
Voters want AFL stadium deal redo but leaders unmoved
An AFL stadium deal worth close to $1 billion is on the nose with most voters in one state but neither the premier or his would-be replacement are sniffing the electoral breeze.
With a snap election weeks away, Tasmanian voters were surveyed on their attitude to a contentious deal struck with the AFL to build a $945 million roofed stadium at Macquarie Point.
The Hobart stadium is a condition of the licence for the Devils' inclusion in the competition in 2028.
The online poll of 842 voters, conducted by YouGov on behalf of progressive think tank The Australia Institute from June 12 to 16, indicates most Tasmanians believe the stadium deal is unfair.
More than two out of three (69 per cent) support Tasmanian parliament renegotiating with the AFL to avoid constructing a new stadium.
Support to renegotiate was even stronger among Labor supporters (71 per cent).
Liberal voters were the most likely to disagree (38 per cent) but a majority (56 per cent) still backed the proposition.
More than two-thirds of those surveyed also believed the AFL was treating Tasmania unfairly in its requirements for granting the state a licence.
The AFL has been staunch in its refusal to renegotiate the deal, declaring the stadium a non-negotiable condition.
The Australia Institute's Leanne Minshull said the deal was a "dud" and one of the most one-sided in Australian sport.
"This state deserves to have a team in the AFL, but Tassie taxpayers don't want to be on the hook for a billion-dollar indoor stadium they don't want," she said.
Some analysts have described the July 19 state election as a referendum on the stadium, but Liberal Premier Jeremy Rockliff and Labor leader Dean Winter have been unwilling to budge on their support.
Mr Rockliff was sticking to his guns on Monday, dismissing the poll as "bodgey" and "anti-jobs".
"This week we would've been putting forward legislation to in fact get on with the job and build the stadium ... (but) unfortunately Dean Winter and Labor forced the election," he told reporters.
Mr Winter also reaffirmed his support for the stadium while criticising the way the AFL deal came together without cabinet approval or treasury advice.
"This has been a problem that Jeremy Rockliff has created and it's a problem that now needs to be dealt with seriously and methodically," he said.
Mr Rockliff separately revealed one of two Spirit of Tasmania replacement ships was expected to arrive in August.
The vessel has been docked in Scotland for six months after his government unsuccessfully tried to lease it.
The other has been undergoing sea trials in Finland, with Tasmania to officially take ownership during the week.
The ferries won't be in service until late 2026, years behind schedule, because a berth has not been built in Devonport.
The Spirit of Tasmania debacle was one of the reasons cited by Labor in its successful no-confidence vote against Mr Rockliff.
An AFL stadium deal worth close to $1 billion is on the nose with most voters in one state but neither the premier or his would-be replacement are sniffing the electoral breeze.
With a snap election weeks away, Tasmanian voters were surveyed on their attitude to a contentious deal struck with the AFL to build a $945 million roofed stadium at Macquarie Point.
The Hobart stadium is a condition of the licence for the Devils' inclusion in the competition in 2028.
The online poll of 842 voters, conducted by YouGov on behalf of progressive think tank The Australia Institute from June 12 to 16, indicates most Tasmanians believe the stadium deal is unfair.
More than two out of three (69 per cent) support Tasmanian parliament renegotiating with the AFL to avoid constructing a new stadium.
Support to renegotiate was even stronger among Labor supporters (71 per cent).
Liberal voters were the most likely to disagree (38 per cent) but a majority (56 per cent) still backed the proposition.
More than two-thirds of those surveyed also believed the AFL was treating Tasmania unfairly in its requirements for granting the state a licence.
The AFL has been staunch in its refusal to renegotiate the deal, declaring the stadium a non-negotiable condition.
The Australia Institute's Leanne Minshull said the deal was a "dud" and one of the most one-sided in Australian sport.
"This state deserves to have a team in the AFL, but Tassie taxpayers don't want to be on the hook for a billion-dollar indoor stadium they don't want," she said.
Some analysts have described the July 19 state election as a referendum on the stadium, but Liberal Premier Jeremy Rockliff and Labor leader Dean Winter have been unwilling to budge on their support.
Mr Rockliff was sticking to his guns on Monday, dismissing the poll as "bodgey" and "anti-jobs".
"This week we would've been putting forward legislation to in fact get on with the job and build the stadium ... (but) unfortunately Dean Winter and Labor forced the election," he told reporters.
Mr Winter also reaffirmed his support for the stadium while criticising the way the AFL deal came together without cabinet approval or treasury advice.
