U.S. military tests nuclear missile in Southern California
If you were outside around 1 a.m. Wednesday on the West Coast, you may have seen or heard the U.S. military test-launching an intercontinental ballistic missile.
A joint team of Air Force Global Strike Command Airmen and Vandenberg Space Force Base Guardians launched an unmanned Minuteman III ICBM equipped with a 'single telemetered joint test assembly re-entry vehicle' from Vandenberg Space Force Base in Santa Barbara County, according to a media release from the U.S. Air Force and U.S. Space Force.
Vandenberg serves as the primary testing ground for the Air Force Global Strike Command's ICBM deterrent infrastructure. Wednesday morning's test was part of what federal officials call 'routine and periodic activities' that ensure the United States' nuclear deterrent 'remains safe, secure, reliable and effective in deterring 21st century threats and reassuring our allies.'
'Wednesday's test launch is just one of the ways the [U.S. Air Force] demonstrates the readiness, precision and professionalism of U.S. nuclear forces,' Acting Secretary of the Air Force Gary Ashworth said. 'It also provides confidence in the lethality and effectiveness of the nation's nuclear deterrence mission.'
Over 300 similar tests have been conducted in the past, officials said. The 377th Test and Evaluation Group, which is located at Vandenberg SFB, is the nation's only dedicated ICBM test organization that professionally runs tests that measure both the current and future capabilities of the nation's ICBM force.
According to 377th Test and Evaluation Group Commander Col. Dustin Harmon, officials looked at key data points that not only help maintain current ICBM technology but pave the way for new technology.
'During this test, we collected and analyzed performance and other key data points to evaluate current missile system competencies,' said Col. Harmon. 'This allows our team to analyze and report accuracy and reliability for the current system while validating projected missile system improvements. The data we collect and analyze is crucial for maintaining Minuteman III while we pave the way for Sentinel.'
The Air Force's Sentinel weapon system is a modernization of the ground leg of the U.S. nuclear system being overseen by aerospace and defense firm Northrop Grumman.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
21 hours ago
- Yahoo
Suit filed over lack of transparency on rocket testing plans at Johnton Atoll
The Center for Biological Diversity has filed suit against U.S. government agencies for failing to release public records on plans to land rockets at Johnston Atoll National Wildlife Refuge. More specifically, the national nonprofit filed a complaint in U.S. District Court in Hawaii over the failures of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Department of the Air Force to comply with Freedom of Information Act requests. Those FOIA requests were filed April 7, but neither agency complied within 30 business days as required, the suit says. The Air Force announced plans months ago to build two landing pads at Johnston, a U.S. incorporated territory about 800 miles southwest of Honolulu, for the project. The atoll, a seabird refuge, is within the Pacific Islands Heritage Marine National Monument, and the plan has sparked concern among numerous conservation groups over the potential destruction to its ecology. While not formally announced, Elon Musk's SpaceX Starship is being considered for the project. 'Landing massive rockets in one of the most isolated and valuable habitats for seabirds would be as destructive and irresponsible as it sounds, ' said Maxx Phillips, the center's Hawaii and Pacific Islands director, in a statement. 'That's exactly why the military and SpaceX are trying to keep this project's details hidden from the public. This project threatens to destroy a site that millions of seabirds need for nesting and overwintering, all in the name of military logistics and Elon Musk's profit.' In March, the U.S. Air Force issued a notice of intent to build and operate two landing pads at Johnston for up to 10 reentry vehicle landings per year over four consecutive years. A draft Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI ) were initially expected to be available for public review in early April, but has been delayed to an unknown date. The Center for Biological Diversity said it requested certain documents pertaining to the proposed construction at Johnston Atoll due to the likelihood of substantial environmental impacts on essential fish habitat, migratory birds, and other protected species. 'The Johnston Atoll and the surrounding Pacific Islands Heritage Marine National Monument protect vital nesting habitat for seabirds, shallow coral reefs, and marine habitat, ' said the Center in its suit. 