‘Make Transitional Arrangement': Supreme Court Asks Union Govt to Pause Release of Women Army Officers
Law
The Wire Staff
Senior advocate Menaka Guruswamy, representing one of the petitioners, noted that Colonel Sofiya Qureshi would not have been able to lead the 'Operation Sindoor' briefing had the court not enabled PC for women.
View of the Supreme Court of India, in New Delhi. Photo: PTI.
Real journalism holds power accountable
Since 2015, The Wire has done just that.
But we can continue only with your support.
Donate now
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday (May 9) asked the Union government not to release Short Service Commission (SSC) women Army officers who are challenging the denial of Permanent Commission (PC) to them, The Indian Express reported. The top court emphasised on keeping their morale high, particularly at a time when the government has been visibly platforming women in significant military roles.
Presiding over a two-judge bench, Justice Surya Kant observed, 'There is some better place now for them to perform. As of date, we would like their morale to be kept high. Meantime, just utilise their services.'
He added, 'It's not your case they are an unsuitable kind of officers,' and suggested making a 'transitional arrangement' until the matter is heard next in August, hinting at the current security climate by saying, 'At this juncture, let us not do something which…'
This intervention comes as the government recently showcased women officers, such as Colonel Sofiya Qureshi of the Indian Army and Wing Commander Vyomika Singh of the Air Force, who have been jointly briefing the nation on 'Operation Sindoor' following military strikes.
Notably, Col. Qureshi's achievements were acknowledged by the Supreme Court in its landmark February 17, 2020, judgment that granted PC to women officers. That ruling had strongly criticised the government's earlier stance, which had described women as 'physiologically unfit' in a note the court found perpetuated gender stereotypes and termed an 'insult not only to women but also to Indian Army.'
During today's hearing, additional solicitor general Aishwarya Bhati, for the Union government, argued that releasing SSC officers was an administrative decision based on a policy to keep the armed forces young, citing the Army's pyramidal structure. She also stated that women have fared 'far better' in securing PC since its full introduction.
Representing Lt Col Geeta Sharma, one of the petitioners, senior advocate Menaka Guruswamy highlighted that Col. Qureshi herself would not have been able to lead the 'Operation Sindoor' briefing had the Supreme Court not enabled PC for women in the 2020 Babita Puniya case. Ms Guruswamy contended that administrative powers could not be an excuse for discrimination and pointed to alleged vacancies.
The Supreme Court, while stating it was not ordering a stay on merits at this stage, stressed the need for a blend of young and experienced officers. Justice Kant remarked on the pride felt for officers serving in challenging conditions, noting, 'We now have far excellent officers. We feel proud of them.'
The legal battle for women officers seeking PC has been protracted. Even after the 2020 judgment, which had underscored the need for 'administrative will and change in mindset' to overcome gender discrimination, women faced hurdles, including challenges over medical fitness criteria that the top court had previously questioned as potentially unjust.
In October 2020, the Supreme Court, then including now-retired Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, had again intervened, noting a 'difference of thinking' between top leaders and Army bureaucracy regarding women's PC.
The Supreme Court will hear the current petitions next in August, starting with the Army's case.
