Advocacy group wants inquiry into initial refusal to search Manitoba landfill for victims of serial killer
A Manitoba non-profit organization dedicated to supporting Indigenous people is pushing for an independent inquiry into the refusal to search a landfill for the human remains of missing and murdered Indigenous women, girls and two-spirit people.
The call for action is coming after Winnipeg police identified Ashlee Shingoose as Mashkode Bizhiki'ikwe, or Buffalo Woman, the first and previously unidentified victim of a Winnipeg serial killer responsible for the murder of three other First Nation women.
Shingoose, from St. Theresa Point Anisininew Nation, had been last seen in downtown Winnipeg in 2022 before she was killed by Jeremy Skibicki. Police believe her remains were taken to Brady Road landfill and the province has promised to search for them.
Manitoba Moon Voices Inc. said in a statement that Shingoose's case underscores the reality of Indigenous women, who are left vulnerable and unsupported by systemic failures.
Cheryl Alexander, co-chair of the non-profit, said the victims' families have had to rely on community support and partnership work with agencies to search a landfill for their loved ones, when that should have been the job of law enforcement agencies and governments from the beginning.
"We could learn to do better," she said.
She said there needs to be more transparency on the Winnipeg Police Service and the former Manitoba PC government's decision not to search the Prairie Green landfill for the remains of Morgan Harris and Marcedes Myran, two of Skibicki's other victims.
"It was a long process … it felt like [it] was being dragged out and I don't think that would have happened if it hadn't been in a non-Indigenous circumstance," Alexander said.
The non-profit is hoping an inquiry would produce a report with recommendations that can trigger policy changes designed to prevent the refusal of a human remains search at a landfill from happening ever again.
Alexander said the refusal to search the landfill was a "historic marker," similar to other painful mistakes in the past that might be repeated if no changes are made.
"At the end of the day these are our relatives and no [one] should be left in that state anywhere," she said.
"It shouldn't be about money. It should be about doing the right thing … a humanitarian effort."
Manitoba Moon Voices is also pushing for a mandatory Indigenous oversight on police missing person investigations related to Indigenous communities, and sustained funding for the search for missing and murdered Indigenous women, girls and two-spirit people.
'It is not to attack anyone'
The Assembly of First Nations has also pushed for a public inquiry into how the Winnipeg Police Service handled the investigation into the deaths of Harris, Myran, Shingoose and Rebecca Contois — Skibicki's fourth victim — including the recovery efforts.
"This must be a turning point for justice," National Chief Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak said in a statement Wednesday, calling also to federal party leaders for support in helping Manitoba to establish the inquiry.
CBC News reached out to the provincial government and Winnipeg Police Service regarding any plans for an inquiry, but they didn't reply in time for publication.
Tanya Dawn McDougall, a mental health advocate who has been offering support to Shingoose's family throughout their search, is also standing behind an inquiry with hopes spreading the truth, no matter how hard it can, could lead to changes.
"It's not to attack anyone," McDougall said "Mistakes were made, and they need to be learned from and in order to learn from you have to expose what those mistakes were."
"We need to make sure that this doesn't happen again."
McDougall said communities are not giving up in their pursuit of justice, even though other probes, such as 1991's Aboriginal Justice Inquiry mandated to investigate the depths of racism in Manitoba's justice system, have produced recommendations that are yet to be brought into action.
"Everything that's done today affects future generations," she said. "Everybody has a right to feel safe. Everybody has a right to feel valued, and that's the effort we have to put forth together as a society."
Sandra DeLaronde, chair of Giganawenimaanaanig Manitoba's MMIWG2S+ implementation committee, told CBC News inquiries and reports over the past 40 years have raised the same questions and concerns on systemic failures but fell short of bringing change forward.
"An inquiry isn't going to achieve the results that people are looking for, because history has shown us," DeLaronde said.
But other measures involving judicial bodies, including human rights tribunals or civil court, could be better at enforcing change, given the actions coming out of those systems are required to be implemented, she said.
DeLaronde isn't confident a new set of recommendations brought forward by an inquiry can prevent a landfill search from being refused in the future.