'Roughly a million seabirds use the Johnston Atoll for feeding, nesting, and resting, and it is home to a variety of wildlife throughout the year.' These include bird species such as red-tailed tropicbirds, red-footed boobies and great frigatebirds, and endangered species such as green sea turtles and Hawaiian monk seals, which are known to be present at times in the waters and on the island. The USFWS declined to comment due to ongoing litigation. The Air Force said the EA and FONSI would be out later this year, with no specific date. Phillips said the FOIA suit is part of an effort to gain more transparency from the agencies on their plans. The FOIA process has strict timelines and clear procedures in place. 'We filed the lawsuit because the USFWS and Air Force are unlawfully holding public records related to—from our standpoint—a deeply concerning proposal to operate rocket landing pads at Johnston, ' Phillips said. 'The public deserves to know when and how the government is putting fragile ecosystems at risk, especially for places like Johnston Atoll that have no permanent residents to speak for them.' One concern includes the impacts of the loud noise from rockets on sensitive species such as Hawaiian monk seals. The Center said the thriving seabird population at Johnston today is only possible after a decade of efforts by the USFWS to eradicate invasive yellow crazy ants, which wreaked havoc on birds, causing blindness, injury and death. Johnston, known as Kalama to Hawaiians, was used by the military in earlier decades to launch nuclear weapons tests, as well as for the storage of the defoliant Agent Orange and destruction of chemical weapons. The yellow crazy ants ended up at Johnston as a result of earlier human activity, but since the military pulled out 20 years ago, the atoll is now recovering. 'This isn't just about rocket testing, ' Phillips said. 'It's about protecting endangered species, honoring conservation efforts already paid for by taxpayers, and defending our shared natural heritage. If we don't demand accountability now, we risk losing one of the Pacific's last wildlife sanctuaries.' The U.S. Air Force project is part of a 'rocket cargo vanguard ' program exploring the use of commercial rockets for rapid, global military cargo delivery. The use of rocket cargo could 'fundamentally alter the rapid logistics landscape, connecting materiel to joint warfighters in a fraction of the time it takes today, ' said Chief of Space Operations Gen. John W. 'Jay ' Raymond in an earlier news release about the program. 'In the event of conflict or humanitarian crisis, the Space Force will be able to provide our national leadership with an independent option to achieve strategic objectives from space, ' Raymond said. But conservation groups have been rallying against the project, saying that rocket testing poses serious risks, including contamination, debris, noise pollution and the potential for failed landings within protected waters. The Pacific Islands Heritage Coalition launched a petition strongly objecting to the plan, calling for a full environmental impact statement. The number of signatures since the petition's launch in March has doubled, with more than 3, 700 signatures as of Friday. The Center says SpaceX has had a history of inadequate environmental review and recurring harm to sensitive and ecologically critical habitat on national wildlife refuge lands, including several explosions. On April 20, 2023, the Center said, a SpaceX rocket exploded next to the Boca Chica Wildlife Refuge in south Texas, igniting a 3.5-acre brush fire and hurling concrete and metal into tidal flats. 'All shorebird nests surveyed after the accident showed damage or missing eggs, consistent with being hit with debris, ' said the center in its news release. At the time, the center, along with the American Bird Conservancy, Surfrider Foundation and other groups sued the Federal Aviation Administration for allowing the expansion of such operations without more detailed environmental study. SpaceX has already had a series of failed landings this year, including on Jan. 17 and March 6, which disrupted commercial flights and rained debris over the Caribbean islands. The latest SpaceX Starship rocket test flight failed last week—when it spun out of control about halfway through its flight after launching from Texas. The center is also part of a suit filed by Earthjustice challenging the legality of Trump's executive order opening the Pacific Islands Heritage Marine National Monument to commercial fishing. 'Since the start of Trump's second term, the Center has pursued numerous strategic Freedom of Information Act lawsuits seeking public records about the administration's destructive anti-environment agenda, ' said the center. 'The records sought include emails and other documents detailing plans to accelerate logging in national forests, carry out mass firings and dismantle protections for the nation's wetlands.' The center said the requested records would help the public understand the project's scope and whether the environmental study adequately examines its risks. It expects to receive records due to the Johnston suit in the next two to three months.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Pentagon planted UFO myths to hide secret weapons programs, report finds
