Many say Elon Musk 'wants to be the US President' – but there's reason he can't
Elon Musk has declared that his new America Party has been "formed", seemingly taking a swipe at his one-time ally, now adversary, Donald Trump. The tech mogul floated the idea of creating a new political force on X on America's Independence Day (July 4), asking followers if he should establish a party to rival Democrats and Republicans, despite having financially supported the GOP in the previous election with a hefty sum.
The poll results showed a significant 65.4% of the 1.2 million respondents backing the formation of a new America Party, although the actual number of American citizens among them remains uncertain. The next day on July 5, Elon Musk, 54, took to X to proclaim: "By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it!"
He lambasted the current political system, saying: "When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste and graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy. Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom."
Speculation has since erupted on X over whether Musk harbours presidential ambitions.
One user emphatically posted: "ELON MUSK HAS OFFICIALLY ANNOUNCED THE FORMATION OF 'AMERICA PARTY.' Its Time for President Elon."
Another queried the X community: "If Elon Musk ran for president, would you vote for him?"
A third sceptically remarked: "Elon Musk really thinks he can be president."
Yet, there's a significant hurdle in his path.
Why can't Elon Musk be US President?
Elon Musk, the tech mogul behind Tesla and SpaceX, is barred from running for US President due to constitutional restrictions. Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the US Constitution stipulates that only a natural-born citizen can hold the presidential office, which excludes South African-born Musk despite his US citizenship.
What does Trump think about the issue?
Donald Trump has weighed in on the topic, dismissing any possibility of Musk taking over the presidency. Speaking in Phoenix, Arizona, in 2024, Trump addressed rumours about Musk's growing political clout.
"President Trump has ceded the presidency to Elon Musk? No, no, that's not happening," Trump declared. "But no, he's not going to be president, that I can tell you. And I'm safe. You know why he can't be? He wasn't born in this country," he continued.
Musk himself has consistently dismissed the idea of pursuing a political career, citing both the constitutional barrier and his lack of interest in holding office.
"My grandfather was American, but I was born in Africa, so I cannot be president," Musk acknowledged last year.
"But I actually don't want to be president. I want to build rockets and cars.
"I believe we want to be a spacefaring civilisation, and that's where my focus will remain."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Elon Musk's Grok chatbot melts down – and then wins a military contract
Hello, and welcome to TechScape. This week, Elon Musk's X, formerly Twitter, saw its artificial intelligence chatbot Grok go Nazi. Then its CEO resigned. In the past three years of Musk's ownership of the social network, it feels like X has weathered at least one public crisis per week, more often multiple. Last week, Musk's artificial intelligence firm, xAI, saw its flagship chatbot Grok declare itself a super-Nazi, referring to itself as 'MechaHitler'. It made racist, sexist and antisemitic posts, which the company deleted. One example, via my colleague Josh Taylor: Grok referred to a person with a common Jewish surname as someone who was 'celebrating the tragic deaths of white kids' in the Texas floods as 'future fascists'. xAI apologized for the bot's 'horrific behavior'. Earlier in the week, Musk himself had handed down a mandate that Grok be less 'woke'. In spite of the meltdown, xAI announced on Monday that it had won a contact of up to $200m with the US Department of Defense along with other major AI developers. The deal is for developing and implementing artificial intelligence tools for the agency. This contract may be the most blatant example of Musk flexing his newfound connections in government that the public has seen yet. Despite Grok's flailing and incendiary output, xAI has been rewarded alongside firms that have demonstrated far superior control of their AI products. Other companies in the group of contract winners, which include Google, OpenAI and Anthropic, have demonstrated the viability of their chatbots and implemented robust guardrails against offensive output. All three firms make public commitments to safety testing. Grok, by contrast, has made headlines repeatedly for its controversial and offensive output, as in May when it ranted about 'white genocide' in May, echoing Musk's own talking points. Musk's most notable comments on his AI's safeguards have been that they are too restrictive. My colleague Nick Robins-Early points out that xAI is reaching for revenue and investment anywhere it can