As UNSC president, Pakistan steps up quiet push on Kashmir
Kashmir issue
, though not by name. Islamabad is planning to hold an open debate on July 22 on the peaceful settlement of global disputes, followed by a draft resolution that calls on countries to use existing UN mechanisms for conflict resolution, as per TOI.
Pakistani deputy prime minister and foreign minister Ishaq Dar will chair the session, with UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres expected to brief the Council. The resolution will urge member states to invoke Chapter VI of the UN Charter, particularly Article 33, which encourages mediation, arbitration and other peaceful methods of resolving disputes.
But the resolution is likely to avoid any direct reference to Jammu & Kashmir. 'The generic resolution which will most likely be conceptual in nature will focus on general principles not specific issues to avoid any objections,' said Syed Akbaruddin, former Indian ambassador to the UN.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Moose Approaches Girl At Bus Stop In Rajshahi - Watch What Happens
Happy in Shape
Undo
That's partly because any mention of Kashmir risks a veto. Resolutions at the UNSC require at least nine affirmative votes and no veto from any of the five permanent members. Apart from China, the other P5 countries continue to view Kashmir as a bilateral issue between India and Pakistan, something India has consistently reinforced, citing the Simla and Lahore Declarations.
Islamabad's move comes after it called closed-door consultations on May 5 following a terrorist attack in Pahalgam. Now, it's turning to more public forums, hoping to keep the issue alive diplomatically without triggering procedural blocks.
Live Events
Pakistan is also using its final stretch at the helm of the UNSC to host another signature event aimed at strengthening ties between the UN and the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC). The meeting, listed under the UN's agenda on cooperation with regional and subregional organisations, will bring together OIC members, including Algeria, Somalia, Sierra Leone, and Guyana—four current non-permanent members of the UNSC.
That event, too, is expected to feature messaging supportive of Pakistan's Kashmir position. But tensions between the Council and the OIC, especially over issues like Israel's actions in Gaza or US strikes on Iran, could complicate any united messaging. India has repeatedly accused the OIC of being used by Pakistan to push its narrative while turning a blind eye to Islamabad's support for cross-border terrorism.
Any mention of Kashmir during the OIC session is likely to be met with a sharp response from New Delhi.
With inputs from TOI
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Print
11 minutes ago
- The Print
Report leak, global headlines pinned Air India crash on dead pilots. But nothing adds up
My only qualification for writing on this subject is that I put my life on the line about twice every week. That's how many flights I take, most of them on Air India. So if air travel — especially on Boeing aircraft or with Air India — is this susceptible to random tragedy, then I have a personal stake in knowing what actually happened. I am, by now means, an aviation expert. But then, neither are 95 per cent of the people who have commented on the crash, assigned blame, claimed to know what really happened, or trashed Air India. Because this column is about the tragic Air India crash at Ahmedabad airport, I want to begin with a few qualifications before we go any further. But here's the problem: even after the passage of several days and the publication of an inquiry report into the crash, I am more confused than ever. Also read: Air India crash report didn't deserve Modi govt's secrecy culture Here's what worries me: The interim inquiry report tells us that the crash was caused by a disruption in fuel supply to the aircraft's engines. It says that the switches controlling the fuel flow were turned off and then back on. But by the time the pilots tried to restore fuel, it was too late. The aircraft crashed. According to the report, the pilots noticed the loss of fuel. It quotes a snatch of cockpit conversation where one pilot asks the other if he had cut off the supply. The reply: no, he had not. Even before this report was released to the Indian public, on whose behalf and at whose expense the inquiry was conducted, it was leaked, at least in part, to the foreign media. Who leaked it? Why? Has there been any investigation into the leak? We have no answers. Nor does it look like we will get any. What does this failure tell us about India's aviation authorities, or about the integrity of the process? You can draw your own conclusions. The people the report was leaked to clearly shared it with Western media outlets along with their own interpretation. That interpretation, to put it crudely, was: 'these stupid Indian pilots screwed up by shutting off the fuel. There was nothing wrong with the plane. It was the pilots who erred.' With some notable exceptions — who were more circumspect — the rest of the Western media ran wild with the 'stupid Indians crashed the plane' narrative for three full days. The report was rumoured to be ready on a Monday. By Tuesday, the first 'pilots did it' stories appeared in the Western media. After that narrative had run unchecked across the global press, the Indian government finally released the report — quietly, in the dead of night, under the cover of darkness. No press conference. No official explanation. Nothing. In fact, the report stated that it had no recommendations for the aircraft or engine manufacturers. This