
Patient who absconded from psychiatric unit jailed for killing pensioner
David Parish, 38, randomly attacked Beryl Purdy with a large golf umbrella he had taken from her porch and inflicted fatal head injuries.
Before the attack, Parish had locked Mrs Purdy's husband, Peter, in the kitchen of their home in Broomfield, near Bridgwater, Somerset.
Parish was suffering from paranoid schizophrenia caused by smoking cannabis and had been detained temporarily under the Mental Health Act at the Rydon Ward in Taunton.
Bristol Crown Court heard he had been able to leave the unit on March 27 2023 after the front door had been left unlocked.
Anna Vigars KC, prosecuting, said after leaving the unit, Parish had travelled to the vicinity of Mrs Purdy's home.
Her body was discovered after her husband had alerted a neighbour because he had been trapped in the kitchen by Parish. It was another neighbour who found her body behind the freezer.
'He then noticed two feet with black shoes on sticking out from behind the displaced fridge freezer,' Mrs Vigars said.
'He went to investigate and found that the feet belonged to the body of Mrs Purdy, which was crumpled against the wall with a washing basket on top of her.
'Mrs Purdy's head was covered in blood to the extent that it was difficult to see what her actual injuries were.'
A post-mortem examination found Mrs Purdy had died from blunt force trauma head injuries consistent with the use of the umbrella.
At a previous hearing, Parish, of Halyard Drive, Bridgwater, pleaded guilty to manslaughter by reason of diminished responsibility.
The father-of-two's mental health had deteriorated following the breakdown of his marriage in 2021.
The court heard that Parish believed he was receiving messages from birds and that he was under threat from people outside his home.
The day before the attack, he was assessed under the Mental Health Act and detained at the Rydon Ward in Taunton.
'It was there that his parents went to visit him on Monday March 27,' Mrs Vigars said.
'Mr Parish seemed to them to be calmer. After a little time of family chat, Mr Parish said he wanted to use the toilet and he left his parents.
'He didn't return to his parents and they raised the alarm with staff at reception.
'Staff apologised, telling the family that the front door to the unit should have been locked, that the police had been alerted to the disappearance and that Mr Parish had been reported as a missing person.'
The court heard an investigation is underway into the circumstances of how Parish was able to leave the unit.
The judge, Mr Justice Saini, asked: 'What accountability has there been for the hospital that allowed Mr Parish to walk out? It is not Mr Parish's fault that he left.
'He was clearly meant to be detained under section two of the Mental Health Act. What's happened?'
Mrs Vigars replied: 'As I understand it, there is an ongoing investigation. It may well be that the conclusion of this process will allow that process to make some progress.'
In a victim impact statement, Mr Purdy said he and his family had been let down by the NHS.
'My lifetime partner and best friend, Bez Purdy, was brutally attacked and killed in our home,' he said.
'I'm reminded of the incident every time I enter the room where she was found, which leaves me with anger and sadness, and more recently, loneliness to contend with every day.
'I miss my wife terribly and wish we could share the memories we had over the 64 years of marriage that we shared.'
Mr Purdy said he was temporarily living in a care home while he recovered from injuries sustained in recent falls but planned to return home.
'I'm nervous to return home, knowing that one day Bez's attacker will be released back into the local community,' he said.
'I feel let down by the NHS and the mistakes that were made that led to the death of Bez and the length of time it's taken to sentence the man that killed her.
'These are all troubling events on top of the grief and sense of loss I experience every day.'
The couple's son, Nick, said his mother's death has had a 'lasting and damaging impact' on all members of the family.
'Hearing that someone had brutally attacked Bez in her home was distressing enough,' he said.
'To then learn that she died from her injuries was unbearable. Nothing can prepare you for that news.'
He added: 'We will for ask the reassurance that what we've suffered could not possibly happen to anyone else.'
Adam Vaitilingam KC, defending, said Parish's mental health had stabilised and he was no longer on medication.
'He feels intense shame about what he did and genuine remorse for what happened,' he said.
'He should have been and could have been kept secure, and in our submission, that is an important mitigating factor as well.'
Parish was jailed for six years and told he would serve at least two-thirds of the sentence in custody before he could apply for parole.
Passing sentence, Mr Justice Saini said: 'You killed Beryl Purdy when you attacked her in her own home with a large golfing umbrella.
'You had been detained in the unit under section two of the Mental Health Act and you should not have been able to leave the hospital.
'The psychiatric experts agreed that at the time you killed Mrs Purdy, you were in an episode of schizophrenic psychosis that reduces what would be murder to manslaughter.
'Your psychosis was, however, precipitated by the use of cannabis.
'Mr Purdy's health has meant he cannot be here. He is reminded of the incident every time he goes into the room where she was found.
'Their son, Nick Purdy, has described how distressing it is to lose his mother because the door was left unlocked, and a man who should have been detained was able to enter his parents' home and kill his mother in such a violent way.'
Speaking after the sentence, Detective Inspector Debbie Hatch said: 'This was a deeply tragic incident in which Bez lost her life in the most distressing of circumstances inside her own home.
'This case highlights the complex intersection between mental health and criminal justice.'