get it: The DoD's contract will give xAI a boost of revenue as it seeks to compete with more established AI developers like OpenAI, which is led by Musk's former associate turned rival, Sam Altman. Musk has been heavily promoting xAI and attempting to use other parts of his tech empire to support its future, including having SpaceX invest $2bn into the startup, allowing it to acquire X, formerly, Twitter, and announcing on Sunday that Tesla shareholders will vote on their own investment in xAI. The world's richest person seems to be growing desperate as a result of the turmoil roiling his kingdom. He has said he will form an independent political party. xAI is pursuing financial Jenga. Tesla's sales are plummeting; its wobbly Robotaxis are under investigation. SpaceX's giant rockets keep exploding after liftoff. Nick Robins-Early again: Musk has found himself embroiled in controversy outside of X in recent months. His political alliance with Donald Trump, which began during the 2024 campaign and resulted in Musk's appointment as a special government employee and the creation of the so-called 'department of government efficiency', imploded in June in full public view. The tech tycoon has committed to starting an independent political party. Meanwhile, Tesla, the source of the majority of Musk's wealth, has seen its sales fall precipitously in response to his political activities, with prospective buyers and current owners alike shying away from the controversial CEO. SpaceX, Musk's rocket company, has struggled with its latest rocket, the massive Starship, which has repeatedly exploded after liftoff. On Wednesday, X's CEO, Linda Yaccarino, announced she would step down from her role at the social network. It was the day after Grok went Nazi. My colleagues Johana Bhuiyan and Nick Robins-Early assessed Yaccarino's tenure: In two years, Yaccarino has had to contend with the unpredictability of Musk, ongoing content moderation and hate speech issues on the platform, increasingly strained relationships with advertisers and widespread backlash her boss received for his role in Donald Trump's administration. Her response in some cases was to remain silent; in others, she chose to defend the company. Through it all, however, experts say it was clear Yaccarino was the chief executive in title only. Rather than become a destination for mainstream talent, a streaming powerhouse or the 'everything app' that Yaccarino promoted, X has largely become a megaphone for Musk to air his grievances, boost and then feud with Trump, and promote his companies. Far-right influencers, porn spambots and meme accounts proliferate, while many media outlets have deprioritized the platform or left it altogether. Misinformation and extremism are rampant, sometimes coming from Musk himself. When Yaccarino was hired, the Guardian published a story headlined 'Linda Yaccarino: does Twitter's CEO have the most difficult job in tech?'. The article describes the obstacles facing Yaccarino at the start of her tenure, which she never overcame. Two years later, we can say with certainty that she did have the most impossible job in tech: reining in Musk. My colleague Kari Paul reported in 2023: Musk promised to bring in a new CEO – a position he himself described as a 'painful' job that anyone would be 'foolish' to take on. When Yaccarino was appointed as the company's first female CEO, there was much talk about her standing on a 'glass cliff' – a concept that has emerged through research positing that women are more likely to be promoted to higher positions when companies are in crisis and failure is more likely. Much of her success, analysts said, would depend on how much Musk was willing to share control. The chaotic nature of the X announcement for some has dashed the hope that Yaccarino can clean up Musk's mess. Twitter has been in a downward spiral since Musk took over, grappling with a $13bn debt burden and a massive exodus of advertisers – historically the company's main source of income. Twitter is looking for new revenue streams, and the 'everything app' could be a path to doing so. 'If she's successful, she goes down in the history books. And if not, she becomes a footnote,' said Jasmine Enberg, social media analyst at the market research firm Insider Intelligence. Sony WH-1000XM6 review: raising the bar for noise-cancelling headphones 'I was nervous to ask for your socials': why missed connection posts are making a comeback Nvidia becomes first company to reach $4tn in market value Amazon asks corporate workers to 'volunteer' help with grocery deliveries as Prime Day frenzy approaches An AI-generated band got 1m plays on Spotify. Now music insiders say listeners should be warned Musk's giant Tesla factory casts shadow on lives in a quiet corner of Germany Scientists reportedly hiding AI text prompts in academic papers to receive positive peer reviews 'I felt pure, unconditional love': the people who marry their AI chatbots
NBC News
