Why Shares of Pony AI Stock Were Up More Than 100% Last Month
Shares of Pony AI (NASDAQ: PONY) soared 112% in May, according to data from S&P Global Market Intelligence. The upstart is trying to bring self-driving and autonomous vehicle technology to the masses, with a focus on the Chinese market. It has a market cap of $4.67 billion but minimal sales and huge operating losses. However, investors are betting big on the potential future for this self-driving disrupter as it signs many partnerships with companies like Uber.
Here's why Pony AI stock was flying high in May.
Betting on autonomous vehicles in China and around the world
Pony AI is developing autonomous vehicle technology to be deployed on robotaxis, trucks, and everyday owned vehicles. It is focused on large cities in China, such as Shenzhen and Beijing. Shares soared last month because of partnership announcements with Uber and Tencent Holdings. Uber is now a strategic partner with Pony AI and hopes to deploy the technology for ridesharing in a Middle East market shortly. The Tencent partnership is with Tencent Cloud.
In the early stages of its business model, Pony AI generated just $14 million in revenue last quarter and a measly $2.3 million in gross profit. On this revenue, it had a $56 million operating loss due to the heavy spending it is implementing on research and development costs. Building self-driving technology is not cheap. The company does have over $500 million in cash on the balance sheet, but that money will run out quickly at its current burn rate.
Should you buy Pony AI stock?
Betting on Pony AI at a market cap of $4.67 billion does not seem wise. It is barely generating any sales and is working in a wildly difficult market in self-driving technology. Plus, it operates in China, an opaque market for Western investors. This adds up to a ton of risks for the stock. Even if the company keeps scaling with partnerships, it may be years before its revenue and earnings align with what a $4.67 billion market cap demands.
For investors interested in self-driving, look at Waymo, a subsidiary of Alphabet. The service is now doing over 250,000 paid weekly trips, which dwarfs anything Pony AI has been able to achieve. This is not to say that Pony AI's technology does not work -- and it does serve different markets -- just that you are betting on a start-up in a field crowded with huge technology competitors. This feels like a risk not worth taking vs. the stock's current valuation figures, meaning investors should stay away from buying Pony AI stock right now.
Should you invest $1,000 in Pony Ai right now?
Before you buy stock in Pony Ai, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Pony Ai wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $656,825!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $865,550!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is994% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to172%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025
Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Brett Schafer has positions in Alphabet. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Tencent, and Uber Technologies. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
29 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Canada has an opportunity to reset our relationship with China – and, in a rare twist, on our terms
L. Philippe Rheault is a lawyer and former Canadian diplomat, and the director of the University of Alberta's China Institute, Canada's largest research and policy institute dedicated to China issues. Canada finds itself in a particularly vulnerable position on the world stage. It is more reliant than most countries on international trade for its prosperity – and a large share of that trade, not to mention its security arrangements, is tied to an increasingly unreliable United States, led by a President who seems intent on upending the postwar international order. But it is not the only country reeling from the recent episodes of trade-policy vaudeville emanating from Washington. China is another. Despite putting on a brave face and having made herculean efforts in recent years to reduce commercial reliance on the U.S., China remains severely buffeted by U.S. trade actions. This comes as China's economy already faces lingering headwinds: weak consumer demand, a property slump, overreliance on investment and exports, and the difficulty of pursuing deeper structural reforms. Given all of these challenges, U.S. uncertainty and higher tariffs on manufacturing and exports represent an added strain that Beijing would rather avoid. Its three-month relative tariff truce with Washington belies the continued underlying tensions and protracted challenges China anticipates in its relationship with America going forward. Predictably, China has responded to U.S. actions by seeking to deepen trade ties elsewhere. Already the world's largest trading nation – and the largest trading partner for most countries, including much of Latin America – it has many places to turn to as it works to continue diversifying its trade portfolio. But China's courting of other countries is not only defensive. Beijing also sees opportunity in Washington's current 'everywhere-all-at-once' approach to trade and foreign policy. Whatever one may think of Donald Trump's methods, one thing that does appear certain is that he is serving as a historical accelerant: compelling almost every country, often reluctantly, to reassess its relationship with America and urgently consider new arrangements as a hedge against continued U.S. unpredictability. Aware of this trend, China's diplomats have adopted – somewhat awkwardly but nonetheless emphatically – a more mellifluous tone, working to pull erstwhile U.S. allies and partners further from Washington's orbit. The tone and approach vary by country and circumstance, but recent pronouncements by China's ambassador to Canada, Wang Di, leave little doubt that he too has received similar instructions. Therein lies the opportunity for Canada. We are currently witnessing a moment in time in which China is more willing to engage with Canada than Canada is with it – a divergence from the normal pattern of recent decades. With much scar tissue left to heal from the saga involving Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou and the detention of Canadians Michael Kovrig and Michael Spavor, as well as concerns about