logo
Netanyahu's governing coalition is fracturing. Here's what it means for Israel and Gaza

Netanyahu's governing coalition is fracturing. Here's what it means for Israel and Gaza

Time of India16-07-2025
Israeli Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu
's government suffered a serious blow on Tuesday when an ultra-Orthodox party announced it was bolting the coalition.
While this doesn't immediately threaten
Netanyahu
's rule, it could set in motion his government's demise, although that could still be months away. It also could complicate efforts to halt the war in Gaza.
United Torah Judaism's two factions said they were leaving the government because of disagreements over a proposed law that would end broad exemptions for religious students from enlistment into the military.
Military service is compulsory for most Jewish Israelis, and the issue of exemptions has long divided the country. Those rifts have only widened since the start of the war in Gaza as demand for military manpower has grown and hundreds of soldiers have been killed.
The threat to the government "looks more serious than ever," said Shuki Friedman, vice president of the
Jewish People Policy Institute
, a Jerusalem think tank.
Live Events
Netanyahu is on trial for alleged corruption, and critics say he wants to hang on to power so that he can use his office as a bully pulpit to rally supporters and lash out against prosecutors and judges. That makes him all the more vulnerable to the whims of his coalition allies.
Here is a look at Netanyahu's political predicament and some potential scenarios:
The ultra-Orthodox are key partners Netanyahu,
Israel
's longest serving leader, has long relied on the ultra-Orthodox parties to prop up his governments.
Without UTJ, his coalition holds just 61 out of parliament's 120 seats. That means Netanyahu will be more susceptible to pressure from other elements within his government, especially far-right parties who strongly oppose ending the war in Gaza.
The political shake up isn't likely to completely derail ceasefire talks, but it could complicate how flexible Netanyahu can be in his concessions to Hamas.
A second ultra-Orthodox party is also considering bolting the government over the draft issue. That would give Netanyahu a minority in parliament and make governing almost impossible.
The ultra-Orthodox military exemptions have divided Israel A decades-old arrangement by Israel's first prime minister granted hundreds of ultra-Orthodox men exemptions from compulsory Israeli service. Over the years, those exemptions ballooned into the thousands and created deep divisions in Israel.
The ultra-Orthodox say their men are serving the country by studying sacred Jewish texts and preserving centuries' old tradition. They fear that mandatory enlistment will dilute adherents' connection to the faith.
But most Jewish Israelis see the exemption as unfair, as well as the generous government stipends granted to many ultra-Orthodox men who study instead of work throughout adulthood. That bitterness has only worsened during nearly two years of war.
The politically powerful ultra-Orthodox parties have long had outsize influence in Israel's fragmented political system and used that status to extract major concessions for their constituents.
But a court last year ruled Netanyahu's government must enlist the ultra-Orthodox so long as there is no new law codifying the exemptions.
Netanyahu's coalition has been trying to find a path forward on a new law. But his base is largely opposed to granting sweeping draft exemptions and a key lawmaker has stood in the way of giving the ultra-Orthodox a law they can get behind, prompting their exit.
The political shake up comes during Gaza ceasefire talks The resignations don't take effect for 48 hours, so Netanyahu will likely spend the next two days seeking a compromise. But that won't be easy because the
Supreme Court
has said the old system of exemptions amounts to discrimination against the secular majority.
That does not mean the government will collapse.
Netanyahu's opponents cannot submit a motion to dissolve parliament until the end of the year because of procedural reasons. And with parliament's summer recess beginning later this month, the parties could use that time to find a compromise and return to the government.
Cabinet Minister Miki Zohar, from Netanyahu's Likud party, said he was hopeful the religious party could be coaxed back to the coalition. "God willing, everything will be fine," he said. A Likud spokesman did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Once the departures become official, Netanyahu will have a razor-thin majority. The far-right parties within it could threaten to leave the coalition, further weakening him, if he gives in to too many of Hamas' demands.
Hamas wants a permanent end to the war as part of any ceasefire deal. Netanyahu's hard-line partners are open to a temporary truce, but say the war cannot end until Hamas is destroyed.
If they or any other party leave the coalition, Netanyahu will have a minority government, and that will make it almost impossible to govern and likely lead to its collapse. But he could still find ways to approve a ceasefire deal, including with support from the political opposition.
Israel may be on the path toward early elections Netanyahu could seek to shore up his coalition by appeasing the far-right and agreeing for now to just a partial, 60-day ceasefire with Hamas, promising his governing partners that he can still resume the war once it expires.
But Netanyahu is balancing those political constraints with pressure from the
Trump
administration, which is pressing Israel to wrap up the war.
Gayil Talshir, a political scientist at the
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
, said she expects Netanyahu to work during those 60 days to shift the narrative away from the draft exemptions and the war in Gaza, toward something that could potentially give him an electoral boost - like an expansion of U.S.-led normalization deals between Israel and Arab or Muslim countries.
Once the 60-day ceasefire is up, Netanyahu could bend to U.S. pressure to end the war and bring home the remaining hostages in Gaza - a move most Israelis would support.
Elections are currently scheduled for October 2026. But if Netanyahu feels like he has improved his political standing, he may want to call elections before then.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Benjamin Netanyahu's push for a no-state solution
Benjamin Netanyahu's push for a no-state solution