"This has been a problem that Jeremy Rockliff has created and it's a problem that now needs to be dealt with seriously and methodically," he said.
Mr Rockliff separately revealed one of two Spirit of Tasmania replacement ships was expected to arrive in August.
The vessel has been docked in Scotland for six months after his government unsuccessfully tried to lease it.
The other has been undergoing sea trials in Finland, with Tasmania to officially take ownership during the week.
The ferries won't be in service until late 2026, years behind schedule, because a berth has not been built in Devonport.
The Spirit of Tasmania debacle was one of the reasons cited by Labor in its successful no-confidence vote against Mr Rockliff.
An AFL stadium deal worth close to $1 billion is on the nose with most voters in one state but neither the premier or his would-be replacement are sniffing the electoral breeze.
With a snap election weeks away, Tasmanian voters were surveyed on their attitude to a contentious deal struck with the AFL to build a $945 million roofed stadium at Macquarie Point.
The Hobart stadium is a condition of the licence for the Devils' inclusion in the competition in 2028.
The online poll of 842 voters, conducted by YouGov on behalf of progressive think tank The Australia Institute from June 12 to 16, indicates most Tasmanians believe the stadium deal is unfair.
More than two out of three (69 per cent) support Tasmanian parliament renegotiating with the AFL to avoid constructing a new stadium.
Support to renegotiate was even stronger among Labor supporters (71 per cent).
Liberal voters were the most likely to disagree (38 per cent) but a majority (56 per cent) still backed the proposition.
More than two-thirds of those surveyed also believed the AFL was treating Tasmania unfairly in its requirements for granting the state a licence.
The AFL has been staunch in its refusal to renegotiate the deal, declaring the stadium a non-negotiable condition.
The Australia Institute's Leanne Minshull said the deal was a "dud" and one of the most one-sided in Australian sport.
"This state deserves to have a team in the AFL, but Tassie taxpayers don't want to be on the hook for a billion-dollar indoor stadium they don't want," she said.
Some analysts have described the July 19 state election as a referendum on the stadium, but Liberal Premier Jeremy Rockliff and Labor leader Dean Winter have been unwilling to budge on their support.
Mr Rockliff was sticking to his guns on Monday, dismissing the poll as "bodgey" and "anti-jobs".
"This week we would've been putting forward legislation to in fact get on with the job and build the stadium ... (but) unfortunately Dean Winter and Labor forced the election," he told reporters.
Mr Winter also reaffirmed his support for the stadium while criticising the way the AFL deal came together without cabinet approval or treasury advice.
"This has been a problem that Jeremy Rockliff has created and it's a problem that now needs to be dealt with seriously and methodically," he said.
Mr Rockliff separately revealed one of two Spirit of Tasmania replacement ships was expected to arrive in August.
The vessel has been docked in Scotland for six months after his government unsuccessfully tried to lease it.
The other has been undergoing sea trials in Finland, with Tasmania to officially take ownership during the week.
The ferries won't be in service until late 2026, years behind schedule, because a berth has not been built in Devonport.
The Spirit of Tasmania debacle was one of the reasons cited by Labor in its successful no-confidence vote against Mr Rockliff.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sydney Morning Herald
41 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
The airline facing a double-whammy after Trump's bunker-busting
You've probably never heard of Mike Murphy – but he is the guy who was choking on his smashed avocado toast at about 9am on Sunday when US President Donald Trump dropped his massive ordnance penetrators on three Iran nuclear installations. Murphy runs the Australian arm of Bain, the majority owner of airline Virgin, which is set to list on the Australian market on Tuesday as the highest profile ASX entrant in years. Timing is everything for investing, and for Bain, the timing of the Virgin listing looks atrocious. Those investors who bought in pre-listing and who were looking to sell out immediately – for what are referred to as stag profits – may need to rethink. Airlines, in particular, are highly sensitive to any geopolitical conflict and they are even more vulnerable to those in oil-producing territories. Loading First, this is because the oil prices surges, and for airlines, fuel is one of the major costs. Second, international airline flights can be disrupted, redirected or in some cases, those that fly over affected areas will temporarily abandon services. Already, British Airways and Singapore Airlines have suspended a number of flights to the Gulf, affecting routes to key hubs such as Dubai, Doha and Bahrain, citing safety concerns and evolving airspace restrictions.


