
'Pro-American' husband and wife become farmers, reveal how their product aligns with healthy living goals
Dana and Lauren Cavalea were living in Florida in 2020 when they were visiting family on Long Island, New York, and decided to buy a farm on a whim.
The husband and wife told Fox News Digital that the venture was their "little COVID experiment." (See the video at the top of this article.)
"The property was somewhat majestic. It was 180 acres, never seen a parcel of land that big. The current owners took us for a beautiful tour and basically sold us on the property," said Dana Cavalea.
Flash forward to the present day — and the Cavaleas are now running Freedom Farms in Greene, in upstate New York. They've been doing so for five years.
The farm produces MRNA vaccine-free, grass-fed, grass-finished prime beef with no added hormones.
"We're pro-American. We're very patriotic. We want to bring farm-raised meats to Americans nationwide," said Dana Cavalea.
He added that amid today's Make America Healthy Again movement, they have seen an influx of new customers.
"A lot of people are concerned about that today, and they want to get back to the land and get back to finding out where their food comes from," said Dana Cavalea.
The couple said that ever since they've been producing their own meat, they can see the difference in quality.
"The color was different. The flavor was different. The taste profile was different. And then we said, 'Well, what have we been eating all of these years?'" said husband Dana Cavalea.
He also told Fox News Digital, "If we start eating off the land and we start raising our own food, how good can we feel? And the answer is, you can feel pretty good."
Freedom Farms has chickens, pigs and 180 heads of cattle, and also partners with like-minded farmers who are also "pro-America," said wife Lauren Cavalea.
The Cavaleas share that they are optimistic about the conversations HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and USDA Secretary Brooke L. Rollins have been having.
"I think less regulation is always a good thing," said Dana Cavalea.
"When we first started, we were told that the waiting list was over a year to get into a USDA slaughterhouse — and that became an issue," he said.
They went to find custom butchers, but since they were not under USDA guidelines, they could only sell in the state of New York.
"We were sort of forced into the USDA model," he said.
"I think lifting some of the regulations and allowing farmers to farm in a more natural way would be a great thing."
Various fast-food chains and restaurants have begun swapping out seed oils for beef tallow, heeding the call of MAHA advocates to ditch seed oils from cooking and from diets.
"If we start eating off the land and we start raising our own food, how good can we feel? The answer is, you can feel pretty good."
"I see a lot of attention to seed oils today. If you really just look at them, think about them, study them, they can't be good for you," said Dana Cavalea.
"When you look at the raw material of tallow, which is suet, which comes from the fat that surrounds the cow's kidney, it's literally a white block of fat that you could render down and turn into a very clean oil," he said.
Lauren Cavalea said the farm just "can't keep it in stock."
"People are wanting to go back to using lard and tallow in order to have the mental security [to know what] they're cooking with," said Lauren Cavalea, "with very clean and natural byproducts."
She said she and her husband have not had the opportunity yet themselves to try cooking with tallow, as it sells out.
"It's like the barber that needs a haircut all the time," she joked.
Toward the end of each year, the farm hosts "Freedom Fest," where it welcomes members of the community to gather for a day of free activities.
This year's gathering is taking place on Sept. 14. It will feature a pig roast, BBQ, live music, rides and games.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Miami Herald
38 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
SNAP user's testimony causes backlash, cruel feedback
After President Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act passed the House, it introduced new fears for millions of Americans who rely on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) to survive. The bill proposed an estimated $300 billion in cuts to SNAP over the next decade. If that portion of the bill passes the Senate as it is currently written, it would leave 12.6% of Americans potentially unable to afford shelter and food. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter The way it currently works is that states would begin to pay at least 5% of food benefit costs, and up to 25% if they have higher error rates, forcing states to choose between raising taxes, cutting other programs, or limiting SNAP access, per the Food Research & Access Center. Related: Scott Galloway sends bold statement on Social Security, US economy Republican senators pushed back hard on the cuts, leading to June 10 reports that the SNAP changes were being scaled down. The reworked plan cuts the state penalty for error from 25% to 15%, but Senate Agriculture Committee Chair John Boozman (R-Ark.) told Politico that they are "still negotiating." Sen. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota took to social media on June 11 to share a video she surely thought would be of help to advocate for keeping SNAP intact. But her efforts have backfired. The video Klobuchar shared is of a SNAP recipient named Felecia talking about her experience as a mother of four living on SNAP benefits. Klobuchar said, "Today, we heard from Felecia, a single mom of four who works up to three jobs at a time to make ends meet. She counts on SNAP to help put food on the table. This is who Republicans in Congress are trying to take food away from. Listen to her story." In the video, Felecia says, "I would like to tell you my story on how SNAP benefit has helped me," becoming visibly emotional. "When I had my oldest daughter 21 years ago, I was working three jobs," Felecia said. "One job alone, I had to pay childcare. Another one to pay food, which wasn't enough. And one to pay the bills, and I still struggled alive." Related: Social Security income tax deduction hits major roadblock Felecia went on to say that she now has a full-time job as a bus monitor, but she only gets paid once a month, which is why she still needs SNAP. "By the time I get my bills paid, I have nothing left to pay for food and other basic needs. If it wasn't for SNAP benefits, I wouldn't be able to feed my children," she said. The comments on the video exploded, causing it to rake in 75,000 views and make the terms "SNAP" and "Felecia" go viral on X. But instead of garnering empathy, it achieved the opposite effect. People in the thread savagely attacked the mother of four, mostly with comments about her weight. "I'm not saying take her SNAP benefits, but what I'm saying is she doesn't need as much as she's getting," X user currermell said. "Either she's eating it all and her kids are already going hungry, or the handouts meant to sustain her life are having the opposite effect." Related: Walmart issues urgent message about the alarming cost of food "Do you know how many calories it takes to look like her? She's doing fine," X user Rafester said. Some opted to attack Felecia's relationship choices instead of her weight, saying, "Why does she have 4 children and no husband? Life choices matter. Sorry but 4 unplanned pregnancies and no partner present is absolute nonsense," X user fictitiousfruit said. A few rare voices in the thread abstained from insults. "Not a single person wants SNAP taken away from Felecia. Every single person wants SNAP revoked for people who aren't trying or aren't contributing to the country they take advantage of," user Zac DiSalvo said. The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Americans weigh in on Trump's deployment of troops to quell Los Angeles unrest