The Hindu

time24 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Benjamin Netanyahu's push for a no-state solution

It took 108 years after the Balfour Declaration, when the British first professed support for the establishment of a Jewish national home 'in Palestine', for London to even commit to recognising Palestinian statehood. Last month, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced that Britain would recognise the state of Palestine in September, unless Israel ended the war in Gaza and took urgent measures aimed at long-term peace, based on the two-state framework. France, another close ally of Israel and an enabler of Israel's nuclear weapons programme, also said that it would recognise Palestine in the UN General Assembly session. Canada, Australia and a few other nations in the western alliance system have also pledged to follow suit. Make no mistake. This is not a moment of sudden moral awakening against Israel's occupation of Palestinian territories. Israel has occupied Palestinian territories since 1967. Several countries in the Global South, including India, recognised Palestinian sovereignty in the late 1980s, following the declaration of independence by the Palestine Liberation Organization. Even after the Oslo Accords of 1993 and 1995, which promised a two-state solution, most western governments insisted that they would recognise Palestine only as part of a final settlement. Today, such a settlement based on the two-state formula appears as remote as ever. But more and more countries in the Global North are now stepping forward to recognise Palestinian sovereignty. Why? Charges of genocide There are two possible explanations. First, the charge that Israel is committing genocide, the most serious crime before international law, is no longer a fringe theory. Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu now faces an arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court, while the International Court of Justice is examining the genocide charge. Within Israel, two leading rights organisations, B'Tselem and Physicians for Human Rights Israel, have accused the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) of committing genocide, a position also echoed by Amnesty International and Médecins Sans Frontières. Omer Bartov, an Israeli-American genocide studies scholar and a veteran of the IDF, has stated that Israel is committing genocide. David Grossman, one of Israel's most respected writers, has said that 'with immense pain and a broken heart' he must use the word genocide to describe his country's war on the Palestinians. In just 22 months, Israeli forces have killed 2.6% of Gaza's pre-war population, wounded over 6.5% and displaced nearly all of them. Among the dead are over 18,000 children. Israel had also imposed a total blockade in March 2025, weaponising hunger and aid delivery, and triggering a mass starvation crisis. Since May, over 1,000 Palestinians have been killed while trying to collect food and other relief, according to the United Nations. Such systemic violence against an entire people in an occupied territory by their colonial rulers has been unprecedented in recent history, which makes the war increasingly impossible for even Israel's staunchest allies to defend — the United States remains the outlier. Second, mounting allegations of war crimes, ethnic cleansing and genocide have shifted international public opinion decisively against the Jewish nation. Across Europe, public protests have swelled, fuelled by anger not just towards the war but also towards the hollow position most of their governments, which, otherwise, are vocal about human rights, have taken. A YouGov poll in June found that only 13%-21% people in western Europe have a favourable view of Israel. In some countries, the support for the Gaza war has dropped to as low as 6%. Dissent is growing even in the U.S., which is Israel's patron and partner. An Economist/YouGov Survey in August found only 27% Americans to be supportive of Mr. Netanyahu, while 84% backed an immediate ceasefire. Nearly half of American voters now believe that Israel is committing genocide against the Palestinians. Ideological regime Israel is aware of the strains in its ties with its traditional allies and that it is losing global public opinion. The stain of Gaza will not fade easily. The most prudent and humane thing for Israel to do is to end the war through a ceasefire for a hostage deal, open all humanitarian corridors, pull back from Gaza and take steps to hold itself accountable for its failures and violations. But Mr. Netanyahu's regime, driven by a settler, expansionist neo-Zionist ideology, is unable to pursue any of these measures. Instead, Mr. Netanyahu seeks to escalate the war further. Last week, his security cabinet cleared a proposal to take control of Gaza City. How did the 'start-up nation', imagined as a collective of communes for what Pankaj Mishra calls 'a pitilessly abused people', become a victimiser? The answer lies in a collective failure of both the post-War world and an expansionist Israel. This failure reached catastrophic proportions following Hamas's brutal October 7, 2023 massacre. Nations typically go to war with clearly defined objectives and a theory of victory. Israel's declared objectives were the destruction of Hamas and the release of hostages. But in Gaza, the target has not just been Hamas. It has been Gaza itself. Twenty-two months later, Hamas is far from destroyed. And some 50 hostages, most of them dead, remain in captivity. If Mr. Netanyahu ends the war and leaves Gaza, that would be tantamount to admitting defeat. If he agrees to a ceasefire, his far-right allies — Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben Gvir — will abandon his government, which has already lost its majority in the Knesset. And once he is out of power, he will have to face a reckoning, not just about the corruption charges he faces but also about the failures of October 7 and the war that followed. So, it is in Mr. Netanyahu's interest to prolong the war even if it continues to devastate Palestinian lives and erode Israel's standing in the world. Shoa and Nakba The second problem is more structural. Mr. Netanyahu, a child of revisionist Zionism, has long supported Jewish settlements in disputed areas. The settlers, a big political bloc in Israel, want more Lebensraum (living space). For them, the war is an opportunity to 'return to Gaza after 20 years'. But Gaza is the home of two million Palestinians. What becomes of them? Mr. Smotrich, the Finance Minister, has openly called for 'Gaza to be totally destroyed' and the Palestinians expelled. Defence Minister Israel Katz wants to push them to the 'humanitarian city' in Rafah, which is widely criticised even by former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, as a concentration camp. If Palestinians are expelled or confined to such concentration camps, Jewish settlers can return to the enclave. This is the theory of victory for Israel's far-right. And this theory aligns well with Mr. Netanyahu's plans to escalate the war and seize control of the territory. When the world pushes for a two-state solution, Mr. Netanyahu is pushing for a no-state solution — no sovereignty for the Palestinians, no state for the Palestinians and no rights for the Palestinians. Milan Kundera once wrote: 'The struggle of a man against power is the struggle of memory against forgetting'. For over seven decades, Israel not only remembered but also reminded the world of the horrors endured by the Jews in Europe. The organised and institutional remembrance of the Shoah has, at times, become a tool in the hands of extremist Zionists to silence criticism of the Israeli state, branding dissent as anti-Semitic. But today, the organised and systemic violence in Gaza, live streamed to millions across the world, is forging a new collective conscience about the Palestinian Nakbas. The decision by Israel's closest allies to recognise Palestinian sovereignty and subjectivity may not immediately alter the situation on the ground. But it is a breaking moment in the post-1948 Israel consensus in the West. Messrs Nentanyahu, Ben-Gvir and Smotrich, blinded by their shared ethno-nationalist ideology and drunk with hard power, are programmatically incapable of grasping the shifts unfolding around them.

