Lula vows retaliatory tariffs if Trump imposes 50% levies on Brazil
Lula said he will trigger Brazil's reciprocity law approved by Congress earlier this year if negotiations with Washington fail.
'If there's no negotiation, the reciprocity law will be put to work. If he charges 50 (% tariffs) from us, we will charge 50 from them,' Lula told TV Record in excerpts of an interview that will be fully aired later in the day. 'Respect is good. I like to offer mine and I like to receive it.'
Lula's comments increase the risk of a tariff war erupting between the two countries, similar to the one that has occurred between the US and China. Trump has vowed to respond forcefully if countries seek to retaliate against the US by imposing tariffs of their own.
The president of Brazil's Senate, Davi Alcolumbre, and Chamber of Deputies Speaker Hugo Motta, a pair of moderates who have recently been at odds with Lula, agreed that the reciprocating law gives Brazil 'the means ... to protect our sovereignty.'
'We will be ready to act with balance and firmness in defense of our economy, our productive sector, and the protection of Brazilian jobs,' they said in a joint statement.
Meanwhile, thousands of Brazilians gathered for a demonstration on Thursday in São Paulo against Trump's tariffs and in favour of taxing the super-rich.
Unions and social groups in São Paulo organised the protest as a call for taxing billionaires and confronting what they call 'an anti-people Congress."
Following Trump's announcements, the movement incorporated critics of tariffs and their significant impact on Brazil's economy.
Many demonstrators wore green and yellow, as well as Brazil's national football team jerseys, carrying placards and signs that reaffirmed Brazil's sovereignty amid Trump's tariff threat.
Some demonstrators also criticised the governor of São Paulo, Tarcísio de Freitas, an avid Trump supporter.
A new front in the trade war
With his tariff letter to Brazil, which he shared on social media on Wednesday, denouncing Bolsonaro's "witch hunt" trial, Trump launched a new front in his trade conflicts, using import levies as a direct means of meddling in another country's internal affairs.
The US president has already tried to use tariffs as what he said was a way to combat fentanyl trafficking and as a negotiating tool to change how other nations tax digital services and regulate their economies.
Bolsonaro, an ally of Trump, is facing criminal charges, and the US president is seeking to control the outcome of his trial.
Bolsonaro maintains that he is being politically persecuted by Brazil's Supreme Court over his charges on the alleged plot to remain in power after his 2022 election loss to Lula.
On Thursday, Lula ordered his diplomats to return Trump's letter if it physically arrives at the presidential palace in Brasilia.
In the letter, Trump threatened to impose a 50% tariff on Brazil beginning on 1 August.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
34 minutes ago
- Euronews
US and China to talk in Stockholm as trade truce expiration nears
When top US and Chinese officials meet in Stockholm on Monday, it's likely that they will agree to leave tariffs at the current levels, if they don't secure a more favourable framework. Analysts say the two sides are working to secure a more lasting trade deal ahead of a meeting between their presidents later this year. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng are holding talks on Monday for the third time this year. This round of discussions is taking place in the Swedish capital, nearly four months after President Donald Trump upset global trade with his sweeping tariff proposal, including an import tax that shot up to 145% on Chinese goods. 'We have the confines of a deal with China,' Trump said on Friday. Bessent told MSNBC on Wednesday that the two countries had reached a 'status quo' after talks in Geneva and London, with the US taxing imported goods from China at 30% and China responding with a 10% tariff, on top of tariffs prior to the start of Trump's second term in office. 'Now we can move on to discussing other matters in terms of bringing the economic relationship into balance,' Bessent said. He was referring to the US running a $295.5 billion (€253.1bn) trade deficit last year. Washington is seeking an agreement that would enable it to export more to China and shift the Chinese economy more toward domestic consumer spending. The Chinese embassy in Washington said Beijing hopes 'there will be more consensus and cooperation and less misperception' coming out of the talks. With an eye on a possible leaders' summit, Stockholm could provide some answers as to the timeline and viability of that particular goal ahead of a possible meeting between Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping. 'The meeting will be important in starting to set the stage for a fall meeting between Trump and Xi,' said Wendy Cutler, a former US trade negotiator and now vice president at the Asia Society Policy Institute. 