Risa joining veterans' bloc? Tito Sotto says, ‘The more, the merrier'
Senator Vicente "Tito" Sotto III on Wednesday welcomed the pronouncement of Senator Risa Hontiveros that she was open to the possibility of joining the five-man "veterans bloc" at the Senate.
'The more the merrier! She is more than welcome. Her integrity and reputation will always be an asset to the Senate,' Sotto said in a Viber message to reporters.
The so-called veterans bloc of the upper chamber is composed of Sotto and Senators Juan Miguel "Migz" Zubiri, Loren Legarda, Panfilo "Ping" Lacson, and Lito Lapid. They are pushing for the reinstatement of Sotto as Senate president, replacing Senator Francis "Chiz" Escudero.
Despite considering herself a veteran lawmaker, Hontiveros emphasized that her final decision on which bloc to join will be revealed on July 28, when the 20th Congress begins its first regular session.
"I have to be open to all possibilities na consistent doon sa gusto kong pagpapalakas ng oposisyon para sa 2028 and beyond," she said.
(I have to be open to all possibilities that are consistent with my goal to strengthen the opposition for 2028 and beyond.)
The lady senator previously said that she is considering forming or joining an independent bloc in the next Congress, explaining that it is 'more realistic' to do so, considering the numbers.
Zubiri had floated the possibility of the veterans bloc forming the Senate minority bloc in the 20th Congress. Legarda, meanwhile, said the bloc has yet to decide whether it will be in the minority. –NB, GMA Integrated News
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
GMA Network
13 hours ago
- GMA Network
4 senators sign reso on how Senate should proceed after SC ruling on impeachment
Senate Deputy Minority Leader Risa Hontiveros said Thursday a draft resolution is being circulated containing former justices' advice on how the Senate should proceed following the Supreme Court decision declaring the articles of impeachment against Vice President Sara Duterte as unconstitutional. Hontiveros said that a total of four senators, including her, have signed the resolution as of Monday. She is hopeful that more senators will be signing the document. 'Mayroong draft resolution, hindi joint resolution, pero resolution na tinatrabaho ng ilang mga senador kasama po ako,' she said in a press conference. (There's a draft resolution, not a joint resolution, but a resolution that some senators, including me, are working on.) 'Draft pa rin siya sa ngayon eh, pero nagsa-cite po siya ng mga references sa ilang mga dating justices na nagbibigay ng payo, ilang mga gabay kung paano pwedeng mag-move forward,' she added. (It's still a draft right now, but it is referenced to some former justices who gave advice and guidelines on how we should move forward.) Hontiveros said that this resolution will be used by some senators during the plenary session on August 6—-the date set by the upper chamber to discuss and decide on the SC decision, as announced by Senate President Francis 'Chiz' Escudero. The Senate President earlier shared his personal opinion on the matter, saying that the SC decision must be followed 'otherwise, [there] will have a constitutional crisis, and our neighboring countries and other people might view us as a banana republic where we only follow what we want.' For her part, Hontiveros believes that the impeachment trial should still push through despite the SC ruling unanimously that the articles of impeachment are barred by the one-year rule under Article XI Section 3 paragraph 5 of the Constitution. 'I'm always hopeful, lalo na sa ganitong mga pinaka-importanteng mga proseso na iniaatas sa Senado na may partikular na obligasyon,' she said. (I'm always hopeful, especially in these important processes that are being tasked to the Senate.) She also reiterated that she thinks that the impeachment court is still convened and will continue to be until evidence is presented in each article of impeachment. Hontiveros also said that it would be 'premature' if the Senate would vote on a motion to dismiss the impeachment case of Duterte if not a piece of evidence has been presented yet. Asked if she will comply with the SC decision or not, the lady senator said, 'Ang disposition ko…ay maghanap ng pagbabalanse o harmonization sa pagitan ng pag-respeto sa Korte Suprema, pagtaguyod sa mga responsibilidad namin bilang Senado, at pagtupad sa aming mga obligasyon sa ating mga mamamayan na nag-eexpect at tamang nag-eexpect sa amin ng pagtaguyod din sa accountability ng mga public officials.' (My disposition is to find a balance or harmonization between respecting the Supreme Court, upholding our responsibilities in the Senate, and fulfilling our obligations to our citizens who rightly expect us to also uphold the accountability of public officials.) The House of Representatives is currently preparing to file a motion for reconsideration of the SC decision to void the impeachment of Duterte, arguing that the ruling was based on what it described as incorrect findings that contradict official records. The SC decision is immediately executory but a motion for reconsideration may be filed. The high court had also emphasized that it is not absolving Duterte from any of the charges against her, but any subsequent impeachment complaint may only be filed starting February 6, 2026. Escudero, for his part, said that he has not yet seen the draft resolution, but emphasized that it has to be filed for the body's consideration. 'But with or without any such resolution, we already agreed in caucus to fix a date certain (Aug 6) to debate and act on this issue of impeachment in light of the recent SC decision,' the Senate President said. —AOL, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
14 hours ago
- GMA Network
Romualdez seeks to allow watchdogs participate in budget deliberations