was widely, and not unreasonably, interpreted to mean the plane and its engines had played no role in the crash. So the general conclusion, led by the Western media, which had access to the leaked report, was that the crash was caused by pilot error. And, to our eternal shame, much of Indian media, including news channels and social media, parroted this line. But here's the thing: the report doesn't explicitly blame the pilots. And you could argue that the quoted cockpit exchange actually exonerates them: they were surprised by the sudden fuel loss and denied having had anything to do with it. Obviously, it is wrong to blame pilots who had hours of experience and impeccable records because they are not alive to defend themselves. But 'it was the pilots' theory also severely damages the reputation of Air India. Would international travellers want to fly with an airline perceived to employ incompetent pilots? Pilot associations in India and abroad have justifiably objected to how the report was spun. But not enough have raised the more serious question: shouldn't action be taken against those who leaked the report to vested interests, and brought Indian aviation, its pilots, and Air India into such disrepute? Isn't that a firing offence? From a passenger's perspective, we still don't know what to make of it all. Could the pilots have accidentally switched the fuel off and on? It seems more and more unlikely. This isn't just a matter of flipping a switch; it involves multiple steps. We are being asked to believe that the pilots shut off both fuel switches off, turned them back on, and then tried to stabilise the aircraft — all within the 30 seconds or so the aircraft was airborne. I suppose it's possible. But it certainly doesn't sound likely. There is another theory now floating around on social media: that the pilots did it on purpose. I won't dignify that with much comment, except to say there is nothing in either man's record to suggest he would commit mass murder. And even if one of them was suicidal — which, again, there is no evidence for — why do it this way? There are simpler, less catastrophic ways to die. Also read: Air India crash should push India to create independent board for transport safety oversight So what did happen? The frightening truth is: we have no idea. It's possible that a mechanical failure caused the fuel valve to shut or that the switch itself was defective. There have been reports of similar issues on other aircraft. But the report dismisses these possibilities and gives a clean chit to the aircraft and its systems. I don't want to do what the Western media did and scapegoat someone without proof. But ever since the crash, questions have been raised about Boeing. In recent years, Boeing's reputation has been trashed by accusations that it cut corners to save money and increase profits. The company is still reeling from the 737 MAX scandal, and its senior executives have been grilled and humiliated by US Congressional committees. If even a part of the crash were linked to Boeing's failures, it would set the company into a tailspin from which it might never recover. So did Boeing leak the report? Did it push the 'pilot error' narrative? It has the resources to influence media coverage and enough money to buy off Indian officials. But I am not going to play that game. Just as it is wrong to blame pilots without proper evidence, it's equally wrong to accuse Boeing without conclusive proof. Which leaves us passengers right where we started. A plane crashed under mysterious circumstances. An interim report was selectively leaked and twisted into an effort to crucify two dead pilots. And we are left asking: is it any safer to fly now? Can we be sure this won't happen again? We still have no answers. Vir Sanghvi is a print and television journalist, and talk show host. He tweets @virsanghvi. Views are personal. (Edited by Prashant)
Time of India
11 minutes ago
- Time of India
India unfazed by Trump's secondary tariff threats: Hardeep Singh Puri on threat to Russian oil imports
Hardeep Singh Puri stated India is not worried about potential US sanctions. He believes oil markets are well-supplied and prices will decrease. India is diversifying its oil sources, including purchases from Argentina and Brazil. This comes after the US threatened tariffs on Russian imports and countries trading with Russia if a peace deal isn't reached. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Petroleum and Natural Gas of India Hardeep Singh Puri on Thursday said India is unfazed by US sanction threats as oil markets remain well supplied, adding that the prices will come said that India is currently buying crude oil from Argentina and will buy more from Brazil. The comments came while answering a question on US President Donald Trump's secondary tariffs threat at Urja Varta 2025 Trump, on Tuesday, had announced 100 per cent tariffs on Russian imports, including oil. Additionally, the US president also introduced equivalent secondary tariffs on countries importing from Russia, including on India. He wanred that the tariffs would be imposed if Russia did not arrive at a peace deal within 50 days. When asked about the secondary tariff warning, Puri said at the Thursday event that right now he does not have 'any pressure' in his oil refiners have been getting Russian oil at discounted rates since 2022, while while the West has moved away from Russia by imposing sanctions. Russia currently accounts for a third of India's oil imports, compared to less than 1 per cent before the war.A secondary tariff would affect Indian refiners with them having to switch to western countries for oil for a higher cost.
