Weber County establishes first veteran treatment court in northern Utah
A veteran treatment court (VTC) is a specialized court that is meant to help veterans with mental health and substance abuse issues who become involved in the criminal justice system.
These are courts designed to help veterans who received honorable or general discharges through evidence-based approaches that 'focus on treatment and support, rather than punishment,' with the goal of helping veterans stay sober, recover, and achieve long-term stability, according to a press release from Weber County. They can also help veterans with housing and employment issues.
Jim Retallick, Director of the Weber Public Defender Group, has been working to establish the Second District VTC since the fall of 2023.
In an interview with ABC4.com, Retallick said that veterans are more likely to be involved in the justice system. He added that about a third of veterans have been arrested compared to only a fifth of the general population.
'Veterans also face some specific and different issues and problems, but using the commonality, probably the base rock of being a veteran, they're able to respond better to treatment,' Retallick said.
Passenger with measles travels through SLC airport, determined low risk for spread
Veteran treatment courts have been proven to reduce re-offending rates among veterans. Retallick cited studies that show only 14% of veterans in veteran treatment courts re-offend, whereas recidivism rates for veterans in traditional courts range from 23% to 46%.
According to Retallick, the court provides treatment that the veterans earned through their military service, and Veteran's Affairs works with the VTC to provide treatment.
Retallick said that the greatest part of the VTC is the mentor program.
'We have a mentor coordinator who is a veteran, and he coordinates other volunteer veterans who will mentor every participant in the program,' Retallick said. 'So hopefully everybody is matched up with a veteran who understands their needs and will help them proceed through the process.'
'You can't force anybody to succeed, but you can point them and get them on the path and provide them the support to help them succeed,' Retallick said.
The VTC in Weber County will join other VTCs in Salt Lake County and Utah County in providing support to Utah's veterans.
Celebrate National Cheese Day (June 4) with Heber Valley Cheese
Weber County establishes first veteran treatment court in northern Utah
Treat yourself to a slice of paradise at Four Seaons Maui at Wailea
Aloha! Hawaii's Governor Josh Green welcomes Utahns to GTU's Maui Week
Chile-Coffee Braised Beef + Sesame Slaw
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
2 days ago
- Newsweek
Pasta Warning Issued Over Undeclared Allergens: 'Should Be Thrown Away'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A public health alert has been issued for misbranded frozen pasta that may contain undeclared soy and sesame allergens. The U.S. Department of Agriculture's Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) issued a warning on Wednesday regarding packets of Schnucks pork and beef tortellini that may contain pork and beef toasted ravioli instead. The warning stated that the pork and beef ravioli contain soy and sesame, known allergens, which are not declared on the product label. No official recall has been requested because the product is no longer available for purchase, but the FSIS urged consumers to check their freezers for the affected items. The alert covers products distributed in Illinois, Indiana, Missouri, and Wisconsin. Why It Matters Food allergies are a significant health concern in the United States, with soybeans and sesame among the nine major food allergens identified under federal law. The other seven include milk, eggs, fish, shellfish, tree nuts, peanuts and wheat. Allergic reactions can vary in severity from coughing and a runny nose to a life-threatening reaction known as anaphylaxis. According to the CDC's National Center for Health Statistics, almost 6 percent of U.S. adults and children have a food allergy. Stock image of tortellini and tomato sauce. Stock image of tortellini and tomato sauce. Getty Images What To Know The public health alert said the affected 16-oz bags of Schnucks Tortellini Pork & Beef had a best before date of 05/27/2026 printed at the top of the bag. The product subject to the public health alert bears the establishment number "EST. 13051" inside the USDA mark of inspection. The affected product was shipped to a Schnucks distribution center in Missouri and sent onward to store locations in Illinois, Indiana, Missouri, and Wisconsin. The misbranding was discovered after a consumer filed a complaint about receiving ravioli in packaging labeled as tortellini. Upon investigation, the company notified FSIS, which led to the public health alert. P. E. & F, Inc. told Newsweek that no injuries or illnesses have been reported in connection with the health alert. What People Are Saying Schnucks told Newsweek: "Since the affected lot of the product is out of date, it is no longer available at Schnucks stores, but we do urge our customers to check their home freezers." What Happens Next The FSIS said consumers who have purchased the products are urged not to consume them. The products should be thrown away or returned to the place of purchase, it added. Anyone concerned about a reaction should contact a healthcare provider, it said.