A spokesman for the Somerset NHS Foundation Trust, which runs the mental health unit, said: 'Our thoughts are with both families at what we realise will be a very difficult time.
'As is standard practice with tragic incidents like this, we conducted a full root cause analysis investigation to understand and review the unit's environment, to identify if there are any areas of learning that we can take forward for our future care and support to patients and families.
'This includes a review of security arrangements on Rydon ward, where appropriate changes have been made.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
26 minutes ago
- BBC News
Wellington cafe owners distraught after two break-ins in a week
A cafe owner has said her family is distraught after the premises were broken into twice in one Akhtar runs the Early Bird Cafe in Wellington Railway Station, which was targeted on Tuesday and again on Thursday, causing more than £1,000 in well as smashed windows, stock was stolen along with a drill, plus loose change and the staff's tips Akhtar said: "The business is like our second home, we spend so much time here and we spend so much effort trying to build it up from scratch. It feels as if someone's attacked my home. It's just too personal." While the family tried to "get on with it" after the first incident, Mrs Akhtar said the second break-in was "a really big blow"."Because it just feels personal now, like someone's got it in for us and keeps coming back," she cafe owner added that her children were very upset by the break-ins and that the family were scared the intruder would return."They think that they're going to attack my home as well," she said."So my daughter didn't sleep all night because she was really really upset." As a result of the damage, the cafe has had to close for two days to get the windows boarded up, turning customers the business had insurance, their premium would cost more than paying for the repairs, and paying out of the profits would hit their ability to cover stock, wages and mortgage payments."I know it's not a large sum of money - but it's money that will help us to pay our rent, pay our mortgages, food costs, and it's just impacted us a lot," Mrs Akhtar said. "We can't take orders from customers so our regular customers have been turned away. We can't afford to keep closing the business."With the family struggling, they received a lifeline in the form of support from a local firm, CS Solicitors, which provided them with new windows. Mrs Akhtar said: "People like CS Solicitors, when they step forward and say to us 'look, you're part of this community and we're willing to help you', it means a lot to us."Without their support we wouldn't have been able to repair the windows as quickly as we hoped." Mohammed Khan from CS Solicitors told the BBC: "These thefts are not simple, petty thefts. These shake livelihoods, they take away the trust we've built within our community and that's something we want to restore as quickly as possible."People need to be aware and come forward if they know something."British Transport Police said it received a report at 07:40 BST on 14 August of a burglary at the cafe."Officers attended and inquiries into the incident are ongoing," a spokesperson said."An investigation has also been launched into an incident of criminal damage at the same location on Tuesday August 12."Anyone with information is asked to contact BTP by texting 61016 or by calling 0800 40 50 40, quoting reference 109 of 14/08/25." Follow BBC Shropshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.


Daily Mail
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Moment driver in stolen car crashes into armed police van during 100mph police chase
Shocking footage shows a 100mph police chase on country roads that ended in a three-vehicle crash and jail for the driver. Marlon Henriques, 30, of Tidworth, Wiltshire, drove at speeds of over 85mph on 30mph roads while dangerously weaving in and out his lane while overtaking. After several near-misses, Henriques finally crashed into a white Citroen van - sending it flying into a hedge - before hitting the back of a police firearms vehicle. The 30-year-old had failed to stop after being caught driving at nearly double the speed limit, instead leading police on a hair-raising pursuit. Henriques, who police called one of the 'worst drivers' they'd ever seen, eventually had the tyres of his vehicle - which didn't even belong to him - punctured by a stinger device. He has now been jailed for nearly two years for his dangerous driving, which put 'numerous lives in danger'. Salisbury Crown Court heard that on June 10, Henriques, driving a black Volkswagen Arteon taken from his housemate, failed to stop for police in Bulford. He was seen overtaking two vehicles on solid white lines, and a pursuit was authorised. During the chase, officers had to reach speeds of more than 100mph to catch up with the driver. After failing to stop for officers with their blue lights and sirens on, Henriques instead overtook a vehicle on the brow of a hill - narrowly avoiding a collision with an oncoming army truck. He was also seen driving the wrong way round a roundabout to evade pursuing police vehicles. Henriques performed several further dangerous overtakes, driving at around 85mph in a 30mph zone and skipping a red light towards the A338. The pursuit continued in the direction of Marlborough and then onto Ludgershall Road, where Henriques veered onto a dirt road on Salisbury Plain. Footage shows the driver mounting a kerb to overtake a vehicle at a junction before speeding away from police cars with their sirens blaring. But as he made his way back towards Tidworth, a stinger device was successfully deployed, puncturing the two nearside tyres of Henriques' vehicle. His car is seen smashing into the back of a white Citroen van, sending it into a tree, before colliding into the rear of an unmarked armed response car that was ahead of the pursuit. After hitting the unmarked vehicle, armed officers run up to Henriques, shouting, 'Get out the car now! Show me your hands now', before detaining him in the road. He later admitted aggravated taking of a vehicle without consent, dangerous driving, driving whilst disqualified and driving without insurance and was jailed for 22 months. Henriques was also disqualified from driving for four years and 11 months. Following his sentence, Wiltshire Police Roads Policing officer PC Webster said: 'Henriques' driving is some of the worst I have seen. 'He put numerous lives in danger through his speeding and reckless overtaking, regularly driving through red lights and the wrong way around roundabouts. 'Stopping him involved excellent collaborative work between the Roads Policing Unit, neighbourhood and response officers, and I'm pleased he has now been sentenced. 'This incident took place during the middle of the day, and I want to thank all members of the public for their assistance and patience when dealing with this matter.'