Israel in talks to possibly resettle Palestinians from Gaza in South Sudan
Israel in talks to possibly resettle Palestinians from Gaza in South Sudan

News18

time24 minutes ago

  • News18

Israel in talks to possibly resettle Palestinians from Gaza in South Sudan

Tel Aviv, Aug 12 (AP) Israel is in discussions with South Sudan about the possibility of resettling Palestinians from the Gaza Strip to the war-torn East African country, part of a wider effort by Israel to facilitate mass emigration from the territory left in ruins by its 22-month offensive against Hamas. Six people familiar with the matter confirmed the talks to The Associated Press. It's unclear how far the talks have advanced, but if implemented, the plans would amount to transferring people from one war-ravaged land at risk of famine to another, and raise human rights concerns. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says he wants to realise US President Donald Trump's vision of relocating much of Gaza's population through what Netanyahu refers to as 'voluntary migration." Israel has floated similar resettlement proposals with other African nations. Palestinians, rights groups, and much of the international community have rejected the proposals as a blueprint for forcible expulsion in violation of international law. For South Sudan, such a deal could help it build closer ties to Israel, now the almost unchallenged military power in the Middle East. It is also a potential inroad to Trump, who broached the idea of resettling Gaza's population in February but appears to have backed away in recent months. Egypt opposes proposals to resettle Palestinians out of Gaza Joe Szlavik, the founder of a US lobbying firm working with South Sudan, said he was briefed by South Sudanese officials on the talks. He said an Israeli delegation plans to visit the country to look into the possibility of setting up camps for Palestinians there. No known date has been set for the visit. Israel did not immediately respond to a request for confirmation of the visit. Szlavik said Israel would likely pay for makeshift camps. Edmund Yakani, who heads a South Sudanese civil society group, said he had also spoken to South Sudanese officials about the talks. Four additional officials with knowledge of the discussions confirmed talks were taking place on condition of anonymity because they were not authorised to discuss them publicly. Two of the officials, both from Egypt, told AP they've known for months about Israel's efforts to find a country to accept Palestinians, including its contact with South Sudan. They said they've been lobbying South Sudan against taking the Palestinians. Egypt is deeply opposed to plans to transfer Palestinians out of Gaza, with which it shares a border, fearing an influx of refugees into its own territory. The AP previously reported on similar talks initiated by Israel and the US with Sudan and Somalia, countries that are also grappling with war and hunger, and the breakaway region of Somalia known as Somaliland. The status of those discussions is not known. Cash-strapped South Sudan needs any 'ally' Szlavik, who's been hired by South Sudan to improve its relations with the United States, said the US is aware of the discussions with Israel but is not directly involved. South Sudan wants the Trump administration to lift a travel ban on the country and remove sanctions from some South Sudanese elites, said Szlavik. It has already accepted eight individuals swept up in the administration's mass deportations, in what may have been an effort to curry favour. The Trump administration has pressured a number of countries to help facilitate deportations. 'Cash-strapped South Sudan needs any ally, financial gain and diplomatic security it can get," said Peter Martell, a journalist and author of a book about the country, 'First Raise a Flag." Israel's Mossad spy agency provided aid to the South Sudanese during their decades-long civil war against the Arab-dominated government in Khartoum ahead of independence in 2011, according to the book. The State Department, asked if there was any quid pro quo with South Sudan, said decisions on the issuing of visas are made 'in a way that prioritises upholding the highest standards for US national security, public safety, and the enforcement of our immigration laws." From one hunger-stricken conflict zone to another Many Palestinians might want to leave Gaza, at least temporarily, to escape the war and a hunger crisis bordering on famine. But they have roundly rejected any permanent