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Angry Farmers Vow to Fight If Korea Leader Bows to Trump Demands
(Bloomberg) -- In a sweltering cattle shed south of Seoul, flies dart across hundreds of cows sitting at the heart of a trade talks between the US and South Korea. The World's Data Center Capital Has Residents Surrounded An Abandoned Art-Deco Landmark in Buffalo Awaits Revival Budapest's Most Historic Site Gets a Controversial Rebuild San Francisco in Talks With Vanderbilt for Downtown Campus We Should All Be Biking Along the Beach Lee Jongtae, 62, has raised cattle and grown rice with his family for more than 15 years in a rural part of Cheonan, just outside of the capital. Both parts of his business have been under threat as President Lee Jae Myung's two-month-old government considered allowing the US greater access to South Korea's beef and rice markets, a politically sensitive topic that spurred widespread protests back in 2008. 'It keeps me up at night — just thinking about it makes my blood boil,' said Lee Jongtae, who participated in the demonstrations almost two decades ago, as he checked on his roughly 400 cattle. 'This is probably the biggest crisis we've faced since starting this farm.' Thousands of farmers were nervous about getting left behind as South Korea raced to reach a last-minute deal with Washington before the Aug. 1 deadline, when President Donald Trump's across-the-board tariffs on Korean exports are set to jump to 25%. Yet, compared with 2008 when more than a million people hit the streets of Seoul, the political power of farmers has declined as the chip and car sectors have increased in prominence. Trump said Wednesday on social media that a deal had been reached, setting a 15% tariff on South Korean exports, and securing a $350 billion investment pledge from Seoul. The agreement also includes purchases of $100 billion worth of American energy and allows for greater access for US products. South Korea later said that rice and beef were excluded from the concessions, citing their political sensitivity and historical context. That shows President Lee's efforts to shield these sectors, which remain deeply symbolic and politically charged following mass protests in 2008. Still, in his posting, Trump said South Korea would be 'completely open' to trade with the US, including agricultural products, leaving open the possibility of a difference of interpretation of the details, as has happened with other recent trade deals. By trying to ring fence a further opening up of the rice and beef markets, President Lee was likely looking to avoid provoking the kind of rural backlash that has rattled previous administrations. His calibrated approach may help preserve political momentum after a June election victory that lifted business and consumer sentiment and pushed stocks to record levels. Still, the government faces scrutiny over how securely it has protected its agricultural sector, the scale of its investment pledge and whether the deal delivers enough relief for Korea's export sectors. Farmers feared they would end up paying the price for that deal as Seoul looked to offer something that would delight one of the key groups in Trump's support base at the risk of sparking outrage similar to the backlash in 2008. South Korea already has a free trade agreement with the US and its corporate giants have pledged tens of billions of dollars of investments as the trade talks continue. Seoul is also expected to increase US energy imports, review digital regulations flagged by Washington and explore partnerships in shipbuilding and defense. Broaching the topic of agricultural market access is politically fraught but strategically valuable. Possible measures include lifting a ban on US beef from cattle over 30 months old and expanding quotas for buying US rice, moves that will hit farmers like Lee. For President Lee, farmers' discontent could have become the first major setback of his presidency. Any perception that core public interests are being compromised could quickly undermine public trust early in Lee's term and generate opposition within his own party. A cautionary tale is the presidency of Lee Myung-bak, who in 2008 was seen as giving ground too easily to the US during trade talks at the start of his term. He lifted a ban on American beef imports related to earlier mad-cow disease outbreaks and stirred a debate tinged by national pride over beef production, food safety and US pressure. Weeks of protests by tens of thousands of demonstrators, candlelit vigils and go-slow tractor convoys triggered a freefall in Lee's approval ratings. With his administration in its first major political crisis, Korea was forced to scramble to rework the terms. 'This is sensitive,' said Kichang Chung, a senior foreign attorney specializing in international trade litigation at Lee & Ko, in an interview with Bloomberg TV on Tuesday. 'The beef issue caused major political unrest about 20 years ago. But it is meaningful for the Korean government to put that issue on the table with the United States.' Beef Influx South Korea imported 493,452 tons of beef in 2024, nearly 1.7 times the volume of domestic hanwoo beef production, with just over half coming from the US, according to customs and industry data. Separate US Meat Export Federation figures show South Korea imported about $2.2 billion of American beef in 2024, making it the largest foreign buyer by value. Under Lee Myung-bak's trade deal with the US, a 40% tariff on American beef was gradually reduced over a 15-year period. A 2.6% duty remains in place for 2025 and that is scheduled to drop to zero next year. South Korea's per-capita consumption of beef is among the highest in Asia, according to the UN's Food and Agriculture Organization. It's used for steaks, barbecued or marinated and grilled in bulgogi or galbi dishes. Gomtang, a beef bone broth, is Korea's equivalent of chicken soup for the soul. Drawing on advantages of scale, US beef comes in at a competitive price of about $9 per kilogram, compared with more than $13 for domestic production, according to customs and industry data from May compiled by Bloomberg. 