
FTC reaches $100M settlement with Assurance IQ over alleged deceptive health insurance marketing
The Federal Trade Commission reached a $100 million settlement with Assurance IQ, the now-defunct Seattle-area insurance technology startup acquired by Prudential Financial in 2019 for $2.35 billion.
The FTC alleged that Assurance misled consumers shopping for health insurance and made deceptive statements about certain short-term medical and limited benefit indemnity plans, as well as supplemental products such as telemedicine, prescription discount, and vision and dental discount plans.
According to the FTC's complaint, Assurance's telemarketers followed company scripts that overstated coverage, promised steep 'repricing' discounts without substantiation, and enrolled customers in supplemental products without clear disclosure or consent.
'The Defendant has deceived consumers out of hundreds of millions of dollars through the deceptive sales of these healthcare plans,' the FTC said in its complaint.
Founded in 2016 by Michael Rowell and Michael Paulus, Assurance used technology to match consumers with insurance plans purchased online or through an agent. The startup flew under-the-radar in the Seattle region and never raised any outside capital as it quietly reached unicorn status as a $1 billion company.
The company's acquisition to Prudential was one of the largest insurance tech exits ever.
Prudential shut down Assurance last year after missed financial targets and government inquiries. It laid off 112 workers in Seattle, according to a state filing.
Under a stipulated court order, Prudential — as Assurance's parent company — will guarantee payment and compliance with the settlement terms.
The FTC's action, filed this week in federal court in Seattle, is part of a broader $145 million settlement that also includes Los Angeles-based MediaAlpha, accused of misleading consumers through deceptive lead generation practices and robocalls.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
1 dead, 5 hurt in Chicago mass shooting, police say
A woman was killed and five other people were hurt when gunfire erupted early Sunday at a large outdoor gathering on Chicago's West Side – one of three separate shootings to occur in the same neighborhood in fewer than three hours, according to police. The shooting occurred just before 2:48 a.m. local time on North La Cross Avenue in the South Austin neighborhood on the West Side of Chicago, according to an incident report from the Chicago Police Department. "Officers responded to a call of a large gathering and found multiple people shot," police said in the report. When officers arrived at the scene they found six people suffering from gunshot wounds, officials said. A 22-year-old woman was discovered with a gunshot wound to the back and was taken to Mt. Sinai Hospital in Chicago, where she was pronounced dead, police said. The victim's name was not immediately released. MORE: 1 dead, 5 wounded, including 5-year-old girl, in Baltimore 'mass shooting': Police Five other people suffered gunshot wounds in the incident, including two 18-year-old boys and a 17-year-boy. One of the 18-year-old victims was shot in the chest and left arm. Police said he was in critical condition at Stroger Hospital in Chicago, while the 17-year-old sustained a gunshot wound to the left thigh and was taken to Mt. Sinai Hospital in critical condition. The other 18-year-old was treated at the scene for a graze wound to his left hand, police said. A 29-year-old man shot in the right leg was also in critical condition at Loretto Hospital in Chicago, according to police. The shooting also left a 29-year-old woman with a gunshot wound to her right elbow, according to police, who said she was taken to Rush Hospital in good condition. No arrests had been announced as of Sunday afternoon. A motive for the shooting remains under investigation, according to police. At least two other shootings occurred in the same Chicago neighborhood on Sunday morning. Police have not said if the shootings are related. About three blocks from the North La Cross Avenue mass shooting, an 18-year-old boy was shot in the back on West Maypole Avenue at about 4:37 a.m. and later died at Stroger Hospital, police said. A second 18-year-old boy was also shot in the arm during the shooting, according to police. MORE: 17-year-old arrested after 3 people shot in Times Square The two teenagers were shot after getting into an argument with a gunman who fired at them from a vehicle, police said. No arrests have been announced. About an hour before the mass shooting on North La Cross Avenue, police responded to a reports of shots fired about a block away on North Lamon Avenue and found a 20-year-old woman suffering from multiple gunshot wounds to her arm, according to police. The woman was taken to Mt. Sinai Hospital, where she was in good condition, police said. No arrests have been announced. The Chicago shootings occurred less than a day after one person was killed and five others wounded, including a 5-year-old girl, in a mass shooting at an outdoor gathering in Baltimore, Md. A motive for that shooting remains under investigation, according to police.