'Beijing will likely insist on detailed preparations before they agree to a leaders' meeting.' In Stockholm, the two sides are likely to focus on commercial announcements to be made at a leaders' summit as well as agreements to address 'major irritants', such as China's industrial overcapacity and its lack of control over chemicals used to make fentanyl, also to be announced when Xi and Trump should meet, Cutler said. Sean Stein, president of the US-China Business Council, said Stockholm could be the first real opportunity for the two governments to address structural reform issues including market access in China for US companies. What businesses will be seeking coming out of Stockholm would largely be 'the atmosphere' — how the two sides characterise the discussions. They will also look for clues about a possible leaders' summit, as any real deal will hinge on the two presidents meeting each other, he said. Fentanyl-related tariffs are likely a focus for China In Stockholm, Beijing will likely demand the removal of the 20% fentanyl-related tariff that Trump imposed earlier this year, said Sun Yun, director of the China program at the Washington-based Stimson Center. This round of the US-China trade dispute began with fentanyl, when Trump in February imposed a 10% tariff on Chinese goods, citing that China failed to curb the outflow of the chemicals used to make the drug. The following month, Trump added another 10% tax for the same reason. Beijing retaliated with extra duties on some US goods, including coal, liquefied natural gas, and farm products such as beef, chicken, pork and soy. In Geneva, both sides climbed down from three-digit tariffs rolled out following Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariffs in April, but the US kept the 20% 'fentanyl' tariffs, in addition to the 10% baseline rate — to which China responded by keeping the same 10% rate on US products. These across-the-board duties were unchanged when the two sides met in London a month later to negotiate over non-tariff measures such as export controls on critical products. The Chinese government has long protested that American politicians blame China for the fentanyl crisis in the US but argued the root problem lies with the US itself. Washington says Beijing is not doing enough to regulate precursor chemicals that flow out of China into the hands of drug dealers. In July, China placed two fentanyl ingredients under enhanced control, a move seen as in response to US pressure and signalling goodwill. Gabriel Wildau, managing director at the consultancy Teneo, said he doesn't expect any tariff to go away in Stockholm but that tariff relief could be part of a final trade deal. 'It's possible that Trump would cancel the 20% tariff that he has explicitly linked with fentanyl, but I would expect the final tariff level on China to be at least as high as the 15-20% rate contained in the recent deals with Japan, Indonesia, Vietnam,' Wildau said. US wants China to dump less, buy less oil from Russia and Iran China's industrial overcapacity is as much a headache for the United States as it is for the European Union. Even Beijing has acknowledged the problem but suggested it might be difficult to address. America's trade imbalance with China has decreased from a peak of $418bn (€358bn) in 2018, according to the Census Bureau. But China has found new markets for its goods; the world's dominant manufacturer ran a global trade surplus approaching $1 trillion last year — somewhat larger than the size of the US overall trade deficit in 2024. And China's emergence as a manufacturer of electric vehicles and other emerging technologies has suddenly made it more of a financial and geopolitical threat for those same industries based in the US, Europe, Japan and South Korea. 'Some enterprises, especially manufacturing enterprises, feel more deeply that China's manufacturing capabilities are too strong, and Chinese people are too hardworking. Factories run 24 hours a day,' Chinese Premier Li Qiang said on Thursday when hosting European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen in Beijing. 'Some people think this will cause some new problems in the balance of supply and demand in world production.' Li added: 'We see this problem too.' Bessent also said the Stockholm talks could address Chinese purchases of Russian and Iranian oil. However, Wildau of Teneo said China could demand some US security concessions in exchange, such as a reduced US military presence in East Asia and scaled-back diplomatic support for Taiwan and the Philippines. This would likely face political pushback in Washington. The Stockholm talks will be 'geared towards building a trade agreement based around Chinese purchase commitments and pledges of investment in the US in exchange for partial relief from U.S. tariffs and export controls,' Wildau said. He doubts there will be a grand deal. Instead, he predicts 'a more limited agreement based around fentanyl'. 'That,' he said, 'is probably the preferred outcome for China hawks in the Trump administration, who worry that an overeager Trump might offer too much to Xi.'