West Australian
3 hours ago
- West Australian
Michaelia Cash: Australia must stand up for its interests in the wake of US Iran strikes
The old adage that 'a week is a long time in politics' has been starkly demonstrated as an enduring truth with the significant world events that have unfolded recently. Israel has further exercised its sovereign right to defend its people and ensure the security of future generations. The Unites States strongly backed Israel with a series of precision strikes on nuclear facilities in Iran. It appears the US strikes will end Iran's nuclear capacity for now. The Coalition supports actions taken by the US to ensure that the Iranian regime is stopped from acquiring nuclear weapons. We can never allow the Iranian regime the capacity to enact its objectives of the destruction of the US and Israel. The world can never accept a nuclear-armed Iran and acting now to ensure that is the case is the right thing to do. These events are a long way from Australia but have implications for us and the rest of the world. President Donald Trump left the G7 meeting in Canada early to deal with the situation in the Middle East. For Australia this meant a planned meeting between the President and our Prime Minister on the sidelines of the G7 was cancelled. Given the situation in the Middle East, the decision by the President to cancel the meeting is completely understandable but to the detriment of Australia. This was an important opportunity for the Prime Minister to seek assurances on AUKUS and protect Australia from tariffs. Given global volatility and the growing list of issues in our relationship with the US, this underscores that the Prime Minister should not have merely relied on meeting with the President on the sidelines of international summits. The Prime Minister should have been more proactive in seeking to strengthen this relationship — Australia's most important — and we encourage him to change his approach to advance our national interest. As Australians we must step up our engagement across the board with the US. President Trump won the US election more than 200 days ago and has held meetings with leaders from the UK, Canada, Germany, Ireland, France, Japan, Norway and South Africa. Our Prime Minister has only spoken to the President on the phone. On the international stage, Australia needs its leader to stand up for our interests so we can build a stronger Australian economy. President Trump's tariffs on our steelmakers are not in the spirit of our century-old partnership, nor in line with our 20-year-old free trade agreement. We urge the US administration to give Australia a fair go and remove the tariffs, as they have done for the UK. And we urge the Albanese Government not to compromise on policies that ensure affordable healthcare, bio-security, and a fair economic landscape for Australian businesses and families. It must not sell out our Australian farmers and producers. Success can not be achieved through putting our world-class agriculture at risk. In regard to AUKUS, the Coalition put it in place and we want it to succeed. But the fact AUKUS is under review by the Pentagon is concerning because any delay or downgrade in the US commitment will impact our future defence capability. The Prime Minister must seek assurances from President Trump to safeguard the AUKUS agreement. AUKUS is the most important strategic initiative Australia has entered into in decades. It provides the nuclear-powered submarines and technological edge we need to deter conflict and defend our sovereignty in a more contested Indo-Pacific. This is not business as usual. The Prime Minister cannot afford to be a bystander in our relationship with the US. Anthony Albanese must put Australia's case clearly and secure the commitments we were promised. We will always support bipartisan co-operation on national security, but that co-operation cannot mask inaction from the Government. The Coalition wants the Government to succeed here because that is in our national interest. Michaelia Cash is the shadow minister for foreign affairs

The Age
4 hours ago
- The Age
eSafety boss reveals scale of ‘harmful' videos on YouTube, urges ban for children
Australian children will be banned from YouTube if the Albanese government accepts the advice of its online safety chief, whose research shows four in 10 young teenagers have been exposed to harmful content, such as eating disorder videos, on the platform. YouTube received an exemption from Labor's world-leading social media ban for under-16s after former communications minister Michelle Rowland, now the attorney-general, deemed it had a significant educational purpose. But eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant, in formal advice delivered to new Communications Minister Anika Wells last week, said the carve-out should be removed because children were experiencing harm on the platform. The advice sets Wells up for a fight with Google, the tech giant that owns YouTube, just weeks into her new role or risk a continued fight from other social media giants including TikTok, Meta and Snap, who argue the exemption makes a mockery of the government's plans. It threatens to be controversial among Australian parents because of its popularity among children who use its Kids' platform to watch clips from groups such as the Wiggles. The minister plans to decide on Inman Grant's advice in coming weeks so that the social media ban can be launched by December. Inman Grant noted children would still be able to access YouTube without having an account. The eSafety Commissioner will tell the National Press Club on Tuesday that risks to children of early exposure to social media were becoming clearer in her agency's research, including on YouTube. 'Four in 10 children reported being exposed to harmful content on YouTube.' An Australian survey of 2600 children aged 10 to 15 found that 96 per cent of them used at least one social media platform, and about 70 per cent had encountered harmful content, including exposure to misogynistic or hateful material, violent fight videos and content that promoted eating disorders. Four in 10 children reported being exposed to harmful content on YouTube.