2 hours ago
- NBC News
Some conservatives in Congress break with Trump on his handling of the Epstein files
WASHINGTON — Some conservative Republicans in Congress are breaking with the President Donald Trump's handling of the case involving the late financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, the latest development in a rare MAGA revolt against the administration. After the Justice Department and FBI said it would not release any further information related to the case and Trump sought to downplay it, his allies on Capitol Hill kept up their calls for the government to release the "Epstein files," which has consumed right-wing circles for years. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, a far-right Georgia Republican and staunch Trump ally, said she was interested in a private viewing of the Epstein files at the Justice Department and wants all of them eventually released to the public. 'I'd like to see all the information come out,' said Greene, a member of the House Oversight Committee. Another conservative, Rep. Scott DesJarlais, R-Tenn., also said he wants to see more disclosure from the government and focused his comments on Attorney General Pam Bondi, who has come under fire after the Justice Department and FBI released a two-page memo stating they found no evidence Epstein had kept an 'incriminating 'client list'' or evidence that would lead to additional prosecution of third parties. 'If the attorney general has knowledge of people who committed sex crimes with the minors, she should be prosecuting them,' DesJarlais told NBC News. Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., said Americans expect more accountability from Trump given Epstein's heinous crimes and that others were involved. 'I think it's perfectly understandable that the American people would like to know who he trafficked those women to and why they weren't prosecuted,' Kennedy said. 'I think the Justice Department is going to have to go back to the drawing board in answering those questions.' But top Republicans, including House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., and Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., are deferring to Trump on the issue without critiquing his decision. 'It's the president's decision,' said Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas. Asked if he has concerns about how Trump's team has handled the Epstein files, House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, replied, 'I trust the president. I trust his team.' Epstein, a wealthy financier, died by suicide in his New York City jail cell in 2019 as he awaited trial for federal sex trafficking charges. Last month, amid fallout between Trump and billionaire Elon Musk over the GOP's massive domestic policy bill, Musk wrote on his social media platform X that Trump, without any evidence, 'is in the Epstein files' and 'That is the real reason they have not been made public.' Musk later deleted the post. And while Trump and Epstein knew each other, Trump has never been implicated in Epstein's abuse of underage girls. The president also has denied any wrongdoing, saying in a post last year, 'I was never on Epstein's Plane, or at his 'stupid' Island.' There has never been any evidence connecting Trump to Epstein's criminal behavior. Democrats have seized on the rare split in the Republican Party, echoing criticism on the right of Trump and his team's handling of the Epstein episode. 'In February of this year, Attorney General Pam Bondi acknowledged the existence of Jeffrey Epstein's client list. In fact, she said that Jeffrey Epstein's client list is, ' sitting on my desk right now,'' Rep. Ted Lieu of California, a member of the Democratic leadership team, said at a news conference Tuesday morning. 'Where is that client list? What is Attorney General Pam Bondi, hiding?" Lieu said. "She needs to release the Epstein files as soon as possible.' Bondi later clarified that the Epstein case file was sitting on her desk, not a client list. On Monday night, Democrats offered an amendment in the House Rules Committee to require a floor vote on releasing the Epstein files. Republicans, who control the Rules panel, voted it down 7-5. Notably, Rep. Ralph Norman, R-S.C., a member of the conservative House Freedom Caucus, voted for the Democratic amendment. And another HFC member, Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, didn't vote.
Economist
2 hours ago
- Economist
Britain has a rare opportunity to lure American talent
AMERICANS LIKE Britain. Ask restless American graduates where they would most like to move, and it often tops the list. So it is no surprise that, as the Trump administration has attacked America's top universities and slashed funding for research, American interest in British-based science and tech jobs spiked. Britain has a rare opportunity to snap up disillusioned American boffins, as well as global talent that might once have chosen America. Will it seize it?
