I challenged Gemini Live vs ChatGPT in 5 voice challenges — there was one clear winner
AI assistants are constantly becoming smarter, faster and gaining new abilities. Now, they can see, speak, listen and even crack a few jokes with you when you need a smile.My favorite chatbots offering hands-free assistance are ChatGPT with Voice and Vision and Google's Gemini Live. I use them both regularly and interchangeably, but one thing I haven't done is test them against each other. So, I just had to know, which assistant is better to the point it actually feels the most human?
To find out, I put both tools through five unique voice-based tests designed to push their limits. These were not your average 'What's the weather?' prompts. I challenged them to recall context, analyze images, collaborate creatively and even roleplay with personality. One emerged as the clear winner, and in this article I'll show you why.
Prompt: 'My name is Amanda and I'm planning a trip to Boston with my family of five. What should we do first?" Later: "Remind me what I said my name was earlier?'Gemini Live quickly asked for more information to ensure it gave me the best information. It asked the ages of my kids and what types of activities we prefer as a family. It made some very general recommendations that I could have gotten anywhere, but still information. The chatbot remembered my name when I asked it to recall it.ChatGPT immediately made some general family-friendly recommendations (similar to what Gemini gave after asking me more about myself) and then asked me about my family's preferences. From there, it offered more unique and engaging activities that were both on and off the typical tourist path. The chatbot remembered my name when asked to recall it.Winner: ChatGPT wins for out-of-the-box recommendations that I hadn't thought of (and I'm from Boston). It was very helpful with both unique and interesting ideas for my active family of five.
Prompt: 'Explain the potential societal impacts of widespread AI companions.'Gemini Live acknowledged positive aspects but remained very general and lacked specific societal consequences. Although the chatbot did mention both sides, without elaborating, the response was somewhat empty and less structured.ChatGPT went beyond vague statements and provided concrete examples of both positive and negative impacts. The chatbot's conclusion emphasized the need for balance. Although ChatGPT responded clearly and thoroughly, the chatbot is very sensitive. At one point during the conversation I put the phone down and it stumbled, asking, 'What else can I help with?' When I asked the bot to keep going, it was confused so I had to re-ask the question, which felt less efficient.Winner: ChatGPT wins for a more thorough and balanced response to the question. While it stumbled with some technicalities, the answer to the prompt was superior. Gemini ended the conversation with "worth thinking about," which seemed less insightful.
Prompt: "Sell me a maple pecan latte like a Gen Z barista, adding in humor naturally."Gemini Live leaned into the Gen Z character with fun lines that felt both natural and effortless. It wasn't as verbose as ChatGPT, which made it feel more human and energetic.ChatGPT delivered a lengthy sales speech that made me cringe. It didn't get the Gen Z tone as well as Gemini and the whole response felt a little too polished and buttoned up.Winner: Gemini Live wins this one. This was where Gemini shined. Its energetic voice delivery and personality were spot-on as it leaned into the character with ease.
Prompt: 'Take a look at these old bananas and give me suggestions for what to do with them.'Gemini Live took one look at the bananas and immediately suggested banana bread. A good option, but an obvious one. When pressed for something different, it suggested smoothies. I told it I didn't have a lot of extra ingredients and it hallucinated saying, 'that's okay, how about a smoothie?' Once again, I told it I didn't have any other ingredients. Finally it suggested making banana ice cream.ChatGPT also suggested banana bread but in the form of 'banking' with other ideas mixed in. It went further to suggest smoothies. When I mentioned I didn't have any other ingredients, it suggested blending with ice and water for a 'refreshing drink.' Additionally, it suggested more pantry-friendly ingredients like honey, cinnamon and vanilla that I was more likely to have on hand (as apposed to Gemini suggesting various fruits, seaweed or kale).Winner: ChatGPT wins this round with a clear edge for true multimodal communication with creativity and visual intelligence.
Prompt: "Help me brainstorm a bedtime jingle for my kids and sing it if you can."
