logo
Karen Read judge sued over 'buffer zone' keeping protesters away from courthouse

Karen Read judge sued over 'buffer zone' keeping protesters away from courthouse

Yahoo03-04-2025

Four protesters are suing Judge Beverly Cannone over a "buffer zone" that they say unlawfully keeps them too far away from the courthouse where Karen Read's retrial on murder and other charges is underway in Massachusetts.
"Cannone has issued this order primarily to quash criticism directed at her, as…the only protests that have been documented have been the Plaintiffs in this case, who have quietly held signs criticizing Cannone," the lawsuit alleges.
Those plaintiffs are Massachusetts residents Jason Grant, Allyson Taggart, Lisa Peterson and Samantha Lyons. Their lawsuit also names Geoffrey Noble, the state police superintendent, and Michael d'Entremont, the chief of police in Dedham, where the courthouse is located.
In their lawsuit, they are asking a federal court to declare the "buffer zone" an unconstitutional "prior restraint" on free speech and an injunction, plus legal fees.
Karen Read Jury Selection: Dozens In Pool Already Have An Opinion On The Case
The court established a 200-foot buffer zone around the courthouse building itself and a parking lot behind the nearby Norfolk County Registry of Deeds building ahead of Read's first trial last year.
Read On The Fox News App
The lawsuit takes issue with the expansion of that zone to extend to 200 feet around Bates Court, Bullard Street, Ames Street and Court Street for her second trial.
SIGN UP TO GET True Crime Newsletter
"Buffer zones that over-zealously prohibit all First Amendment activity are almost always unconstitutional and this one is no different," said Mark Trammell, a lawyer for the plaintiffs and the executive director of the Center for American Liberty. "The Karen Read trial continues to inspire passionate public debate—and citizens must be allowed to protest peacefully outside their own courthouse."
Have A News Tip? Click Here
David Gelman, a Philadelphia-area defense attorney who has been following the case, told Fox News Digital the lawsuit is likely to fail.
"The judge is not saying they can't protest – the judge is saying they just can't protest at the courthouse," he said. "The reasons are legit too. It could sway a jury each day they enter and leave the building."
GET REAL-TIME UPDATES DIRECTLY ON THE True Crime Hub
Similar orders have been upheld around the country, he added.
"The judge is 100% within her right to do this and will prevail," he said. "It's the most common gripe among protesters. All speech is not free speech."
Follow The Fox True Crime Team On X
Protesters both for and against Read have been regularly attending many of her court dates since she was charged in 2022 with the murder of her Boston police officer boyfriend, John O'Keefe, 46.
Go Here For Full Coverage Of The 2Nd Karen Read Trial
Read the lawsuit here:
A nor'easter tore through the region on the morning he was found dead – Jan. 29, 2022. An autopsy found he had died from trauma to the head and hypothermia. However, the medical examiner left the manner of death "undetermined."
The 45-year-old Read's first trial over O'Keefe's death ended with a hung jury last year.
Jury selection for the do-over began Tuesday. It is expected to take six to eight weeks after opening statements.
Karen Read And John O'keefe: Inside Evolution Of Boston Murder Mystery Since July Mistrial
Read is charged with second-degree murder, manslaughter and leaving the scene of a deadly accident. She could face up to life in prison if convicted of the top charge.
Read denied the charges, pleaded not guilty and claimed that she is being framed as part of a police cover-up.
Cannone warned potential jurors at the start of jury selection Tuesday not to be influenced by protesters outside.
"John Adams said that we are a government of laws, not of men, and that the law must be deaf to the clamoring of the public," she said, referring to the Founding Father with deep Boston roots.
"He meant that while the public opinion about a given subject may ebb and flow, the law must be steady, reliable, and even-handed."Original article source: Karen Read judge sued over 'buffer zone' keeping protesters away from courthouse

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Defense rests case in second trial of Karen Read for Boston police officer boyfriend's death
Defense rests case in second trial of Karen Read for Boston police officer boyfriend's death