Speaker Martin Romualdez formalized Thursday his call to open the national budget deliberations to watchdogs and other civil society organizations by filing House Resolution 94. Under the resolution, bonafide people's organizations will be formally accredited and invited to actively participate as official non-voting observers in the deliberations of the House committee on appropriations and its sub-committees in the crafting of the national budget for 2026 and in all succeeding annual General Appropriations deliberations. Likewise, the resolution provides that the House committee on appropriations, in consultation with the Committee on People's Participation, will draft appropriate guidelines to determine eligibility, accreditation procedures, and the scope of participation of such organizations, consistent with existing laws and rules of the House. 'Let this resolution affirm the commitment of the House of Representatives to uphold democratic governance, participatory budgeting, and inclusive national development,' the resolution read. Romualdez co-authored House Resolution 94 with his wife, Tingog party-list Rep. Yedda Romualdez, and their son, also Tingog party-list Rep. Andrew Julian Romualdez. The other author is Tingog party-list Rep. Jude Acidre. Earlier, lawmakers from the House and the Senate also filed a joint resolution opening all bicameral conference committee deliberations on the national budget to the public, conducted in person or through digital live streaming. Likewise, the joint resolution requires the bicameral conference panel to produce a matrix comparing the differences between the House of Representatives' and the Senate's versions of the bill, and how these differences were resolved. Authors of the Open Bicam Resolution in the House include: ML party-list Rep. Leila de Lima, Albay Rep. Krisel Lagman, Dinagat Islands Rep. Arlene Bag-ao, and Akbayan party-list Reps. Chel Diokno, Perci Cendaña, and Dadah Ismula. The Senate counterpart of the joint resolution is authored by Senate Minority Leader Vicente Sotto III, Senators Panfilo Lacson, Risa Hontiveros, Migz Zubiri, Loren Legarda, Francis Pangilinan, and Bam Aquino. Aquino and Pangilinan are the only senators from the majority bloc who signed on the Open Bicam Joint Resolution. 'The President mentioned about flood control projects bypassing the legitimate process, and we want the budget process to be transparent and accountable. This [Joint Resolution] is in response to the President's call for good governance and fighting corruption during his SONA,' Lagman told reporters.—AOL, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
16 hours ago
- GMA Network
PhilConsa calls on SC to revisit ruling on Sara Duterte impeachment
'A blueprint for evasion.' This was how the Philippine Constitution Association (PhilConsa) described the Supreme Court ruling that barred the impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte as it called on the High Court to revisit its decision and for the Senate impeachment court to proceed with the trial. 'This ruling invites dangerous abuse. It opens the door for impeachable officials—or their allies—to deliberately file weak or premature complaints to 'consume' the one-year window and block any real effort at accountability,' it said in a statement. 'This is not a safeguard against harassment—it is a blueprint for evasion,' it added. PhilConsa is chaired by retired Chief Justice Reynato Puno. To recall, three impeachment complaints were filed against Duterte in December 2024, all of which were connected with the alleged misuse of confidential funds. It was the fourth impeachment complaint that was endorsed by over one-third of lawmakers from the House of Representatives, and was later transmitted to the Senate as the Articles of Impeachment. In its ruling, the SC declared that the Articles of Impeachment against Duterte are barred by the one-year rule under Article XI, Section 3(5) of the Constitution. The SC ruled that the one-year ban is reckoned from the time an impeachment complaint is dismissed or is no longer viable. It ruled that the first three complaints were deemed terminated or dismissed when the House endorsed the fourth complaint. According to PhilConsa, the ruling overreached constitutional boundaries, disrupted the separation of powers, and weakened Congress' exclusive authority to hold impeachable officers accountable. It stressed that that the SC previously held that impeachment is only deemed initiated after the complaint is found sufficient in form and substance and referred to the Committee on Justice. 'The earlier complaints never reached that stage. To treat them as having 'initiated' proceedings defies both logic and constitutional intent,' PhilConsa said. Aside from this, PhilConsa argued that the doctrine of operative fact should have applied. It said the principle recognizes the legal effects of acts done in good faith under a law or process that was later declared unconstitutional. PhilConsa said that the Senate has already convened as an impeachment court and that Duterte has filed her formal answer after being served summons. 'All these were done in good faith, based on long-standing jurisprudence and the clear text of the Constitution,' it said. 'To declare all those acts null and void—after the process had matured to the point of trial—is not only legally harsh, it is institutionally destabilizing. The doctrine exists precisely to prevent this outcome,' it added. It said that invoking the doctrine does not violate due process as Duterte was given the opportunity to defend herself. Meanwhile, PhilConsa said the SC should have acted with judicial restraint. 'This ruling, though perhaps well-intentioned, is a clear instance of judicial activism. It turns the Judiciary from a neutral guardian of the Constitution into an arbiter of congressional timing and internal processes—matters the Constitution never assigned to the courts,' it said. 'Judicial activism, if unchecked, becomes judicial supremacy. And that supremacy can, over time, paralyze the political departments that the people themselves empowered,' it added. —AOL, GMA Integrated News
