requirements, and Auckland's Climate Plan, including the TERP.
The draft SOI comes ahead of Road Safety Week (12-18 May 2025). The theme is 'Be a Road Safety Hero'.
This week Bike Auckland's Chief Biking Officer Fiáin d'Leafy quizzed members of Auckland Council about the latest Auckland Transport Statement of Intent (SOI) at the Transport, Resilience and Infrastructure Committee Meeting. Speaking on behalf of many concerned Aucklanders, d'Leafy asked how the Mayor and Councillors will meet their obligations, in particular around safety.
'You have a responsibility as a Council to make sure that Auckland Transport has a plan to achieve your commitments. It is not enough to water down next year's targets. There needs to be a plan to ensure you meet your long term targets and safety improvements.'
Those obligations are significant, both locally and internationally.
Auckland Transport has a statutory requirement to make our land transport system effective, efficient and safe. The Auckland Plan 2050 vision includes a safe transport network free from death and serious injury.
Moreover, internationally, Auckland Transport stands to lose credibility if it reneges on its commitments as a Vision Zero organisation. First implemented in Sweden in the 1990s, Vision Zero is a strategy to eliminate all traffic fatalities and severe injuries, widely and effectively used across Europe. Vision Zero is not mentioned in Auckland Transport's latest draft SOI, suggesting that they have quietly abandoned this programme without informing the public.
As recently as December 2024, Auckland Transport was awarded a prestigious Prince Michael International Road Safety Award, recognising the outstanding achievements of its Safe Speeds Programme.
D'Leafy says it's vital for Auckland to hold onto these achievements. Speaking after the committee meeting they referenced the theme of this year's Road Safety Week, which is 'Be a Road Safety Hero':
'In recent years Auckland Transport has been a road safety hero, showing leadership in reducing our high road harm numbers. Is it now choosing to become a road safety villain?'
This abandonment of safety forms the backdrop to the hot-potato issue of imminent speed limit increases across vast tracts of suburban Auckland. Other city councils have succeeded in maintaining the majority of their potentially affected 30 km/h zones, via a markedly different application of the Speed Rule.
By compulsorily raising speed limits whether or not communities agree, the Speed Rule is estimated to cause an additional 55 deaths and serious injuries in Auckland over the next two years, a toll that road safety experts are calling unconscionable, and unnecessary.
D'Leafy believes Auckland Council and Auckland Transport are failing to achieve the outcome that Aucklanders want and deserve:
'Auckland Council needs to be bolder in directing Auckland Transport to find a common-sense solution to the Speed Rule. Like other cities across Aotearoa New Zealand, Auckland must be allowed to retain its highly supported safe speed streets. Other cities have shown us that leadership is about doing what is right, not what is easy. Now it's time for our Auckland leaders to show their backbone.'
In their presentation to the Mayor and Councillors, d'Leafy also elaborated how the SOI misses the mark on Auckland's climate obligations.
Since 2015, Auckland has been a member of the C40 alliance: a 'global network of mayors of the world's leading cities that are united in action to confront the climate crisis.' There are just under 100 cities in C40, and with this SOI, Auckland isn't on track to meet its membership obligations. These include having zero emissions from city centre streets by 2030.
The Auckland Climate Plan sets a target of a 64% reduction in transport emissions by 2030. The Transport Emissions Reduction Pathway, unanimously adopted by Auckland Councillors in 2022, lays out the steps needed to meet this target. A key strategy is to 'supercharge walking and cycling'.
As well as reducing emissions, walking and cycling contribute to Auckland's goals by reducing noise and waterway pollution, improving independence for those who can't or don't want to drive, including disabled people, and improved health outcomes for Aucklanders.
'This SOI has two massive holes: road safety and emissions reduction,' says d'Leafy. 'These are obviously key roles for Auckland Transport. To fix the SOI, the TERP and Vision Zero need to be back in the plan.'
At the same time, d'Leafy urges Auckland Council and Auckland Transport to take advantage of cycling and micro-mobility as an affordable, fast way of achieving its aims.
'Cycling and micro-mobility projects can be fast and affordable to deliver, aligned with roading renewals to minimise disruption. They extend the value of the public transport network by providing first and last mile connectivity.
