
Trump says will double steel, aluminum tariffs to 50%
USA - US President Donald Trump said Friday that he would double steel and aluminum import tariffs to 50 percent from next week, the latest salvo in his trade wars aimed at protecting domestic industries.
"We're going to bring it from 25 percent to 50 percent, the tariffs on steel into the United States of America," he said while addressing workers at a US Steel plant in Pennsylvania.
"Nobody's going to get around that," he added in the speech before blue-collar workers in the battleground state that helped deliver his election victory last year.
Shortly after, Trump wrote in a Truth Social post that the elevated rate would also apply to aluminum, with the new tariffs "effective Wednesday, June 4th."
Since returning to the presidency in January, Trump has imposed sweeping tariffs on allies and adversaries alike in moves that have rocked the world trade order and roiled financial markets.
The tariffs had seen a brief legal setback earlier this week when a court ruled Trump had overstepped his authority, but an appellate court on Thursday said the tariffs could continue while the litigation moves forward.
Trump has also issued sector-specific levies that affect goods such as automobiles.
On Friday, he defended his trade policies, arguing that tariffs helped protect US industry.
He added that the steel facility he was speaking in would not exist if he had not also imposed duties on metals imports during his first administration.
- 'Devil in the details' -
On Friday, Trump touted a planned partnership between US Steel and Japan's Nippon Steel, but offered few new details on a deal that earlier faced bipartisan opposition.
He stressed that despite a recently announced planned partnership between the American steelmaker and Nippon Steel, "US Steel will continue to be controlled by the USA."
He added that there would be no layoffs or outsourcing of jobs by the company.
Upon returning to Washington late Friday, Trump told reporters he had yet to approve the deal.
"I have to approve the final deal with Nippon, and we haven't seen that final deal yet, but they've made a very big commitment," Trump said.
Last week, Trump said that US Steel would remain in America with its headquarters to stay in Pittsburgh, adding that the arrangement with Nippon would create at least 70,000 jobs and add $14 billion to the US economy.
Trump in Pennsylvania said that as part of its commitment, Nippon would invest $2.2 billion to boost steel production in the Mon Valley Works-Irvin plant where he was speaking.
Another $7 billion would go towards modernizing steel mills, expanding ore mining and building facilities in places including Indiana and Minnesota.
A proposed $14.9 billion sale of US Steel to Nippon Steel had previously drawn political opposition from both sides of the aisle. Former president Joe Biden blocked the deal on national security grounds shortly before leaving office.
There remain lingering concerns over the new partnership.
The United Steelworkers union (USW) which represents thousands of hourly workers at US Steel facilities said after Trump's speech that it had not participated in discussions involving Nippon Steel and the Trump administration, "nor were we consulted."
"We cannot speculate about the meaning of the 'planned partnership,'" said USW International President David McCall in a statement.
"Whatever the deal structure, our primary concern remains with the impact that this merger of US Steel into a foreign competitor will have on national security, our members and the communities where we live and work," McCall said.
"The devil is always in the details," he added.
Trump had opposed Nippon Steel's takeover plan while on the election campaign trail. But since returning to the presidency, he signaled that he would be open to some form of investment after all.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

TimesLIVE
2 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Understanding market shocks: A Guide for the resilient South African investor
Another day, another headline, and another market jolt. Lately, this has become a regular feature of global financial markets, with South African investors caught in the crosswinds. From global trade tensions to local political uncertainty, markets can swing sharply in response to shifting narratives and breaking developments. Beneath the surface of these market moves are what economists call 'shocks'; unexpected events that trigger wide-reaching effects across economies and portfolios. So, understanding the different types — namely event, cyclical, and structural — is essential for navigating volatility and building a portfolio that can withstand uncertainty. Event Shocks: Fast, loud, and disruptive Event shocks are sudden surprises that jolt the economic system, forcing a rapid repricing of risk before the full impact is clear. These include tariffs, wars, pandemics, assassinations and natural disasters. US President Donald Trump's tariff announcements are a classic example, disrupting supply chains, fuelling inflation concerns and shaking investor confidence overnight. When such shocks escalate, they can weaken company margins, hurt earnings and tip markets into a broader downturn. While event shocks are unpredictable, investors can build resilience through diversification, holding cash or owning defensive assets like government bonds, gold, or consumer staples such as companies that sell essentials like food and healthcare products that stay in demand regardless of economic conditions. It's also important not to overreact to short-term market noise unless it points to a deeper shift with lasting consequences. We've seen how quickly markets can rebound once some uncertainty or trade tensions ease. However, that sharp recovery doesn't mean the uncertainty is gone, it just means it's changed shape. Cyclical Shocks: The market's natural downturn Cyclical shocks are part of the market's natural rhythm. They emerge during phases of economic slowdown, often marked by things like shrinking growth, tighter lending conditions or a spike in borrowing costs. While they tend to build up gradually, their effects can hit hard.

IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
Investment in ESG is irresponsible
By taking punitive action against what they condemn as carbon polluters like Sasol, the ESG disciples push up the cost of living and exacerbate impoverishment, says the writer. It is saddening to note that the Coronation Fund Managers Stewardship Activities Report (Business Report, May 29) uncritically embraces the false globalist ideology of ESG (environmental, social, governance). Proudly, the Coronation Fund Managers declare that they 'assess and advocate for improvements in their climate change strategies.' Clearly, despite Coronation's research capacity, they have wittingly or unwittingly allowed themselves to be shepherded by the controlled sirens of pliant science and the mass media in believing that human activity can influence climate change. Uncorrupted science and history have proved that warming periods occurred in millennia before fossil fuels were being widely used as they are today. Uncorrupted science has also shown that temperature changes occur as a result of the inconsistency of the Earth's elliptical path around the sun and the slight variations that occur in the Earth's tilt. So, ignoring true science and history is inexcusable. But what is worse is the agenda of the climate change globalists. It requires investing in the hugely expensive green deal – lithium-powered vehicles, wind turbines and solar panels. It ignores the vast environmental damage the extraction of lithium causes and the unreliability of wind turbines, with their terrible toll on bird life. By taking punitive action against what they condemn as carbon polluters like Sasol, the ESG disciples push up the cost of living and exacerbate impoverishment. Of course, if they studied the science and history of carbon dioxide, they would note that although it comprises less than one percent of the atmosphere, it is vitally important for plant and vegetation growth. The section of the Stewardship Report that reveals double standards is Coronation's focus on the potential oil and gas bonanza off the Namibian coast. Despite their green commitment, the temptation of lucrative investment in fossil fuel exploitation is enticing. Although the Stewardship Report does not address the social aspect of ESG, it is important to note that it relates to DEI – diversity, equity, and inclusion. One wonders how that aligns with Coronation's commitment to 'responsible investment,' especially when it is evident that the principle of merit is overlooked in the implementation of DEI policy. Given the Trump Administration's recognition of the globalists' green deal for the scam it is, in keeping with their commitment to responsible investment, Coronation's Fund Managers ought to be ditching ESG and focusing on the massive fossil fuel exploitation that is about to take off in the US. Investment in ESG is irresponsible. DR Duncan Du Bois Durban

TimesLIVE
4 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Trump pulls Musk ally's NASA nomination, will announce replacement
The White House on Saturday withdrew its nominee for NASA administrator, Jared Isaacman, abruptly yanking a close ally of Elon Musk from consideration to lead the space agency. President Donald Trump said he would announce a new candidate soon. 'After a thorough review of prior associations, I am hereby withdrawing the nomination of Jared Isaacman to head NASA,' Trump wrote on his Truth Social site. 'I will soon announce a new nominee who will be mission aligned, and put America First in space.' Isaacman, a billionaire private astronaut who had been Musk's pick to lead NASA, was due next week for a much-delayed confirmation vote before the US Senate. His removal from consideration caught many in the space industry by surprise. Trump and the White House did not explain what led to the decision. 'It may not always be obvious through the discourse and turbulence, but there are many competent, dedicated people who love this country and care deeply about the mission,' Isaacman said in a post on X. 'That was on full display during my hearing, where leaders on both sides of the aisle made clear they're willing to fight for the world's most accomplished space agency. 'I am incredibly grateful to President Trump, the Senate and all those who supported me.' His removal comes days after Musk's official departure from the White House, where the SpaceX CEO's role as a 'special government employee' leading the department of government efficiency created turbulence for the administration and frustrated some of Trump's aides. Semafor reported the news earlier.