Law
Legal Victories, Lived Defeats: Disability Justice After the 'Courtroom Revolution'
View More
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
42 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Democracy without dissent a contradiction: Justice Surya Kant
Democracy without dissent is a contradiction and that silence in the face of injustice is not neutrality, but complicity, Supreme Court judge justice Surya Kant has asserted as he invoked India's constitutional ethos and the top court's role in defending civil liberties. Justice Kant, who is in line to take over as the Chief Justice of India (CJI) in November this year, was speaking at the Washington Supreme Court as part of an international judicial exchange. In his address earlier this week that underscored the shared constitutional commitments of India and the United States, the judge said: 'Democracy without dissent is a contradiction, and that silence in the face of injustice is not neutrality, but complicity…These are not merely legal precedents; they are constitutional declarations.' Justice Kant highlighted that the right to free speech, protected under Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution and the First Amendment in the US, has been 'zealously defended' by courts on both sides of the Atlantic. Drawing parallels with the US Supreme Court's protection of student protest in Tinker Vs Des Moines (1969), he recalled how India's top court, much earlier, had established the primacy of expression in Romesh Thappar and Brij Bhushan cases in 1950, ruling against pre-censorship and vague notions of public order. 'In both countries, the judiciary has consistently pushed back against the temptation to suppress dissent under misguided and deceptive notions that the executive may hold,' he noted. Reaffirming the foundational nature of constitutional supremacy in both democracies, Justice Kant highlighted that the basic structure doctrine in India that asserts Parliament cannot amend away core constitutional values mirrors the American principle that 'even the majoritarian will must bow' before foundational ideals like liberty, federalism, and equality. 'These doctrines reflect a shared understanding that tampering with these principles would cause a rift so immense that it would threaten the very heart of our existence,' he warned. ALSO READ | Free speech, democracy, and the epidemic of hurt feelings Justice Kant also spotlighted India's global leadership in using public interest litigation (PIL) as a judicial tool to redress collective harm. Citing the Vishaka judgment (1997) where the Indian Supreme Court laid down workplace sexual harassment guidelines in the absence of legislation, he said: 'Though structurally distinct, both approaches reflect a shared judicial philosophy: that justice must not be confined to individual litigants but must be responsive to collective harm and systemic failure.' In contrast, he acknowledged the role of class action lawsuits in the US, such as Lois Jenson Vs Eveleth Taconite Co (1993), where female workers collectively challenged workplace abuse. Addressing the evolution of due process jurisprudence, Justice Kant recalled how the Indian Constitution initially adopted 'procedure established by law' over the American-style 'due process,' but eventually evolved the latter through judicial interpretation. 'In the seminal Maneka Gandhi case (1978), the Indian Supreme Court read into the phrase the requirements of justice, fairness, and reasonableness -- effectively harmonizing our doctrine with the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution,' he added. Justice Kant concluded his address on a note of judicial kinship, stating: 'It is my firm belief that our countries, and our legal systems, share a kindred spirit rooted in the pursuit of justice, liberty, and the rule of law… The law must be a shield for the weak, not a sword for the powerful.'
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Bhoomipuja often carried out for political gain than execution: Gadkari
1 2 3 4 Nagpur: Union minister Nitin Gadkari on Sunday said that regardless of which party is in power, dozens of project bhoomipujans are carried out, often driven by political optics than execution. "MLA saheb wins the first election with the bhoomipujan announcement, the second after the actual bhoomipujan is done, and the third election based on budget provisions and pending work," Gadkari said, citing the example of the Gosikhurd project. Speaking on the second day of the Vidarbha Water Conference held at Vanamati, the Union minister added, "The Gosikhurd project started at ₹360 crore. Today, over ₹12,500 crore has been spent, out of which over ₹6,000 crore was allocated when I was the water resources minister. Yet, the project remains stagnant. Rehabilitation issues in the region are still unresolved." Citing another example, Gadkari addressed the status of Central Road Fund (CRF) allocations, clarifying that the entire Rs7,000 crore budgeted amount had already been approved for projects. "MLAs fly to Delhi requesting approvals. Against proposals worth Rs7,000 crore, we've sanctioned the full amount. But beyond that, I can't approve more unless new provisions are made," he said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với mức chênh lệch giá thấp nhất IC Markets Đăng ký Undo He stressed that govt processes inherently take time and are bound by budgetary