Gemini Live went line by line of the song for a more collaborative experience. It was asking me about instruments and themes as well as styles. While it was nice to be included, any parent trying to get their kid to sleep at bedtime just wants something fast. I would appreciate this collaborative effort if I needed the song in a different situation.ChatGPT created a sweet lullaby in minutes – and even sang it! The song was creative and well written even though the bot's voice was a little too robotic. I then asked it for different lyrics and for it to sing it in other styles and it got straight to work even rapping it like Kendrick Lamar (that is, if Lamar were a bot).Winner: tie. Both tools came up with catchy rhymes and fun ideas. ChatGPT took the lead in structure while Gemini felt a little looser, more like spit balling with a friend — which was charming, but less directed.
After putting both AI assistants through their paces, it's clear that ChatGPT currently offers the more advanced and well-rounded experience. From deeper reasoning and sharper memory to stronger visual analysis and quicker creative execution, ChatGPT consistently delivered results that felt more helpful and polished.That said, Gemini had standout moments, especially in personality-driven prompts where it came across as more spontaneous and fun. If you're looking for an assistant to make you smile and keep the vibe light, Gemini shines. But if you want the most capable hands-free AI companion that can think deeply, see clearly and even sing (or rap!) on command — ChatGPT is still the one to beat.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
OpenAI says this state will play central role in artificial intelligence development
New York is poised to play a central role in the development of artificial intelligence (AI), OpenAI executives told key business and civic leaders on Tuesday. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman spoke at a private event hosted by the Partnership for New York City and the AI firm revealed a report showing that New York is well-positioned to play a central role in AI development, unlike during other stages of the digital economy, a source familiar with the event told FOX Business. Altman spoke to the business and civic leaders in attendance and outlined how he sees AI progressing in the next three years as well as why he sees New York as well-positioned to play a leading role in AI development. According to a copy of the OpenAI report obtained by FOX Business, New York is the top market in the world for active users of the enterprise version of ChatGPT. It also ranks second among U.S. states in terms of developers building their products on OpenAI's infrastructure, while it trails only California and Texas in terms of weekly ChatGPT users. Openai Backs Off Push To Become For-profit Company "OpenAI belongs here," the company wrote in the report. OpenAI said it has more employees working out of its office building in New York City than in any other office aside from San Francisco, and that it has room to triple its size. Read On The Fox Business App "New York's world-class higher ed institutions and irresistible pull for graduates from around the world will help us deliver on our mission to build AI that benefits the most people possible," OpenAI wrote. OpenAI chief economist Ronnie Chatterji also spoke to the business and civic leaders in attendance about how AI can increase productivity and fuel economic growth, according to a source familiar with the event. Openai Shakes Up Corporate Structure With Goal Of Scaling Up Agi Investment The report noted that economists have projected a wide range of increased productivity from AI, ranging from 0.06% at the low-end to 18%. OpenAI explained that even at the low end, it would add billions of dollars to U.S. gross domestic product given a nearly $30 trillion GDP. It also said factors that will affect the advancement of AI include geography, organizations and values. OpenAI added that implementing commonsense rules to protect people from the harms of AI and based on democratic values like those the U.S. has represented on the world stage will help ensure the technology helps as many people as possible. OpenAI's report also addressed concerns some have raised about the impact of AI on the labor force, as the company wrote that new innovations often complement workers rather than substitute them. It also said new technologies can lead to the creation of new types of jobs, noting that most of the professions in the workforce today didn't exist prior to article source: OpenAI says this state will play central role in artificial intelligence development
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
1 Spectacular Growth Stock Down 74% to Buy Hand Over Fist, According to Wall Street
Confluent's data streaming platform helps organizations create live experiences for their customers. Data streaming is becoming a critical piece of the artificial intelligence (AI) revolution, because chatbots require constant access to real-time information. Wall Street analysts are bullish on Confluent stock, and it's trading near the cheapest level in its history. 