'Young people with tight budgets are already leaning toward US beef,' said Lee Jongtae, the farmer in Cheonan, part of the bellwether region of Chungcheong where half the residents voted for Lee Jae Myung in June. 'If the restrictions are relaxed any further, it will deal a serious blow to us.' Premium Products The higher price of local beef also reflects its different characteristics. The government has tried to elevate the highly marbled Hanwoo beef as a premium product through a grading system. While that offers potential for a higher markup, Lee said his margins have shrunk by more than 30% as the costs of producing higher grade Hanwoo rise. To lower costs, he began growing rice as cattle feed, pouring savings into tractors and silos, while his debts continued to rise, he said. But the price of Hanwoo beef has fallen in recent years, adding to the squeeze and leaving farmers vulnerable to any further changes in market dynamics. 'I wanted to pass this farm on to my son, but now I regret bringing him into this,' Lee said. 'To move forward, you need to see at least a glimpse of the future, but it's completely dark at the moment.' Reflecting the high political stakes of opening up further to US imports of beef and rice, lawmakers from President Lee's Democratic Party had issued a rare statement standing against the government and vowing to protect farmers 'until the end.' 'Our agriculture and rural communities have solely borne the brunt of international trade negotiations for the last 30 years,' DP lawmakers on the National Assembly's agriculture panel said in the statement. 'The consequences — decline in grain self-sufficiency, surge in farm household debt and the disappearance of rural communities — remain unhealed to this day.' Lee appears likely to use the legislative power of his party to appease farmers and navigate the tricky balancing act facing pressure from inside the country and outside. The National Assembly could pass a grain act that would require the government to automatically purchase surplus rice if certain conditions are met as early as next week — a bill that had been vetoed by former President Yoon Suk Yeol. 'I can tell you that we are doing our best to minimize our concessions to protect our domestic industries,' Woo Sang-ho, a South Korean presidential secretary said Monday, acknowledging that negotiators were under strong US pressure to accept demands on agricultural products. This time around, the government can at least argue that it's not alone in coming under heavy US pressure as Trump tries to reshape global trade. Policymakers can also point to concessions on beef already announced by other countries including Australia. Most sectors in South Korea's economy will be taking a hit from Trump's barrage of tariffs, making it difficult for the agriculture industry to insist it should be exempt from the pain. On an overall economic level the farming sector generates about 1.5% of gross domestic product whereas the automobile and semiconductor industries are key drivers of the nation's total exports, which are equivalent to more than 40% of the economy. Chips accounted for around 21% of exports last year, while cars comprised around 10%. The strength of the agricultural community to trigger protests is also likely weaker than in 2008. At the end of 2024, farmers accounted for just 4% of the total population, with nearly 70% over the age of 60. Still, for President Lee, this aging but politically engaged group represents a highly mobilized voting bloc. Rice carries even heavier symbolism in South Korean society. The country imposes a 513% tariff on rice imports beyond an annual quota of 410,000 tons, roughly one-third of which is allocated to the US. Consumption has fallen over the years due to demographic shifts and changing diets. The government has been buying up surplus rice, expanding incentives for farmers who shift to alternative crops. It also launched a program to reduce rice-growing areas by 80,000 hectares this year. Against that backdrop, the talk of more US rice imports felt contradictory to local farmers, as it would add to already excess supply while relying on subsidies is only a short-term fix that doesn't guarantee the industry's sustainability. Song Taesung, 54, a rice farmer in Cheonan, said he felt a sense of betrayal when Trade Minister Yeo Han-koo said agricultural concessions are always painful but may be strategically required. That's because President Lee campaigned on protecting the market and his party's base overlaps with key rice-producing regions. 'President Lee was the one who criticized the Yoon administration for not protecting farmers — but now they want to bring in more American rice?' Song said. 'This goes beyond deception. It feels like a complete betrayal.' Following Yeo's comments, protests erupted almost immediately across the country, with farmer groups accusing the government of using their livelihoods as bargaining chips. Both farmers, Lee and Song, say they are ready to take to the streets again should any deal end up containing harmful concessions. 'Sure, it'll be a symbolic win for Trump and his supporters in rural America,' Song said. 'It's heartbreaking that we're being used as a political tool when it's a matter of life or death for us.' (Updates with Trump comment) Russia Builds a New Web Around Kremlin's Handpicked Super App Burning Man Is Burning Through Cash It's Not Just Tokyo and Kyoto: Tourists Descend on Rural Japan Everyone Loves to Hate Wind Power. Scotland Found a Way to Make It Pay Off Cage-Free Eggs Are Booming in the US, Despite Cost and Trump's Efforts ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio
Bloomberg
4 days ago
- Bloomberg
Angry Farmers Vow to Fight If Korea Leader Bows to Trump Demands
By and Soo-Hyang Choi Updated on Save In a sweltering cattle shed south of Seoul, flies dart across hundreds of cows sitting at the heart of a trade talks between the US and South Korea. Lee Jongtae, 62, has raised cattle and grown rice with his family for more than 15 years in a rural part of Cheonan, just outside of the capital. Now, both parts of his business are under threat as President Lee Jae Myung's two-month-old government considers allowing the US greater access to South Korea's beef and rice markets, a politically sensitive topic that spurred widespread protests back in 2008.