limits. "People get excited when big projects are announced, photos are clicked during bhoomipujans, coconuts are broken — and then projects remain stuck for 25 years," Gadkari remarked. Referring to the ongoing crisis of farmer suicides in Vidarbha, Gadkari pointed to water scarcity as one of the main causes, especially in districts like Akola, Washim, Buldhana, Yavatmal, Amravati, and Wardha. "In the past few years, many farmers died by suicide. Several studies were conducted, and one of the major reasons found was water scarcity. The second key factor was the cotton price mechanism. We need to increase production, and for that, water conservation is essential. Until irrigation is secured, farmer suicides will not stop," he said. Speaking further on conservation, Gadkari said, "Major and medium-scale projects will continue, but what individuals can do at their level matters most. Water that runs should be slowed, water that slows should be stopped, and the water that stops should seep into the ground — only then will groundwater levels rise." He also emphasised the role of educational institutions in building agricultural self-sufficiency. Citing the late Dr Shrikant Jichkar, Gadkari said universities should focus on seed development, branding, and selling agricultural produce. "The income generated should go toward paying teachers' salaries. If the revenue doesn't come in one season, it will come in the next. Without such accountability, institutions risk becoming colourless, tasteless, and odourless," he warned, urging alignment of academic research with field-level agricultural needs. Gadkari also advocated for the creation of a regional water grid to address unequal water availability across basins. "Some basins receive excess rainfall and flood, while others remain dry. Just like roads and power grids, a water grid is needed to move surplus water from one basin to another," he said. He added that while large projects require land acquisition, environmental clearances, and funding, basin-to-basin transfers could be launched faster through proper planning and community-led initiatives. Gadkari cited upcoming projects in Himachal Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh that aim to channel sufficient water into the Yamuna, ensuring Delhi won't face shortages at least until 2090. Drawing comparisons, he pointed out that Telangana implemented a Rs80,000 crore water project, along with 49 other previously planned projects in the southern parts, saving a significant amount of water that would have otherwise flowed directly into the sea.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
‘Whole world now knows the truth': Shashi Tharoor-led delegation wraps up US visit; urges global terror fight
NEW DELHI: The multi-party parliamentary delegation led by Congress MP Shashi Tharoor on late Sunday concluded its high-level visit to the United States, wrapping up the final leg of a diplomatic mission aimed at building international consensus on India's counter-terrorism stance following the April 22 terror attack in Pahalgam, which left 26 people dead. Taking to X as he wrapped up the US visit, Tharoor wrote: 'If you are born a hundred times, you will do it a hundred times. I will love my country with all my heart… A Watan. The whole world now knows the truth. We are lovers of non-violence, but only until someone tests that... Jai Hind!' — ShashiTharoor (@ShashiTharoor) On the final day of the tour, the delegation paid tribute to Mahatma Gandhi's statue in Washington. Tharoor later posted on X: 'It is striking how many world capitals are adorned with statues or busts of the Mahatma, the 20th century's greatest apostle of peace, nonviolence, and human freedom.' The group, which arrived in Washington on June 3 after stops in Guyana, Panama, Colombia, and Brazil, met with several key American leaders including US Vice President JD Vance, Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau, senior members of Congress, policy experts, and members of the Indian-American community. Describing the meeting with Vance as 'an excellent meeting,' Tharoor said the Vice President was 'warm and welcoming and receptive,' and 'expressed complete understanding, first of all, outrage of what happened in Pahalgam and support and respect for India's restrained response in Operation Sindoor.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Capital Gains Exemptions for Seniors SmartAsset Learn More Undo A US State Department spokesperson said Landau 'reaffirmed the United States' strong support of India in the fight against terrorism and the strategic partnership between the two countries.' Addressing the Centre on Foreign Relations, Tharoor had said India's actions were targeted at terror infrastructure, not civilians. 'We're not interested in attacking Pakistani civilians, ordinary people. This is about India versus terrorism… If you're not prepared to shut down the safe havens or arrest terrorist leaders, then I'm afraid this is the only way we can deal with it,' he said. Referring to Pakistan's military, he added, 'In India, the state has an army. In Pakistan, the army has a state,' accusing Islamabad of manipulating public opinion through conflict. Tharoor dismissed claims of Pakistani success during the brief hostilities that followed, saying, 'Two videos came out on social media, both turned out to be from other conflicts in other years, nothing to do with this one.'