'There are many cycling infrastructure projects ready to go - but they require funding from Auckland Council. Walking and cycling is vastly underfunded at less than 1% of the transport budget. Even with this minimal investment, one in twenty trips into the city centre is by bike. Imagine how our cycling rates would leap up if Auckland Council invested the 20% of the transport budget that the UN's Environment Programme recommends.'
Auckland needs urgent action on emissions reduction. Aucklanders need a safe transport system that offers people choice for how they get around. To ensure Auckland meets its commitments these must be reflected in high level documents like the SOI.
Bike Auckland urges Auckland Council to be a Road Safety Hero and provide the leadership we so urgently need.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsroom
2 days ago
- Newsroom
‘Insulted' Wayne Brown and council tell Govt to stick its local government reform
'The cheek,' exclaimed Mayor Wayne Brown, as he led criticism of a Government bill that tells councils what they should focus on and how they should behave. 'The temerity.' Brown is not only angry at Wellington trying to force councils nationwide to act the same, he's irritated ministers don't recognise how distinct Auckland Council is from the rest, and boiling over at an attempt to impose a state-declared code of conduct. He's threatening to write a code of conduct and send it to Parliament to bring MPs' behaviour under control. Auckland councillors voted by a large, voice majority on Thursday to tell the coalition in a submission to Parliament that it cannot support the Local Government (Systems Improvement) Amendment Bill and doesn't need Beehive politicians telling Auckland what to do. The Government has given councils and others just four weeks to submit on the bill, despite it recasting local government's main focus, setting out 'core' services and eliminating 'four wellbeings' such as cultural, community and environmental priorities. It argues the rules are needed to make councils provide better core services of roads, rubbish and water and stop spending on nice-to-haves, thus limiting the chance of rates increases. Councils nationwide argue the real driver of high rates is the cost of infrastructure they are being forced to shoulder. As well as the 'core services' edict, the bill contains a range of changes including removing a requirement for six-yearly service delivery reviews, adding new principles on openness of information for elected councillors, and requiring councils to report on use of contractors. In Auckland, the strength of the pushback, from almost all political persuasions around the council table at a policy and planning committee meeting, was compelling. For the mayor and the policy committee chairman Richard Hills, who have worked hard to find ways of cooperation with Wellington, the bill has caused disappointment and frustration. There was much criticism of a coalition of political parties that had promised devolution and deregulation ending up attempting to regulate local government and take away its decision-making and flexibility. The committee passed a motion, inspired by the mayor's strong rejection of the bill, that read: 'The policy and planning committee oppose this bill as it does not adequately acknowledge that Auckland Council has special legislation that applies to Auckland Council and any new legislation that affects Auckland Council to this degree should be negotiated with us in partnership.' The partnership wording plays back to the Government its own reputed desire to have Auckland Council support its initiatives in housing, infrastructure and planning reforms – and in an upcoming City Regional Deal. Two councillors abstained, citing concerns about the current lack of definitions for the 'four wellbeings' in the Local Government Act and council policies. One, Maurice Williamson, backed the overall motion opposing the bill but voted against officials' proposed submissions on specific aspects. Retiring councillor Chris Darby renamed the proposed law the 'Local Government (Especially Auckland and its People) Neutering Bill because it neuters this council and its communities'. He said it was an insult it had got this far without proper consideration of the international city of Auckland and had been put together by 'Johnny-come-latelys that are so badly informed.' He defended the 'four wellbeings' as dynamic considerations that guided him in decision-making. 'There's a lot in this bill that is kicking mud in the face of not just this council but the people of Auckland.' Manukau councillor Lotu Fuli said the move was 'real overreach. We've said all term long we don't want Wellington to be running Auckland and this is an attempt to do that.' She argued 'core' council business was people and communities. 'It's what makes us human, our music, our dogs we keep at home … and therefore they are core to what we should do.' Wayne Brown took particular umbrage at Auckland's special status, with 30 percent of the population and its own special statute, being ignored by the one-size-fits-all approach to constrain councils nationwide. Worse, ministers had not consulted Auckland Council before introducing the bill in July with a deadline for public submissions by August 27. 'We are a product of the Local Government (Auckland Council) Act and we are not like the others. 