10 stocks we like better than Confluent › Wall Street analysts don't always get things right, but it can pay to listen when they reach a consensus on a particular stock. The Wall Street Journal tracks 34 analysts who cover Confluent (NASDAQ: CFLT) stock, and the majority have assigned it a buy rating, with no analysts recommending selling. Confluent developed an industry-leading data streaming platform, which helps some of the world's biggest organizations deliver real-time digital experiences to their customers. But it's also becoming a key proponent of the artificial intelligence (AI) revolution, which could be a major growth driver for the company from here. Confluent stock is down 74% from its record high, which was set during the tech frenzy in 2021. Its valuation was unsustainable back then, but it's now trading near the cheapest level ever. Here's why Wall Street is right to be optimistic. Confluent is used by companies in a variety of industries, including retail, banking, and even sports betting. Walmart uses Confluent's platform to connect data between all of its physical stores and its online store so it has a real-time view of its inventory. This means Walmart instantly knows whenever a product is sold, so it can restock the shelves before they run bare. Plus, when shopping online, customers always have up-to-date information on whether a product is available before buying it. Sports betting and investing platforms use data streaming in a slightly different way. AI allows them to calculate odds or prices, feed them to customers' devices, and accept bets or orders, all in a matter of seconds. Without this technology, they would have to rely on cumbersome phone-based processes, and products like live in-game wagering on sporting events probably wouldn't exist. Data streaming also plays a pivotal role in AI, because a chatbot can only produce accurate responses if it has access to real-time data on command. Businesses can use Confluent's platform to build data pipelines, which they can plug into ready-made AI models like those created by OpenAI, in order to create a tailored experience for their customers. For example, let's say you're scheduled to catch a flight tomorrow and you want to inquire about a potential delay or even change your departure date. A mainstream chatbot like OpenAI's ChatGPT can only provide you with generic information, like how much it might cost to bring extra baggage onto a plane. However, if the airline plugs its data pipelines into OpenAI's models, it can create a custom chatbot that can assist with inquiries specific to your flight. Therefore, companies that invest in data streaming platforms like Confluent could save untold amounts of money over the long term by automating customer service workflows. According to the 2025 Data Streaming Report by Radma Research, 68% of information technology leaders from around the world plan to increase their investments in data streaming over the next two years. Confluent's subscription revenue came in at $260.9 million during the first quarter of 2025 (ended March 31), a 26% increase from the year-ago period. It marked an acceleration from the 24% growth the company delivered in the final quarter of 2024 three months earlier, which highlights the momentum in its business. The strong result was driven by two things. First, Confluent's net revenue retention rate was 117% during the quarter, meaning existing customers were spending 17% more money on the platform than they were in the year-ago period. Second, Confluent's customer base grew to a record high of 6,140 businesses, which included a 25% jump in the number of customers spending at least $1 million on its platform annually. But there is one caveat. Ongoing global trade tensions spurred by President Donald Trump's tariffs could put a dent in economic activity, which would impact corporate spending on platforms like Confluent. As a result, management slightly reduced its revenue guidance for 2025 to $1.11 billion, from $1.12 billion previously (at the high end of the forecast range). Turning to the bottom line, Confluent made some progress during the first quarter because it carefully managed its operating expenses, which only grew by 13%. Since revenue grew much faster, the company's generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) net loss shrank by 27% year over year and came in at $67.5 million. But the company was profitable on a non-GAAP basis, which is a better indicator of how much money the business is generating because it excludes one-off and noncash expenses. Its non-GAAP net income came in at $28.9 million, which was up by a whopping 83% compared to the year-ago period. Confluent's focus on managing costs to drive profitability will create a more sustainable business for the long term. When Confluent stock peaked in 2021, its price-to-sales (P/S) ratio soared to around 60, which was completely unsustainable. But the 74% decline in the stock since then, combined with the company's consistent revenue growth, has pushed its P/S ratio down to 7.8. That is near the cheapest level since the stock went public: Valuation might be one reason Wall Street is bullish right now. The Wall Street Journal tracks 34 analysts who cover Confluent stock, and 21 have assigned it a buy rating. Five others are in the overweight (bullish) camp, and seven recommend holding. While one analyst has given the stock an underweight (bearish) rating, none recommend outright selling. The analysts have an average price target of $28.13, which implies a potential upside of just 15.5% over the next 12 to 18 months. The Street-high target is a little more juicy at $36, which suggests a potential upside of 47.8% instead. The consensus target might not sound compelling, but I would urge investors to focus on the longer term. Confluent values its addressable market at more than $100 billion today -- a figure that has doubled since 2021 -- and based on the company's current revenue, it has barely scratched the surface of that opportunity. As AI adoption grows, I would expect Confluent's addressable market to expand even further. In summary, this stock offers investors a unique, out-of-the-box way to expose their portfolios to the AI boom, and it could be a great long-term buy, especially at the current price. Before you buy stock in Confluent, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Confluent wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $660,341!