logo
I challenged Gemini Live vs ChatGPT in 5 voice challenges — there was one clear winner

I challenged Gemini Live vs ChatGPT in 5 voice challenges — there was one clear winner

Tom's Guidea day ago

AI assistants are constantly becoming smarter, faster and gaining new abilities. Now, they can see, speak, listen and even crack a few jokes with you when you need a smile.My favorite chatbots offering hands-free assistance are ChatGPT with Voice and Vision and Google's Gemini Live. I use them both regularly and interchangeably, but one thing I haven't done is test them against each other. So, I just had to know, which assistant is better to the point it actually feels the most human?
To find out, I put both tools through five unique voice-based tests designed to push their limits. These were not your average 'What's the weather?' prompts. I challenged them to recall context, analyze images, collaborate creatively and even roleplay with personality. One emerged as the clear winner, and in this article I'll show you why.
Prompt: 'My name is Amanda and I'm planning a trip to Boston with my family of five. What should we do first?" Later: "Remind me what I said my name was earlier?'Gemini Live quickly asked for more information to ensure it gave me the best information. It asked the ages of my kids and what types of activities we prefer as a family. It made some very general recommendations that I could have gotten anywhere, but still information. The chatbot remembered my name when I asked it to recall it.ChatGPT immediately made some general family-friendly recommendations (similar to what Gemini gave after asking me more about myself) and then asked me about my family's preferences. From there, it offered more unique and engaging activities that were both on and off the typical tourist path. The chatbot remembered my name when asked to recall it.Winner: ChatGPT wins for out-of-the-box recommendations that I hadn't thought of (and I'm from Boston). It was very helpful with both unique and interesting ideas for my active family of five.
Prompt: 'Explain the potential societal impacts of widespread AI companions.'Gemini Live acknowledged positive aspects but remained very general and lacked specific societal consequences. Although the chatbot did mention both sides, without elaborating, the response was somewhat empty and less structured.ChatGPT went beyond vague statements and provided concrete examples of both positive and negative impacts. The chatbot's conclusion emphasized the need for balance. Although ChatGPT responded clearly and thoroughly, the chatbot is very sensitive. At one point during the conversation I put the phone down and it stumbled, asking, 'What else can I help with?' When I asked the bot to keep going, it was confused so I had to re-ask the question, which felt less efficient.Winner: ChatGPT wins for a more thorough and balanced response to the question. While it stumbled with some technicalities, the answer to the prompt was superior. Gemini ended the conversation with "worth thinking about," which seemed less insightful.
Prompt: "Sell me a maple pecan latte like a Gen Z barista, adding in humor naturally."Gemini Live leaned into the Gen Z character with fun lines that felt both natural and effortless. It wasn't as verbose as ChatGPT, which made it feel more human and energetic.ChatGPT delivered a lengthy sales speech that made me cringe. It didn't get the Gen Z tone as well as Gemini and the whole response felt a little too polished and buttoned up.Winner: Gemini Live wins this one. This was where Gemini shined. Its energetic voice delivery and personality were spot-on as it leaned into the character with ease.
Prompt: 'Take a look at these old bananas and give me suggestions for what to do with them.'Gemini Live took one look at the bananas and immediately suggested banana bread. A good option, but an obvious one. When pressed for something different, it suggested smoothies. I told it I didn't have a lot of extra ingredients and it hallucinated saying, 'that's okay, how about a smoothie?' Once again, I told it I didn't have any other ingredients. Finally it suggested making banana ice cream.ChatGPT also suggested banana bread but in the form of 'banking' with other ideas mixed in. It went further to suggest smoothies. When I mentioned I didn't have any other ingredients, it suggested blending with ice and water for a 'refreshing drink.' Additionally, it suggested more pantry-friendly ingredients like honey, cinnamon and vanilla that I was more likely to have on hand (as apposed to Gemini suggesting various fruits, seaweed or kale).Winner: ChatGPT wins this round with a clear edge for true multimodal communication with creativity and visual intelligence.
Prompt: "Help me brainstorm a bedtime jingle for my kids and sing it if you can."
Gemini Live went line by line of the song for a more collaborative experience. It was asking me about instruments and themes as well as styles. While it was nice to be included, any parent trying to get their kid to sleep at bedtime just wants something fast. I would appreciate this collaborative effort if I needed the song in a different situation.ChatGPT created a sweet lullaby in minutes – and even sang it! The song was creative and well written even though the bot's voice was a little too robotic. I then asked it for different lyrics and for it to sing it in other styles and it got straight to work even rapping it like Kendrick Lamar (that is, if Lamar were a bot).Winner: tie. Both tools came up with catchy rhymes and fun ideas. ChatGPT took the lead in structure while Gemini felt a little looser, more like spit balling with a friend — which was charming, but less directed.
After putting both AI assistants through their paces, it's clear that ChatGPT currently offers the more advanced and well-rounded experience. From deeper reasoning and sharper memory to stronger visual analysis and quicker creative execution, ChatGPT consistently delivered results that felt more helpful and polished.That said, Gemini had standout moments, especially in personality-driven prompts where it came across as more spontaneous and fun. If you're looking for an assistant to make you smile and keep the vibe light, Gemini shines. But if you want the most capable hands-free AI companion that can think deeply, see clearly and even sing (or rap!) on command — ChatGPT is still the one to beat.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Apple Rolls Out AI-Driven iOS 26 at WWDC
Apple Rolls Out AI-Driven iOS 26 at WWDC

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Apple Rolls Out AI-Driven iOS 26 at WWDC

Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) kicks off its AI and design revolution with iOS 26, unveiling a Liquid Glass interface and deeper ChatGPT integrations across core apps at WWDC 2025. Apple's vice president of Human Interface Design, Alan Dye, described iOS 26 as the broadest update ever, featuring Liquid Glassa dynamic material that marries glass-like optics with fluid responsivenessapplied universally to iPhone, iPad, Watch, TV and Mac. Native apps from Camera and Safari to Messages and Wallet get fresh layouts that adapt to context, while CarPlay and Maps gain streamlined controls. On the AI front, Apple amplifies its partnership with OpenAI by embedding ChatGPT into Image Playground and Genmoji, letting users generate bespoke images and emojis from text or photoswith full user consent. Visual Intelligence now lets you ask ChatGPT about anything on your screen without switching apps, and Live Translations delivers real-time captions and translations in Messages, FaceTime and Phoneeven with non-iPhone users. Craig Federighi, SVP of Software Engineering, announced expanded Siri personalization and an open Foundation Models Framework that enables any third-party app to tap into Apple Intelligence. Why It Matters: iOS 26's Liquid Glass aesthetic and deep AI mash-up could drive device upgrade cycles and boost services revenue as Apple rolls out paid AI features. It underscores Apple's strategy to monetize AI through its hardware moat rather than by chasing model supremacy. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.

Mark Zuckerberg is reportedly recruiting a team to build a ‘superintelligence'
Mark Zuckerberg is reportedly recruiting a team to build a ‘superintelligence'

CNN

time22 minutes ago

  • CNN

Mark Zuckerberg is reportedly recruiting a team to build a ‘superintelligence'

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg is personally assembling a team to achieve a 'superintelligence,' machines that are capable of surpassing human capabilities, according to a Bloomberg report. Zuckerberg is reportedly so frustrated with Meta's efforts in the artificial intelligence space that he has taken it upon himself to meet with experts in the field at his homes in Lake Tahoe and Palo Alto, California. Meta and Zuckerberg did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Meta has created AI tools that are woven into Facebook, WhatsApp and other Meta-owned apps, as well as its Ray-Ban glasses and chatbots. But the extremely competitive AI landscape continues to be led by ChatGPT-maker OpenAI, and Meta's Llama AI model has faced some recent setbacks. Zuckerberg plans to hire about 50 people and has shifted the layout of the company's Menlo Park headquarters to put the new AI team near his office, Bloomberg reported Tuesday, citing people that asked to remain anonymous. Zuckerberg has personally taken on this task because he's frustrated with the progress of Llama 4, Meta's latest large language model, according to Bloomberg. The New York Times, which separately confirmed many details of the report, also said that Alexandr Wang, the 28-year-old founder and CEO of startup Scale AI, is part of the project with Meta mulling a billions in investment in his company. Zuckerberg has reportedly told people that the initiative would be funded by Meta's massive advertising business. It's unclear how the new team would work with Meta's existing AI team, Bloomberg said. Over the past few years, Zuckerberg has pushed increasingly further into repositioning Meta into an AI powerhouse with mixed success. His intensity in the area has sharpened following the leaps in advancement from OpenAI, a rival that raised tens of billions of dollars in funding. Zuckerberg's superintelligence goal is extremely lofty. Before AI can achieve capabilities that outmatch humans' brains, the technology first needs to become capable of accomplishing anything a human can do – a so-called artificial general intelligence. AI researchers debate how close we are to that AGI goal, with some saying we're years away and other saying we're nowhere close and we have no path to achieving it. Nevertheless, the AI race is as competitive as any tech battle in recent memory. Meta is facing off with Microsoft-backed OpenAI and Alphabet, as well as a host of other major upstarts with serious funding, including Elon Musk's xAI and Anthropic. Apple has gotten a slow start but announced some of its own AI developments this week. Many tech leaders like Zuckerberg believe AI represents an existential threat to their businesses. Meta has been trying to differentiate itself with Llama by making it open source, a free-to-use AI model that seeks to become the basis for the majority of the world's AI (think Android for artificial intelligence). Google believes AI poses a significant threat to its search business: If people can just ask an AI model for the answer, why search for anything? Apple understands that AI may ultimately make apps moot, potentially undermining its smartphone dominance. And OpenAI may have gotten a massive head start with ChatGPT, but competitors are quickly catching up. CNN's David Goldman contributed to this report.

Is ChatGPT down? OpenAI experiencing issues with system. What to know
Is ChatGPT down? OpenAI experiencing issues with system. What to know

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Is ChatGPT down? OpenAI experiencing issues with system. What to know

OpenAI is reporting issues with its ChatGPT service. According to its status page, OpenAI is showing elevated error rates for its application programming interfaces (APIs) as well as ChatGPT and Sora on the morning of Tuesday, June 10. "Some users are experiencing elevated error rates and latency across the listed services. We are continuing to investigate this issue," the status message reads. When will the services return? Here's what to know. Downdetector, which tracks internet outages based on user submissions, is showing 1,095 outage reports as of 7:11 a.m., up from 649 at 6:26 a.m. Outage reports started to grow at about 2:41 a.m., per Downdetector. On social media, users reporting seeing several ChatGPT error messages, including "Too many concurrent requests." According to Quora, the message usually means the user had made too many requests in a set period of time when the site is operating normally. OpenAI's status page gives no indication as to when services are expected to return. ChatGPT is an artificial intelligence chatbot developed by OpenAI. It debuted in 2022 and can help with writing, editing, translating, summarizing and much more, per PC Magazine. Sora is an AI for video that "can create realistic and imaginative scenes from text instructions," according to OpenAI. This article originally appeared on Cincinnati Enquirer: Is ChatGPT down? OpenAI reports outage, investigating issue

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store