
Analysis: The ugliest things Trump and Musk just said about one another
About 10 minutes into his bilateral meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz on Thursday, President Donald Trump was finally asked about the domestic elephant in the room: Elon Musk and his sharp criticisms this week of Trump's agenda bill.
'He hasn't said anything about me that's bad,' Trump said. 'I'd rather have him criticize me than the bill.'
Trump certainly got his wish. By the end of the meeting, he and Musk had quickly moved from what had been a legislative difference of opinion into the realm of personal attacks. Musk effectively live-tweeted his responses to Trump's comments on his social media platform X, getting progressively more personal. And Trump ultimately hit back hard on his own platform, Truth Social.
It was the kind of clash many predicted would eventually arrive when the two powerful, outspoken and unwieldy billionaires formed their alliance of convenience last year. And it's now arrived in a big way.
Late Thursday afternoon, Musk responded to an X user who chose Musk over Trump and called for the president's impeachment by simply saying, 'Yes.'
It's increasingly hard to see how this spat gets resolved without getting even uglier given what's being said.
Shortly before the Oval Office event, Musk specifically invoked Trump's flip-flops on the national debt, citing years-old tweets from when Trump was much more of a professed spending hawk. ('Where is the man who wrote these words?' Musk asked. 'Was he replaced by a body double!?')
But Trump has never been particularly sensitive about his rhetorical consistency or fiscal conservatism.
And as the minutes wore on, things got much more personal.
Here are the comments (so far) that really stick out – and will seemingly be hard to move past.
Musk really went there, accusing the Trump administration of withholding information about disgraced financier and convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein because it invokes Trump himself.
'Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public,' Musk wrote on X. 'Have a nice day, DJT!'
He later added: 'Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out.'
Musk did not detail how he would have gained access to unreleased files. And the inclusion of a person's name in files related to the case does not by itself indicate they have been accused of any wrongdoing.
CNN has reached out to the White House for a response.
Trump's proximity to Epstein in the past is not exactly news; he's been photographed with Epstein. But Musk's allegation – made without providing any evidence of where it came from – feeds into concern in some right-wing circles about the lack of transparency about Epstein, who died by suicide in 2019 while awaiting trial on federal sex-trafficking charges.
After Trump talked during the campaign about potentially releasing more government files about Epstein, Attorney General Pam Bondi released an initial tranche of files in February that largely duplicated information that had already been made public.
Exactly what Musk is getting at isn't clear or substantiated. But it's really going nuclear, given the subject matter.
The most sacred of topics in Trump's eyes: his election wins.
Trump claimed he would have won the crucial state of Pennsylvania even without Musk's help. But Musk, who spent hundreds of millions of dollars and campaigned for Trump, shot back that he was in fact the reason Trump won the presidency.
'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,' Musk said.
Musk then added in another post: 'Such ingratitude.'
There are few topics Trump takes as seriously as his reputation as a winner. He often talks about how his endorsements help Republicans and has endlessly exaggerated the size of his electoral victories and mandate.
It's clearly a point of emphasis, and Musk just went there.
Trump, like other Republicans in recent days, suggested Musk's criticism of his 'Big Beautiful Bill' wasn't really about excessive spending – as Musk has said it is – but instead about one of his personal businesses, Tesla.
'Elon's upset because we took the [electric vehicle] mandate and – you know, which was a lot of money for electric vehicles,' Trump said in the Oval Office.
'He only developed a problem when he found out I would cut the EV mandate,' Trump added.
Trump later posted on Truth Social that Musk 'went CRAZY' over the EV changes.
Musk sought to call Trump's bluff, encouraging lawmakers to keep the EV subsidies cuts but trim spending.
'Whatever,' Musk said. 'Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill.'
Musk pointed to past comments in which he actually discouraged lawmakers from enacting EV tax credits. He also pointed to a clip in which Trump himself said that Musk had 'never asked me for a thing.'