The Print
24 minutes ago
- The Print
Terrorists behind Pahalgam attack identified, could be eliminated soon, says J&K L-G Manoj Sinha
'Terrorism has been the state policy of Pakistan, and it is in the DNA of Pakistan…since inception, it has used a terror policy post-1947, to attack Jammu & Kashmir. The recent attack was by the design and intention of Pakistan, too,' Manoj Sinha said. On the motive behind the attack, Lt. Governor Sinha said that it was to 'create communal divide and disrupt peace of state and business activity, so that Pakistan can again start recruitment of handlers'. New Delhi: The security agencies have identified the terrorists behind the 22 April Pahalgam attack, and soon, will eliminate them, Manoj Sinha said, speaking on the occasion of his completion of 5 years as the Lt. Governor of Jammu and Kashmir, at a function in Gandhi Smriti, Delhi, Wednesday. However, 'the people of Kashmir showed up and demonstrated how fed up they were with terror', he added. 'They want peace and prosperity.' Two days ago, the L-G stunned the state, saying it was a 'security failure' that led to the deaths of 26 innocent people in Pahalgam. 'What happened in Pahalgam was very unfortunate. Innocent people were killed. I took full responsibility for the incident, but it was undoubtedly a security failure,' Manoj Sinha said. Calling Pakistan the 'biggest enemy of humanity', he said that the 'global powers will have to end terrorism from Pakistan; it is the duty of the global powers'. 'Pakistan does not want prosperity in Jammu and Kashmir; our neighbour does not like peace in Kashmir. But there is a change brewing in the state, and local people have realised that their destiny and prosperity lie with India and in peace'. Quoting a Gandhi speech, Sinha said, 'Gandhi wanted peace and prosperity in Jammu & Kashmir. He once said that if one has to choose between cowardice and violence, the way is violence. And, when Pakistan disturbed the peace in Kashmir, Gandhi said our Army should move forward and defeat the enemy.' In 1924, the late Mahatma Gandhi said, 'My non-violence does not admit of running away from danger and leaving dear ones unprotected. Between violence and cowardly flight, I can prefer only violence to cowardice; shunning non-violence is the summit of bravery.' Without directly saying it, Manoj Sinha cited the Gandhian philosophy as the context of the subsequent Indian attack on Pakistan. At the event, Vijay Goel, the Gandhi Smriti and Darshan Samiti Vice-Chairperson, delivered a brief speech. He said, 'Like Gandhi, Modi is bringing peace and prosperity in Jammu & Kashmir'. Elaborating on the Kashmir situation since he had assumed the L-G role in 2020, Sinha said, 'Kashmir's economy has doubled. A Kashmir bank, specifically Jammu & Kashmir Bank, was running at a loss of Rs 1,300 crore, but today its profit margin stands at Rs 1,700 crore. Roughly 2.38 crore tourists visited Kashmir last year, and builders constructed 5,000 new hotels. A 1.5 lakh crore highway project is under construction here. A Tiranga Yatra took place in the village of Burhan Wani.' During the Lok Sabha and assembly elections, the state was peaceful, he said. 'Not a single incident happened, and there was no question about election integrity. Forget firing, not a single pebble was thrown. Currently, people are enjoying nightlife, and children are going to school.' Operation Sindoor, Manoj Sinha said, showed that if anybody has bad intentions towards India, the country will give a befitting reply. He added that the most striking part of the operation was how the Army made use of India-made drones and other indigenously produced defence equipment to attack Pakistan. 'Prime Minister Modi has said categorically that Operation Sindoor has not ended, and if any misadventure takes place, it will be treated as an act of war,' he added. Discussing his efforts for establishing normalcy in J&K, L-G Sinha said, 'The incident of throwing stones has become history, the recruitment of handlers by Pakistan is minimal. Earlier, it recruited 150 locals, but last year, there were only six such cases, and this year, it was only one case. Radicalisation has stopped.' NIA officers showing no mercy to terrorists and public support for peace, and a change in their outlook were critical in bringing normalcy, he added. 'After abrogation of Article 370, the Prime Minister desired peace in the state, and my vision was clear on how to have peace and prosperity in the state—peace is not for buying but for establishing,' Manoj Sinha stated. (Edited by Madhurita Goswami) Also read: 'Some screamed with every thud, others prayed'—J&K residents recall night of Operation Sindoor