The Brief A 2024 Pentagon review found the U.S. military spread fake UFO stories to conceal Cold War weapons testing An Air Force colonel admitted planting false flying saucer photos near Area 51 to hide stealth jet development AARO investigators uncovered decades of military disinformation that fueled popular alien conspiracy theories LOS ANGELES - In the shadow of the Cold War, while America raced to outpace the Soviet Union in military innovation, the Pentagon turned to an unexpected tactic: alien conspiracy theories. A newly revealed Department of Defense review shows that the U.S. military deliberately spread UFO rumors—including staged photos and false briefings—to protect classified weapons programs. The practice wasn't just passive denial or silence. In some cases, it was policy. One such incident, first uncovered by the Wall Street Journal, involves an Air Force colonel who, in the 1980s, handed fake photos of flying saucers to a bar owner near the top-secret Area 51 base in Nevada. The colonel, now retired, later admitted to investigators that he was acting under official orders to deflect attention away from the then-classified F-117 Nighthawk stealth fighter. The backstory The findings stem from a 2024 report by the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO), a unit created in 2022 to sift through decades of military records and claims of unidentified aerial phenomena. While the office was originally intended to investigate possible extraterrestrial sightings, much of what it uncovered pointed back at the government itself. According to the report, several UFO legends were intentionally stoked to mislead the public and foreign adversaries about advanced weapons programs. One example is the use of fabricated photos and stories placed in local communities near sensitive testing sites like Area 51. What we know The Air Force colonel's fake UFO photos helped launch decades of speculation around Area 51 The military saw the spread of alien rumors as a form of "camouflage," a Pentagon official said The disinformation helped obscure the testing of advanced technologies like stealth jets AARO found multiple examples of fabricated narratives designed to deflect attention from classified work What we don't know The full scope of disinformation programs remains classified Some events, including specific pranks and altered documents, were redacted from the report The Pentagon has not released names of individuals involved, beyond the now-retired colonel By the numbers At least a dozen personnel were reportedly introduced to a fictional alien-investigation program called "Yankee Blue" as part of a hazing ritual The practice began in the 1980s and reportedly continued until 2023 The Pentagon formally banned the practice after AARO flagged it during its review What they're saying "These episodes reveal how secrecy and misinformation, even when well-intentioned, can spiral into myth," said Sean Kirkpatrick, AARO's first director. He told the Wall Street Journal that many popular conspiracy theories can be traced to actual efforts by the U.S. military to conceal vulnerabilities or capabilities during tense periods of geopolitical rivalry. Kirkpatrick added that not all findings from the review have been made public, but promised more details in a forthcoming report. Big picture view The revelations come as public trust in government transparency around UFOs continues to grow. While recent years have seen serious Congressional inquiries into unidentified aerial phenomena, this new report adds a surprising twist: that many UFO legends were never about aliens at all—they were cover stories engineered by the military itself. What's next The Pentagon says it will publish a follow-up to the Historical Record Report later in 2025, which will include more details on the disinformation programs, hazing rituals, and instances of "inauthentic materials" being used as deception tools. The Source This report is based on information first published by The Wall Street Journal, which reviewed findings from a 2024 Department of Defense analysis led by the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO). Additional details were obtained through official Pentagon statements and interviews conducted by WSJ with AARO staff and other defense officials involved in the review.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Air Force spends millions on relaxation cubes that may prove worth it