'For instance the standardised code of conduct: The problems of Gore are not the problems of Auckland. 'The very fact that a Government whose standard of behaviour inside their own thing is appalling should have the temerity to tell us about standards of behaviour is a bit rich,' Brown said. 'This is a third of New Zealand. We don't really need any of this actually. We'll decide what wellbeings for Aucklanders are. 'The whole point is that we are different… the cheek of them to suggest that we are going to do something by the 27th of August for a third of New Zealand without even coming to talk to us is a good enough reason for us to oppose the whole bloody thing.' He said right at the start of its submission Auckland Council should say: 'Where are you? How dare you post us a letter and tells us we've got to behave. It's insulting. I'm quite prepared to put in there that we'll form a group here for a code of conduct for their behaviour and send it down to them and see how they like it.' Another retiring councillor, Manurewa's Angela Dalton, said the bill was a 'one-size-fits-all. This is just so far away from localism it isn't funny.' She was mystified how central government came to think removing the 'four wellbeings' would lead to rate decreases or constraints on rate increases. 'There seems to be a view there's some mamby pamby stuff going on and we're all sitting around hugging each other.' Many things the council did were forced on it by other legislation. 'We have a role to be leaders for our city and our people. If that means giving a damn then we will give a damn. Because if we don't, central government won't be there. They're actually proving that at the moment. They are not there for our people. 'I just want to see the evidence, the data and the analysis that says the four wellbeings is costing us more.' Measures in the bill such as removing a requirement for councils to consider tikanga Māori in appointing council company directors were 'just appalling.' Dalton said she'd love to throw the bill back at the Government and say 'you've got to be kidding.' 'For a Government that is right into people being in control of their own destiny and removing regulation and rules, look what they're doing to the councils: 'This is what you will do and we are going to take this power off you.'' Councillor Julie Fairey said of the Government's moves: 'It's not supposed to be a parent-child relationship … It should not be the case we have this parent coming in over the top all the time.' Recalling repeated rejections of Auckland's advocacy for a bed night levy to fund development and destination functions, her message to Wellington was: 'If you are worried about rates, let central government give us some power to raise funds in some other ways.' Committee chair Hills noted all the accountability demands on councils that didn't apply to central government like having to consult for six months on annual budgets. 'And we have to provide a balanced budget every year, by statute. They don't have to do that. We do.' He defended the consideration of the four wellbeings as having highlighted and helped address issues like homelessness and public safety. 'It's annoying to have to get told how bad we are,' he said. 'I hope the Government can come back to us and look at a different model.' The council will submit against the overall bill, opposing specific measures on the grounds of unclear policy rationale, unclear definitions and risks that alternative paths to improve efficiency might be negated.
Scoop
3 days ago
- Scoop
RMA Reforms To Deliver Jobs And Growth
Minister for RMA Reform The Government's second RMA Amendment Bill has passed into law, bringing in sweeping changes to many of the handbrakes on New Zealanders' lives, helping to drive economic growth, and laying the groundwork for job creation,' RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop says. 'The Resource Management Act (RMA) has been holding New Zealand back for decades. It has let successive governments and councils say 'no' to progress, 'no' to development, and 'no' to building the houses, infrastructure, clean energy and other important projects that New Zealanders need to get ahead,' Mr Bishop says. 'Our full replacement for the RMA will be introduced to Parliament this year, be passed into law next year, and be in effect by 2027- but in the meantime, through this Amendment Bill, we're making it quicker and simpler to consent renewable energy, boost housing supply, and reduce red tape for the primary sector. 'The Bill contains five broad packages of changes which will remove roadblocks and cut red tape holding back progress for: Infrastructure and renewable energy Housing, including a streamlined process for removing heritage protections Farming and the primary sector Emergency and natural hazards package Resource Management system improvements 'We also added a new provision which requires Auckland Council to allow even greater housing and development around key stations benefitting from City Rail Link investment, to ensure Aucklanders reap the full benefits of this transformational investment into the city. 