The Guardian
33 minutes ago
- The Guardian
UK rights watchdog warns against ‘heavy-handed' policing of Gaza protests
The UK's official human rights watchdog has written to ministers and police expressing concern at a potentially 'heavy-handed' approach to protests about Gaza and urging clearer guidance for officers in enforcing the law. In the letter to Yvette Cooper, the home secretary, and Mark Rowley, the head of the Metropolitan police, the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) said the perception that peaceful protest could attract disproportionate police attention 'undermines confidence in our human rights protections'. Kishwer Falkner, the EHRC chair, wrote that it was vital that any policing of protests was both proportionate and based on clear legal tests. The letter raised concerns about 'reports of police engagement with individuals participating in forms of protest that are not linked to any proscribed organisation'. It cited as an example the case of Laura Murton, first revealed by the Guardian. Keny police threatened her with arrest under the Terrorism Act for holding a Palestinian flag and having signs saying 'Free Gaza' and 'Israel is committing genocide'. Murton filmed police telling her that even such general statements 'all come under proscribed groups, which are terror groups that have been dictated by the government'. During the exchange, one officer said the phrase 'Free Gaza' was 'supportive of Palestine Action', that it was illegal 'to express an opinion or belief that is supportive of a proscribed organisation', and that she had committed that offence with her signs. Falkner wrote: 'Whilst we acknowledge police expertise in assessing security risks, we want to emphasise that any interference with protest rights must be lawful and assessed case by case. 'Heavy-handed policing or blanket approaches risk creating a chilling effect, deterring citizens from exercising their fundamental rights to freedom of expression and assembly through fear of possible consequences. 'This concern extends beyond those directly affected by police engagement to the broader health of our democracy, because the perception that peaceful protest may attract disproportionate police attention undermines confidence in our human rights protections.' Falkner urged ministers and police to make sure all officers were given 'clear and consistent guidance on their human rights obligations in relation to protest', which should 'ensure that the appropriate balance is maintained between public safety and the protection of essential human rights'. Murton told the Guardian last week that her solicitors had issued a letter of claim on her behalf to the chief constable of Kent police, in what was also said to be a move to remind other police forces of their responsibilities towards peaceful protests. Falkner said in a statement: 'The right to peaceful protest is fundamental to our democracy and must be protected even when dealing with complex and sensitive issues. 'We recognise the genuine challenges the police face in maintaining public safety, but we are concerned that some recent responses may not strike the right balance between security and fundamental rights. 'Our role as the national human rights institution is to uphold the laws that safeguard everyone's right to fairness, dignity and respect. When we see reports of people being questioned or prevented from peaceful protests that don't support proscribed organisations, we have a duty to speak out.' The Liberal Democrats called on Cooper to act swiftly. Lisa Smart, the party's home affairs spokesperson, said: 'The lack of clarity that has been given to police officers has led to confusion, increasing tensions and risks creating a chilling effect on freedom of speech. 'The home secretary needs to step in and give officers, often dealing with incredibly complex and sensitive situations, clear direction as to what is expected of them at protests. 'Without that officers will be left exposed and those exercising their democratic rights worried about the consequences.' The warning comes in the context of wider police operations targeting protesters who, unlike Murton, appear to directly express support for Palestine Action, which is illegal given the group's banned status. Membership of, or support for, the group is a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison under the Terrorism Act. The group was proscribed last month after incidents including one in which four people were arrested over damaged caused to two Voyager aircraft at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire. In the latest of a series of mass protests against the decision, more than 500 people were arrested in London last Saturday, almost all for displaying placards or signs allegedly supportive of Palestine Action. Half of those arrested were aged 60 or above, according to police figures. On Friday night the Metropolitan poice said a further 60 people would be prosecuted for 'showing support for the proscribed terrorist group Palestine Action'. Amnesty International UK said that while it welcomed the EHRC letter, the watchdog had 'failed to acknowledge the hundreds of people unfairly arrested for peacefully exercising their right to free expression'. Sacha Deshmukh, the organisation's chief executive, said: 'This isn't just about the chilling effect on freedom of speech for people 'not linked to any proscribed organisation', as the EHRC states, it's also about the excessive policing of citizens' right to protest against a decision made by their elected government. 'Under international human rights law, protest speech should only be criminalised if it incites violence, hatred or discrimination. Holding a placard and peacefully stating opposition to a government decision to proscribe an organisation cannot realistically be treated as an example of incitement.' Downing Street has justified the ban on Palestine Action by saying it is 'a violent organisation that has committed violence, significant injury, extensive criminal damage', a description one of its co-founders has said is false and defamatory. The Home Office said the issues the EHRC had raised were an operational matter for the police. The Met referred the query to the Home Office.