But perhaps most strikingly, Musk promoted a post from the chief GOP critic of the bill in the House, Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky.
'Some politicians get into politics to enrich themselves,' Massie said. 'Maybe that's why they can't imagine someone would judge a bill based on what's good for the country instead of what's good for their wallet.'
That seems a pretty sharp dig at Trump, who has intermingled his personal business with his role as president plenty in his second term.
Trump's comments have, to this point, been largely suggestive about Musk's motives. But Musk has clearly taken offense.
Despite the White House claiming this week that it had been previously aware of Musk's opposition to the package, Trump on Thursday claimed that he was in fact surprised.
'I'm very disappointed, because Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anybody sitting here, better than you people,' Trump said in the Oval Office. 'He knew everything about it. He had no problem with it. All of a sudden, he had a problem.'
'But he knew every aspect of this bill. He knew it better than almost anybody, and he never had a problem until right after he left.'
Musk responded that Trump's version of events was 'false.'
He wrote that 'this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!'
Musk seemed to put to rest any illusions that this somehow isn't devolving into a power struggle.
Responding to an X user who noted lawmakers are feeling pressured to pick a side, Musk made a case for them picking him.
'Oh and some food for thought as they ponder this question: Trump has 3.5 years left as President, but I will be around for 40+ years,' Musk wrote.
In other words: Tread carefully. I have lots of money – and time.
Trump later posted on Truth Social that, if lawmakers wanted to really save money, they should 'terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts.'
When a user claimed Trump's idea would mean effectively abandoning the International Space Station, Musk promoted the post and dared Trump. 'Go ahead, make my day,' he wrote on X.
Musk later said he would 'begin decommissioning' a key spacecraft.
It remains to be seen where things go from here. Trump often reconciles with allies, even after ugly things are said.
But rarely is the other figure someone as powerful and outspoken as Musk. The power dynamics are usually such that the other party feels pressured to cave to Trump.
Musks suggests he's ready for that power struggle. If he is, buckle up.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Raise taxes to bring down energy bills, British Gas boss tells Reeves
The boss of British Gas owner Centrica has urged Rachel Reeves to raise taxes to bring down energy bills. Chris O'Shea said the Chancellor must act to prevent hard-up households from shouldering the cost of Ed Miliband's net zero transition. In particular, he signalled that Centrica would support plans to shift green levies from household bills to general taxation. Speaking on BBC Radio 4's Broadcasting House, he said: 'The cost of the energy transition is not small. 'It's not because renewables are expensive, it's just because we have an energy system that was designed for a world that no longer exists, so we're having to upgrade the energy system and that requires a quite substantial investment. 'At the moment, the costs for doing that come off consumer bills. There is an option to put that on general taxation and that's something that we would support at Centrica.' Mr O'Shea acknowledged that the Chancellor was facing significant financial pressures, especially ahead of the upcoming spending review. However, he said: 'The reality is that we as a country have to pay for the upgrade of the energy infrastructure, either through bills or through general taxation.' His comments come amid mounting scrutiny over so-called green levies, which are charges added to household energy bills to help fund renewables such as wind and solar. These are seen as key to supporting Mr Miliband's target of reaching net zero by 2050. However, critics have accused the Energy Secretary of failing to tackle sky-high energy bills. The Climate Change Committee, which advises the Government on its emissions targets, has said that green levies should be removed from household costs and shifted either on to gas bills or general taxation. In a report last month, the quango said it was concerned that high electricity bills were preventing consumers from buying heat pumps and electric cars, which in turn was slowing down the energy transition. Business leaders have also urged Mr Miliband to scrap green levies as British companies grapple with the highest electricity prices of anywhere in the developed world. Rain Newton-Smith, the director general of the Confederation for British Industry (CBI), last week warned that the net zero costs were acting as an 'anchor' on UK ambitions. Household energy bills are set to fall next month after regulator Ofgem said it would lower the price cap by £129. Nevertheless, high energy costs remain a key political concern, especially as Britain ploughs ahead with a costly transition to renewable sources. In a sign of tensions over Labour's net zero strategy, Sir Keir Starmer has intervened in controversial proposals to make homes and businesses in the South pay more for power than those in the North. Supporters of so-called zonal pricing, which is under consideration by Mr Miliband, claim the switch would lead to savings of £52bn for consumers. Mr O'Shea said increasing energy storage would help to lower prices, but warned that other measures would amount to simply redistributing costs. He said: 'If we're just talking about reallocating things then the cost has to be met by the country. The question is who in the country meets that cost – is it consumers, is it businesses, is it the taxpayer?' The comments come a month after Centrica faced a shareholder backlash over Mr O'Shea's £4.3m pay package. The energy chief was handed a 29pc salary increase, though his total pay was down sharply on the year before, when it ballooned to £8m thanks to a bonus. Mr O'Shea has previously said it was 'impossible to justify' his pay when millions of households are struggling with their bills.