foreign interference and persistent bilateral irritants such as trade restrictions on canola, Canadians and their government are now viewing China with a more exacting vigilance. For many Canadians, taking a second look at China would likely not be a particularly enticing priority in the absence of recent provocation from Washington. The Decibel podcast: How Canadian businesses are getting caught up in U.S. tariffs on China But that is precisely why China's overtures should be seized upon by Canada as an opportunity to examine gradual re-engagement, on terms that reflect Canadian interests, objectives and potential vulnerabilities. Laying out a comprehensive approach grounded in such principles will require serious and previously neglected domestic homework on the part of the new Carney government – clearly articulating proposed areas of engagement that enhance Canadian prosperity, increase diplomatic leverage by aligning exports to areas of critical Chinese need, and help build Canadian resilience and optionality vis-à-vis the U.S. This would signal a clear departure from the 'engagement for engagement's sake' posture of yesteryear, and could form the guiding axiom of Canadian policy toward China going forward. In line with this thinking, two areas that emerge as clear priority sectors for immediate attention already stand out: energy and agri-food. As a country with critical demand, security and diversification concerns of its own, China will be receptive to proposals for deepened relationships in these areas. Just one year into the expanded Trans Mountain pipeline's operations – and in defiance of many expert predictions – data show China emerging as an avid customer for Canadian energy that reaches Pacific tidewater, willing to pay a significant premium over what the same energy currently fetches in the United States. Similarly, Beijing's strong interest in the soon-to-launch LNG Canada project in Kitimat, B.C., further underscores its desire to diversify and bolster Chinese energy security. The strategic value of this development should not be underestimated: expanded Canadian energy exports could significantly enhance Canada's leverage in the bilateral relationship, potentially allowing us to avoid – or more effectively resolve – future disputes. As a major added benefit, increased diplomatic relevance through energy trade would extend beyond China to Canada's broader network of relationships across the Indo-Pacific. This increased influence should be a central consideration as Canada revisits both the economic and strategic rationale for developing new pipeline and export infrastructure. As the U.S. trade war escalates, LNG Canada is poised to start exports to Asia When it comes to agri-food, despite Beijing's tendency in recent years to target canola or seafood in retaliatory trade actions – or, perhaps more aptly, because of this tendency – Canada should move to seek structured engagement. This could take the form of sectoral trade talks that aim to provide a more predictable framework for agricultural trade. By no means would this make Canada bulletproof against all risk of future coercion or retaliation, but successful negotiations would nevertheless provide an important extra layer of predictability and security to one of Canada's largest and most profitable exports. Given the critical importance of food security to China, we may be surprised how receptive Beijing could be to a potential framework deal with Canada – one that would help diversify its supply base and foster a more predictable relationship with a reliable partner. Myriad other areas will also merit careful attention, such as establishing a clearer investment regime around foreign direct investment, to name only one issue. Clearer guidance would help ensure that sensitive sectors remain off-limits, but that capital aligned with Canada's needs is not deterred by regulatory ambiguity. Likewise, emerging opportunities in critical minerals, green technology and Canadian services exports – where Canadian capabilities and Chinese demand or interests potentially intersect – should not be overlooked. To be clear, this is not a panda-hugging exercise. None of the above precludes working with like-minded partners to strengthen the rules-based international order or, to the extent possible, existing multilateral institutions. Nor does it obviate the need to remain vigilant and push back against egregious Chinese conduct. But the point bears emphasizing: Canada's increased relevance as an important supplier of things China critically needs will enhance its diplomatic standing and traction not just with Beijing, but across diplomatic channels more broadly – providing a welcome fillip to the government's continuing Indo-Pacific strategy. As it moves ahead with this approach, Ottawa will also need to remain acutely aware of how its actions are perceived in Washington. Despite Mr. Trump's continued truculence, the United States remains our primary security partner and top export market – a destination for 20 times more exports than No. 2 customer China – and so almost every major Canadian foreign policy move in these volatile times must include a U.S. calculus. But while Mr. Trump has included several China hawks in his administration, he appears to be more transactional than ideological; his reprieve on Chinese tariffs, among other actions, suggest that he may not be aiming for a full decoupling from China. Canada, therefore, must also prepare for the possibility of a sudden U.S.-China deal that would pay little heed to Canadian interests – leaving Canada adrift between the Scylla of American unpredictability and the Charybdis of Chinese detachment, with few safe harbours in sight. This is not the first time Canada has looked to China to diversify from U.S. overdependence. As recently as 2017, the Trudeau government explored free trade talks with China as a potential hedge during Mr. Trump's first term. The difference eight years later is that Beijing is eager, while Canada now has an opportunity to consider re-engagement on its own, principled terms, focused on Canada's prosperity, resilience, optionality and enhanced diplomatic relevance. Canada faces generational geopolitical challenges, and diplomacy alone will not be a panacea. But a new approach may have the potential to transform some challenges into opportunities, leaving Canada on firmer ground as it responds to continued global change.