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $874,192!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 999% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 173% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Anthony Di Pizio has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Walmart. The Motley Fool recommends Confluent. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 1 Spectacular Growth Stock Down 74% to Buy Hand Over Fist, According to Wall Street was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Anthropic shows the limits of AI as it scraps blog experiment
Anthropic shows the limits of AI as it scraps blog experiment originally appeared on TheStreet. One of the market's fastest-growing artificial intelligence (AI) startups just terminated one of its initiatives shortly after launching it. Since the launch of ChatGPT in 2022, users have marveled at the chatbot's writing ability, often asking it to break down technical topics. Students quickly seized on these new tools and began using them to write their academic papers, launching an ongoing debate that still has no clear resolution. 💵💰Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter💰💵 As the technology sector's new growth market has evolved, Anthropic has emerged as one of its leading startups, known primarily for its Claud AI model, a popular choice in the tech community. But a recent revelation from the company raises questions about the future of AI as a tool for writing. Early in June 2025, Anthropic quickly launched an initiative intended to demonstrate its models' writing abilities, only to abruptly cease it one week later. Many people outside the tech community likely missed that Anthropic kicked off June 2025 with the launch of Claude Explains, a blog with posts written by its AI models. It featured pieces that instructed readers on how to 'Simplify complex codebases with Claude' and similar highly technical topics tied to only a week of operation, though, Anthropic has opted to scrap the AI blog initiative, quietly removing it from its webpage over the weekend of June 8. Users who click on its former address are now directed back to the company's home page, which does not mention the former blog. According to TechCrunch, while AI models did the writing, human editors still oversaw its posts for accuracy, described as 'subject matter experts and editorial teams." A spokesperson for the company is quoted as saying, '[The blog] is an early example of how teams can use AI to augment their work and provide greater value to their users. Rather than replacing human expertise, we're showing how AI can amplify what subject matter experts can accomplish.' However, now the entire project appears to have ended as quickly as it began, indicating that Anthropic decided the results produced by the blog simply did not justify the resources required to maintain it. But one expert has laid out some reasons why the company likely opted for this course of action. In an article on LinkedIn, AI 4 Writers owner Thomas Testi discussed the early demise of Claude Explains, highlighting a lack of transparency as a factor that worked against it. 'A big problem with Claude Explains was that it was really hard to understand,' he states. 'The blog posts failed to distinguish AI-generated content from human-edited content clearly for readers. In an era where digital audiences are increasingly skeptical of AI-generated media, this absence of disclosure was a breach of trust.' More AI News: Hollywood legend bets big on controversial technology One AI stock makes up 78% of Nvidia's investment portfolio ChatGPT suffers major outage with no restoration date Despite Anthropic's attempts to frame Claude Explains as a resource for AI enthusiasts, Testi also notes that many social media users saw it as a 'thinly veiled attempt to automate content marketing,' an accurate characterization, in his view. Shortly before the launch of Clade Explains, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei caught many people's attention when he predicted that AI would lead to a 'bloodbath' for white-collar workers, particularly for those in early career based on the decision made by his team to terminate its AI blog, it seems that Anthropic doesn't have the technology to completely replace technical writers and bloggers, at least not yet. Additionally, despite its initial framing as a blog written by AI, Claude Explains' content still had oversight from human editors. There is also the possibility that Anthropic might have opted against its AI blogging initiative due to the tendency of AI models to make false claims. According to a recent report from the MIT Sloan School of Management: 'The technology behind generative AI tools isn't designed to differentiate between what's true and what's not true. Even if generative AI models were trained solely on accurate data, their generative nature would mean they could still produce new, potentially inaccurate content by combining patterns in unexpected ways.' The fact that Anthropic has not addressed its decision to terminate the blog suggests it wants to move on quickly, rather than issuing a shows the limits of AI as it scraps blog experiment first appeared on TheStreet on Jun 10, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jun 10, 2025, where it first appeared. Sign in to access your portfolio
