Labour welfare body urges postal ballot for migrant workers
In a letter to the Chief Election Commission of India, NCC-CL coordinator Subhash Bhatnagar, said migrant workers from Bihar, have long returned to their home state to participate in parliamentary, assembly, and local elections. However, recent moves to remove their names from the electoral roll under the SIR in Bihar have sparked outrage among workers' organisations.
The NCC-CL and its affiliated groups, which have been advocating for postal ballot rights for migrant workers for over a decade, have condemned the proposal to remove migrant workers' names from the electoral roll rather than granting them access to postal voting facilities.
These workers, employed across various States, including construction sites in Tamil Nadu, contribute significantly to their families and to Bihar's economy, wrote Mr. Bhatnagar. The increase in migration is linked to shortfalls in MNREGA allocations and worsening distress in the region.
'Whose names were deleted? Migrant workers and Muslims,' pointed out R. Geetha, South Regional Coordinator of NCC-CL, highlighting the disproportionate impact of the voter list revisions on already marginalised and vulnerable communities.
In an appeal, the NCC-CL has called on the Election Commission of India to immediately halt the removal of migrant workers' names from Bihar's electoral rolls and to establish mechanisms for postal voting. Until such measures are in place, the organisation insists that the existing rolls remain untouched and that the ongoing verification drive in Bihar be suspended.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
38 minutes ago
- News18
Tejashwi Alleges NDA MP Veena Devi Holds Two Voter IDs, Slams EC For Inaction
Tejashwi alleged that Veena Devi submitted two separate enumeration forms, bearing two different signatures during SIR process, both allegedly verified and signed off by EC. Amid the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) row, Former Deputy Chief Minister Tejashwi Yadav has responded to the Election Commission's claim that no political party had made any complaints and alleged that 'our BLAs and officials complain to the Election Commission every day, but they neither accept the complaints nor provide any acknowledgement." He further alleged serious irregularities in the voter list, and claimed that Veena Devi, an NDA Member of Parliament from Vaishali, of holding two separate EPIC (Electors Photo Identity Cards)—ID numbers UTO1134543 and GSB1037894—registered in two different Lok Sabha constituencies across two separate districts. He further claimed that the MP has votes in two different Assembly constituencies and that her EPIC cards show two different ages. Yadav further alleged that Veena Devi submitted two separate enumeration forms, bearing two different signatures during SIR process, both allegedly verified and signed off by the Election Commission. 'How did she end up with two different votes, two EPIC cards, two Lok Sabha constituencies, two Assembly constituencies, and two different ages in the new draft list published by the Election Commission?" Yadav questioned in his post. Labelling it a clear case of fraud, manipulation, and collusion, Yadav accused the Election Commission of favouring the BJP-NDA. He sarcastically referred to the Commission as the 'Troll Commission" and demanded accountability, asking whether the EC would now send 'two different notices from two different places" to the MP. Tejashwi Yadav also responded to EC's claim that no official complaint has been filed in the matter and said,"Our BLAs and officials complain to the Election Commission every day, but they neither accept the complaints nor provide any acknowledgement. Yet, they issue press releases daily claiming that political parties have not made any complaints." 'In lying, the Election Commission has even surpassed Prime Minister Modi. This is truly a wonder of the Election Commission. We have never seen anything like this anywhere," he further added. Earlier, the EC on Friday told RJD leader Tejashwi Yadav that it was a crime to forge and use a bogus government document and set a deadline for him to submit his 'apparently fake" Electoral Photo Identity Card (EPIC) by August 16. The Official had earlier written to the former Deputy CM, urging him to 'hand over for investigation' the voter card which he claimed to possess despite it having been 'not issued officially'. In the latest letter, the ERO said that a perusal of the voters list for the past several years has led to the conclusion that the EC had never issued the voter card with the EPIC number quoted by Yadav. view comments Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
Make grand arrangements for I-Day fete, Collector directs officials
Anantapur: In-charge District Collector Shiv Narayan Sharma has directed officials to make grand arrangements for the 79th Independence Day celebrations to be held on August 15 at the Police Parade Grounds, Anantapur. Accompanied by AR ASP Ilyaz Basha and Assistant Collector Sachin Sahar, the Collector inspected the ongoing arrangements and participated in police parade rehearsals. He announced that as per the State government's directions, the celebrations will begin at 9:02 am. with the unfurling of the national flag by Finance, Planning, Commercial Taxes and Legislative Affairs Minister Payyavula Keshav, a resident of the district. He urged the public to participate and make the event a success. Officials were instructed to complete all arrangements by Thursday. ensuring a patriotic atmosphere. Tasks include stage decoration, police, NCC, and Home Guard parades, flag-hoisting arrangements, protocol adherence, security, invitation distribution, uninterrupted power supply, seating, drinking water, sanitation, traffic management, parking, barricading, mobile toilets, medical first-aid camps, and the PTC band. Awards of appreciation will be presented to those who rendered exceptional services. The Collector also directed departments to set up exhibition stalls showcasing state welfare and development schemes, and to organise cultural programmes by school students promoting national unity. All activities must be coordinated between revenue, police and other departments to ensure smooth execution from the start of the programme until the national anthem. The inspection was attended by forest, revenue, housing, health, agriculture, R&B, and other department officials, NCC cadets, police personnel and students.