Globe and Mail
32 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Oil prices headed for rebound this week as Trump and Xi resume trade talks
Oil prices slipped on Friday but were on track for their first weekly gain in three weeks after U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping resumed trade talks, raising hopes for growth and stronger demand in the world's two largest economies. Brent crude futures fell 28 cents, or 0.4 per cent, to $65.06 a barrel at 5:14 a.m. ET. U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude lost 36 cents, or 0.6 per cent, to $63.01. On a weekly basis, both benchmarks were on track to settle higher after falling for two straight weeks. Brent has advanced 1.8 per cent this week, while WTI is trading 3.7 per cent higher. China's official Xinhua news agency said trade talks between Xi and Trump took place at Washington's request. Trump said the call had led to a 'very positive conclusion,' adding the U.S. was 'in very good shape with China and the trade deal.' Analysis: In Trump-Xi dealings, China seems to have the upper hand Canada also continued trade talks with the U.S., with Prime Minister Mark Carney in direct contact with Trump, according to Industry Minister Mélanie Joly. The oil market continued to swing with news on tariff negotiations and data showing how trade uncertainty and the impact of the U.S. levies are flowing through into the global economy. 'The potential for increased US sanctions in Venezuela to limit crude exports and the potential for Israeli strike on Iranian infrastructure add to upside risks for prices,' analysts at BMI, a Fitch affiliate, said in a note on Friday. 'But both weaker demand for oil and increased production from both OPEC+ and non-OPEC producers will add to downside price pressures in the coming quarters.' Top exporter Saudi Arabia cut its July crude prices for Asia to near two-month lows. That was a smaller price reduction than expected after OPEC+ agreed to ramp up output by 411,000 barrels a day in July. The kingdom had been pushing for a bigger output hike, part of a broader strategy to win back market share and discipline overproducers in OPEC+, which groups the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and allies including Russia. 'The market looks balanced in 2Q/3Q on our estimates as oil demand rises in summer and peaks in July-August, matching supply increases from OPEC+,' HSBC said in a note. 'Thereafter, accelerated OPEC+ hikes should tip the market into a bigger 4Q25 surplus than previously forecasted,' the bank added.
CTV News
32 minutes ago
- CTV News
Lululemon shares tumble as yogawear firm warns tariffs will crimp profit
Lululemon Athletica's LULU.O shares fell 20 per cent in premarket trading on Friday, as the maker of high-end leggings warned that tariff-related costs and uneven demand in key markets of North America and China will dent its profits this year. The Canadian firm, whose popular Align yoga pants sell for up to $128 apiece on its website, will take modest price hikes for a 'small portion of the assortment' and ramp up discounts for the rest of the year, company executives said. Lululemon has struggled to retain shoppers, despite its efforts to introduce fresh styles of sports bras and athletic jackets, as it faces intense competition from trendier and more affordable brands in North America and mainland China. 'Despite (Americas) decline, management continues to prioritize product newness and China expansion over addressing a pullback from core customers and evident traffic declines,' Jefferies analyst Randal Konik said in a note. 'We believe this misalignment is concerning.' Lululemon joins sportswear rivals Nike NKE.N and On ONON.N in raising prices in the U.S. as erratic trade tactics under President Donald Trump rattle global markets and fuel fears of a recession. Lululemon trimmed its 2025 earnings forecast and said it expects margins to come under pressure from the proposed tariffs, which will impact products from some of its largest sourcing hubs in Vietnam, Cambodia and Sri Lanka. 'My sense is that in the U.S., consumers remain cautious right now, and they are being very intentional about their buying decisions,' CEO Calvin McDonald said on a post-earnings call. The company's stock, which is down about 14 per cent this year, was trading at $263.50 before the bell on Friday. The news dragged Nike's shares down 1.3 per cent. At least 12 brokerages cut their price targets on the stock, with slashing it the most, to $303 from $389. Lululemon's forward price-to-earnings multiple, a common benchmark for valuing stocks, is 21.46, compared to that of 31.37 for Nike and 9.54 for Gap GAP.N. (Reporting by Savyata Mishra in Bengaluru; Editing by Shreya Biswas)