Associated Press

time33 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

Defense rests case in second trial of Karen Read for Boston police officer boyfriend's death

The defense in Karen Read's second murder trial rested its case on Wednesday, arguing she was framed for the killing of her Boston police officer boyfriend. Read, 45, faces murder and other charges for the death of John O'Keefe, who was found dead in the snow in January 2022 after a night of drinking. Prosecutors have said Read intentionally struck O'Keefe with her sport utility vehicle and left him to die. Read's defense has suggested she was the victim of a wide-ranging conspiracy that included planting evidence and using her as a convenient scapegoat for her boyfriend's death. They also unsuccessfully sought a mistrial earlier in the trial. Read's first trial ended in a hung jury.

Posting about the L.A. protests? Apparently that can get you banned from Facebook
Posting about the L.A. protests? Apparently that can get you banned from Facebook

San Francisco Chronicle​

time43 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Posting about the L.A. protests? Apparently that can get you banned from Facebook

Apparently, acknowledging the existence of violence can get you kicked off Facebook. Rebecca Solnit 's account on Meta's social media network has been suspended, the San Francisco author and activist posted to Bluesky on Monday, June 10. 'Facebook decided to suspend my account because of a piece (below) I wrote Monday about violence which in no way advocates for it (but does point out who is violent in the current ruckus),' Solnit wrote. She included a screenshot of Facebook's explanation of its decision, which reads, 'Your account, or activity on it, doesn't follow our Community Standards on account integrity.' Solnit did not explain how, beyond timing, she believed that the essay in question, 'Some Notes on the City of Angels and the Nature of Violence,' written on her independent site Meditations in an Emergency, was the reason for her ouster. Meta did not immediately respond to the Chronicle's request for comment. 'I think maybe it's begun, the bigger fiercer backlash against the Trump Administration,' her piece begins, referring to the clashes in Los Angeles between protesters of President Donald Trump's immigration policies and the California National Guard deployed by Trump against city and state officials' wishes. 'All they can do is punish and incite, and I hope that some of the protesters are telling them they're violating their mission and maybe the law,' the essay continues. 'We are escalating because they are escalating.' The 'Men Explain Things to Me' author goes on to question longtime right-wing and media narratives that stereotype protesters as violent while giving law enforcement a pass for much more harm to people and property. 'One thing to remember is that they'll claim we're violent no matter what; the justification for this ongoing attack on immigrants and people who resemble immigrants in being brown is the idea that America is suffering an invasion and in essence only a certain kind of white person belongs here,' she writes. The piece never advocates meeting fire with fire. Instead, it argues for a defiant yet nonviolent response. 'I believe ardently that nonviolent resistance is in the big picture and the long term the most effective strategy, but that doesn't mean it must be polite, placid, or please our opponents,' she writes. Solnit concludes by enumerating the kinds of violence the Trump administration has perpetrated — against the environment, against the First Amendment, against women, against his personal enemies, against the very notion of truth. 'It is up to us to defeat that agenda,' she writes. Solnit said she appealed the suspension. On Wednesday, June 11, she shared a screenshot of Facebook's response saying it decided to disable her account: 'It still doesn't follow our Community Standards on account integrity. You cannot request another review of this decision.' Solnit noted that she doesn't think a Meta higher-up has it in for her, despite the popularity of her account. She cited 'inane algorithms that often delete posts' as the likeliest explanation. (In April, the Chronicle reported on Meta's rejection of an ad promoting a Northern California Pride festival.) Even so, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has cozied up to the Trump administration, dining with the president at Mar-a-Lago and appointing Trump ally Dana White to his company's board. Meta also donated $1 million to Trump's inauguration fund. Meta's Community Standards on its account integrity page state that the company reserves the right to restrict or disable accounts that risk 'imminent harm to individual or public safety.' Solnit is the author of more than 30 books, including 'Infinite City: A San Francisco Atlas' and the children's book 'Cinderella Liberator,' which Marin Shakespeare Company

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store