Scroll.in
an hour ago
- Scroll.in
What the outrage over stray dogs says about the moral compass of middle-class Indians
The emotional response that followed the Supreme Court ordering the removal of all stray dogs in the National Capital Region is a grim reflection on the moral priorities of India's middle-class. On August 11, the Supreme Court instructed the Delhi government and civic bodies to house stray dogs in shelters and said that animals must not be allowed back on to the streets. Soon, an Instagram post on how the ruling would deprive stray dogs of freedom and shelter had reached a million shares. Animal rights activists and citizens mobilised protests in multiple cities. Such an expression of empathy and solidarity, in barely two days, is astonishing. It is in stark contrast to the usual enabling hush over instances like, to name just a few: the detention of Indians in centres across Assam over disputed citizenship, the forced expulsion of Bengali-speaking Muslims accused of being 'Bangladeshis' and Rohingya refugees, and the illegal bulldozing of Muslim homes. Instead, these incidents have been cheered on or justified as necessary for 'national' security. It is tempting to dismiss the outrage over stray dogs as an instance of misplaced priorities or to accuse people of caring about animals more than humans. But human suffering, particularly when it is caused by poverty, war, casteism, racism or displacement, is politically messy. It implicates power structures, governments and entrenched hierarchies. To acknowledge it fully would require one to confront their own privilege, complicity and ideological alignments. Animal suffering is perceived as morally 'clean'. Stray dogs become 'pure' victims: voiceless, without political agency and incapable of being blamed for their condition. They are easier to empathise with because that empathy carries no political risk. Instead of confronting the grave injustices of our times, the Indian middle class has chosen 'safe empathy' – compassion that enables them to feel moral without challenging the status quo. Animal rights activists scuffled with police & were detained during a protest against the relocation of stray dogs near Hanuman Mandir in Connaught Place. The rally was billed as a 'Chakka Jam for Our Stray Babies' Photos by Ankit Roy @photojournalog #ThePrintPictures — ThePrintIndia (@ThePrintIndia) August 12, 2025 The silence on Gaza Consider Gaza. It has been nearly two years of Israel's military assault on the blockaded strip since October 2023. Relentless bombardment has reduced vast stretches of Gaza to rubble, destroyed health, education and water sanitation infrastructure with a death toll of 61,000 as of August – many of the dead are children. Israel has choked aid to the strip, causing a man-made famine that is claiming more lives. The very possibility of life itself has been deliberately strangled. It is widely recognised as an ongoing genocide. India's official stance has long been in support of Palestinian statehood. In December, the Ministry of External Affairs told Parliament that it is concerned about the situation in Gaza and that it has emphasised the need to safely deliver humanitarian assistance. But barring isolated instances of protests, which were quickly cracked down upon, there has been little public outrage in India over the situation in Gaza. When the Communist Party of India (Marxist) sought to hold protests in solidarity with Gaza, the Bombay High Court was critical: 'You are looking at Gaza and Palestine while neglecting what's happening here,' the court said in July, according to The Hindu. A few weeks later in August, the court allowed the party to hold a 'peaceful assembly'. 'Demonstration sounds more intense,' said a judge. The judiciary is the same institution that Indian liberals will turn to, seeking protection for stray dogs. #Breaking: Mumbai Police permits Communist Party of India (Marxist) to hold a peaceful protest to condemn the ongoing genocide in Gaza. Bombay High Court division bench of Justices Ravindra Ghuge and Gautam Ankhad accepted the statement made by the Mumbai Police that the… — Live Law (@LiveLawIndia) August 12, 2025 But political solidarity with Palestine would have meant confronting Hindutva's alliance with Zionism and the broader Islamophobia that underpins public discourse. Similarly, there has been silence when it