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Dave Ramsey Tells Divorced Dad With 2.25% Mortgage to Take Out HELOC to Get Ex-Wife 'Off Your Back'—But Says He's Keeping the House for the Wrong Reasons
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. It's not every day Dave Ramsey tells someone to take on debt. In fact, his entire brand is built on helping people get rid of it. But when a recently divorced dad called "The Ramsey Show" asking if a home equity line of credit could help him pay his ex-wife her share of the house, Ramsey surprised him with a rare "yes" — followed quickly by a reality check. The caller's situation was tight. He owed his ex-wife $150,000 for her half of the equity in their home. He had $70,000 saved but needed the rest by the end of August. His first mortgage balance was $110,000, the house was worth about $430,000 to $440,000, and his interest rate was a jaw-dropping 2.25 percent. His solution? A HELOC — short for home equity line of credit — which allows homeowners to borrow against the equity in their property and pay it back over time. Don't Miss: . . "I don't tell people to borrow money," Ramsey told him, "but you're already in debt. You're in debt to your ex-wife, and we're going to change that to another kind of debt called a HELOC." In other words, he wasn't advising the caller to pile on more debt, just to restructure the kind he already had. "Get her off your back," Ramsey said. Then he pivoted to the bigger question: "Why are you keeping the house?" The caller explained that he loved the home, wanted to keep his kids in the school district, and thought stability was important for them. Ramsey didn't buy it. "Neither one of them care," he said of the children, ages four-and-a-half and five months. "You're the only one that cares... A 5-month-old does not have any feelings except food and wet diapers." Co-host George Kamel suggested a hybrid approach — take out the HELOC, list the house, and use the sale proceeds to pay it off and put the remainder toward a new place. Ramsey agreed that was worth considering, especially for one very human reason: "Your next wife probably doesn't want to live in the house where your ex-wife used to live in the same bedroom." Trending Now: Warren Buffett once said, "If you don't find a way to make money while you sleep, you will work until you die." Here's how you can earn passive income with just $100. $100k in assets? Maximize saving for your retirement and cut down on taxes: . While Ramsey made it clear the caller could keep the home if he wanted, he stressed that after decades of financial counseling, most people in this situation keep a house for the wrong reasons. "Five years from now," he said, "your world will look completely different. And it probably involves a different house." For homeowners in a time crunch like this caller, a HELOC can be a flexible option. Lenders such as Rocket Mortgage offer traditional revolving HELOCs for those with at least 15 to 20 percent equity, letting borrowers tap into their home's value for large expenses and repay as needed. The company is known for upfront, transparent closing costs — typically between 2 and 5 percent — which can make the process smoother during a stressful financial pivot. In this case, the math made sense. The emotional math was trickier. Ramsey's advice was blunt but compassionate: it's fine to take out the HELOC, fine to sell the house, and fine to move on. What mattered was not clinging to a property out of sentiment when the wiser move might be starting fresh. And while a low mortgage rate is hard to walk away from, Ramsey reminded the caller that sometimes the right decision isn't about the percentage — it's about the peace that comes when the debts, and the baggage, are gone. See Next: . . This article Dave Ramsey Tells Divorced Dad With 2.25% Mortgage to Take Out HELOC to Get Ex-Wife 'Off Your Back'—But Says He's Keeping the House for the Wrong Reasons originally appeared on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
A 240-year-old Swiss watchmaker raced to beat Trump's tariff deadline