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
Trump and Starmer to discuss Ukraine and Gaza in Scotland
US President Donald Trump and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer are set to meet on Monday, one day after a new US-EU trade deal was announced. The two will meet at a golf property owned by the US president's family in southwestern Scotland. They will then travel to Aberdeen, where there is another Trump golf course and a third is set to open soon. Discussions between the two heads of state are expected to cover US tariffs, Russia's all-out war in Ukraine and the Israel-Hamas war in Gaza, among other topics. According to Starmer's office, they will address diplomatic steps necessary to bring Russian President Vladimir Putin to the negotiating table within the next 50 days. London is also reportedly hoping for deeper US involvement in Gaza ceasefire talks. Protesters have planned a demonstration near Trump's existing course after previously taking to the streets on Saturday to decry the American president's visit. The discussions follow a meeting between Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen at his Turnberry course on Sunday. The two announce a new trade framework – though many major details remain pending. The new trade agreement between the US and EU will see a blanket tariff of 15% on most EU goods imported to the US and is set to kick in on Friday. It means that the EU will avoid 30% tariffs previously threatened by Trump. At a previous G7 summit in Canada, Starmer and Trump signed a trade agreement lifting US tariffs on British aerospace exports and reducing duties on auto-related goods from 25% to 10% while increasing the amount of US beef it pledged to import. The US ran a $11.4 billion trade surplus with the UK last year, meaning it exported more than it imported. US Census Bureau figures this year indicate that the surplus could grow. Trump is set to return to the UK in September for an unprecedented second state visit. Trump will be hosted then by King Charles III and Queen Camilla at Windsor Castle.
LeMonde
2 hours ago
- LeMonde
EU-US trade deal: A bittersweet compromise for the EU
The palpable relief among European officials following the announcement of the trade agreement reached on Sunday, July 27, by Donald Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen spoke volumes about the ordeal the US president had imposed on the European Union (EU). Fearing a 30% tariff on goods exported to the United States starting August 1, Europe was satisfied to escape with a 15% rate. Finalized in Turnberry, Scotland, at one of the luxury golf resorts owned by the billionaire, the agreement at this stage remains silent on the specific list of exemptions that the Commission negotiated for the most sensitive sectors. Trump highlighted the EU's commitment to purchase $750 billion worth of energy and make an additional $600 billion in investments in the US. The outcome of the talks, with its ambiguities, leaves a bitter aftertaste. Given the size of its market (450 million consumers) and its status as the US's second-largest supplier of goods, Europe seemed at first to have stronger leverage than Japan in seeking a rate lower than 15%. The changing benchmarks set by negotiators illustrated their setbacks. At the end of June, the EU aimed for less than 10%. By mid-July, the bloc thought it was on the verge of securing 10%, the rate negotiated by the United Kingdom, the US's third-largest trading partner. The uneven compromise advocated by the Commission underscored how difficult it was for the 27 member states to assert themselves against a former ally who not only seeks to impose its own rules on the rest of the world, but is pursuing a political agenda to weaken the EU. Urged by France to take a tougher stance in the final stretch, with the adoption of a package of retaliatory measures worth €93 billion that would have taken effect on August 7 if trade talks failed, the president of the European Commission was, not without reason, focused on maintaining European unity in the face of the temptation for each country to go its own way. Deeply involved in transatlantic trade, Germany – and even more so Italy – were not ready for confrontation. The need to secure US support in Ukraine and America's contribution to European defense also weighed heavily in the decision. Presented as the lesser evil, the 15% tariff followed previous increases imposed by Trump on steel and aluminum (50%), as well as on automobiles and auto parts (25%). These measures are bound to affect the competitiveness of the companies involved and drive prices higher. In exchange, von der Leyen and the business world are clinging to the hope of stabilizing the economic environment. In reality, they have no such guarantee. Unpredictable and abrupt, Trump has broken with all the rules of international trade. Three days after the summit between China and the EU – which ended in a dialogue of the deaf and highlighted Brussels' inability to obtain even a minimal rebalancing of trade – the handshake between Trump and von der Leyen epitomized the current balance of power: In the emerging new world order taking shape, contrary to the values it defends, Europe is not breaking ranks, but its current purely defensive approach offers no protection against future power plays.