resettlement from what they see as an integral part of their national homeland. They fear that Israel will never allow them to return, and that a mass departure would allow it to annex Gaza and reestablish Jewish settlements there, as called for by far-right ministers in the Israeli government. Still, even those Palestinians who want to leave are unlikely to take their chances in South Sudan, among the world's most unstable and conflict-ridden countries. South Sudan has struggled to recover from a civil war that broke out after independence, and which killed nearly 400,000 people and plunged pockets of the country into famine. The oil-rich country is plagued by corruption and relies on international aid to help feed its 11 million people – a challenge that has only grown since the Trump administration made sweeping cuts to foreign assistance. A peace deal reached seven years ago has been fragile and incomplete, and the threat of war returned when the main opposition leader was placed under house arrest this year. Palestinians in particular could find themselves unwelcome. The long war for independence from Sudan pitted the mostly Christian and animist south against the predominantly Arab and Muslim north. Yakani, of the civil society group, said South Sudanese would need to know who is coming and how long they plan to stay, or there could be hostilities due to the 'historical issues with Muslims and Arabs." 'South Sudan should not become a dumping ground for people," he said. 'And it should not accept to take people as negotiating chips to improve relations." (AP) GSP (This story has not been edited by News18 staff and is published from a syndicated news agency feed - PTI) view comments First Published: August 13, 2025, 00:00 IST News agency-feeds Israel in talks to possibly resettle Palestinians from Gaza in South Sudan Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Israel in talks with South Sudan to relocate Gaza's Palestinians: Report; Netanyahu pushes ‘voluntary migration' vision
Israel in talks with South Sudan to relocate Gaza's Palestinians: Report; Netanyahu pushes ‘voluntary migration' vision

Mint

time24 minutes ago

  • Mint

Israel in talks with South Sudan to relocate Gaza's Palestinians: Report; Netanyahu pushes ‘voluntary migration' vision

Israel is holding discussions with South Sudan about relocating Palestinians from the Gaza Strip to the East African nation, The Associated Press reported citing six people familiar with the matter. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says the plan aligns with US President Donald Trump's vision to relocate much of Gaza's population. Netanyahu has referred to the effort as 'voluntary migration'. But Palestinians, rights groups, and much of the international community have condemned the proposals as a blueprint for forcible expulsion in violation of international law. Joe Szlavik, founder of a US lobbying firm working with South Sudan, said he was briefed on the talks and confirmed that 'an Israeli delegation plans to visit' to assess potential camp locations. He added that Israel would likely finance makeshift camps for Palestinians. Edmund Yakani, head of a South Sudanese civil society group, said he had also been informed of the discussions. 'South Sudan should not become a dumping ground for people,' Yakani warned. 'And it should not accept to take people as negotiating chips to improve relations.' Egypt, which borders Gaza, is lobbying South Sudan against accepting Palestinians. Two Egyptian officials said they have known for months about Israel's outreach to Juba. They fear any relocation plan could spur an influx of refugees into Egyptian territory. South Sudan is also seeking to persuade the Trump administration to lift a travel ban and remove sanctions on some of its elites. The country has previously accepted individuals deported by the US, a move seen as an attempt to curry favor in Washington. While some Palestinians might want to leave Gaza temporarily to escape war and near-famine conditions, most reject permanent resettlement. They fear Israel would never allow them to return, paving the way for annexation and Jewish settlement expansion in Gaza. Even for those willing to leave, South Sudan — still reeling from a civil war that killed nearly 400,000 people and left parts of the country in famine — offers uncertain prospects. Yakani cautioned that without clear agreements, 'there could be hostilities due to historical issues with Muslims and Arabs.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store