A new national poll indicates that Americans are divided over President Donald Trump's deployment of the National Guard and U.S. Marines to the nation's second most populous city. Aiming to extinguish escalating protests in Los Angeles sparked by immigration raids carried out by ICE at his administration's direction, Trump sent in National Guard troops and even mobilized Marines. The unrest and the moves by the president have dominated national headlines for a week. Forty-one percent of adults nationwide questioned in a Washington Post/George Mason University Schar School poll said they support the president's move, with 44% opposed and 15% unsure. The survey was conducted on Tuesday and questioned over 1,000 adults nationwide, including roughly 200 in blue-state California. First On Fox: Immigrant Voters Abandon Democrats On Immigration Issue Support for the president's actions among the California respondents stood at 32%, with 58% opposed. Read On The Fox News App The poll also highlighted an expected massive partisan divide. Click Here For The Latest Fox News Polling Eight-six percent of Republicans surveyed supported the president's deployment of the National Guard and Marines to the streets of LA, with more than three-quarters of Democrats giving a thumbs down on Trump's move. A third of independents approved of the sending of the troops, with nearly half opposed and nearly one in five unsure. Trump took control of California's National Guard without the permission of Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, the first time in 60 years that a president has federalized National Guard troops without a governor's request. Newsom, leading the resistance to Trump's moves, took legal action to try and reverse the order. Trump Deployment Of Troops To Quell La Rioters Latest Page In President's Political Playbook A federal district court judge this week ruled that Trump's moves were illegal and ordered him to return control of the National Guard troops to Newsom. But a federal appeals court quickly temporarily blocked the lower court judge's ruling. The survey also indicates Americans are divided over whether they support (39%) or oppose (40%) the protests. Just over one in five (21%) were unsure of their support or opposition. Seventy percent of Democrats — but just 39% of independents and only 6% of Republicans — support the aims of the protesters. According to the poll, Americans are also divided over whether the protests have been mostly peaceful (35%) or mostly violent (37%).Original article source: Americans weigh in on Trump's deployment of troops to quell Los Angeles unrest


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Trump clears path for Nippon Steel investment in US Steel that gives feds a ‘golden share'
President Donald Trump on Friday signed an executive order paving the way for a Nippon Steel investment in U.S. Steel, so long as the Japanese company complies with a 'national security agreement' submitted by the federal government. Trump's order didn't detail the terms of the national security agreement. But U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel said in a joint statement that the agreement stipulates that approximately $11 billion in new investments will be made by 2028 and includes giving the U.S. government a 'golden share' — essentially veto power to ensure the country's national security interests are protected. 'We thank President Trump and his Administration for their bold leadership and strong support for our historic partnership,' the two companies said. 'This partnership will bring a massive investment that will support our communities and families for generations to come. We look forward to putting our commitments into action to make American steelmaking and manufacturing great again.' President Donald Trump signed an executive order to pave the way for a Nippon Steel investment in U.S. Steel. AP The companies have completed a U.S. Department of Justice review and received all necessary regulatory approvals, the statement said. 'The partnership is expected to be finalized promptly,' the statement said. The companies offered few details on how the golden share would work and what investments would be made. Trump said Thursday that he would as president have 'total control' of what U.S. Steel did as part of the investment. Trump said then that the deal would preserve '51% ownership by Americans.' The Japan-based steelmaker had been offering nearly $15 billion to purchase the Pittsburgh-based U.S. Steel in a merger that had been delayed on national security concerns starting during Joe Biden's presidency. Trump opposed the purchase while campaigning for the White House, yet he expressed optimism in working out an arrangement once in office. 'We have a golden share, which I control,' said Trump, although it was unclear what he meant by suggesting that the federal government would determine what U.S. Steel does as a company. Trump added that he was 'a little concerned' about what presidents other than him would do with their golden share, 'but that gives you total control.' Still, Nippon Steel has never said it was backing off its bid to buy and control U.S. Steel as a wholly owned subsidiary. The proposed merger had been under review by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, or CFIUS, during the Trump and Biden administrations. The order signed Friday by Trump said the CFIUS review provided 'credible evidence' that Nippon Steel 'might take action that threatens to impair the national security of the United States,' but such risks might be 'adequately mitigated' by approving the proposed national security agreement. The agreement states that nearly $11 billion will be invested by 2028, which will also give the federal government the authority to ensure the country's national security interests are protected. AP The order doesn't detail the perceived national security risk and only provides a timeline for the national security agreement. The White House declined to provide details on the terms of the agreement. The order said the draft agreement was submitted to U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel on Friday. The two companies must successfully execute the agreement as decided by the Treasury Department and other federal agencies that are part CFIUS by the closing date of the transaction. Trump reserves the authority to issue further actions regarding the investment as part of the order he signed on Friday.