To have that standard, the responsibility of searching has to be amended into legislation or written within the contract of law enforcement agencies.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Global News
25 minutes ago
- Global News
Public divided on Bill 5 but say Indigenous rights are more important than speed: poll
Public sentiment is divided on the Ford government's controversial new mining law, according to fresh polling, which indicates people are in favour of speeding up projects but not at the expense of First Nation rights or labour laws. New polling from Liason Strategies for the National Ethnic Press and Media Council of Canada gauged the mood of Ontarians as the government passed Bill 5 into law. The legislation makes a number of changes, among them is the power for the government to create so-called special economic zones, where municipal, environmental or labour laws could be bypassed. The government has indicated the Ring of Fire will be one such area, potentially along with Highway 401 and Ontario's fleet of nuclear power stations. The law's passage at Queen's Park last week sparked a storm of protests and backlash from First Nations leaders, who fear it will infringe on their rights and labour unions, who worry about workers' rights. Story continues below advertisement First Nations groups, in particular, have promised a summer of disruption in response to the legislation — potentially blocking railways, highways and mines in the north. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Liaison's polling shows public opinion on the legislation itself is evenly split. About half of those polled (49 per cent) said they were following the legislation somewhat or very closely as it passed through the legislature. Opinion of its value was also split. Forty-four per cent of those polled said they were in favour of it, while 41 per cent said they were opposed. Fifteen per cent of people said they were unsure. 'Given the poll's margin of error, this is a pretty close result,' David Valentin, principal at Liason Strategies, said in an interview on Focus Ontario. 'It's not probably where the premier wants to see it, which is somewhere closer to 60 or 65 per cent, but it's also not where the opposition would like to see it, with overwhelming opposition. So, we've got a sort of mixed result.' The poll also asked people to rank various issues against the importance of fast-tracking key construction projects. Sixty-three per cent of respondents said fast-tracking was more important than municipal bylaws, and 58 per cent favoured speeding up projects over following environmental regulations. Story continues below advertisement On the other hand, 64 per cent of people said respecting Indigenous rights was more important than speeding up projects, and 56 per cent of those polled said it was more important to follow labour laws than to speed up projects. The polling points to public opinion sitting behind two groups who have been most vocal in their opposition to Bill 5. 'It shows you that when it comes to Indigenous leaders and labour leaders, they've gotten their message out, their message has resonated, and Ontarians agree with them: Yeah, you can speed up the process, but you're not going to suspend labour laws,' Valentin said. Last week, Bill 5 received Royal Assent and became law, with Ontario Premier Doug Ford saying he wants to designate the Ring of Fire as a special economic zone 'as quickly as possible.' At the same time, the government is promising to consult with First Nations leaders before any major changes are made using the new powers. Valentin said the lack of examples for what a special economic zone will be was potentially making it harder for people to form a strong opinion in favour or against the legislation. 'What does it actually mean? Which regulations, which laws are going to be suspended? Which groups are ultimately going to be impacted?' he said. 'They've written the law so they can do a lot of things — OK, what are the specifics of that going to be? I think that might be why people perhaps have a hard time understanding what the ultimate effects of the bill are.'


Toronto Sun
3 hours ago
- Toronto Sun
Two First Nations working on roads to Ring of Fire don't support new mining law
Bill 5 seeks to speed up development, particularly mining projects Published Jun 09, 2025 • 1 minute read Two First Nations in and around the Ring of Fire that signed deals with the provincial government are speaking out against a new Ontario law. Aroland First Nation Chief Sonny Gagnon says his community objects to the law known as Bill 5, which seeks to speed up development, particularly mining projects. The legislation passed last week allows Ontario to suspend provincial and municipal laws by creating so-called special economic zones for certain projects it chooses. Ontario intends to name the mineral-rich Ring of Fire as the first such zone, but the law has created a firestorm of anger among many First Nations. Aroland signed a shared-prosperity agreement with the province in January for major upgrades to roads that lead to the Ring of Fire, but Gagnon says they have never given consent to mine the region. Marten Falls First Nation also has an agreement with the province as it leads the development of another proposed road to the area, and its chief says he cannot support the law as it is written _ though he hopes Ontario can correct course with consultation. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Canada Sunshine Girls World Golf Editorial Cartoons


Winnipeg Free Press
3 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Two First Nations working on roads to Ring of Fire do not support new mining law
TORONTO – Two First Nations in and around the Ring of Fire that signed deals with the provincial government are speaking out against a new Ontario law. Aroland First Nation Chief Sonny Gagnon says his community objects to the law known as Bill 5, which seeks to speed up development, particularly mining projects. The legislation passed last week allows Ontario to suspend provincial and municipal laws by creating so-called special economic zones for certain projects it chooses. Ontario intends to name the mineral-rich Ring of Fire as the first such zone, but the law has created a firestorm of anger among many First Nations. Aroland signed a shared-prosperity agreement with the province in January for major upgrades to roads that lead to the Ring of Fire, but Gagnon says they have never given consent to mine the region. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. Marten Falls First Nation also has an agreement with the province as it leads the development of another proposed road to the area, and its chief says he cannot support the law as it is written — though he hopes Ontario can correct course with consultation. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 9, 2025.