By Helen Reid LONDON/GENEVA (Reuters) -As a U.S. tariff deadline neared last week, Swiss watch manufacturer DuBois et fils rushed to ship five high-end watches worth thousands of dollars each to the United States. By Wednesday the firm had blocked orders on its U.S. website. Now CEO Thomas Steinemann is calculating the price hikes he'll need to make. The whipsaw week for the Swiss horologist, as U.S. President Donald Trump slapped a surprise 39% trade tariff on imports from the European country, underscores how businesses big and small are being forced to adapt and rejig operations under pressure. DuBois et fils, founded in 1785, accelerated shipments on Monday from its factory in Muttenz, near Basel, to get through customs before the U.S. tariff on imports from Switzerland came into force. The 39% rate - up from the baseline tariff rate of 10% since April - took effect at 0400 GMT on Thursday after the Swiss president came back from an emergency trip to Washington without a deal. "For the watch industry it's a huge disaster," said Steinemann, who explained that he'd blocked U.S. orders because prices would need to be recalculated to account for tariffs. The firm would not soak up the hit, he said. "The U.S. was a big driver in the last two years. Now this kills a lot of the business." His U.S. prices were going to rise, he added. The DuBois DBF008 watch, for example, would likely go up to $14,500, from $10,800. The United States accounts for around 15% of the global sales of DuBois, which sells directly to U.S. consumers. The wider Swiss watch industry is feeling the pinch, planning price hikes, pausing U.S. orders, and looking for alternative markets for its expensive, hand-made timepieces. The country is home to brands such as Rolex, Patek Philippe, LVMH-owned Tag Heuer, Swatch-owned Omega and IWC Schaffhausen, owned by Richemont. The U.S. accounted for 17% of Switzerland's total 26 billion Swiss francs ($32 billion) of watch exports last year, according to the Federation of the Swiss Watch Industry. Exports to the U.S. surged in April as watchmakers frontloaded shipments ahead of a first tariff deadline. 'LOSS FOR THE UNITED STATES' Combined with a weaker dollar against the Swiss franc, the tariff hike will make Swiss watches some 65% more expensive on average for U.S. consumers, estimated Amarildo Pilo, owner of Pilo & Co watchmakers. He said that many brands had already shipped some product to the U.S. in advance, but warned this was not a long-term solution. The United States had been a market that everyone was focusing on recently and wanted to develop, he added. "My personal opinion is that what's going to happen is that Americans will no longer buy watches in the United States," said Pilo, who is also founder of the Swiss Independent Watchmakers Pavilion, which represents 28 independent brands. "But those who want them and who like watches will buy them elsewhere. So honestly, it's a loss for the United States." The tariff hit is a wider broadside against Switzerland, even if talks are continuing with the hope of eventually striking a deal. Trump argues that tariffs are needed to undo trade distortions and bring manufacturing back to the United States. "The impact could be very strong on the Swiss economy," said John Plassard, partner and head of investment strategy at Cite Gestion Private Bank. Analysts estimate the tariffs could knock between 0.3% to 0.6% off Swiss GDP growth over the next year. "It will cut the potential growth in half, I would say. So the indirect impact could be more unemployment in the Swiss economy," said Plassard. 'GAME OVER NUMBER' In Sacha Davidoff's vintage watch boutique in Geneva, there was a sense of shock. Many in the country had expected a deal similar to or better than the 15% that will be levied on most imports from the European Union. Switzerland is outside the bloc. "Right now we're living the nightmare that we had hoped wouldn't come to be. You kind of like wake up in the morning and you're like, 'no, that wasn't real'," Davidoff told Reuters, saying that 39% was a hammer blow for exports. "(It) is kind of a 'game over' number for us. It basically cuts the U.S. market as a possibility for export of vintage watches entirely." He hoped, however, that the situation would be resolved eventually. "I think that this is just going to be a difficult period where we're basically going to have to put the American market kind of on pause and focus on domestic sales," he said. ($1 = 0.8070 Swiss francs)