'We added changes to ensure a more cost-effective transition between the current RMA and the upcoming new planning system by putting a stop to councils making RMA plan or policy statement changes until the new system is in place in 2027. There will be some exemptions for important work that aligns with Government priorities, or for activities such as managing natural hazards. 'Alongside this change, we added a new a new regulation making power that will allow the responsible Minister to recommend changes or even removal of parts of council RMA plans and policy statements that are proven to be holding back economic growth, development, or job creation. 'This week we also took urgent action to prevent what could have amounted to a 'stop work' notice for thousands of New Zealand farmers, by further amending the Bill to broaden what water discharges can be allowed as a permitted activity. 'And, to the great excitement of countless Wellingtonians, we added a provision that removes heritage protections from the unsafe and derelict Gordon Wilson Flats in Wellington, clearing the way for the flats to be demolished so that new student accommodation can be built.' 'This legislation is part of our wider three-phase RMA reform programme. In Phase One, before Christmas last year, we repealed the previous government's overly complex RMA changes. 'Phase Two is now well underway, with our Fast-track one-stop shop up and running, the biggest package of national direction changes in New Zealand's history being worked through with decisions due before the end of this year, and this second Amendment Bill delivering meaningful improvements. 'Phase Three will see the complete replacement of the RMA with two new laws that better reflect the importance of private property rights. The new planning system legislation will be introduced to Parliament before the end of this year, pass into law next year, and be in effect by 2027.' The Resource Management (Consenting and Other System Changes) Amendment Bill will be enacted the day after it receives royal assent, which is expected in the coming days. Fact sheet for a summary of changes to be enacted through the Resource Management (Consenting and Other System Changes) Amendment Bill here.
RNZ News
3 days ago
- RNZ News
Mayoral hopeful Kerrin Leoni attacks Wayne Brown's financial record
Auckland councillor and mayoral candidate Kerrin Leoni Photo: Supplied / NZ Herald The main challenger for the Auckland mayoralty has launched a broadside at Wayne Brown, saying he failed to fix the city, as he promised. Auckland councillor and mayoral candidate Kerrin Leoni faced the media for the first time on Thursday morning since releasing her fiscal policy plan . "Three years ago, Wayne Brown swaggered into Auckland, saying that he was going to fix Auckland. "The feedback we're getting is that there has been no fix for Auckland. We've got the same issues happening right across the city, our debt has increased by $1 billion, our rates have gone up by over 20 percent, and Aucklanders are really unhappy with what they're getting at the moment from council." She accused the mayor of not managing council finances well. "Our most significant asset, the Auckland Airport shares is gone, it has been sold, and it's never coming back. "He sold our biggest asset, but has still had to raise rates and increase our debt. I don't think his management of funds has been the best, and we could do a lot better." She said the council's lease on the Ports of Auckland could be under threat if Brown was re-elected. As part of her fiscal plan, Leoni proposed that a 75 percent council majority be met or a public referendum be held before the council sold any of its strategic assets. "We want to ensure we're not selling any more strategic assets in the future. "The Ports of Auckland could still be on the table if Wayne Brown gets back in. There's no legal document regarding the sale of the ports in the future that stops him from doing that. "The North Harbour Stadium is another strategic asset that could be sold under his leadership in the next term. He has talked about that in the past." She conceded that her policy to cut spending on consultants by 40 percent was a goal, and that it might be closer to 30 percent in reality. Auckland mayor Wayne Brown Photo: RNZ / Marika Khabazi In a statement to RNZ, mayor Brown pushed back on Leoni's economic plan, questioning her credibility. "Her announcement can't be taken seriously. "She directly voted against plans to reduce spending in the current term. She has not bought solutions to the council table. She has not established any credibility on these issues. "It is concerning that she wants a 'fiscal policy', which is set by central government rather than a council financial plan. If she wants to challenge those settings, she is standing for the wrong office." Leoni also pledged to cap rates rises to below or at the inflation rate from the second year of her term if elected. When asked by RNZ if he would match this, Brown said he would continue to keep rates as low as possible. "Her promise doesn't match her voting record on council. Mine does. I have kept rates as low as possible through reducing wasteful spending, driving down costs, and improving asset performance. That's my renewed pledge." In response to the mayor's comments, Leoni said all Auckland councillors had voted to reduce spending. "In terms of solutions, one clear solution we voted on to save money for Aucklanders was the $50 cap for public transport in the city."