At dozens of bases across the Air Force, troops are undertaking tried-and-true relaxation techniques — biofeedback, meditation — in shiny mirrored cubes that can project light patterns and even galaxies. The experience, as one researcher put it, is more like a 'Disney ride' than a studio or clinical office. This is Lumena Mindgym, a flashy new curriculum-based therapeutic tool that's taking the Air Force by storm. More than two dozens Mindgyms have been installed at base fitness centers and support facilities for about $100,000 apiece; Mindgym just marked its first installations outside the continental United States, in Kuwait and Turkey, earlier this year. As the number of Mindgym advocates across the Air Force grows, other services are also entering talks to purchase the technology. It's a lot of flash and glitz to deliver relaxation to stressed-out service members. But the number of passionate advocates for Mindgym in the military is growing, and some argue the attention it's getting from troops who might otherwise avoid meditation and de-stressing techniques might make it worth every penny. The technology itself was created by an entrepreneur with a finance background, rather than a scientist; company executives make clear they are not the clinical experts. 'We don't have anybody in-house that's a neuroscientist or Ph.D.,' Brandon Murphy, head of growth for Lumena, told Military Times in an interview, adding that they did maintain an advisory board of doctors and researchers. Nor was Mindgym designed with the military specifically in mind. Founders were shopping the technology at a Colorado-based sporting tradeshow in 2019, Murphy said, when they encountered Adam Strang, Biotechnology Product Line Lead at the Air Force Research Laboratory. Strang was intrigued by the tech and connected the team with veteran Air Force pilot and human performance expert Jannell MacAulay, who'd become a vocal advocate for Mindgym and help develop the curriculum to be used by airmen. 'It's like a flight simulator for your mind,' MacAulay posted on Facebook in April during a visit to one of the Air Force's facilities. By 2022, a seed fund grant had enabled the installation of the first Mindgym at Hill Air Force Base, Utah, complete with a clinically validated curriculum and wearable components that measured brain activity and heart rate. The first users were explosive ordnance disposal technicians from Hill's 775th Civil Engineering Squadron. And that initial group of 55 airmen gave Mindgym its best evidence for effectiveness. Over 219 20-minute training sessions, according to Lumena Labs, the group self-reported an average 30% improvement in mood. The biodata receptors documented a 16.2% reduction in stress indicators, while 61% of users said their stress management capabilities improved. Sleep quality also improved for 15% of users. 'Many in the group reported stronger focus during the Weighted Airmen Performance Systems (WAPS) testing — the program that determines promotions for Staff Sergeant (E-5) and Technical Sergeant (E-6),' Lumena stated in study analysis. 'They also cited decreased incidents of road rage and across-the-board improvements in their marital relations, gym workouts, and even their golf scores.' While follow-up studies have not been conducted, the feedback appears to demonstrate how even a small amount of therapeutic attention to the brain and the mental resilience of service members under stress can make a significant difference. Strang, at the Air Force Research Lab, told Military Times in an interview that Mindgym compared favorably to the sensory deprivation float tanks popular for promoting relaxation and stress reduction. 'Float tanks are messy and maintenance is challenging,' Strang said, adding that it was never clear to him if the atmosphere of the tank or the opportunity to take a nap in it made the most difference to his mental state. 'I hopped into Mindgym, and it didn't feel like a waterless float tank to me at all,' he said. 'It felt like a psychedelic experience.' AFRL has plans to study the efficacy of Mindgym in comparison with other mindfulness and relaxation technologies, though those are predicated on future funding awards. Strang emphasized that Mindgym is not a panacea for mental health or resilience but said boosting cognition and reducing stress, particularly in a 'next frontier' warfare environment where troops are joining a real fight from their desks as drone pilots or Space Force satellite operators, was worth the dedicated investment. 'They're $100,000 cubes, I think, the last time I checked,' Strang said. 'Let's say they facilitate relaxation and recovery across 100 people by 10%; what's the operational impact of that? I don't know. But what happens if one person who is flying an F-35 sits in that cockpit and, because of these interventions, prevents a mishap of a $60 million aircraft? Would that be worth it? Probably.' As the Air Force continues to install Mindgyms, the company has recently had more conversations with Navy officials, even demonstrating the Mindgym at the Sea Air Space naval trade show earlier this year. Murphy said he saw value for the technology particularly in the submarine community, where stress and operational tempo were high. There are now 32 different sessions a service member can select in Mindgym; a grant last year enabled the recent development and deployment of a stroboscopic light therapy protocol that is supposed to promote higher theta brain wave state, enabling reduced stress in high-intensity situations. 'I'd honestly love to have [a Mindgym] on every military base on the globe,' Murphy said, 'so that there's not a service member that doesn't have access to something like this.'