Associated Press
10 minutes ago
- Associated Press
INVESTOR DEADLINE APPROACHING: Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Investigates Claims on Behalf of Investors of Zenas BioPharma
Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Securities Litigation Partner James (Josh) Wilson Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses Exceeding $75,000 In Zenas To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their Options If you purchased or otherwise acquired stock of Zenas pursuant and/or traceable to Zenas' registration statement for the initial public offering held on or about September 13, 2024 and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310). [You may also click here for additional information] New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - June 8, 2025) - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, is investigating potential claims against Zenas BioPharma, Inc. ('Zenas' or the 'Company') (NASDAQ: ZBIO) and reminds investors of the June 16, 2025 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action that has been filed against the Company. [ This image cannot be displayed. Please visit the source: ] Faruqi & Faruqi is a leading national securities law firm with offices in New York, Pennsylvania, California and Georgia. The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors since its founding in 1995. See As detailed below, the complaint alleges that the Company and its executives violated federal securities laws by making false and/or misleading statements and/or failing to disclose that: (1) Zenas BioPharma materially overstated the amount of time it would be able to fund its operations using existing cash and expected net proceeds from the IPO; and (2) as a result, defendants' public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times and negligently prepared. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages. The court-appointed lead plaintiff is the investor with the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class who is adequate and typical of class members who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of the putative class. Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision to serve as a lead plaintiff or not. Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP also encourages anyone with information regarding Zenas' conduct to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others. To learn more about the Zenas BioPharma class action, go to or call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310). Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, on X, or on Facebook. Attorney Advertising. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP ( ). Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your particular case. All communications will be treated in a confidential manner. To view the source version of this press release, please visit


Associated Press
10 minutes ago
- Associated Press
ROSEN, SKILLED INVESTOR COUNSEL, Encourages Organon & Co. Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action
NEW YORK, June 08, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of securities of Organon & Co. (NYSE: OGN) between October 31, 2024 and April 30, 2025, both dates inclusive (the 'Class Period'), of the important July 22, 2025 lead plaintiff deadline. SO WHAT: If you purchased Organon securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement. WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Organon class action, go to or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than July 22, 2025. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually litigate securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm achieved the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company at the time. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers. DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, defendants provided overwhelmingly positive statements to investors while, at the same time, disseminating materially false and misleading statements and/or concealing material adverse facts concerning the true state of Organon's priorities, particularly, related to capital allocation through quarterly dividends. Notably, defendants concealed the high priority of Organon's debt reduction strategy following Organon's acquisition of Dermavant, resulting in a 70% decrease for the regular quarterly dividend. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages. To join the Organon class action, go to call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff. Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: on Twitter: or on Facebook: Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Contact Information: Laurence Rosen, Esq. Phillip Kim, Esq. The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. 275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor New York, NY 10016 Tel: (212) 686-1060 Toll Free: (866) 767-3653 Fax: (212) 202-3827 [email protected]