comes to India's own Muslim population. Indian citizens were among those illegally pushed into Bangladesh after the police, especially in Bharatiya Janata Party-ruled states, rounded up Bengali-speaking Muslims and demanded proof of Indian citizenship following the Pahalgam terror attack. Elsewhere, Muslims have been lynched for their religious identity and visibility, their homes illegally bulldozed in defiance of Supreme Court orders, their businesses boycotted and their places of worship demolished. Hindutva parties and their supporters have actively celebrated these acts as furthering the establishment of a Hindu nation. But the tragedy and the hypocrisy is that much of the liberal and centrist middle-class has also either justified this violence under the garb of 'law and order' or looked away, unwilling to confront majoritarian hatred. It is a court order against stray dogs that suddenly awakens public conscience. When the victims are Muslim, whether in Palestine or in India, liberal outrage collapses into moral cowardice or polite distance. For Gaza, the refrain was that 'it's too complex' or 'too far away' to take a stance. Complexity, however, was not an obstacle when it came to stray dogs in Delhi – an issue that demands balancing human safety with empathy for animals while addressing administrative failures. Animal right activists for a noble cause are having a candle light march on Kartavya Path New Delhi against the Supreme Courts orders on Stray dogs in the capital — Ravinder Kapur. (@RavinderKapur2) August 13, 2025 Convenient empathy Advocating for animals rarely attracts the kind of social or political backlash that campaigning against caste violence, Islamophobia, or settler colonialism does. One can campaign for stray dogs without worrying about losing a job, alienating their family, or facing state surveillance. Fighting for oppressed humans has real consequences. The path of least resistance becomes the path most travelled. The mainstream media and nonprofits know this. They package animal welfare stories accordingly: apolitical, emotionally accessible and with feel-good sentiment – 'adopt, don't shop'. Reporting on caste atrocities, religious hatred, or settler colonialism, on the other hand, demands naming perpetrators and acknowledging systemic injustice, which makes audiences uncomfortable. This discomfort is evident in the silence and selective outrage of India's liberal class. There is also an undercurrent of cynicism and misanthropy. Many have internalised the belief that humans are inherently selfish, corrupt and unworthy of trust, a belief shaped by personal betrayals or repeated exposure to systemic injustice. Animals, in contrast, are idealised as loyal, honest and incapable of malice. This makes animal advocacy emotionally safer; one can help without fear of ingratitude or manipulation. But this cynicism feeds political disengagement. If humans are 'hopeless', the incentive to fight for them disappears. This belief serves the interests of oppressive systems, as it channels moral energy into spaces that pose no threat to power. None of this is to argue against caring for animals. Empathy is not a finite resource. Protecting stray dogs from cruelty is important. But empathy that does not extend to fellow humans is an empathy shaped and limited by blind privilege. The legal and political systems that abandon stray dogs are the same ones that let poor families starve, imprison minorities without trial and support genocide abroad. The outrage over the Supreme Court's stray dog order has shown that mass empathy can be mobilised quickly, creatively and with impact. If the liberal Hindu middle-class can find its voice for stray dogs within 48 hours, its silence on human suffering is a deliberate choice, not an oversight. Real solidarity requires dismantling the hierarchy of empathy that places animals above humans when human beings are politically inconvenient. It means recognising that the fight for animal welfare and the fight for human dignity are bound by the same thread: resistance to cruelty, exploitation and systemic neglect. Severing that connection allows the oppressor to define the limits of compassion. Until that selective and comfortable activism changes, every candle lit for a stray dog will cast a shadow long enough to hide the silence and complicity in majoritarian hatred – at home and beyond.
